A Novel X-Ray Tool for True Sourceless Density Logging
- Matthieu Simon (Schlumberger) | Avto Tkabladze (Schlumberger) | Sicco Beekman (Schlumberger) | Timothy Atobatele (Schlumberger) | Marc-André De Looz (Schlumberger) | Rahul Grover (Schlumberger) | Farid Hamichi (Schlumberger) | Jacques Jundt (Schlumberger) | Kevin McFarland (Schlumberger) | Justin Mlcak (Schlumberger) | Jani Reijonen (Schlumberger) | Arnaud Revol (Schlumberger) | Ryan Stewart (Schlumberger) | Jonathan Yeboah (Schlumberger) | Yi Zhang (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts
- Publication Date
- October 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 565 - 587
- 2018. Society of Petrophysicists & Well Log Analysts
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 155 since 2007
- Show more detail
Formation bulk density is classically measured by irradiating the formation with gamma rays emitted by a 137Cs source, and counting the Compton scattered photons returning to the gamma-ray detectors in the well-logging instrument. Finding a suitable replacement for the 137Cs source has been difficult. The X-ray source described in this paper appears to be a robust replacement for this type of source.
The continued success of 137Cs sources in density logging shows that attempts at their replacement have been unsuccessful due to the insufficient measurement quality or lack of practicality of alternative logging instruments.
An X-ray density-pad sonde was engineered to measure bulk density without a radioisotopic source. The pad contains a rugged, compact X-ray generator with an endpoint energy larger than 300 keV. The core of the tool is the generator, which emits a controlled, focused, stable X-ray flux into the formation. The scattered X-rays are detected by strategically placed scintillation detectors. The pad-tool architecture significantly reduces the effects of standoff and borehole rugosity compared to a mandrel design.
Modeling and experimental data show that the physics of the formation density measurement using a sonde with an X-ray generator and scintillation detectors can be described in the same way as the traditional density measurement, which is based on a monoenergetic gammaray source. Although the 137Cs gamma-ray source density measurement and the X-ray density measurement differ in the relative magnitude of the responses to formation density and lithology (photoelectric factor, PEF), the fundamental physics is the same. An endpoint energy above 300 keV ensures that the transport and attenuation of X-rays in the formation are dominated by Compton scattering, like the attenuation of gamma rays from a 137Cs source. The contribution of the photoelectric absorption to the attenuation of the X-rays is increased, but remains much smaller than the effect of Compton scattering, making the corrections for lithology and borehole fluid straightforward.
A characterization database was acquired to probe the physics of the measurement and to derive robust density and PEF algorithms. Plots of near- and far-detector count rates for different mudcake thicknesses and mud types show spine-and-ribs behavior like 137Cs-based density tools. Field logs acquired with the new tool show improved precision and vertical resolution compared to the 137Cs source tools suggesting that this new tool may be a viable replacement for the older tools.
|File Size||20 MB||Number of Pages||23|