Gas/Water Flow in Porous Media in the Presence of Adsorbed Polymer: Experimental Study on Non-Darcy Effects
- Vincent Blanchard (University of Bordeaux) | Didier Lasseux (University of Bordeaux) | Henri Jacques Bertin (University of Bordeaux) | Thierry Rene Pichery (Gaz de France) | Guy Andre Chauveteau (Institute Francais du Petrol IFP) | Rene Tabary (Institute Francais du Petrol IFP) | Alain Zaitoun (Institute Francais du Petrol IFP)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 423 - 431
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 4.6 Natural Gas, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 4.3.4 Scale, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.8 Formation Damage, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex)
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 741 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
The objective of this paper is to report some experimental investigations on the effect of polymer adsorption on gas/water flow in non-Darcy regimes in homogeneous porous media, in contrast to previously available analyses focused mainly on the Darcy regime. Our investigation concentrates on gas flow either at low mean pressure, when Klinkenberg effects (or gas slippage) must be considered, or at high flow rates, when inertial effects are significant.
The experimental study reported here consists of water and nitrogen injections into various silicon carbide model granular packs having different permeabilities. Experiments are carried out at different water saturations before and after polymer adsorption over flow regimes ranging from slip flow to inertial flow. In good agreement with previous works, in the Darcy regime, we observe an increase in irreducible water saturation and a strong reduction in the relative permeability to water, while the relative permeability to gas is slightly affected. At low mean pressure in the gas phase, the magnitude of the Klinkenberg effect is found to increase with water saturation in the absence of polymer, whereas for the same water saturation, the presence of an adsorbed polymer layer reduces this effect. In the inertial regime, a reduction of inertial effects is observed when gas is injected after polymer adsorption, taking into account water-saturation and permeability modifications. Experimental data are discussed according to hypotheses put forth to explain these effects. Consequences for practical use are also put under prospect.
Water/oil or water/gas flows in porous media are strongly modified in the presence of an adsorbed polymer layer on the pore surface. Several studies, performed in the Darcy regime, showed a phenomenon of disproportionate permeability reduction (DPR). The relative permeability to water (krw ) is reduced more than the relative permeability to gas (krg ) or to oil (kro ). Although this effect was observed over most of the water-soluble polymer/weak gel systems and rock materials, the origin of this effect is still controversial in the literature. Several physical processes have been put forth to explain the selective action of the polymer.
- Mennella et al. (1998) studied water/oil flows in the presence of an adsorbed polymer layer in random packs of monodisperse spheres. They concluded that the DPR was caused by a swelling/shrinking effect depending on the kind of fluid flowing throughout the packs. They also explained the DPR by pore-scale topological modification (pore-size reduction). Similar studies (Dawe and Zhang 1994; Sparlin and Hagen 1984) were carried out on different systems such as micromodels.
- Some authors (White et al. 1973; Schneider and Owens 1982; Nilsson et al. 1998) have interpreted the effect of polymer by assuming that a porous medium is composed of separate oil/water pore networks. With this representation, the DPR can be explained by the fact that water permeability is affected by the hydrosoluble polymer present in the pore network occupied by water, while oil permeability is not.
- Many studies attributed the DPR to a wall effect (Zaitoun and Kohler 1988, 2000; Barreau 1996; Zaitoun et al. 1998), which decreases the pore section accessible to water. The physical origin of this mechanism is adsorption—almost irreversible—on the solid surface. An adsorbed polymer layer on pore walls induces steric hindrance, lubrication effects, and wettability modification, all of which are in favor of a stronger reduction of water permeability than of oil permeability. The physical relevance of this mechanism was tested on numerical simulations at the pore scale (Barreau et al. 1997).
- Liang and Seright (2000), following Nilsson et al. (1998), proposed to complete the explanation of DPR by a "gel-droplet?? model. In this scenario, gel droplets formed in pore bodies cause a higher pressure drop at the pore throat in the wetting phase than in the nonwetting one.
These reported studies mainly have been dedicated to the polymer action on oil/water systems, and much less attention has been paid to gas/water flow. However, all available results in this last configuration lead to the same behavior, and the same type of physical explanation (wall effect) was proposed (Zaitoun and Kohler 1989; Zaitoun et al. 1991).
If published results dealing with the effect of polymer on permeability reduction observed in the Darcy regime are quite numerous, very little work has been dedicated to the non-Darcy regimes. Elmkies et al. (2002) reported laboratory experimental data showing that adsorbed polymer on natural porous-media cores decreases the inertial effects during gas flow.
In this paper, we focus our attention on the influence of adsorbed polymer on gas/water core flow in non-Darcy regimes. Gas injection was performed on unconsolidated cores having different permeabilities, at different water saturations, before and after polymer treatment, and at low mean pressure to investigate Klinkenberg effects, as well as at high flow rates, when inertial effects become important.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Barreau, P. 1996. Modifications despropriétés polyphasiques d'un milieu poreux en présence d'une couche depolymère adsorbé : études expérimentale et numérique. PhD thesis, EcoleNationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, Bordeaux, France.
Barreau, P., Lasseux, D., Bertin, H.,Glénat, Ph., and Zaitoun, A. 1997. Polymer Adsorption Effect on RelativePermeability and Capillary Pressure: Investigation of a Pore ScaleScenario. Paper SPE 37303 presented at the SPE International Symposium onOilfield Chemistry, Houston, 18-21 February. DOI: 10.2118/37303-MS.
Broseta, D., Medjahed, F., Lecourtier,J., and Robin, M. 1995. PolymerAdsorption/Retention in Porous Media: Effects of Core Wettability and ResidualOil. SPE Advanced Technology Series 3 (1): 103-112.SPE-24149-PA. DOI: 10.2118/24149-PA.
Chauveteau, G., Nabzar, L., El Attar, Y.,and Jacquin, C. 1996. Pore Structure and Hydrodynamics in Sandstones. Paper SCA9607 presented at the Intl. Symposium of the Soc. of Core Analysts,Montpellier, France, 8-10 September.
Dawe, R.A. and Zhang, U. 1994.Mechanistic study of the selective action of oil and water penetrating into agel emplaced in a porous medium. J. Pet. Sci. & Eng. 12 (2):113-125. DOI: 10.1016/0920-4105(94)90011-6.
Edwards, D.A., Shapiro, M., Bar-Yoseph,P., and Shapira, M. 1990. The influence of Reynolds number upon the apparentpermeability of spatially periodic arrays of cylinders. Physics ofFluids 2 (1): 45-55.
Elmkies, Ph., Lasseux, D., Bertin, H.,Pichery, T., and Zaitoun, A. 2002. Polymer Effect on Gas/Water Flow inPorous Media. Paper SPE 75160 presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium onImproved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 13-17 April.DOI: 10.2118/75160-MS.
Forchheimer, P. 1901. Wasserbewegungdurch boden. Z. Ver. Deutsch Ing. 45:1782-1788.
Geertsma, J. 1974. Estimating the Coefficient of InertialResistance in Fluid Flow Through Porous Media. SPEJ 14 (5):445-450. SPE-4706-PA. DOI: 10.2118/4706-PA.
Klinkenberg, L.J. 1941. The permeabilityof porous media to liquids and gases. Drilling and Production Practice,200-213. New York City: American Petroleum Inst.
Li, D. and Engler, T.W. 2001. Literature Review on Correlations ofthe Non-Darcy Coefficient. Paper SPE 70015 presented at the SPE PermianBasin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, 15-17 May.DOI:10.2118/70015-MS.
Li, K. and Horne, R.N. 2004. Experimental Study of Gas Slippage inTwo-Phase Flow. SPEREE 7 (6): 409-415. SPE-89038-PA. DOI:10.2118/89038-PA.
Liang, J. and Seright, R.S. 2000. Wall-Effect/Gel-Droplet Model ofDisproportionate Permeability Reduction. Paper SPE 59344 presented at theSPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3-5 April.DOI:10.2118/59344-MS.
Médout-Marère, V., El Ghzaoui, A.,Charnay, C., Douillard, J.M., Chauveteau, G., and Partyka, S. 2000. SurfaceHeterogeneity of Passively Oxidized Silicon Carbide Particles:Hydrophobic-Hydrophilic Partition. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 223(2): 205-214. DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1999.6625.
Mennella, A., Chiappa, L., Bryant, S.L.,and Burrafato, G. 1998. Pore-ScaleMechanism for Selective Permeability Reduction by Polymer Injection. PaperSPE 39634 presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa,19-22 April. DOI: 10.2118/39634-MS.
Nicholls, C.I. and Heaviside, J. 1988. Gamma-Ray-Absorption TechniquesImprove Analysis of Core Displacement Tests. SPEFE 1 (4):69-75; Trans., AIME, 285. SPE 14421-PA. DOI:10.2118/14421-PA.
Nilsson, S., Stavland, A., andJonsbraten, H.C. 1998. MechanisticStudy of Disproportionate Permeability Reduction. Paper SPE 39635 presentedat the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 19-22 April.DOI:10.2118/39635-MS.
Sampath, D. and Keighin, C.W. 1982. Factors Affecting Gas Slippage inTight Sandstones of Cretaceous Age in the Uinta Basin. JPT 34(11): 2715-2720. SPE-9872-PA.DOI: 10.2118/9872-PA.
Schneider, F.N. and Owens, W.W. 1982. Steady-State Measurements of RelativePermeability for Polymer/Oil Systems. SPEJ 22 (1): 79-86.SPE-9408-PA. DOI: 10.2118/9408-PA.
Sparlin, D.D. and Hagen, R.W. Jr. 1984.Controlling water in producing operations. World Oil 205 (6):137-142.
White, J.L., Goddard, J.E., and Phillips,H.M. 1973. Use of Polymers toControl Water Production in Oil Wells. JPT 25 (2): 143-150.SPE-3672-PA.DOI: 10.2118/3672-PA.
Zaitoun, A. and Kohler, N. 1988. Two-Phase Flow Through Porous Media:Effect of an Adsorbed Polymer Layer. Paper SPE 18085 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 2-5 October. DOI:10.2118/18085-MS.
Zaitoun, A. and Kohler, N. 1989.Modification of water/oil and water/gas relative permeabilities after polymertreatment of oil or gas wells. In Situ 13 (1 and 2):55-77.
Zaitoun, A. and Kohler, N. 2000.Production Well Water Shut-Off Treatments by Weak Polymer Gels. In Noveltiesin Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery, Progress in Mining and OilfieldChemistry, ed. I. Lakatos, 2: 101-116. Budapest: AkademiaiKiado.
Zaitoun, A., Bertin, H., and Lasseux, D.1998. Two-Phase Flow PropertyModifications by Polymer Adsorption. Paper SPE 39631 presented at theSPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium Tulsa, 19-22 April. DOI:10.2118/39631-MS.
Zaitoun, A., Kohler, N. and Guerrini, Y.1991. Improved PolyacrylamideTreatments for Water Control in Producing Wells. JPT 43 (7):862-867. SPE-18501-PA.DOI: 10.2118/18501-PA.