Effects of Matrix Shrinkage and Swelling on the Economics of Enhanced-Coalbed-Methane Production and CO2 Sequestration in Coal
- Fatma Burcu Gorucu (National Energy Technology Laboratory) | Sinisha A. Jikich (National Energy Technology Laboratory) | Grant S. Bromhal (National Energy Technology Laboratory) | W. Neal Sams (National Energy Technology Laboratory) | Turgay Ertekin (Pennsylvania State U.) | Duane H. Smith (National Energy Technology Laboratory)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 382 - 392
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 7.1.10 Field Economic Analysis, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.10.1 CO2 Capture and Sequestration, 6.5.7 Climate Change, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 6.5.3 Waste Management, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 7.1.9 Project Economic Analysis, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 5.8.3 Coal Seam Gas, 5.7.5 Economic Evaluations, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 1,204 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Increases in carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere and their contributions to global climate change are a major concern. CO2 sequestration in unmineable coals may be a very attractive option, for economic as well as environmental reasons, if a combination of enhanced-coalbed-methane (ECBM) production and tax incentives becomes sufficiently favorable compared to the costs of capture, transport, and injection of CO2.
Darcy flow through cleats is an important transport mechanism in coal. Cleat compression and permeability changes caused by gas sorption/desorption, changes of effective stress, and matrix swelling and shrinkage introduce a high level of complexity into the feasibility of a coal sequestration project. The economic effects of CO2-induced swelling on permeabilities and injectivities has received little (if any) detailed attention.
CO2 and methane (CH4) have different swelling effects on coal. In this work, the Palmer-Mansoori model for coal shrinkage and permeability increases during primary methane production was rewritten to also account for coal swelling caused by CO2 sorption. The generalized model was added to a compositional, dual-porosity coalbed-methane reservoir simulator for primary (CBM) and ECBM production. A standard five-spot of vertical wells and representative coal properties for Appalachian coals was used (Rogers 1994). Simulations and sensitivity analyses were performed with the modified simulator for nine different parameters, including coal seam and operational parameters and economic criteria. The coal properties and operating parameters that were varied included Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, cleat porosity, and injection pressure. The economic variables included CH4 price, CO2 cost, CO2 credit, water disposal cost, and interest rate. Net-present-value (NPV) analyses of the simulation results included profits resulting from CH4 production and potential incentives for sequestered CO2. This work shows that for some coal seams, the combination of compressibility, cleat porosity, and shrinkage/swelling of the coal may have a significant impact on project economics.
In recent years, primary production of natural gas from coal seams has become an important source of energy in the United States. Proven CBM reserves have been estimated at 18.5 Tscf, representing 10% of the total natural-gas reserves in the United States. CBM production started in the early 1980s as a small, high-cost operation but reached 1.6 Tscf in 2002. This was more than 8% of the total US natural-gas production that year (Kuuskraa 2003).
The production of CBM reservoirs begins with the pumping of significant volumes of water to lower reservoir pressure and to allow CH4desorption and flow (Stevens et al. 1998). The fraction of the original gas in place typically produced by primary depletion seems to be somewhat controversial. However, according to recent publications, recoveries are often between 20 and 60% of the original gas in place, so that considerable amounts of gas are left behind (Gale and Freund 2001; Stevens et al. 1999; Van Bergen et al. 2001).Because of this, and because of concerns about global warming caused by accumulations of CO2 in the atmosphere (National Energy Technology Laboratory 2003, 2004), new technologies for ECBM production based on the injection of carbon are being investigated in the US, Europe, China, and Japan (Coal-Seq Forum 2004, 2006).
In the CO2-ECBM/sequestration process, injected CO2 flows through the cleats in the coal by Darcy flow, diffuses into the coal matrix, and is sorbed by it; CH4 diffuses from the matrix into the cleats, through which it flows to production wells (Sams et al. 2005). The injection of CO2 into coalbeds has many potential advantages: It sequesters CO2, it reduces the production time for CBM, and it increases reserves by improving the recovery of CBM. However, the improved CH4 recovery is accompanied by an increase in costs for CO2 supply, additional drilling, and well and surface equipment. Thus, CO2-ECBM and sequestration are accompanied not only by promised benefits but also by new technical challenges and financial risks.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Balen, R.M., Meng, H.-Z., and Economides,M.J. 1988. Applications of the NetPresent Value (NPV) in the Optimization of Hydraulic Fractures. Paper SPE18541 presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Charleston, West Virginia,1-4 November. DOI: 10.2118/18541-MS.
Berkowitz, N. 1979. An Introduction toCoal Technology. New York City: Academic Press.
Bromhal, G., Jikich, S.A., Sams, W.N.,Gorucu, F., Ertekin, T., and Smith, D.H. 2004a. Optimizing Economics forSequestering CO2 in Coal Seams With Horizontal Wells. Paperpresented at the Third Annual Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Alexandria,Virginia, 3-6 May.
Bromhal, G., Sams, W.N., Jikich, S.A.,Ertekin, T., and Smith, D.H. 2004b. Simulation of the Effects of Shrinkage andSwelling on Coal Seam Sequestration and Coal Bed Methane Production. Paper 0418presented at the International Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama,5-6 May.
Bromhal, G., Sams, W.N., Jikich, S.A.,Ertekin, T., and Smith, D.H. 2005. Simulation of CO2 Sequestrationin Coal Beds: The Effects of Sorption Isotherms. Chemical Geology217 (3): 201-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.12.021.
Byrer, C.W., Mroz, T.H., and Covatch,G.L. 1987. Coalbed MethaneProduction Potential in U.S. Basins. JPT 39 (7): 821-834.SPE-12832-PA. DOI: 10.2118/12832-PA.
Cairns, G. 2003. Enhanced Coal BedMethane (CBM) Recovery and CO2 Sequestration in an Unminable CoalSeam. Paper presented at the Second Annual Conference on CO2Sequestration, Alexandria, Virginia, 5-9 May.
Dubois, M.K., White, S.W., and T.R., C.2002. Co-generation, Ethanol Production and CO2 Enhanced OilRecovery: Model for Environmentally and Economically Sound Linked EnergySystems. Paper presented at the AAPG Convention Meeting, Houston, 10-13March.
Gale, J. and Freund, P. 2001. Coal BedMethane Enhancement With CO2 Sequestration Worldwide Potential.Environmental Geosciences 8 (3): 210-217.
Gunter, W.D., Law, D.H.-S., and Mavor,M.J. 2005. Improvements in Coalbed Methane and Enhanced Coalbed MethaneReservoir Simulators. Paper presented at the International Coalbed MethaneSymposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 18-19 May.
Harpalani, S. 2002. Potential Impact ofCO2 Injection on Permeability of Coal. Paper presented at the FirstInternational Forum on Geologic Sequestration of CO2 in Deep,Unminable Coalseams, Houston, 14-15 March.
Harpalani, S. and Chen, G. 1997.Influence of Gas Production Induced Volumetric Strain on Permeability of Coal.Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 15 (4): 303-325. DOI: 10.1007/BF00880711.
Jarrell, P.M., Fox, C.E., Stein, M.H.,and Webb, S.L. 2002. Practical Aspects of CO2Flooding. Monograph Series, SPE, Richardson, Texas,22.
Jikich, S.A., Bromhal, G., Sams, W.N.,Gorucu, F.B., Ertekin, T., and Smith, D.H. 2004. Economics for Enhanced CoalbedMethane (ECBM) and CO2 Sequestration With Horizontal Wells.Paper SPE 91391 presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Charleston, WestVirginia, 15-17 September. DOI: 10.2118/91391-MS.
Kuuskraa, V.A. 2003. Economics of usingenhanced recovery of coalbed methane for carbon management. Paper presented atthe Second Annual Conference on CO2 Sequestration, Alexandria,Virginia, 5-9 May.
Kuuskraa, V.A. 2004. Why PursueCO2 Sequestration Using Enhanced Recovery of Coalbed Methane (ECBM).Paper presented at the Coal-Seq III Forum, Baltimore, Maryland, 25-26March.
Laxminarayana, C., Cui, X., and Bustin,R.M. 2004. Implications of Volumetric Swelling/Shrinkage of Coal inSequestration of Acid Gases. Paper 0435 presented at the International CoalbedMethane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 5-6 May.
Manik, J. 1999. Compositional Modeling ofEnhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery. PhD dissertation, Pennsylvania State U.,University Park, Pennsylvania.
Manik, J., Ertekin, T., and Kohler, T.E.2002. Development and Validation of a Compositional Coalbed Simulator. J.Cdn. Pet. Tech. 41 (4): 39.
Moritis, G. 2000. EOR Weathers Low OilPrices. Oil & Gas J. 98 (12): 39-61.
National Energy Technology Laboratory.2003. Carbon Sequestration Technology Roadmap and Program Plan. Finalreport, US Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC (March 2003).
National Energy Technology Laboratory.2004. Carbon Sequestration Technology Roadmap and Program Plan. Finalreport, Office of Fossil Energy, US Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC (April2004).
Pagnier, H.J.M., Bergen, F.V., and Van deVate, L. 1999. Inventory of the Potential of Combined Coalbed MethaneProduction Carbon Dioxide Disposal in the Dutch Subsurface. Paper presented atthe XIV International Congress Carboniferous and Permian (ICCP), Calgary, 20May.
Palmer, I. and Mansoori, J. 1998. How Permeability Depends on Stressand Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model. SPEREE 1 (6):539-544. SPE-52607-PA. DOI: 10.2118/52607-PA.
Pashin, J.C. 2005. Coalbed MethaneExploration in Thrustbelts: Experience From the Southern Appalachians, USA.Paper 519 presented at the International Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa,Alabama, 18-19 May.
Patchen, D.G. et al. 1991. Coalbed GasProduction, Big Run and Pine Grove Fields. Final report, Contract No.Publication C-44, West Virginia Geological Survey, Wetzel County.
Pautz, J.F., Sellers, C.A., and Allison,E. 1992. Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects Data Base. Final report, Contract No.DOE Report DE92001039, IIT Research Inst., NIPER, Bartlesville, Oklahoma (April1992).
Pekot, L.J. and Reeves, S.R. 2003.Modeling the Effects of Matrix Shrinkage and Differential Swelling on CoalbedMethane Recovery and Carbon Sequestration. Paper 328 presented at theInternational Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 5-9May.
Peng, D.Y. and Robinson, D.B. 1976. A NewTwo-Constant Equation of State. Industrial and Engineering ChemistryResearch Fundamentals 15 (1): 59-64. DOI: 10.1021/i160057a011.
Proc., 2004 Coal-Seq III Forum, Baltimore, Maryland,25-26 March; Proc., 2006 Coal-Seq V Forum, Houston, 8-9November.
Reeves, S. and Oudinot, A. 2005. TheAllison CO2-ECBM Pilot, A Reservoir and Economic Analysis. Paper0522 presented at the International Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa,Alabama, 18-19 May.
Rogers, R.E. 1994. Coalbed Methane:Principles and Practice, xi, Prentice-Hall Petroleum Engineering Series.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: PTR Prentice Hall.
Sams, W.N., Bromhal, G., Jikich, S.A.,Ertekin, T., Smith,D.H., 2005. Field-Project Designs for Carbon DioxideSequestration and Enhanced Coalbed Methane Production. Energy Fuels19 (6): 2287. DOI: 10.1021/ef049667n.
Sawyer, W.K., Paul, G.W., andSchraufnagel, R.A. 1990. Development and Application of a 3D Coalbed Simulator.Paper CIM/SPE 90 presented at the SPE/CIM International Technical Meeting,Calgary, 10-13 June.
Seidle, J.P. and Huitt, L.G. 1995. Experimental Measurement of CoalMatrix Shrinkage Due to Gas Desorption and Implications for Cleat PermeabilityIncreases. Paper SPE 30010 presented at the SPE International Meeting onPetroleum Engineering, Beijing, 14-17 November. DOI:10.2118/30010-MS.
Seidle, J.P., Jeansonne, M.W., andErickson, D.J. 1992. Applicationof Matchstick Geometry to Stress Dependent Permeability in Coals. Paper SPE24361 presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming,18-21 May. DOI: 10.2118/24361-MS.
Siriwardane,H., Smith, D.H., and Gorucu,F.B. 2006a. Shrinkage and Swelling of Coal During Coalbed Methane Production orGeologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide. Paper 0648 presented at theInternational Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 22-26May.
Siriwardane,H.J., Smith, D.H., Gorucu,F., and Ertekin, T. 2006b. Influence of Shrinkage and Swellingof Coal on Production of Coalbed Methane and Sequestration of CarbonDioxide. Paper SPE 102767 presented at the SPE Annual Technical ConferenceandExhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24-27 September. DOI:10.2118/102767-MS.
Stach, E. 1982. Textbook of CoalPetrology, third edition. Stuttgart and Berlin: Borntraeger.
Stevens, S., Schoeling, L., and Pekot, L.1999. CO2 Injection for Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery: ProjectScreening and Design. Paper presented at the International Coalbed Symposium,Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 3-7 May.
Stevens, S.H., Spector, D., and Riemer,P. 1998. Enhanced Coalbed MethaneRecovery Using CO2 Injection: Worldwide Resource and CO2Sequestration Potential. Paper SPE 48881 presented at the SPE InternationalOil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, 2-6 November. DOI:10.2118/48881-MS.
Taber, J.J. 1990. EnvironmentalImprovements and Better Economics in EOR Operations. In Situ 14(4): 345.
Thompson, R.S. and Wright, J.D. 1985.Oil Property Evaluation. Golden, Colorado: Thompson-WrightAssocs.
Van Bergen, F. et al. 2001. Inventory ofPotential for Enhanced Coalbed Methane Production With Carbon Dioxide Disposalin the Netherlands. Paper presented at the International Coalbed MethaneSymposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 14-18 May.