Carbon Dioxide Foam Rheology in Porous Media: A CT Scan Study
- Dongxing Du (Delft U. of Technology) | Pacelli Lidio Jose Zitha (Delft U. of Technology) | Matthijs G.H. Uijttenhout (Delft U. of Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 245 - 252
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 4.3.1 Hydrates, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 5.4.9 Miscible Methods, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 3.2.6 Produced Water Management, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 4.1.4 Gas Processing, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,197 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Carbon dioxide (CO2) foam has been widely studied in connection with its application in enhanced oil recovery (EOR). This paper reports an experimental study concerning CO2 foam propagation in asurfactant-saturated Bentheim sandstone core and the subsequent liquid injection with the aid of X-ray computed tomography (CT). The experiments were carried out under various system backpressures. It is found that CO2 foam flows in a characteristic front-like manner in the transient stage and that the water saturation keeps at relatively high level at the outlet of the porous media because of CO2 solubility and capillary end effect. The subsequent surfactant solution injection shows a significant fingering behavior, accompanied by a low flow resistance over the core. It is also found that CO2 foam flow shows higher liquid saturation near the outlet and lower pressure drops under higher system backpressures. This can be attributed to the solubility of CO2 in the liquid phase. The results indicate the advantage of using foam in EOR processes such as water alternating foam (WAF), in which foam flow has higher sweep efficiency and stronger mobility control ability compared, for instance, to water alternating gas (WAG). Nevertheless, care should be taken during the water-injection stage in order not to favor the fingering.
Foam applications in EOR and fluid (acid) diversion have grown considerably over the last three decades.For instance, WAGhas been regularly used in the field as a gasflood mobility control measure. Nevertheless, this technique has not always demonstrated the desired beneficial mobility effects because of the gravity segregation and the unstable preceding of the front between the water and moremobile gas (Holm 1987; Smith 1988). Creating foam by adding surfactant to the aqueous phase has proven to be able to increase the total recovery significantly by increasing the apparent viscosity of the system (Holm and Josendal 1974; Ali et al. 1985; Patzek 1996; Zhdanov et al. 1996; Turta and Signhal 1998).
There are many attractive features of EOR using CO2 foaminjection. First, carbon dioxide is a proven solvent for reconnecting, mobilizing, and recovering waterflood residual oil. Many studies (Stalkup 1983) have shown that CO2 can achieve miscible-like displacement efficiency through multiple contacts (partitioning and extraction) with the crude oil. Second, CO2 is available naturally in large quantities and as a byproduct of lignite gasification and many manufacturing processes. Its price is also low, and there are no other large-volume uses competing for CO2. Third, with the push toward sustainable power production and the increasing realization for the need to reduce CO2 emissions, EOR using CO2 is becoming an important alternative for geological CO2 storage.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||8|
Ali, J., Burley, R.W., and Nutt, C.W. 1985. Foam Enhanced Oil-Recovery FromSand Packs. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 63:101-111.
Borchardt, J.K. 1988. Structure-Property Relationships for Mobility-ControlSurfactants. ACS Symposium Series 373: 181-183.
Borchardt, J.K., Bright, D.B., and Wellington, S.L. 1988. Surfactant forCarbon Dioxide Foam Flooding: Effects of Surfactant Chemical Structure onOne-Atmosphere Foaming Properties. ACS Symposium Series 373:163.
DiAndreth, J.R. and Paulaitis, M.E. 1988. Multiphase Equilibria forWater-Carbon Dioxide—2-Propanol Mixtures at Elevated Pressures. ACSSymposium Series 373: (1988) 82.
Du, D.X., Nadeli-Beni, A., and Zitha, P.L.J. 2007. Effect of watersolubility on carbon dioxide foam flow in porous media: an X-ray computedtomography study. J. Petroleum Science and Technology (in process).
Elsik, C.M. and Miller, C.A. 1988. Videomicroscopy of Two-Phase SteadyConcurrent Flow in a Model Porous Media. ACS Symposium Series373: 258.
Flumerfelt, R.W. and Prieditis J. 1988. Mobility of Foam in Porous Media.ACS Symposium Series 373: 295.
Fulton, J.L. and Smith, R.D. 1988. Organized Surfactant Assemblies inSupercritical Fluids. ACS Symposium Series 373: 91.
Heller, J.P. 1984. ReservoirApplication of Mobility Control Foams in CO2 Floods. Paper SPE12644 presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium,Tulsa, 15-18April. DOI: 10.2118/12644-MS.
Holm, L.W. 1987. Evolution ofthe Carbon Dioxide Flooding Processes. JPT 39 (11):1337-1342. SPE-17134-PA. DOI: 10.2118/17134-PA.
Holm, L.W. and Josendal, V.A. 1974. Mechanism of Oil Displacement byCarbon Dioxide. JPT 26 (12): 1427-1436; Trans., AIME,257.SPE-4736-PA. DOI: 10.2118/4736-PA.
Irani, C.A. and Solomon, C. 1986. Slim-Tube Investigation ofCO2 Foams. Paper SPE 14962 presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced OilRecovery Symposium,Tulsa, 20-23 April. DOI: 10.2118/14962-MS.
Kovscek, A.R., Patzek, T.W., and Radke, C.J. 1995. A Mechanistic PopulationBalance Model for Transient and Steady-State Foam Flow in Boise Sandstone.Chemical Engineering Sciences 50 (23): 3783-3799.
Lawson, J.B. and Reisberg, J. 1980. Alternate Slugs of Gas and DiluteSurfactant for Mobility Control During Chemical Flooding. Paper SPE 8839presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium,Tulsa, 20-23 April.DOI: 10.2118/8839-MS.
Lee, H.O. and Heller, J.P. 1988. Carbon Dioxide Foam Mobility Measurement atHigh Pressure. ACS Symposium Series 373: 375.
Nadeli-Beni, A. 2004. Effect of Gas Solubility on Foam Flow in Porous Media:an X-Ray Computed Tomography Study & Foam Rheology in Converging-DivergingChannels. MS thesis, Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University ofTechnology.
Nguyen, Q.P. 2004. Dynamics of Foam in Porous Media. PhD dissertation,Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Nguyen, Q.P., Currie, P.K., and Zitha, P.L.J. 2003. Determination of Foam-Induced FluidPartitioning in Porous Media Using X-ray Computed Tomography. Paper SPE80245 presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry,Houston, 5-7 February. DOI: 10.2118/80245-MS.
Patzek, T.W. 1996. FieldApplication of Steam Foam for Mobility Improvement and Profile Control.SPEREE 11 (2): 79-85. SPE-29612-PA. DOI: 10.2118/29612-PA.
Plambeck, J.A. 1995. Physical Science Information Gateway website. http://www.psigate.ac.uk/newsite/reference/plambeck/chem2/p01182.htm.
Ratulowski, J. and Chang, H.-C. 1988. Snap Off at Strong Constrictions:Effect of Pore Geometry. ACS Symposium Series 373:282.
Shirley, A.I. 1988. Foam Formation in Porous Media: A Microscopic VisualStudy. ACS Symposium Series 373: 234.
Smith, D.H. 1988. Promise and Problems of Miscible-Flood Enhanced OilRecovery: The Need for Surfactant-Based Sweep and Mobility Control. ACSSymposium Series 373: 2.
Stalkup, F.I. Jr. 1983. Miscible Displacement. Monograph No. 8. NewYork City: Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME.
Turta, A.T. and Signhal, A.K. 1998. Field Foam Applications in EnhancedOil Recovery Projects: Screening and Design Aspects. Paper SPE 48895presented at the SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition inChina, Beijing, 2-6 November. DOI: 10.2118/48895-MS.
Uijttenhout, M.G.H. 2004. Investigation of CO2 Foam in PorousMedia: Modelling and X-Ray Computed Tomography Experiments. MS thesis, Delft,The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Vinegar, H.J. and Wellington, S.L. 1987. Tomographic Imaging of Three-PhaseFlow Experiments. Review of Scientific Instruments (58): 96-104.
Wellington, S.L. and Vinegar, H.J. 1988. Surfactant-Induced Mobility Controlfor Carbon Dioxide Studied With Computerized Tomography. ACS SymposiumSeries 373: 344.
Zhdanov, S.A., Amiyan, A.V., Surguchev, L.M., Castanier, L.M., and Hanssen,J.E. 1996. Application of Foam forGas and Water Shut-off: Review of Field Experience. Paper SPE 36914presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference, Milan, Italy, 22-24October. DOI: 10.2118/36914-MS.
Zitha, P.L.J., Nguyen, Q.P., and Currie, P.K. 2003. Effect of Flow Velocity and RockLayering on Foam Flow: An X-Ray Computed Tomography Study. Paper SPE 80530presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition,Jakarta, 9-11 September. DOI: 10.2118/80530-MS.