Predicting Horizontal-Openhole-Completion Success on the North Slope of Alaska
- Michael D. Erwin (ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc.) | David O. Ogbe (Schlumberger Data & Consulting Services)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2008
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 666 - 675
- 2008. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 3.2.5 Produced Sand / Solids Management and Control, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 1.11.4 Solids Control, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 3.3.2 Borehole Imaging and Wellbore Seismic, 5.1.2 Faults and Fracture Characterisation, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.1.8 Seismic Modelling, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 2 Well completion, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 2.2.2 Perforating, 5.5.11 Formation Testing (e.g., Wireline, LWD), 5.6.5 Tracers, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 4.3.4 Scale, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 1.14 Casing and Cementing, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 763 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The Colville River field represents the first widespread and successful application of horizontal openhole completions on the North Slope of Alaska, and one of the first in the world. The purposes of this paper are to examine why this completion technique was selected and identify key parameters that favored its successful application in the Colville River field. The optimal completion technique for a candidate well is determined by reservoir properties, geologic setting, rock mechanics, development plan, and completion design. In this paper, we will review the unique advantages and disadvantages of horizontal openhole completions in the Colville River field.
Three key parameters were critical to the success of horizontal openhole completions and could be applied broadly in other situations. Using these three criteria, other major North Slope reservoirs were evaluated to determine their potential for horizontal-openhole-completion applications. Focus areas in this evaluation include in-situ reservoir parameters, development plans, fluid contacts, and wellbore geometries. The results show that only one other major field on the North Slope could have benefited from horizontal openhole completions.
The results of this paper are meant to provide guidelines for future application of horizontal openhole completions on the North Slope of Alaska and elsewhere.
From the early 1970s through the 1990s, engineers have been drilling and completing wells on the North Slope of Alaska with conventional cemented and perforated liners. Wells drilled in Prudhoe Bay, Kuparuk, Lisburne, and numerous other fields are protected with casing and cement to maintain wellbore stability, ensure reservoir access, restrict solids, and provide conformance control for various reservoir fluids. Although technological advances ushered in the "horizontal-multilateral-well" age, conventional cemented liners remained the accepted default completion in the 1990s.
In 2000, the Colville River field, often referred to as the Alpine field, was developed without conventional wellbore isolation or protection. What key factors contributed to successful development of the Colville River field with horizontal openhole completions? Understanding why horizontal openhole completions were applied successfully at Colville River is the starting point to examining potential applications in other North Slope fields and is the purpose of this paper.
We will examine the advantages, limitations, and unique requirements for applying openhole completions. Major issues evaluated include fluid isolation and coning, damage remediation, fluid mobility and conformance control, sand control, and surveillance. Failure to address these issues properly can result in surface-facility and processing problems from uncontrolled water, gas, and sand production.
This evaluation is presented in three sections. First, an overview of the Colville River field provides background information on the pioneering application of horizontal openhole completions on the North Slope of Alaska. Second is a critical evaluation of the key parameters instrumental to the success of horizontal openhole completions at the Colville River field. In the third section, the characteristics identified in the Colville River field are used to evaluate other major producing fields on the North Slope of Alaska to understand which characteristics would aid or impair the application of horizontal openhole completions in offset fields.
This paper provides a basis for engineers to recognize new applications and potential shortcomings of this cost-saving well-completion method.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Adamson, G.R., Heliman, H.L., and Metzger, R.R. 1991. Design and Implementation of theFirst Arctic Offshore Waterflood, Endicott Field, Alaska. Paper SPE 21760presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Long Beach, California, USA,20-22 March. DOI: 10.2118/21760-MS.
Belfield, W.C. 1996. Characterization of a NaturallyFractured Carbonate Reservoir: Lisburne Field, Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. PaperSPE 18174 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Houston, 2-5 October. DOI: 10.2118/18174-MS.
Bidinger, C.R. and Dillon, J.F. 1995. Milne Point Schrader Bluff: Findingthe Keys to Two Billion Barrels. Paper SPE 30289 presented at the SPEInternational Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 19-21 June. DOI:10.2118/30289-MS.
Chen, J., Song, X., and Yao, F. 1999. Application of Seismic Inversion andSpecial Processing Techniques to Fracture Distribution Prediction. PaperSPE 54337 presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, Jakarta,20-22 April. DOI: 10.2118/54337-MS.
Erwin, M.D., Pierson, C.R., and Bennion, D.B. 2003. Brine Imbibition Damage in theColville River Field, Alaska. SPEPF 20 (1): 26-34.SPE-84320-PA. DOI: 10.2118/84320-PA.
Erwin, M.D., Redman, R.S., and Sanders, L.A. 2002. Multiwell Interference Test in theColville River Field, Alaska. Paper SPE 77453 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29 September-2October. DOI: 10.2118/77453-MS.
Foerster, C.P., Lynch, K.W., Stramp, R.L., Werner, M.R., and Thompson, R.R.1997. West Sak Development:Analysis of a Marginal Project. Paper SPE 37946 presented at the SPEHydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Dallas, 16-18 March. DOI:10.2118/37946-MS.
Gingrich, D., Knock, D., and Masters, R. 2001. Geophysical InterpretationMethods Applied at Alpine Oil Field: North Slope, Alaska. SEG Leading EdgeMagazine 20 (7): 730-739.
Hallam, R.J., Piekenbrock, E.J., Abou-Sayed, A.S. et al. 1991. Resource Description and DevelopmentPotential of the Ugnu Reservoir, North Slope, Alaska. SPEFE 7(3): 211-218. SPE-21779-PA. DOI: 10.2118/21779-PA.
Hannon, R. and Gingrich, D. 2000. The discovery of a new Alaskan reservoir:The Alpine Field, North Slope, Alaska-USA. In AAPG 2000 Abstracts, AAPGAnnual International Meeting, San Antonio, Texas. Tulsa: AAPG.
Paige, K.T. and Dayton, J.S. 1987. Development of the LisburneReservoir. Paper SPE 16845 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, Dallas, 27-30 September. DOI: 10.2118/16845-MS.
Panda, M.N., Zhang, M., Ogbe, D.O., Kamath, V.A., and Sharma, G.D. 1989. Reservoir Description of West SakSands Using Well Logs. Paper SPE 18759 presented at the SPE CaliforniaRegional Meeting, Bakersville, California, USA, 5-7 April. DOI:10.2118/18759-MS.
Ramos, G.G., Erwin, M.D., and Enderlin, M.B. 2002. Geomechanical Factors in theSuccessful Implementation of Barefoot Horizontal Completions Totaling 100,000ft Long, Alpine Field, Alaska. Paper SPE 78193 presented at the SPE/ISRMRock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, USA, 20-23 October. DOI:10.2118/78193-MS.
Redman, R.S. 2002. HorizontalMiscible Water Alternating Gas Development of the Alpine Field, Alaska.Paper SPE 76819 presented at the SPE Western Regional/AAPG Pacific SectionJoint Meeting, Anchorage, 20-22 May. DOI: 10.2118/76819-MS.
Reinbold, E.W, Bokhari, S.R., Enger, S.R., Ma, T.D., and Renke, S.M. 1992.Early Performance and Evaluationof the Kuparuk Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood. Paper SPE 24930 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC, 4-7 October.DOI: 10.2118/24930-MS.
Scheihing, M.H., Thompson, R.D., and Seifert, D. 2002. Multiscale Reservoir DescriptionModels for Performance Prediction in the Kuparuk River Field, North Slope ofAlaska. Paper SPE 76753 presented at the SPE Western Regional/AAPG PacificSection Joint Meeting, Anchorage, 20-22 May. DOI: 10.2118/76753-MS.
Shaw, A., Reynolds, T., and Warren, E. 1996. Integrated Description of a ComplexLow Net/Gross Sandstone Reservoir: Upper Subzones of the Endicott Field, N.Slope of Alaska. Paper SPE 35496 presented at the SPE European 3D ReservoirModeling Conference, Stavanger, 16-17 April. DOI: 10.2118/35496-MS.
Sneider, R.M. and Erickson, J.W. 1994. Rock Types, Depositional History, andDiagenetic Effects, Ivishak Reservoir, Prudhoe Bay Field. SPERE12 (1): 23-30. SPE-28575-PA. DOI: 10.2118/28575-PA.
Starley, G.P., Masino, W.H. Jr., Weiss, J.L., and Bolling, J.D. 1991. Full-Field Simulation for DevelopmentPlanning and Reservoir Management at Kuparuk River Field. JPT43 (8): 974-982; Trans., AIME, 291. SPE-20045-PA. DOI:10.2118/20045-PA.
Wolcott, D.S. and Chopra, A.K. 1993. Incorporating Reservoir HeterogeneityUsing Geostatistics To Investigate Waterflood Recoveries. SPEFE8 (1): 26-32. SPE-22164-PA. DOI: 10.2118/22164-PA.