Multiple Model Seismic and Production History Matching: A Case Study
- Karl D. Stephen (Heriot-Watt University) | Juan Soldo (Heriot-Watt University) | Colin Macbeth (Edinburgh Anisotropy Project UK) | Mike A. Christie (Heriot-Watt University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- December 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 418 - 430
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 3.3 Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring, 5.5.3 Scaling Methods, 5.1.2 Faults and Fracture Characterisation, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.5.8 History Matching, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 5.5.5 Evaluation of uncertainties, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.1.9 Four-Dimensional and Four-Component Seismic, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.1.8 Seismic Modelling, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 7.2.2 Risk Management Systems, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 1.2.3 Rock properties
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 825 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Time-lapse (or 4D) seismic is increasingly being used as a qualitative description of reservoir behavior for management and decision-making purposes. When combined quantitatively with geological and flow modeling as part of history matching, improved predictions of reservoir production can be obtained. Here, we apply a method of multiple-model history matching based on simultaneous comparison of spatial data offered by seismic as well as individual well-production data. Using a petroelastic transform and suitable rescaling, forward-modeled simulations are converted into predictions of seismic impedance attributes and compared to observed data by calculation of a misfit. A similar approach is applied to dynamic well data. This approach improves on gradient-based methods by avoiding entrapment in local minima. We demonstrate the method by applying it to the UKCS Schiehallion reservoir, updating the operator's model. We consider a number of parameters to be uncertain. The reservoir's net to gross is initially updated to better match the observed baseline acoustic impedance derived from the RMS amplitudes of the migrated stack. We then history match simultaneously for permeability, fault transmissibility multipliers, and the petroelastic transform parameters. Our results show a good match to the observed seismic and well data with significant improvement to the base case.
Reservoir management requires tools such as simulation models to predict asset behavior. History matching is often employed to alter these models so that they compare favorably to observed well rates and pressures. This well information is obtained at discrete locations and thus lacks the areal coverage necessary to accurately constrain dynamic reservoir parameters such as permeability and the location and effect of faults. Time-lapse seismic captures the effect of pressure and saturation on seismic impedance attributes, giving 2D maps or 3D volumes of the missing information. The process of seismic history matching attempts to overlap the benefits of both types of information to improve estimates of the reservoir model parameters.
We first present an automated multiple-model history-matching method that includes time-lapse seismic along with production data, based on an integrated workflow (Fig. 1). It improves on the classical approach, wherein the engineer manually adjusts parameters in the simulation model. Our method also improves on gradient-based methods, such asSteepest Descent, Gauss-Newton, and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithms (e.g., Lépine et al. 1999;Dong and Oliver 2003; Gosselin et al. 2003; Mezghani et al. 2004), which are good at finding local likelihood maxima but can fail to find the global maximum. Our method is also faster than stochastic methods such as genetic algorithms and simulated annealing, which often require more simulations and may have slower convergence rates. Finally, multiple models are generated, enabling posterior uncertainty analysis in a Bayesian framework (as in Stephen and MacBeth 2006a).
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Backus, G.E. 1962. Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontallayering. J. Geophysical Research 67 (11): 4427-4440.
Batzle, M. and Wang, Z. 1992. Seismic Properties of Pore Fluids.Geophysics 57 (11): 1396-1408. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1443207.
Chapin, M., Terwogt, D., and Ketting, J. 2000. From Seismic to SimulationUsing New Voxel Body and Geologic Modelling Techniques, Schiehallion Field,West of Shetlands. The Leading Edge 19 (4): 408-412. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1438622.
Christie, M.A., Glimm, J., Grove, J.W., Higdon, D.M., Sharp, D.H., andWood-Schultz, M.M. 2005. Error analysis and simulations of complex phenomena.Los Alamos Science 29: 6-25.
Christie, M.A., MacBeth, C., and Subbey, S. 2002. Multiple History MatchedModels for Teal South. The Leading Edge 21 (3): 286-289. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1463779.
de Marseily, G., Levendan, G., Boucher, M., and Fasanino, G. 1984.Interpretation of Interference Tests in a Well Field Using GeostatisticalTechniques to Fit the Permeability Distributions in a Reservoir Model. In G.Verly, M. David, A.G. Journel, and A. Marechal (eds.), Geostatistics forNatural Resource Characterisation, Proc., NATO Advanced Study Inst.831-849.
Deutsch, C.V. and Journel, A.G. 1992 GSLIB: Geostatistical SoftwareLibrary and User's Guide. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford U. Press.
Domenico, S.N. 1976. Effect of brine-gas mixture on velocity in anunconsolidated gas reservoir. Geophysics 41: 882-894. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1440670.
Dong, Y. and Oliver, D.S. 2003. Quantitative Use of 4D Seismic forReservoir Description. SPEJ 10 (1): 91-99. SPE-84571-PA. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84571-PA.
Gassmann, F. 1951. Über die elastizität poröser medien.Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Zürich 96:1-23.
Gosselin, O., Aanonsen, S.I., Aavatsmark, I., et al. 2003. History Matching Using Time-LapseSeismic (HUTS). Paper SPE 84464 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84464-MS.
Hall, S., MacBeth, C., Barkved, O.I., and Wild, P. 2005. Cross-matching withinterpreted warping of 3D streamer and 3D OBC data at Valhall for time-lapseassessment. Geophysical Prospecting 53: 283-297.
Hoffman, B.T. and Caers, J. 2005 Regional Probability Perturbation forHistory Matching. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 46(1-2): 53-71.
Hu, L. 2000. Gradual deformation and iterative calibration ofgaussian-related stochastic models. Mathematical Geology 32 (1):87-107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007506918588.
Lancaster, S. and Whitcombe, D. 2000. Fast Track Coloured Inversion.Proc., 70th Annual International Meeting of the Soc. of ExplorationGeophysicists, Calgary, 6-11 August. 1572-1575.
Leach, H.M., Herbert, N., Los, A., and Smith, R.L. 1999. The Schiehalliondevelopment. Proc., 5th Conference of the Petroleum Geology of NorthwestEurope, ed. A.J. Fleet and S.A.R. Boldy, 683-692.
Lépine, O.J., Bissel, R.C., Aanonsen, S.I., Pallister, I.C., and Barker,J.W. 1999. Uncertainty Analysis inPredictive Reservoir Simulation Using Gradient Information.SPEJ 4 (3): 251-259. SPE-48997-PA. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/48997-PA.
MacBeth, C. 2004. A classification for the pressure sensitivity propertiesof a sandstone rockframe. Geophysics 69: 497-510.
MacBeth, C., Stephen, K.D., and McInally, A. 2005. The 4D seismic signatureof oil-water contact movement due to natural production in a stacked turbiditereservoir. Geophysical Prospecting 53: 183-203.
Mezghani, M., Fornel, A, Langlais, V., and Lucet, N. 2004. History Matching and Quantitative Useof 4D Seismic Data for an Improved Reservoir Characterization. Paper SPE90420 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston,26-29 September. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/90420-MS.
O'Sullivan, A.E. 2004. Modelling simulation error for improvedreservoir prediction. PhD dissertation, Heriot-Watt U., Edinburgh.
Parr, R.S., Marsh, M., and Griffin, T. 2000. Interpretation and Integrationof 4D Results Into Reservoir Management, Schiehallion Field UKCS. ExtendedAbstracts of the SEG Annual Meeting, Calgary, 6-11 August.
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling W.T., and Flannery, B.P. 1998.Numerical recipes in FORTAN: the art of scientific computing. New York:Cambridge U. Press.
Reid, F., Bertrand, A., McInally, A., and MacBeth, C. 2005. 4D SignalEnhancement Using Singular-Value Decomposition: Application to MappingOil-Water Contact Movement Across the Nelson Field. GeophysicalProspecting 53: 253-263.
Sambridge, MS. 1999. Geophysical inversion with a neighborhood algorithm-I.Searching a parameter space. Geophys. J. Int. 138: 479-494.
Sambridge, M.S. 2001. Finding acceptable models in nonlinear inverseproblems using a neighbourhood algorithm. Inverse Problems 17:387-403. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/17/3/302.
Saxby, I. 2001. Impact of 4-D Reservoir Monitoring in the Schiehallion FieldUKCS. Proc., AAPG Annual Meeting, Denver, 3-6 Jun.
Soldo, J. 2005. Quantitative Integration of Time-Lapse Seismic Data. PhDdissertation, Heriot-Watt U., Edinburgh.
Stephen, K.D. and MacBeth, C. 2006a. Seismic History Matching in theSchiehallion UKCS Field. First Break 24: 43-49.
Stephen, K.D. and MacBeth, C. 2006b. Reducing Reservoir PredictionUncertainty Using Seismic History Matching. Paper SPE 100295 presented atthe SPE/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, 12-15 June. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/100295-MS.
Stephen, K.D., MacBeth, C., Christie, M., and Soldo, J. 2005. Upscaling andDownscaling in Seismic History Matching. SPE poster presented at the SPE/EAGEWorkshop "Upscaling and Downscaling of Reservoir Parameters—Can Geoscientistsand Reservoir Engineers Learn From Each Other, Use the Same Techniques, andExploit Synergies?", Lisbon, Portugal, 14-16 March.
Stephen, K.D., Soldo, J., MacBeth, C., and Christie, M. 2004a. Practicaldynamic updating of reservoir models using frequently acquired 4D seismic data.Proc., 66th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Paris, 7-10 June.
Stephen, K.D., Soldo, J., MacBeth, C., and Christie, M. 2004b. A multiplemodel approach to history matching and uncertainty analysis using time-lapseseismic. Proc., 9th European Conference on the Mathematics of OilRecovery, Cannes, France, 20 August-2 September.
Subbey, S., Christie, M.A., and Sambridge, M. 2002. Uncertainty Reduction inReservoir Modelling. In Fluid Flow and Transport in Porous Media:Mathematical and Numerical Treatment. Z. Chen and R.E. Ewing (eds.),American Mathematical Soc. Contemporary Mathematics Monograph.
Tarantola, A. 1987. Inverse Problem Theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier.