Pickling Well Tubulars Using Coiled Tubing: Mathematical Modeling and Field Application
- Saleh Haif Al-Mutairi (Texas A&M University) | Alfred Daniel Hill (University of Texas at Austin) | Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din (Saudi Aramco)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 326 - 334
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 1.8 Formation Damage, 3.2.4 Acidising, 4.3.4 Scale, 2.2.2 Perforating, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.7.1 Completion Fluids, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5.6.5 Tracers, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4.2.3 Materials and Corrosion, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 2.4.5 Gravel pack design & evaluation
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 504 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Coiled tubing is usually used to conduct acid pickle treatments. The purpose of the treatment is to prevent pumping damaging materials into the formation before the main acid job. In this case, the acid is pumped down the coiled tubing, and then flowed up through the tubing-coiled tubing annulus. Pickling is a process of flow with heterogeneous reactions occurring with mill scale (Fe3O4) and other contaminants at both the inner wall of the production tubing and the outer surface of the coiled tubing.
Pickling is an essential part of well stimulation treatments if the main treatment fluids (e.g., acidizing, fracturing, and gravel packing) are to be bullheaded. However, it appears that traditional pickle practices are overestimating the required acid volume and/or concentration. Field data indicate that excessive acid volumes are used for tubing pickle because large returns of unreacted acid are usually recovered on the surface.
In this paper, mechanisms to explain the behavior of acid contact with the tubing are presented, and a model for predicting acid consumption and dissolution of tubular contaminants is developed. The model includes reactions of acid with mill scale. A system of nonlinear, partial differential equations is developed, and the equations are solved numerically to predict the concentrations of major species as a function of axial position along the tubing and in the effluent from the well during flowback.
Field application included pickling of low-carbon steel tubing (11,900 ft of 5.5-in. C-95) using coiled tubing. A slug of 5,000 gals of 20 wt% HCl with additives was used. Samples were collected from the treated well during the flowback of the pickling treatment. The model was used to predict the concentrations of various species in the well flowback samples. Model predictions for acid, chloride ion, and total iron concentrations were in agreement with field results. In addition, the model proved to be a valuable tool in optimizing future pickling treatments.
Scientists and engineers working on chemical treatments to enhance well performance usually focus on reservoir characteristics, fluid placement, fluid compatibility, and thermal stability. Less attention, however, is given to potential formation damage that might occur if the contaminants present in the well tubulars invade the formation.
Several studies were conducted to identify the type and amount of contaminants present in well tubulars (Holub et al. 1974; Maly 1976; McLeod et al. 1983; McLeod 1984). Pipe dope and mill scale were identified as main contaminants present in the production tubing (Coulter and Gougler 1984; Gougler et al. 1985; Loewen et al. 1990; Nasr-El-Din et al. 2002). Invasion of these materials into the target zone can cause severe formation damage. Therefore, it is always recommended to minimize the amount of pipe dope used and to clean well tubulars before any chemical treatments, especially if these chemicals are to be bullheaded.
The types of fluids used in pickling treatments depend on the type of contaminants. Xylene and similar organic solvents are used to dissolve the organic portion of pipe dope. Hydrochloric acid is used to remove acid-soluble material present in the pipe dope (mainly zinc) and mill scale. Selection of acid additives depends on temperature, type of tubular, and fluids that will come in contact with the acid. It should be noted that environmentally friendly pickling fluids were introduced during recent years, with positive field results (Curtis and Kalfayan 2003; Berry et al. 2003).
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Al-Mutairi, S.H. 2004. Modeling of Tubing Pickling in Conjunction WithMatrix Acidizing Treatments. MS thesis. Austin, Texas:University of Texasat Austin.
Al-Mutairi, S.H., Hill, A.D., and Nasr-El-Din, H.A. 2005. Modeling of Tubing Pickling inConjunction With Acidizing Treatments. Paper SPE 93291 presented at the SPEInternational Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands, Texas, 2-4February. DOI: 10.2118/93291-MS.
Berry, S.L., Boles, J.L., and DiLullo, G.F. 2003. Evaluation of a Safe, Slightly AcidicTubing Clean-Out Fluid. Paper SPE 84125 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. DOI:10.2118/84125-MS.
Blesa, M.A., Morando, P.J., and Regazzoni, A.E. 1994. ChemicalDissolution of Metal Oxides. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
Coulter, A.W., Jr., and Gougler, P.D. 1984. Field Tests Indicate Tubing isMain Source of Iron Precipitation in the Wellbore. OGJ 9:87-88.
Cumper, C.W.N., Grzeskowiak, R., and Newton, P. 1982. Effect of Pyrole,Indole and their Dimethyl Derivatives on the Dissolution of Magnetite.Corrosion Science 22: 551-557.
Curtis, J. and Kalfayan, L. 2003. Improving Wellbore and FormationCleaning Efficiencies With Environmental Solvents and Pickling Solutions.Paper SPE 81138 presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean PetroleumEngineering Conference, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, 27-30 April. DOI:10.2118/81138-MS.
Galus, Z. and Adams, R.N. 1963. The Investigation of the Kinetics ofModerately Rabid Electrode Reactions Using Rotating Disk Electrodes. J.Phys. Chem. 67: 866-871.
Gougler, P.D. Jr., Hendrick, J.E., and Coulter, A.W. 1985. Field Investigation Identifies Sourceand Magnitude of Iron Problems. Paper SPE 13812 presented at the SPEProduction Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, 10-12 March. DOI:10.2118/13812-MS.
Holub, R.W., Maly, G.P., Noel, R.P., and Weinbrandt, R.M. 1974. Scanning Electron Microscope Picturesof Reservoir Rocks Reveal Ways to Increase Oil Production. Paper SPE 4787presented at the SPE Symposium on Formation Damage Control, New Orleans, 30January- 2 February. DOI: 10.2118/4787-MS.
Loewen, K., Chan, K.S., Fraser, M., and Leuty, B. 1990. A Well StimulationAcid Tube Clean Methodology. Paper CIM/SPE 90-47 presented at the PetroleumSociety of CIM/SPE International Technical Meeting, Calgary, 10-13 June.
McLeod, H.O. Jr. 1984. MatrixAcidizing. JPT 36 (12): 2055-2069. SPE-13752-PA. DOI:10.2118/13752-PA.
Maly, G.P. 1976. Close Attentionto the Smallest Job Details Vital for Minimizing Formation Damage. PaperSPE 5702 presented at the SPE Symposium on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette,Louisiana, 29-30 January. DOI: 10.2118/5702-MS.
McLeod, H.O. Jr., Ledlow, L.B., and Till, M.V. 1983. The Planning, Execution andEvaluation of Acid Treatments in Sandstone Formations. Paper SPE 11931presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Francisco,5-8 October. DOI: 10.2118/11931-MS.
Nasr-El-Din, H.A., and Metcalf, A.S. 2004. Workovers in Sour Environments: HowDo We Avoid Coiled Tubing Failures? Paper SPE 87622 presented at the SPEInternational Symposium on Oilfield Corrosion, Aberdeen, 28 May. DOI:10.2118/87622-MS.
Nasr-El-Din, H.A., Al-Humaidan, A., Fadel, B.A., and Saleh, R. 2000. Effectof Acid Additives on the Efficiency of Dissolving Iron Sulfide Scale. PaperNACE 439 presented at the NACExpo 2000, Orlando, Florida, 26-31 March.
Nasr-El-Din, H.A., Al-Mutairi, S.H., and Al-Driweesh, S.M. 2002. Lessons Learned From Acid PickleTreatments of Deep/Sour Gas Wells. Paper SPE 73706 presented at the SPEInternational Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette,Louisiana, 20-21 February. DOI: 10.2118/73706-MS.
Riggs, O.L. and Hurd, R.M. 1968. Effect of Inhibitors on Scale Removal inHCl Pickling Solutions. Corrosion 24 (2): 45-49.
Smith, B. 1990. Proper Treatment of Tubulars Key to Iron Control.Southwestern Petroleum Short Course.
Tanaka, N. and Tamamushi, R. 1964. Kinetic Parameters of ElectrodeReactions. Electrochimica Act. 9: 963.
Williams, B.B., Gidley, J.L., and Schechter, R.S.: AcidizingFundamentals Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, 1979.