A Review on Recent Advances in the Numerical Simulation for Coalbed-Methane-Recovery Process
- Xiaorong R. Wei (University of Queensland) | Guoxiong X. Wang (University of Queensland) | Paul Massarotto (University of Queensland) | Sue D. Golding (University of Queensland) | Victor Rudolph (University of Queensland)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- December 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 657 - 666
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 5.8.6 Naturally Fractured Reservoir, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.10.1 CO2 Capture and Sequestration, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 5.3.4 Integration of geomechanics in models, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.8.3 Coal Seam Gas, 4.6 Natural Gas, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5.2.2 Fluid Modeling, Equations of State
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 2,161 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The recent advances in numerical simulation for primary coalbed methane (CBM) recovery and enhanced coalbed-methane recovery (ECBMR) processes are reviewed, primarily focusing on the progress that has occurred since the late 1980s. Two major issues regarding the numerical modeling will be discussed in this review: first, multicomponent gas transport in in-situ bulk coal and, second, changes of coal properties during methane (CH4) production. For the former issues, a detailed review of more recent advances in modeling gas and water transport within a coal matrix is presented. Further, various factors influencing gas diffusion through the coal matrix will be highlighted as well, such as pore structure, concentration and pressure, and water effects. An ongoing bottleneck for evaluating total mass transport rate is developing a reasonable representation of multiscale pore space that considers coal type and rank. Moreover, few efforts have been concerned with modeling water-flow behavior in the coal matrix and its effects on CH4 production and on the exchange of carbon dioxide (CO2) and CH4. As for the second issue, theoretical coupled fluid-flow and geomechanical models have been proposed to describe the evolution of pore structure during CH4 production, instead of traditional empirical equations. However, there is currently no effective coupled model for engineering applications. Finally, perspectives on developing suitable simulation models for CBM production and for predicting CO2-sequestration ECBMR are suggested.
CBM has been recognized as a significant natural gas resource for a long time. Recently, CO2 sequestration in coalbeds for ECBMR has been attracting growing attention because of greater concerns about the effects of greenhouse gases and the emerging commercial significance of CBM.
Reservoir-simulation technology, as a useful tool of reservoir development, has the capability to provide us with an economic means to solve complex reservoir-engineering problems with efficiency. The development of a numerical simulator for CBM-reservoir simulation before the late 1980s has been reviewed by King and Ertekin (1989a, 1989b). This paper will further present the recent advances in this highly active area, focusing on modeling the CBM and ECBMR processes.
Pore Structure and Gas-Diffusion Mechanisms. The pore structure of coal is highly heterogeneous, and the heterogeneity of the pores depends on the coal type and rank (Unsworth et al. 1988, Laxminarayana and Crosdale 1999). Recent studies (Smith and Williams 1984; Gan et al. 1972; Clarkson and Bustin 1999a) suggest that lower-rank coals usually exhibit a bidisperse or multimodal pore structure, with significant fractions of the total pore volume being larger than 30 nm and smaller than 1.2 nm. The commonly assumed pores in coals can be divided into three categories: micropores (<2 nm), mesopores (between 2 and 50 nm), and macropores (>50 nm) (Shi and Durucan 2003a, Cui et al. 2004).
|File Size||900 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Arri, L.E., Yee, D., Morgan, W.D., and Jeansonmne, M.W. 1992. Modeling Coalbed Methane ProductionWith Binary Gas Sorption. Paper SPE 24363 presented at the SPE RockyMountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming, 18-21 May. DOI:10.2118/24363-MS.
Arvind, G. and Bhatia, S.K. 1995. Determination of concentration-dependentadsorbate diffusivities by numerical inversion. Chemical EngineeringScience 50 (8): 1361-1372.
Bielicki, R., Perkins, J., and Kissell, F. 1972. Methane DiffusionParameters for Sized Coal Particles: Measuring Apparatus and Some PreliminaryResults. Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations, US Department of theInterior.
Bhatia, S.K. 1987. Modeling the Pore Structure of Coal. AIChE J.33 (10): 1707-1718.
Ceglarska, S.G. and Zarebska, K. 2002. The Competitive Sorption of CO2 andCH4 With Regard to the Release of Methane From Coal. Fuel ProcessTechnology 77-78: 423-429.
Chen, H.Y. and Teufel, L.W. 1997. Coupling Fluid-Flow and Geomechanicsin Dual-Porosity Modeling of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Paper SPE38884 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SanAntonio, Texas, 5-8 October. DOI: 10.2118/38884-MS.
Chin, L.Y., Raghavan, R., and Thomas, L.K. 1998. Fully-Coupled Geomechanics andFluid-Flow Analysis of Wells with Stress-Dependent Permeability. Paper SPE48857 presented at the SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibitionin China, Beijing,2-6 November. DOI: 10.2118/48857-MS.
Choi, S.K. and Wold, M.B. 1994. Simulation of Fluid Flow in CoalUsing a Discrete Fracture Network Model. Paper SPE 28781 presented at theSPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 7-10 November.DOI: 10.2118/28781-MS.
Choi, X. 2003. Simulation coupled geomechanical-reservoir model. The SecondInternational Forum on Geologic Sequestration of CO2 in Deep, UnmineableCoalseams (Coal-Seq II). Washington DC.
Clarkson, C.R. and Bustin, R.M. 1999a. The Effect of Pore Structure and GasPressure Upon the Transport Properties of Coal: A Laboratory and ModelingStudy. 1. Isotherms and Pore Volume Distributions. Fuel 78 (11):1333-1344.
Clarkson, C.R. and Bustin, R.M., 1999b. The Effect of Pore Structure and GasPressure Upon the Transport Properties of Coal: A Laboratory and ModelingStudy. 2. Adsorption Rate Modeling. Fuel 78 (11):1345-1362.
Clarkson, C.R. and Bustin, R.M. 2000. Binary gas adsorption/desorptionisotherms: effect of moisture and coal composition upon carbon dioxideselectivity over methane. International J. of Coal Geology 42(4): 241-271.
Clarkson, C.R. 2003. Application of a New MulticomponentGas Adsorption Model to Coal Gas Adsorption Systems. SPEJ 8(3): 236-250. SPE-78146-PA. DOI: 10.2118/78146-PA.
Cui, X.J., Bustin, R.M., and Dipple, G. 2004. Selective Transport of CO2,CH4, and N2 in Coals: Insights From Modeling of Experimental Gas AdsorptionData. Fuel 83 (3): 293-303.
Crosdale, P.J., Beamish, B.B., and Valix, M. 1998. Coalbed Methane SorptionRelated to Coal Composition. International J. of Coal Geology 35(1-4): 147-158.
Dindoruk, B. 1992. Analytical theory of multiphase, multicomponent flow inporous media, PhD dissertation, Stanford U., Stanford, California.
Do, D.D. and Rice, R.G. 1991. A simple method of determining pore andsurface diffusivities in adsorption studies. Chemical EngineeringCommunications 107: 151-161.
Duda, J.L. and Vrentas, J.S. 1971. Mathematical analysis of sorptionexperiments. AIChE J. 17 (2): 464-469.
Ettinger, I., Lidin, I.L., Dmitriev, A.M., and Shaupakhina, E.S. 1958. USBureau of Mines Translation No. 1505/National Coal Board Translation A1606SEH.
Fitzgerald, J.E., Sudibandriyo, M., Pan, Z., Gasem, K.A.M., and Robinson,R.L. 2003. Modeling the Adsorption of Pure Gases on Coals With the SLD Model.Carbon 41 (12): 2203-2216.
Gamson, P.D., Beamish, B.B., and Johnson, D.P. 1993. Coal Microstructure andMicropermeability and Their Effects on Natural Gas Recovery. Fuel72 (1): 87-99.
Gamson, P., Beamish, B., and Johnson, D. 1996. Coal Microstructure andSecondary Mineralization: Their Effect on Methane Recovery. Coalbed methaneand coal geology, R. Gayer and I. Harris, eds., London: Geological Societyof London.
Gan, H., Nandi, S.P., and Walker, P.L. 1972. Nature of the Porosity inAmerican Coals. Fuel 51 (4): 272-277.
George, J.D.S. and Barakat, M.A. 2001. The Change in Effective StressAssociated With Shrinkage From Gas Deportation in Coal. International J. ofCoal Geology 45 (2-3): 105-113.
Gray, I. 1987. ReservoirEngineering in Coal Seams: Part 1—The Physical Process of Gas Storage andMovement in Coal Seams. SPERE 2 (1): 28-34. SPE-12514-PA. DOI:10.2118/12514-PA.
Gray, P.G. and Do, D.D. 1991. Dynamics of carbon dioxide sorption onactivated carbon particles. AIChE J. 37 (7): 1027-1034.
Hall, F.E., Zhou, C., Gasem, K.A.M., Robinson, R.L., and Yee, D. 1994.Adsorption of Pure Methane, Nitrogen, and Carbon Dioxide and Their BinaryMixtures on Wet Fruitland Coal. Paper presented at the Eastern RegionalConference and Exhibition, Charleston, West Virginia, 8-10 November.
Harpalani, S. and McPherson, M.J. 1985. Effect of stress on permeability ofcoal. Quarterly Review of Methane from Coal Seams Technology 3:23-28.
Harpalani, S. and Pariti, U.M. 1993. Study of Coal Sorption Isotherms Usinga Multicomponent Gas Mixture. Paper presented at the International CoalbedMethane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 17-21 May.
Harpalani, S. and Chen, G. 1994. Estimation of changes in fracture porosityof coal with gas emission. Fuel 74 (10): 1491-1498.
Harpalani, S. and Chen, G. 1997. Influence of Gas Production InducedVolumetric Strain on Permeability of Coal. Geotechnical and GeologicalEngineering 15 (4): 303-325.
Hu, X. and Do, D.D. 1993. Multicomponent adsorption kinetics of hydrocarbonsonto activated carbon: effect of adsorption equilibrium equations. ChemicalEngineering Science 47 (7): 1715-1725.
Joubert, J.I., Grein, C.T., and Bienstock, D.,1973. Sorption of methane onmoist coal. Fuel 52 (3): 181-185.
Joubert, J.I., Grein, C.T., and Bienstock, D. 1974. Effect of moisture onthe methane capacity of American coals. Fuel 53 (3):186-191.
Karacan, C.O. and Mitchell, G.D. 2003. Behavior and effect of different coalmicrolithotypes during gas transport for carbon dioxide sequestration into coalseams. International J. of Coal Geology 53 (4): 201-217.
King, G.R. and Ertekin, T. 1989a. A Survey of Mathematical Models Related toMethane Production From Coal Seams, Part 1: Empirical and Equilibrium SorptionModel. Paper presented at the Coalbed Methane Symposium at the University ofAlabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 17-20 April.
King, G.R. and Ertekin, T. 1989b. A Survey of Mathematical Models Related toMethane Production From Coal Seams, Part 2: Non-Equilibrium Sorption Models.Paper presented at the Coalbed Methane Symposium at the University of Alabama,Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 17-20 April.
Klinkenberg, L.J. 1941. The permeability of porous media to liquids andgases. API. Drilling and Production Practices, 200-213.
Kolesar, J.E., Ertekin, T., and Obut, S.T. 1990a. The Unsteady-State Nature of Sorptionand Diffusion Phenomena in the Micropore Structure of Coal; Part 1, Theory andMathematical Formulation. SPEFE 5 (1): 81-88. SPE-15233-PA.DOI: 10.2118/15233-PA.
Kolesar, J.E., Ertekin, T., and Obut, S.T. 1990b. The Unsteady-State Nature of Sorptionand Diffusion Phenomena in the Micropore Structure of Coal; Part 2,Solution. SPEFE 5 (1): 89-97. SPE-19398-PA. DOI:10.2118/19398-PA.
Krishna, R. 1990. Multicomponent surface diffusion of adsorbed species. Adescription based on the generalized maxwell-stefan equations. ChemicalEngineering Science 45 (7): 1779-1791.
Law, D.H.-S., van der Meer, L.G.H., and Gunter, W.D. 2003. Comparison ofNumerical Simulators for Greenhouse Gas Sequestration in Coalbeds, Part III:More Complex Problems. Paper presented at the Annual DOE Conference on CarbonSequestration, Alexandria, Virginia, 5-8 May.
Law, D.H.-S., van der Meer, L.G.H., and Gunter, W.D. 2002. Numerical Simulator Comparison Studyfor Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery Processes, Part 1: Pure Carbon DioxideInjection. Paper SPE 75669 presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium,Calgary, 30 April-2 May.DOI:10.2118/75669-MS.
Law, D.H.-S., van der Meer, L.G.H., Mavor, M.J., and Gunter, W.D. 2000.Modelling of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Coalbeds: A Numerical Challenge.Paper presented at the International conference on greenhouse gas controltechnology, Cairns, Australia, 13-16 August.
Laxminarayana, C. and Crosdale, P.J. 1999. Role of Coal Type and Rank onMethane Sorption Characteristics of Bowen Basin, Australia. International J.of Coal Geology 40 (4): 309-325.
Levy, J.H., Day, S.J., and Killingley, J.S. 1997. Methane capacities ofBowen Basin coals related to coal properties. Fuel 76 (9):813-819.
Lin, L.J. and Ma, F.S. 2001. Coupled mathematical model for water-gas flowand solid deformation in coalbed gas production. Hydrogeology andEngineering Geology 28 (1): 1-3.
Manik, J., 1999. Compositional Modeling of Enhanced Coalbed MethaneRecovery. PhD thesis, Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Pennsylvania StateUniversity, Pennsylvania, 1999.
Manik, J., Ertekin, T., and Kohler, T.E. 2002. Development and Validation ofa Compositional Coalbed Simulator. J. of Cdn. Pet. Tech. 41 (4):39-45.
Mazumder, S., Bruining, J., and Wolf, K-H. 2003a. A Preliminary NumericalModel of CO2 Sequestration in Coal for Improved Coalbed Methane Production.Paper presented at the International Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa,Alabama, 5-9 May.
Mazumder, S., Plug, W.-J., and Bruining, J. 2003b. Capillary Pressure and WettabilityBehavior of Coal-Water-Carbon Dioxide System. Paper SPE 84339 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. DOI:10.2118/84339-MS.
Moffat, D.H. and Weale, K.E. 1955. Sorption by coal of methane at highpressures. Fuel 34: 4449-4462.
Myers, A.L. and Prausnitz, J.M. 1965. Thermodynamics of Mixed-GasAdsorption. AIChE J. 11 (1): 121-127.
Nandi, S.P. and Walker, P.L. 1970. Activated Diffusion of Methane in Coal.Fuel 49 (3): 309-323.
Palmer, I. and Mansoori, J. 1996. How Permeability Depends on Stressand Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model. Paper SPE 36737 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 6-9 October. DOI:10.2118/36737-MS.
Palmer, I. and Mansoori, J. 1998. How Permeability Depends on Stressand Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model. SPEREE 1 (6):539-544. SPE-52607-PA. DOI: 10.2118/52607-PA.
Pekot, L.J. and Reeves, S.R. 2003. Matrix shrinkage and permeabilityreduction with carbon dioxide injection. Paper presented at the InternationalForum on Geologic Sequestration of CO2 in Deep,Unmineable Coalseams (Coal-SeqII). Washington, DC, 6-7 March.
Puri, R., Evanoff, J.C., and Brugler, M.L. 1991. Measurement of Coal Cleat Porosityand Relative Permeability Characteristics. Paper SPE 21491 presented at theSPE Gas Technology Symposium, Houston, 23-25 January. DOI:10.2118/21491-MS.
Reeves, S. and Pekot, L. 2001. Advanced Reservoir Modeling InDesorption-Controlled Reservoirs. Paper SPE 71090 presented at the SPERocky Mountain Petroleum Conference, Keystone, Colorado, 21-23 May. DOI:10.2118/71090-MS.
Reeves, S., Taillefert, A., Pekot, L., and Clarkson, C. 2003. The AllisonUnit CO2-ECBM pilot: a reservoir modeling study. Topical Report, Morgantown.West Virginia: US Department of Energy.
Reucroft, P.J. and Patel, H. 1986. Gas-induced swelling in coal. Fuel65 (6): 816-820.
Reyes, S. and Jensen, K.F. 1985. Estimation of Effective TransportCoefficients in Porous Solids Based on Percolation Concepts. ChemicalEngineering Science 40 (9): 1723-1734.
Reyes, S. and Jensen, K.F. 1986a. Percolation Concepts in Modeling ofGas-Solid Reactions-1. Application to Char Gasification in the Kinetic Regime.Chemical Engineering Science 41 (2): 333-343.
Reyes, S. and Jensen, K.F. 1986b. Percolation Concepts in Modeling ofGas-Solid Reactions-2 Application to Char Gasification in the Diffusion Regime.Chemical Engineering Science 41 (2): 345-354.
Reznik, A.A., Singh, P.K., and Foley, W.L. 1984. An Analysis of the Effect of CO2Injection on the Recovery of In-Situ Methane From Bituminous Coal: AnExperimental Simulation. SPEJ 24 (5): 521-528. SPE-10822-PA.DOI: 10.2118/10822-PA.
Ruckenstein, E., Vaidyanathan, A.S., and Youngquist, G.R. 1971. Sorption bySolid With Bidisperse Pore Structures. Chemical Engineering Science26 (9): 1305-1318.
Ruthven, D.M. 1984. Principles of Adsorption and AdsorptionProcesses. New York City: John Wiley & Sons.
Sawyer, W.K., Paul, G.W., and Schraufnagel, R.A. 1990. Development andApplication of a 3D Coalbed Simulator. Paper CIM 90-119 presented at theCIM/SPE International Technical Conference, Calgary, 10-13 June.
Scott, A.R. 2002. Hydrogeologic Factors Affecting Gas Content Distributionin Coal Beds. International J. of Coal Geology 50 (1-4):363-387.
Seeburger, D.A. and Nur, A. 1984. A pore space model for rock permeabilityand bulk modulus. J. of Geophysical Research 89:527-536.
Seidle, J.P., Jeansonne, M.W., and Erickson, D.J. 1992. Application of Matchstick Geometry ToStress Dependent Permeability in Coals. Paper SPE 24361 presented at theSPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming, 18-21 May. DOI:10.2118/24361-MS.
Sethuraman, A.R. 1987. Gas and vapor induced coal swelling. AmericanChemical Society 32 (1): 259-264.
Settari, A. and Price, H.S. 1984. Simulation of Hydraulic Fracturing inLow Permeability Reservoirs. SPEJ 42 (2): 141-152.SPE-8939-PA. DOI: 10.2118/8939-PA.
Shi, J.Q. and Durucan, S. 2003a. A Bidisperse Pore Diffusion Model forMethane Displacement Desorption in Coal by CO2 Injection. Fuel 82(10): 1219-1229.
Shi, J.Q. and Durucan, S. 2003b. Gas Storage and Flow in CoalbedReservoirs: Implementation of a Bidisperse Pore Model for Gas Diffusion in CoalMatrix. Paper SPE 84342 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. DOI: 10.2118/84342-MS.
Siemons, N., Busch, A., Bruining, H., and Krooss, B. 2003. Assessing the Kinetics and Capacityof Gas Adsorption in Coals by a Combined Adsorption/Diffusion Method. PaperSPE 84340 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Denver, 5-8 October. DOI: 10.2118/84340-MS.
Smith, D.M. and Williams, F.L. 1984. Diffusional Effects in the Recoveryof Methane From Coalbeds. SPEJ 24 (5): 529-535. SPE-10821-PA.DOI: 10.2118/10821-PA.
Somerton, W.H. 1975. Effect of stress on permeability of coal.International J. of Rock Mechanics Mining Science and GeologicalAbstracts 12: 129-145.
Stefanska, C.G. 1990. Influence of carbon dioxide and methane on changes ofsorption, and dilatometric properties of bituminous coals. ArchiwumGornictwa 35: 105-113.
Stevenson, M.D. 1997. Multicomponent Gas Adsorption on Coal at In-SituConditions. PhD dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Stevenson, M.D., Pinczewski, W.V., Somers, M.L., and Bagio, S.E. 1991. Adsorption/Desorption ofMulticomponent Gas Mixture at In-Seam Condition. Paper SPE 23026 presentedat the SPE Asia-Pacific Conference, Perth, Australia, 4-7 November. DOI:10.2118/23026-MS.
Unsworth, J.F., Fowler, C.S., and Jones, L.F. 1988. Moisture in Coal: 2.Maceral Effects on Pore Structure. Fuel 68 (1): 18-26.
Vrentas, J.S., Duda, J.L., Ju, S.T., and Ni, N.-W. 1984. Oscillatorydiffusion experiments for solvent diffusion in polymer films. J. of MembraneScience 18: 161-175.
Wang, F.Y. and Bhatia, S.K. 2001. A generalised dynamic model for charparticle gasification with structure evolution and peripheral fragmentation.Chemical Engineering Science 56 (12): 3683-3697.
Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J. 1963. The Behavior of Naturally FracturedReservoirs. SPEJ 3 (3): 245-255. SPE-426-PA. DOI:10.2118/426-PA.
Wolf, K.-H., Barzandji, O.H., Bruining, H., and Ephraim, R. 2003. CO2Injection for Enhanced CH4 Production from Coal Seams: Laboratory Experimentsand Simulations. Proc.of Petrotech. New Delhi, India.
Yale, P.D. 1984. Network modelling of flow, storage and deformation inporous rock. PhD dissertation, Stanford U., Stanford, California.
Zhu, J., Jessen, K., Anthony, R.K., and Franklin, M.O.J. 2002. Recovery of Coalbed Methane by GasInjection. Paper SPE 75255 presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil RecoverySymposium, Tulsa, 13-17 April. DOI: 10. 2118/75255-MS.