Sanding: A Rigorous Examination of the Interplay Between Drawdown, Depletion, Start-Up Frequency and Water Cut
- Hans H. Vaziri (BP America) | Robert D. Allam (BP Exploration Co. Ltd.) | Gordon A. Kidd (BP Exploration) | Clive L. Bennett (BP plc) | Trevor D. Grose (BP Amoco) | Peter A. Robinson (BP Exploration) | Jeremy Malyn (BP plc)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 430 - 440
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.6.9 Production Forecasting, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 1.14 Casing and Cementing, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 3.3 Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring, 2.4.5 Gravel pack design & evaluation, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 2 Well Completion, 2.2.2 Perforating, 3.2.5 Produced Sand / Solids Management and Control, 1.8 Formation Damage, 2.4.6 Frac and Pack, 4.5 Offshore Facilities and Subsea Systems, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 4.3.4 Scale
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,453 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Factors and mechanisms leading to sanding are described within an integrated-rock and soil-mechanics framework. While the conventional sanding models generally consider a single-mechanism for sanding, namely the critical depletion resulting in rock disaggregation, the proposed approach considers the interplay of several mechanisms that can lead to the rock breakup and sand transport. One important difference is that rock disaggregation is not seen to represent the onset of sanding, because the sand mass can offer significant resistance from frictional properties, interlocking of sand grains, and arching. The approach presented here can be used to explain why sanding in the field tends to be episodic, and how depletion, which is a major factor in rock breakup, can be highly effective in holding broken-up sand grains together and, in fact, become a sand-stabilizing agent.
The proposed approach is used in discussing sanding at several wells in two different fields. These wells have been in production for several years and show that sanding cannot be linked to just one unique mechanism (e.g., depletion). However, once all mechanisms for sanding are incorporated, a more consistent analysis can be used by completion and production engineers to make more objective and pragmatic decisions in managing sanding while maximizing production over the life of the well.
While a great deal of work has been done in the general area of sand production (Veeken et al. 1991; Weingarten and Perkins 1995; Risnes et al. 1982; Morita 1994; Sanfilippo et al. 1995, 1997; Tronvoll and Halleck 1994; Tronvoll et al. 1997; Papamichos and Malmanger 1999; Morita and Boyd 1991; Bradford and Cook 1994; Van den Hoek et al. 1996; Vardoulakis and Papanastasious 1988; Willson 1996; Morita et al. 1996), most of the approaches used for practical applications are on based on the assumption that the onset of sand production is represented by the failure of the perforation-tunnel wall, which is generally determined using the thick-wall-cylinder (TWC) strength test. Such an approach is well suited to predicting the maximum depletion in relatively competent rocks, particularly if they have brittle behavior. But what about weak-to-totally unconsolidated rocks having an almost-zero TWC strength, yet remaining stable under reasonably high drawdown (DD) and, in fact, showing an increase in stability with depletion (field examples presented later)? How should the DD strategy in terms of rate of change and magnitude be adjusted as the rock undergoes a structural change from a cemented formation to a totally disaggregated sand mass?
Strictly speaking, the conventional techniques for sanding prediction, which are based on Geertsma's (1985) equations, disclose the increase in confining pressure required to fail a perforation tunnel or the wellbore cavity. In practice, the approach provides an indication of the depletion that can be sustained before the weakest perforation tunnel undergoes a significant deformation, leading to its disaggregation (normally referred to as the critical bottomhole reservoir pressure). This single-case-solution scenario, which is not coupled with fluid flow, does not provide options to make objective assessment of the risks at different stages in the well's life and the most effective contingencies to mitigate such risks [see Vaziri et al. (2002a) for a full discussion of the past work in this area, formulations used, and some of the limitations). For the base case of no active sand control, operators would like to know, at any stage, how much sand will be produced (rate and duration) for a given production strategy (e.g., maximum DD, and rate of bean-up/shutdown frequency) and other changes in the reservoir conditions, such as water cut (WC). By better understanding the roles of multiple variables, one is enabled to choose the optimal completion method over the life of the well. For a more comprehensive discussion of these issues see Vaziri (2004).
|File Size||5 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Bradford, I.D.R. and Cook, J.M. 1994. A Semi-Analytic Elastoplastic Modelfor Wellbore Stability With Applications to Sanding. Paper SPE 28070presented at the SPE Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Delft, TheNetherlands, 29-31 August. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28070-MS.
Geertsma, J. 1985. SomeRock-Mechanical Aspects of Oil and Gas Well Completions. SPEJ25 (6): 848-856. SPE-8073-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8073-PA.
Geilikman, M.B., Dria, D.E., Stewart, D.R., and Wong, G.K. 2005. Bean-Up Guidelines for Sand-ControlCompletions. Paper SPE 95870 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference, Dallas, 9-12 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/95870-MS.
Morita, N. 1994. Field andLaboratory Verifications of Sand-Production Prediction Models. SPEDC9 (4): 227-235. SPE-27341-PA.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/27341-PA.
Morita, N. and Boyd, P.A. 1991. Typical Sand Production Problems:Case Studies and Strategies for Sand Control. Paper SPE 22739 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 6-9 October.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22739-MS.
Morita, N., Burton, B., and Davis, E. 1996. Fracturing, Frac-Packing andFormation Failure Control: Can Screenless Completions Prevent SandProduction? Paper SPE 36457 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Denver, 6-9 October.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36457-MS.
Papamichos, E. and Malmanger, E.M. 1999. A Sand Erosion Model for VolumetricSand Predictions in a North Sea Reservoir. Paper SPE 54007 presented at theSPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Caracas,21-23 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/54007-MS.
Risnes, R., Bratli, R.K., and Horsrud, P. 1982. Sand Stresses Around a Wellbore.SPEJ 22 (6): 883-898. SPE-9650-PA.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/9650-PA.
Sanfilippo, F., Brignoli, M., Giacca, D., and Santarelli, F.J. 1997. Sand Production: From Prediction toManagement. Paper SPE 38185 presented at the SPE European Formation DamageConference, The Hague, 2-3 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38185-MS.
Sanfilippo, F., Ripa, G., Moricca, G., and Santarelli, F.J. 1995. ExtensiveField Testing of Sand Production Prediction Methodologies. Paper presented atthe Intl. Workshop on Sand Control, Caracas, 26-28 July.
Tronvoll, J. and Halleck, P.M. 1994. Observations of Sand Production andPerforation Cleanup in a Weak Sandstone. Paper SPE 28071 presented at SPERock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands, 29-31 August.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28071-MS.
Tronvoll, J., Papamichos, E., Skjaerstein, A., and Sanfilippo, F. 1997. Sand Production in UltraweakSandstones: Is Sand Control Absolutely Necessary? Paper SPE 39042presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum EngineeringConference, Rio de Janiero, 30 August-3 September.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/39042-MS.
Van den Hoek, P.J., Herlogh, G.M.M., Kooijman, A.P., de Bree, P., Kenter,C.J., and Papamichos, E. 1996. ANew Concept of Sand Production Prediction: Theory and LaboratoryExperiments. Paper SPE 36418 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Denver, 6-9 October.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36418-MS.
Vardoulakis, I. and Papanastasious, P.C. 1988. Bifurcation Analysis of DeepBoreholes I: Surface Instabilities. Intl. J. Num. Analy. Methods inGeomechanics 12 (4): 379-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610120404.
Vaziri, H. 2004. Integrated Soil and Rock Mechanics: A Major Step TowardsConsistent and Improved Sand Production Prediction and Management. PaperARMA/NARMS 04-461presented at the North America Rock Mechanics Symposium,GulfRocks04, Houston, 7-9 June.
Vaziri, H. and Byrne, P.M. 1990. Analysis of Stress, Flow and StabilityAround Wellbores. Geotechnique 40 (1): 63-77.
Vaziri, H. and Xiao, Y. 2003. Numerical Evaluation of GeomechanicalParameters Affecting Productivity Index in Weak Rock Formations, Part 1:Theoretical Model. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 42 (12): 27-31.
Vaziri, H., Xiao, Y., and Palmer, I. 2002a. Assessment of Several Sand PredictionModels With Particular Reference to HP/HT Wells. Paper SPE/ISRM 78235presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, 20-23October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/78235-MS.
Vaziri, H., Barree, B., Xiao, Y., Palmer, I., and Kutas, M. 2002b. What is the Magic of Water inProducing Sand? Paper SPE 77683 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, San Antonio, 29 September-2 October.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/77683-MS.
Vaziri, H., Wang, X., and Palmer, I. 1997. Well-bore CompletionTechnique and Geotechnical Parameters Influencing Gas Production. CanadianGeotechnical J. 34 (1): 87-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cgj-34-1-87.
Vaziri, H.H. 1996. Theory and Application of a Fully CoupledThermo-Hydro-Mechanical Reservoir Simulator. Intl. J. of Computers andStructures 61 (1): 131-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00409-2.
Veeken, C.A.M., Davies, D.R., Kenter, C.J., and Kooijman, A.P. 1991.Sand Production Prediction Review:Developing an Integrated Approach. Paper SPE 22792 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 6-9 October.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22792-MS.
Weingarten, J.S. and Perkins, T.K. 1995. Prediction of Sand Production in GasWells: Methods and Gulf of Mexico Case Studies. JPT 47 (7):596-600. SPE-24797-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24797-PA.
Willson, S.M. 1996. Improved Sand Production Prediction Methods FromBack—Analysis of SNS Sand Production Data. Report No. XTP/POB/020/96. BP.