The Effect of Wettability and Pore Geometry on Foamed-Gel-Blockage Performance
- Laura Beatriz Romero-Zeron (U. of New Brunswick) | Apostolos Kantzas (U. of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- April 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 150 - 163
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.4 Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation, 1.8 Formation Damage, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 1.6 Drilling Operations
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,017 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Excessive gas and/or water production is a common problem encountered throughout the lifetime of oil-producing wells. High-producing gas/oil or water/oil ratios are normally responsible for both rapid productivity decline and increased operating costs caused by gas or water processing. The result is often a premature shut-in of wells because production has become uneconomical. Foamed gels have been used as selective barriers to counteract disproportionate gas/oil and/or water/oil ratios in oil production. However, research on the effects of critical parameters such as wettability of the porous medium and pore geometry on foamed-gel-blockage performance remains incomplete.
In this work, microscale experiments, which involve the magnified observation of flowing and trapped foamed gel in etched-glass micromodels, were performed. The purpose of this research is to provide new insights into the sensitivity of foamed-gel-blockage performance as a function of porous-media wettability (strongly water-wet or strongly oil-wet systems) and pore geometry.
The experimental results indicate that foamed gels presented higher blocking efficiency in strongly oil-wet systems than in strongly water-wet systems. Under these experimental conditions, foamed gels exhibited higher blocking efficiency at lower pore-body-/pore-throat-size aspect ratios. The plugging treatment exhibited stability after subsequent steps of gas and brine injection. Ultimately, these results indicate that the combination of foam and gel systems has technical advantages that make foamed gels superior mobility-control and plugging agents.
In porous media, foam is a gas (or immiscible liquid) dispersed in a second interconnected liquid partially comprising thin, surfactant-stabilized films called lamellae (Morrow 1990). The surfactant used to impart stability to the mixture concentrates at the gas/liquid interface to reduce interfacial tension and form stable lamellae. Foams are structured, two-phase fluids that are compressible in nature (Schramm 1994). Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of a 2D slice of a general foam system. The bulk liquid is at the bottom of the foam structure, and the gas phase is at the upper side. The gas phase is separated from the thin liquid film by a 2D interface, or lamella, which is defined as the region that encompasses the thin film, the two interfaces on either side of the thin film, and part of the junction to other lamellae. The connection of three lamellae, at an angle of 120°, is referred to as the plateau border (Schramm 1994; Bernard and Jacobs 1965).
Foams have been of great practical interest because of their widespread occurrence and their important properties. In the oil and gas sector, foams may be applied or encountered at all stages in the petroleum recovery and processing industry, such as in oilwell drilling, reservoir injection, oilwell production, and process-plant foams (Schramm 1994).
The usage of foams for enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) processes can be classified into two main groups: foams for mobility control or gas-injection-well treatments and gas-blocking foams for oil-production-well treatments. When foams are used for mobility control, the most important parameter is the viscous performance of the foam, while in the case of gas-blocking foams, the fundamental issue is their capability to divert unwanted fluids (Schramm 1994). In these applications, the foam is usually prepared in situ by coinjection of gas and surfactant solution. As the mixture of gas and surfactant solution flows through the porous rock, rapid shear strain occurs and leads quite naturally to the generation and stretching of bubbles within the pores. The texture of the foam (that is, the size of the bubbles) depends mainly on the size of the pores. Similarly, the number of bubbles that exist will be determined by the balance between the rate of generation of lamellae and the rate of decay. The rate of generation depends on pore sizes and porous-media complexities, and it should be roughly proportional to the flow rate. The rate of decay is the result of several simultaneous processes such as lamellae rupture and coalescence that cause bubbles' breakdown (Schramm 1994).
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Aizad, T. and Okandan, E. 1977. Flow Equation for Foam Flowing ThroughPorous Media and Its Application as a Secondary Recovery Fluid. Paper SPE6599 presented at the SPE International Oilfield and Geothermal ChemistrySymposium, San Diego, California, 27-29 June. DOI: 10.2118/6599-MS.
Ali, J., Burley, W., and Nutt, C.W. 1985.Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery from Sand Packs. Chem. Eng. Res. Des.63 (2): 101-111.
Al-Kindi, A. and Langedijk, R. 2002. Development Modeling of the SaihNihayda Gas-Condensate Field. Paper SPE 75523 presented at the SPE GasTechnology Symposium, Calgary, 30 April-2 May. DOI:10.2118/75523-MS.
Bernard, G.G. 1963. Effect of Foam onRecovery of Oil by Gas-Drive. Producers Monthly 27(1):18-21.
Bernard, G.G. and Jacobs, W.L. 1965. Effect of Foam on Trapped GasSaturation and on Permeability of Porous Media to Water. SPEJ5 (4): 295-300; Trans., AIME, 234. SPE-1204-PA. DOI:10.2118/1204-PA.
Casteel, J.F. and Djabbarah, N.F. 1988.Sweep Improvement inCO2 Flooding by Use of Foaming Agents. SPERE 3(4): 1186-1192. SPE-14392-PA. DOI: 10.2118/14392-PA.
Craft, B.C. and Hawkins, M. 1991.Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
de Vries, A.S. and Wit, K. 1990. Rheology of Gas/Water Foam in theQuality Range Relevant to Steam Foam. SPERE 5 (2): 185-192.SPE-18075-PA. DOI: 10.2118/18075-PA.
Dellinger, S.E., Patton, J.T., andHolbrook, S.T. 1984. CO2Mobility Control. SPEJ 24 (2): 191-196. SPE-9808-PA. DOI:10.2118/9808-PA.
Fried, A.N. 1961. The Foam-Drive Processfor Increasing the Recovery of Oil. Report of Investigations, 5866. Washington,DC: USBM.
Heller, J.P., Lien, C.L., andKuntamukkula, M.S. 1985. FoamlikeDispersions for Mobility Control in CO2 Floods. SPEJ25 (4): 603-613. SPE-11233-PA. DOI: 10.2118/11233-PA.
Kate, J.M. and Gokhale, C.S. 2006. ASimple Method to Estimate Complete Pore Size Distribution of Rocks.Engineering Geology 84 (1-2): 48-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.009.
Lee, H.O. and Heller, J.P. 1990. Laboratory Measurements ofCO2-Foam Mobility. SPERE 5 (2): 193-197.SPE-17363-PA. DOI: 10.2118/17363-PA.
Lescure, B.M. and Claridge, E.L. 1986. CO2 Foam Flooding vs. RockWettability. Paper SPE 15445 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 5-8 October. DOI:10.2118/15445-MS.
Minssieux, L. 1974. Oil Displacement by Foams in Relationto Their Physical Properties in Porous Media. JPT 26 (1):100-108; Trans., AIME, 257. SPE-3991-PA. DOI:10.2118/3991-PA.
Morrow, N. ed. 1990. InterfacialPhenomena in Petroleum Recovery. New York City: Marcel Dekker.
Pierce. 2003. AquaSil TMSiliconizing Agent. Material Safety Data Sheet, MSDS # 442, Rockford,Illinois.
Romero, L. and Kantzas, A. 2003. PoreLevel Displacement Mechanisms During Foam Flooding. Paper 2003-128 presented atthe Petroleum Society's Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary,10-12 June.
Sagar, N. and Castanier, L.M. 1997.Oil-Foam Interactions in a Micromodel. SUPRI TR-110 Report, Contract No.DE-FG22-96BC14994. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Energy.
Sanchez, J.M. and Hazlett, R.D. 1992. Foam Flow Through an Oil-Wet PorousMedium: A Laboratory Study. SPERE 7 (1): 91-97. SPE-19687-PA.DOI: 10.2118/19687-PA.
Schramm, L. ed. 1994. Foams:Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. Washington, DC:American Chemical Society.
Schramm, L. ed. 2000. Emulsions andFoams in the Petroleum Industry. Washington, DC: Cambridge UniversityPress.
Seright, R.S. 1988. Placement of Gels To Modify InjectionProfiles. Paper SPE 17332 presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil RecoverySymposium, Tulsa, 16-21 April. DOI: 10.2118/17332-MS.
Sydansk, R.D. 1990. A Newly Developed Chromium(III) GelTechnology. SPERE 5 (3): 346-352. SPE-19308-PA. DOI:10.2118/19308-PA.
Wassmuth, F.R., Hodgins, L.H., Schramm,L.L., and Kutay, S.M. 2000. Screening and Coreflood Testing ofGel Foams To Control Excessive Gas Production in Oil Wells. Paper SPE 59283presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3-5 April.DOI: 10.2118/59283-MS.
Willhite, G.P. 1986.Waterflooding. Textbook Series, SPE, Richardson, Texas3.
Zhang, Y., Yue, X., Dong, J., and Yu, L.2000. New and Effective FoamFlooding to Recover Oil in Heterogeneous Reservoir. Paper SPE 59367presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3-5 April.DOI: 10.2118/59367-MS.