Steady-State Flow Behavior of CO2 Foam
- Jisung Kim (U. of Texas at Austin) | Yan Dong (U. of Texas at Austin) | William R. Rossen (U. of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- December 2005
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 405 - 415
- 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.6.5 Tracers, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 1.8 Formation Damage, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 3.2.4 Acidising, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 1,154 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Foams can improve oil recovery by reducing gas mobility and the effects ofreservoir heterogeneity. Numerous studies report that foam flow in porous mediacomprises two regimes. In the "high-quality regime," pressure gradient isnearly independent of gas superficial velocity. In the "low-quality regime,"pressure gradient is nearly independent of liquid superficial velocity.Previous published data from CO2 foam studies lie either in the high- orlow-quality regime, but no single study shows both regimes. Delineating the twofoam-flow regimes is essential to modeling and predicting the behavior of CO2foam in petroleum applications.
Experiments were performed with a sandpack and fired Berea and Boisesandstone cores at a backpressure of 1500 or 2000 psig, above and below thecritical temperature of CO2. The data from the sandpack, Berea, and Boisesandstone experiments at room temperature do not show the two conventionalfoam-flow regimes. Instead, these experiments find a third regime evidentlyrelated to the low-quality regime. This same behavior was observed in thesandpack above the critical temperature of CO2. In this new regime, pressuregradient decreases with increasing liquid superficial velocity at constant gassuperficial velocity. The Boise sandstone experiment above the criticaltemperature of CO2 did find the two conventional foam-flow regimes, however. Nosingle experimental factor appears to explain the difference in results.
Earlier theoretical work of Hirasaki and Lawson and de Vries and Wit canpartially explain the flow regime seen in our study. A model combining abundle-of-tubes approach with the effective-viscosity function of Hirasaki andLawson predicts the behavior in this new regime.
In producing the oil from a reservoir, on average approximately two-thirdsof oil originally in place is left in the reservoir at the end ofwaterflooding. The goal of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is to increase thefraction of oil recovered from a reservoir. Injecting steam, carbon dioxide(CO2), and field gas have been the most productive EOR methods. CO2 is injectedinto oil reservoirs because CO2 dissolves into oil easily, reduces oilviscosity, and can extract the light components of crude oil at sufficientlyhigh pressure, and CO2 can become miscible with oil at lower pressure thanother gases. The CO2 process can be highly effective within rock strata whereit contacts oil.
However, actual oil recovery with CO2 in the field is much lower, because ofpoor sweep efficiency: the gas contacts and sweeps only a small portion of oilin the reservoir. Poor sweep efficiency is caused by the low viscosity anddensity of CO2 and by reservoir heterogeneity. These effects cause early gasbreakthrough and low sweep efficiency. Foam can improve the sweep efficiency ofthe injected gas by reducing gas mobility and the effects of reservoirheterogeneity. Foams are also used in matrix acid well-stimulation treatmentsand environmental remediation.
Field trials of CO2 foam showed some success. A number of foam EOR fieldtrials with other miscible or near-miscible gases have been carried out aswell.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||11|
1. Lake, L.W.: Enhanced Oil Recovery, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NewJersey (1989).
2. Moritis, G.: "EOR Continues to Unlock Oil Resources," Oil Gas J. (12April 2004) 45.
3. Abdassah, D., Siregar, S., and Kristanto, D.: "The Potential of Carbon Dioxide GasInjection Application in Improving Oil Recovery," paper SPE 64730 presentedat the 2000 SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing,7-10 November .
4. Heller, J.P.: "CO2 Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery," Foams: Fundamentalsand Applications in the Petroleum Industry, L.L. Schramm (ed.), AmericanChemical Society, Washington D.C. (1994) 201-234.
5. Gdanski, R.D.: "Experience and Research Show Best Designs forFoam-Diverted Acidizing," Oil and Gas Journal (6 September 1993) 85.
6. Robert, J.A. and Mack, M.G.: "Foam Diversion Modeling andSimulation," SPEPF (May 1997) 123.
7. Rossen, W.R. and Wang, M.-W.: "Modeling Foams for AcidDiversion," SPEJ (June 1999) 92.
8. Hirasaki, G.J. et al.: "Field Demonstration of the Surfactant/FoamProcess for Remediation of a Heterogeneous Aquifer Contaminated With DNAPL,"NAPL Removal: Surfactants, Foams, and Microemulsions, S. Fiorenza et al.(eds.), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida (2000).
9. Jonas, T.M., Chou, S.I., and Vasicek, S.L.: "Evaluation of a CO2 Foam Field Trial:Rangely Weber Sand Unit," paper SPE 20468 presented at the 1990 SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 23-26 September.
10. Stephenson, D.J., Graham, A.G., and Luhning, R.W.: "Mobility Control Experience in theJoffre Viking Miscible CO2 Flood," SPERE (August 1993) 183; Trans., AIME,295.
11. Chou, S.I. et al.: "CO2Foam Field Trial at North Ward-Estes," paper SPE 24643 presented at the1992 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, D.C., 5-7October.
12. Heller, J.P. and Watts, R.J.: "Two Fields Tests of CO2-Foam," paperpresented at the 1993 DOE/NIPER Symposium on Field Application of Foams for OilProduction, Bakersfield, California, 11-12 February.
13. Hoefner, M.L. and Evans, E.M.: "CO2 Foam: Results From FourDevelopmental Field Trials," SPEREE (November 1995) 273.
14. Martin, F.D., Stevens, J.E., and Harpole, K.J.: "CO2-Foam Field Test at the EastVacuum Grayburg/San Andres Unit," SPEREE (November 1995) 266.
15. Chad, J., Matsalla, P., and Novosad, J.J.: "Foam Forming Surfactants inPembina/Ostracod ‘G' Pool," paper presented at the 1988 Annual TechnicalMeeting of the Petroleum Society of CIM, Calgary, Alberta, 12-16 June.
16. Liu, P.C. and Besserer, G.J.: "Application of Foam Injection inTriassic Pool, Canada: Laboratory and Field Test Results," paper SPE 18080presented at the 1988 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 2-5October.
17. Kuehne, D.L. et al.: "Design and Evaluation of aNitrogen-Foam Field Trial," JPT (April 1990) 504.
18. Krause, R.E. et al.: "FoamTreatment of Producing Wells to Increase Oil Production at Prudhoe Bay ,"paper SPE 24191 presented at the 1992 SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil RecoverySymposium, Tulsa, 22-24 April.
19. Skauge, A. et al.: "Foam-Assisted WAG: Experience fromthe Snorre Field," paper SPE 75157 presented at the 2002 SPE/DOE ImprovedOil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 13-17 April.
20. Osterloh, W.T. and Jante, M.J. Jr.: "Effects of Gas and Liquid Velocity onSteady-State Foam Flow at High Temperature," SPE 24179 presented at the1992 SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 22-24 April.
21. Khatib, Z.I., Hirasaki, G.J., and Falls, A.H.: "Effects of Capillary Pressure onCoalescence and Phase Mobilities in Foams Flowing Through Porous Media,"SPERE (August 1988) 919.
22. Ettinger, R.A. and Radke, C.J.: "Influence of Texture on Steady FoamFlow in Berea Sandstone," SPERE (February 1992) 83.
23. Rossen, W.R. and Zhou, Z.H.: "Modeling Foam Mobility at the LimitingCapillary Pressure," SPE Advanced Technology Series (1995) 3, No. 1, 146.
24. Alvarez, J.M., Rivas, H.J., and Rossen W.R.: "Unified Model for Steady-State FoamBehavior at High and Low Foam Qualities ," SPEJ (September 2001) 325.
25. Rong, J.G.: "Experimental Evaluation of Foam in EnvironmentalRemediation," PhD dissertation, U. of Texas at Austin (2002).
26. de Vries, A.S. and Wit, K.: "Rheology of Gas/Water Foam in theQuality Range Relevant to Steam Foam," SPERE (May 1990) 185.
27. Romero, C., Alvarez, J.M., and Müller, A.J.: "Micromodel Studies ofPolymer-Enhanced Foam Flow Through Porous Media," paper SPE 75179 presentedat the 2002 SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 13-17 April.
28. Lee, H.O. and Heller, J.P.: "Laboratory Measurements of CO2-FoamMobility," SPERE (May 1990) 193.
29. Lee, H.O. and Heller, J.P.: "Mobility of CO2 and Surfactant Adsorptionin Porous Rocks," Oil-Field Chemistry Enhanced Recovery and ProductionStimulation, J.K. Borchardt and T.F. Yen (eds.), American Chemical Society,Washington D.C. (1989).
30. Heller, J.P., Lien, C.L., and Kuntamukkula, M.S.: "Foamlike Dispersions for MobilityControl in CO2 Floods," SPEJ (August 1985) 603.
31. Yaghoobi, H.: "LaboratoryInvestigation of Parameters Affecting CO2-Foam Mobility in Sandstone atReservoir Conditions," paper SPE 29168 presented at the 1994 SPE EasternRegional Meeting, Charleston, West Virginia, 8-10 November.
32. Chang, S.-H. and Grigg, R.B.: "Effects of Foam Quality and Flow Rateon CO2-Foam Behavior at Reservoir Temperature and Pressure," SPEREE (June1999) 248.
33. Kim, J.S., Dong., Y., and Rossen, W.R.: "Steady-State Flow Behavior of CO2Foam," paper SPE 89351 presented at the 2004 SPE/DOE Symposium on ImprovedOil Recovery, Tulsa, 17-21 April.
34. Dong, Y.: "Experimental Study of CO2 Foam Flow in Porous Media andApplication and Fractional-Flow Method to Foam Flow," MS thesis, U. of Texas atAustin (2001).
35. Kim, J.S.: "Experimental Study of Dense CO2 Foam Flow Behavior in PorousMedia at Elevated Pressure," MS thesis, U. of Texas at Austin (2003).
36. Hill, A.D.: Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements,Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas (1990).
37. Rossen, W.R.: "Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery," Foams: Theory,Measurement and Applications, R.K Prud'homme and S.A. Khan (eds.), MarcelDekker, Inc., New York City (1996) 413-464.
38. Bernard, G.G., Holm, L.W., and Jacobs, W.L.: "Effect of Foam on Trapped GasSaturation and on Permeability of Porous Media to Water," SPEJ (December1965) 295; Trans., AIME, 234.
39. Sanchez, J.M., Schechter, R.S., and Monsalve, A.: "The Effect of Trace Quantities ofSurfactants on Nitrogen/Water Relative Permeabilities," paper SPE 15446presented at the 1986 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans,5-8 October.
40. Huh, D.G. and Handy, L.L.: "Comparison of Steady- andUnsteady-State Flow of Gas and Foaming Solution in Porous Media," SPERE(February 1989) 77.
41. Hirasaki, G.J. and Lawson, J.B.: "Mechanisms of Foam Flow in PorousMedia: Apparent Viscosity in Smooth Capillaries," SPEJ (April 1985)176.
42. Falls, A.H., Musters, J.J., and Ratulowski, J.: "The Apparent Viscosity of Foams inHomogeneous Bead Packs," SPERE (May 1989) 155.
43. Kovscek, A.R. and Radke, C.J.: "Fundamentals of Foam Transport in PorousMedia," Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry, L.L.Schramm (ed.), American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. (1994) 115-163.
44. Friedmann, F., Chen, W.H., and Gauglitz, P.A.: "Experimental and Simulation Study ofHigh-Temperature Foam Displacement in Porous Media," SPERE (February 1991)37; Trans., AIME, 291.
45. Radke, C.J. and Gillis, J.V.: "A Dual Gas Tracer Technique forDetermining Trapped Gas Saturation During Steady Foam Flow in PorousMedia," paper SPE 20519 presented at the 1990 SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 23-26 September.
46. Nguyen, Q.P.: "Dynamics of Foam in Porous Media," PhD dissertation,Delft U. of Technology, The Netherlands (2004).
47. Tang, G.-Q. and Kovscek, A.R.: "Measurement and Theory of GasTrapping in Porous Media During Steady-State Foam Flow," paper SPE 90142presented at the 2004 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston,26-29 September.
48. Nguyen, Q.P. et al.: "Determination of Gas Trapping WithFoam Using X-Ray CT and Effluent Analysis ," paper SPE 94764 prepared forpresentation at the 2005 SPE European Formation Damage Conference,Scheveningen, The Netherlands, 25-27 May.
49. Wellington, S.L. and Vinegar, H.J.: "CT Studies of Surfactant-Induced CO2Mobility Control," paper SPE 14393 presented at the 1985 SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, 22-26 September.
50. Lee, H.O., Heller, J.P., and Hoefer, A.M.W.: "Change in Apparent Viscosity of CO2Foam With Rock Permeability," SPERE (November 1991) 421; Trans., AIME,291.
51. Falls, A.H. et al.: "Development of a Mechanistic FoamSimulator: The Population Balance and Generation by Snap-Off," SPERE(August 1988), 884.
52. Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., and Lightfoot, E.N.: Transport Phenomena,first edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York City (1960).
53. Cheng, L. et al.: "Simulating Foam Processes at High andLow Foam Qualities," paper SPE 59287 presented at the 2000 SPE/DOE ImprovedOil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3-5 April.
54. Xu, Q., and Rossen, W.R.: "Effective Viscosity of Foam in PeriodicallyConstricted Tubes," Colloids Surfaces A:Physicochem Eng. Aspects (2003)216, 175.