Methane Pressure-Cycling Process With Horizontal Wells for Thin Heavy-Oil Reservoirs
- Mingzhe Dong (U. of Regina) | S.-S. Sam Huang (Saskatchewan Research Council) | Keith Hutchence (Saskatchewan Research Council)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- April 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 154 - 164
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 3.2.5 Produced Sand / Solids Management and Control, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 4.3.4 Scale, 6.5.3 Waste Management, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 5.5.8 History Matching, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 845 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
The methane pressure-cycling (MPC) process is an enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) scheme intended for application in some heavy-oil reservoirs after termination of either primary or waterflood production. The essence of the process is the restoration of the solution-gas-drive mechanism. The restoration is accomplished by reinjecting an appropriate amount of solution gas (mainly methane) and then repressuring the gas back into solution by injecting water until approximate original reservoir pressure is reached. This, aside from the replacement of produced oil by water, recreates the primary-production conditions. This novel recovery technique is being developed to target the considerable portion of heavy-oil resources located in thin reservoirs. Primary and secondary methods have managed to recover at best 10% of the initial oil in place (IOIP). Heat losses to overburden and underburden or bottomwater zones make thermal methods unsuitable for thin reservoirs.
Sandpack-flood tests in 30.5-cm (length) x 5.0-cm (diameter) sandpacks were carried out for oils with a range of dead-oil viscosities from 1700 to 5400 mPa.s. The results showed that the pressure-cycling process could create a favorable condition for recharged gas to contact the remaining oil in reservoirs. This restores the situation whereby substantial amounts of gas are in solution for further "primary?? production. The effects on the efficiency of the MPC process of cycle termination strategy, oil viscosity, and mobile-water saturation were investigated. Simulations were conducted to investigate the MPC process in three heavy-oil reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada. The effects on the process of infill wells, oil viscosity, gas-injection rate, and the presence of wormholes in reservoirs were studied.
Heavy oil in thick-pay reservoirs (i.e., >10 m) is commonly produced with thermal-recovery methods. These methods (steam injection and its variants) are generally not suitable for thin reservoirs because of heat losses to overburden and underburden or bottomwater zones (Fairfield and White 1982; Dyer et al. 1994). The world's large untapped oil resource remaining after recovery by conventional technology offers potential for exploitation by a suitably developed tertiary-recovery technique. For example, Saskatchewan accounts for 62% of Canada's total heavy-oil resources (Bowers and Drummond 1997), including 1.7 billion m3 of proved reserves and 3.7 billion m3 of probable reserves (Saskatchewan Energy and Mines 1998). Of the province's proven initial heavy oil in place, 97% is contained in reservoirs where the pay zone is less than 10 m, and 55% in reservoirs with a pay zone less than 5 m thick (Huang et al. 1987; Srivastava et al. 1993). Primary and secondary methods combined recover, on average, only about 7% of the proven IOIP (Saskatchewan Energy and Mines 1998). The incentive is strong for the development of appropriate EOR techniques that will maximize the recovery potential of and profitability from these thin heavy-oil reservoirs.
Extensive literature is available on CO2, flue gas, and produced-gas injection for heavy-oil recovery, including slug displacement, water alternating gas (WAG), and cyclic (huff ‘n' puff) processes (Huang et al. 1987; Srivastava et al. 1993, 1994, 1999; Srivastava and Huang 1997; Ma and Youngren 1994; Issever et al. 1993; Olenick et al. 1992). A comparative study of the oil-recovery behavior for a 14.1°API heavy oil with different injection gases (CO2, flue gas, and produced gas) showed that CO2 was the best-suited gas for EOR of heavy oils (Srivastava et al. 1999). Cyclic CO2 injection for heavy-oil recovery was tested in the field, and field case histories indicated that oil production was enhanced (Olenick et al. 1992). However, natural CO2 sources are not available to most oil reservoirs. The cost of CO2 capture from flue gas and other sources may range from U.S. $25 to $70/ton (Padamsey and Railton 1993). Produced gas is available in large quantities at a much lower cost. With this consideration, produced gas can be an economically effective agent for heavy-oil recovery by the cyclic-injection process.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Bowers, B. and Drummond, K.. 1997. Conventional Crude Oil Resources of theWestern Canadian Sedimentary Basin. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 36(2):56-63.
Dyer, S.B., Huang, S.S., Farouq Ali, S.M., and Jha, K.N. 1994. PhaseBehaviour and Scaled Model Studies of Prototype Saskatchewan Heavy Oils withCarbon Dioxide. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 33(8):42-48.
Fairfield, W.H. and White, P.D. 1982. Lloydminster Fireflood Performance,Modifications Promise Good Recoveries. Oil & Gas J. 80(6):101-102.
Huang, S.S., Pappas, E.S., and Jha, K.N. 1987. The Carbon Dioxide RecoveryProcess and Its Potential for Saskatchewan Reservoirs. Paper No. 1 presented atthe Second Petroleum Conference of the South Saskatchewan Section, PetroleumSoc. of CIM, Regina, 6-8 October.
Issever, K., Pamir, A.N., and Tirek, A. 1993. Performance of a Heavy-Oil FieldUnder CO2 Injection, Bati Raman, Turkey. SPERE8(4):256-260; Trans., AIME, 295. SPE-20883-PA.
Ma, T.D. and Youngren, G.K. 1994. Performance of ImmiscibleWater-Alternating-Gas (WAG) Injection at Kuparuk River Unit, North Slope,Alaska.Paper SPE 28602 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 25-28 September.
Olenick, S., Schroeder, F.A., Haines, H.K., and Monger-McClure, T.G. 1992.Cyclic CO2 Injection for Heavy-OilRecovery in Halfmoon Field: Laboratory Evaluation and PilotPerformance.Paper SPE 24645 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Washington, DC, 4-7 October.
Padamsey, R. and Railton, J. 1993. CO2 Capture and Use for EOR in WesternCanada, 4. Economic Results and Conclusions. Presented at the I.E.A. CarbonDioxide Disposal Symposium, U. of Oxford, U.K. (29-31 March).
Saskatchewan Energy and Mines. 1998. Reservoir Annual, Regina, Saskatchewan,Canada.
Srivastava, R.K. and Huang, S.S. 1997. A Laboratory Evaluation of SuitableOperating Strategies for Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery by Gas Injection. J.Cdn. Pet. Tech. 36(2):33-41.
Srivastava, R.K, Huang, S.S. and Dong, M. 1999. Comparative Effectiveness of CO2,Produced Gas, and Flue Gas for Enhanced Heavy-Oil Recovery.SPEREE 2(3):238-247. SPE-56857-PA.
Srivastava, R.K., Huang, S.S., Dyer, S.B., and Mourits, F.M. 1993. A ScaledPhysical Model for Saskatchewan Heavy Oil Reserves—Design, Fabrication andPreliminary CO2 Flood Studies. Paper No. 33 presented at the Fifth PetroleumConference of the South Saskatchewan Section, Petroleum Soc. of CIM, Regina,18-20 October.
Srivastava, R.K., Huang, S.S., Dyer, S.B., and Mourits, F.M. 1994. Heavy Oil Recovery by SubcriticalCarbon Dioxide Flooding.Paper SPE 27058 presented at the SPE LatinAmerican and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, 27-29April.