Drilling Wellbore Stability in the Compacting and Subsiding Valhall Field: A Case Study
- Tron G. Kristiansen (BP Amoco Norge UA)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- December 2007
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 277 - 295
- 2007. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.6.10 Running and Setting Casing, 4.5 Offshore Facilities and Subsea Systems, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 2.3.4 Real-time Optimization, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 1.12.2 Logging While Drilling, 5.3.4 Integration of geomechanics in models, 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials, 1.7.6 Wellbore Pressure Management, 1.7 Pressure Management, 5.1.2 Faults and Fracture Characterisation, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 5.5.4 Visualization Technologies, 1.1 Well Planning, 1.6.1 Drilling Operation Management, 6.3.3 Operational Safety, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 1.14.1 Casing Design, 1.6.7 Geosteering / Reservoir Navigation, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.14 Casing and Cementing, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 1.2.7 Geosteering / reservoir navigation, 1.11.2 Drilling Fluid Selection and Formulation (Chemistry, Properties), 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 4.3.4 Scale, 1.6.2 Technical Limit Drilling
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,436 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Valhall is a field development located in the southernmost part of the Norwegian Continental Shelf. The chalk reservoir is weak and started to compact when oil production was initiated in 1982. The reservoir compaction was soon after observed at the seafloor in form of seafloor subsidence. Drilling was initially not a major challenge at Valhall, but as the reservoir depletion, compaction, and subsidence continued through the 90s, one had to develop drilling strategies to handle the associated reduction in frac gradient in the reservoir as well as the increasing problems experienced in high-angle ERD wells in the overburden. The problems in the overburden were associated with the compaction and subsidence and were most problematic in high-angle wells. An important factor in supporting the drilling teams in their decision-making process has been the development of wellbore stability models and the integration of drilling engineering and rock mechanics with subsurface technology. This paper briefly reviews the drilling history at Valhall prior to the ERD program initiated in the mid-90s, and more in detail the increasing problems in the late 90s in the ERD wells, where several very expensive wells did not make it to the reservoir target to produce oil. The paper reviews the work that supported the abandonment of the ERD program in favor of unmanned platforms in the North and South flank of the field, which resulted in the current drilling performance of the flank reservoir targets today being achieved with best-in-class drilling performance.
The Valhall field is an overpressured, undersaturated Upper Cretaceous chalk reservoir located in the North Sea approximately 290 km offshore southern Norway in 69 m of water. The field is located in the southwestern most corner of the Norwegian continental shelf (see Fig. 1). Valhall was discovered in 1975 and a three-platform complex with 24 slots was installed in 1981. The 24 slots have been extended to 30 on the original platform around 1990. In 1996 a new 19-slot wellhead platform was installed next to the existing central complex for infill and ERD drilling. Because of severe drilling problems during the ERD drilling a third unmanned wellhead platform was installed in the South flank in 2002 in order to drain this area of the field more cost effectively. A similar wellhead platform was installed in the North flank in 2003. A new platform will also be installed in 2003 to waterflood the crestal part of the field. The field was originally developed to recover 250 MM bbl, but has currently produced around twice of this, and work is ongoing to recover over 1 billion bbl from the Valhall structure.
The reservoir is at a depth of approximately 2400 m subsea and consists of two oil-bearing chalk formations, Tor and Hod. Approximately 2/3 of the oil and the majority of the productivity are located in the Tor. For more details around reservoir management at Valhall, see the 10- and 20-year summary papers by Ali and Alcock (1994) and Barkved et al. (2003).
The effective overburden stress in the crest of the field was around 500 to 1,000 psi at discovery because of significant overpressure (0.82 psi/ft). The chalk is relatively weak (UCS between 450 and 2,000 psi), and chalk production has resulted in lost oil production and casing deformations. As reservoir pressure has been reduced during primary depletion from around 6,500 to 2,500 psi in the crest, the chalk matrix has compacted; a partial transfer of this compaction through the overburden results in seafloor subsidence. The current seafloor subsidence is approaching 6 meters and continuing at a rate of less than 20 cm/year. The compaction and subsidence have also resulted in casing deformations, as observed in other compacting and subsiding fields. More details on the well life and well design issues at Valhall can be found in papers by Kristiansen et al. (2000) and Pattillo and Kristiansen (2002).
|File Size||7 MB||Number of Pages||19|
Aadnoy, B.S. 1988. InversionTechnique to Determine the In-Situ Stress Field From Fracturing Data. PaperSPE 18023 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Houston, 2-5 October. DOI: 10.2118/18023-MS.
Aadnoy, B.S. 1998. Geomechanical Analysis of Deep-WaterDrilling. Paper SPE 39339 presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference,Dallas, 3-6 March. DOI: 10.2118/39339-MS.
Ali, N. and Alcock, T. 1994. Valhall Field, Norway—The First Ten Years.North Sea Oil and Gas Reservoirs - III, NTH: 25-40.
Barkved, O.I., Heavey, P., Kjelstadli, R., Kleppan, T., and Kristiansen,T.G. 2003. Valhall Field—Still onPlateau After 20 Years of Production. Paper SPE 83957 presented at OffshoreEurope, Aberdeen, 2-5 September. DOI: 10.2118/83957-MS.
Barton, N. and Bandis, S.C. 1990. Review of Predictive Capabilities ofJRC-JCS Model in Engineering Practice. In Rock Joints, ed. N.
Barton and O. Stephansson, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Balkema,603-610.
Beacom, L. 2002. Internal fault mapping study.
Bradford, I. et al. 2000. WhenRock Mechanics Met Drilling: Effective Implementation of Real-Time WellboreStability Control. Paper SPE 59121 presented at the IADC/SPE DrillingConference, New Orleans, 23-25 February. DOI: 10.2118/59121-MS.
Coates, G.R. and Denoo, S.A. 1981. Mechanical Properties Program UsingBorehole Analysis and Mohrs Circle. SPWLA 22nd Annual Logging Symposium, 23-26June.
Deere, D.U. and Miller, R.P. 1966. Engineering Classification and IndexProperties for Intact Rock. Technical Report AFWL-TR-65-116, Air Force WeaponsLaboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico.
Fjær, E., Holt, R.M., Nes, O., and Sønstebø, E.F. 2002. Mud Chemistry Effects on Time-DelayedBorehole Stability Problems in Shales. Paper SPE 78163 presented at theSPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, 20-23 October. DOI:10.2118/78163-MS.
Hoek, E. and Brown, E.T. 1980. Underground Excavations in Rock.London: Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
Hope, S.A., Pearce, A., and Minton, J.M.A. 2002. Prediction of Compaction atValhall Using Explicit and Fully Coupled Solution Strategies. Internal VIPSreport for BP Norge, September.
Horsrud, P. 2001. EstimatingMechanical Properties of Shale From Empirical Correlations. SPEDC16 (2): 68-73. SPE-56017-PA. DOI: 10.2118/56017-PA.
Johnston, D.H. 1987. PhysicalProperties of Shale at Temperature and Pressure. Geophysics52 (10): 1391-1401. DOI: 10.1190/1.1442251.
Kinn, S., Allen, P., and Slater, M. 2000. Use of a Rotary Steerable Tool at theValhall Field, Norway. Paper SPE 59217 presented at the IADC/SPE DrillingConference, New Orleans, 23-25 February. DOI: 10.2118/59217-MS.
Kristiansen, T.G. 1996. A Review of Completion Techniques and the Impact ofGeomechanical Processes on Their Performance in the Valhall Field. Paperpresented at Fifth North Sea Chalk Symposium, Reims, France, 7-9 October.
Kristiansen, T.G. 1998. Geomechanical Characterization of theOverburden Above the Compacting Chalk Reservoir at Valhall. Paper SPE 47348presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Trondheim,Norway, 8-10 July. DOI: 10.2118/47348-MS.
Kristiansen, T.G., Mandzuich, K., Heavey, P, and Kol, H. 1999. MinimizingDrilling Risk in Extended-Reach Wells at Valhall Using Geomechanics, Geoscienceand 3D Visualization Technology. Paper SPE 52863 presented at the SPE/IADCDrilling Conference, Amsterdam, 9-11 March.
Kristiansen, T.G., Barkved, O., and Pattillo, P.D. 2000. Use of Passive Seismic Monitoring inWell and Casing Design in the Compacting and Subsiding Valhall Field, NorthSea. Paper SPE 65134 presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference,Paris, 24-25 October. DOI: 10.2118/65134-MS.
Lal, M. 1999. Shale Stability:Drilling Fluid Interaction and Shale Strength. Paper SPE 54356 presented atthe SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, 20-22April.
Moschovidis, Z.A., Gardner, D.C., and Sund, G.V. 1994. Disposal of Oily Cuttings by DownholePeriodic Fracturing Injections, Valhall, North Sea: Case Study and ModelingConcepts. SPEDE 9 (4): 256-262; Trans., AIME,297. SPE-25757-PA. DOI: 10.2118/25757-PA.
Moschovidis, Z.A., Kleppan T., and Kristiansen T.G. 1998. Evaluation ofCuttings Injection in A-20 D Splitter Well in Valhall. Paper presented at the6th International Conference on Minimising the Environmental Effects ofDrilling Operations, Aberdeen, 18-19 June.
Pattillo, P.D., Kristiansen, T.G., Sund, G.V., and Kjelstadli, R. 1998. Reservoir Compaction and SeafloorSubsidence at Valhall. Paper SPE 47274 presented at the SPE/ISRM RockMechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Trondheim, Norway, 8-10 July. DOI:10.2118/47274-MS.
Pattillo, P.D. and Kristiansen, T.G. 2002. Analysis of Horizontal CasingIntegrity in the Valhall Field. Paper SPE 78204 presented at the SPE/ISRMRock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, 20-23 October. DOI:10.2118/78204-MS.
Plischke, B. 2003. Valhall Subsidence Prediction with Waterflood; AdditionalSensitivities. Internal ISAMGEO report for BP Norge, January.
Ruddy, I., Andersen, M.A., Pattillo, P.D., Bishlawi, M., and Foged, N. 1989.Rock Compressibility, Compaction,and Subsidence in a High-Porosity Chalk Reservoir: A Case Study of ValhallField. JPT 41 (7): 741-746; Trans., AIME 287.SPE-18278-PA. DOI: 10.2118/18278-PA.
Sinor, L.A., Tybero, P., Eide, O., and Wenande, B. 1998. Rotary Liner Drilling for DepletedReservoirs. Paper SPE 39399 presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference,Dallas, 3-6 March. DOI: 10.2118/39399-MS.