Scale Formation and Prevention in the Presence of Hydrate Inhibitors
- Mason B. Tomson (Rice U.) | Amy T. Kan (Rice U.) | Gongmin Fu (Rice U.) | Musaed Al-Thubaiti (Saudi Aramco) | Dong Shen (Rice U.) | Heather J. Shipley (Rice U.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 248 - 258
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 4.3.1 Hydrates
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,151 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
There is no accepted methodology to correlate the effects of hydrate inhibitors on scale formation as there is for electrolytes. Similarly, the effect of hydrate inhibitor on scale inhibition with common inhibitors is not well known. In this paper, a semi-empirical approach is proposed to correlate the effect of hydrate inhibitors on scale formation from experimental solubility measurements of halite, barite, gypsum, calcite, and carbonate equilibrium chemistry. The ion-cosolvent activity coefficients can be used directly in any solution speciation code to evaluate the effect of cosolvent on mineral scale formation. The validity of the equation has been tested between 4 and 50°C as well as between 1 and 6 M ionic strength. Working equations that can be used in gas and oil production to calculate the effect of cosolvents on scale formation are presented. Details about how to predict hydrate-inhibitor-induced scale formation and case studies that demonstrate the severity of methanol on scaling tendency are also discussed. Finally, barite nucleation and kinetics are studied in the presence and absence of methanol. A semi-empirical equation to predict the nucleation time is proposed. Preliminary studies of scale-inhibitor efficiency in the presence of methanol are also discussed. At high methanol concentration, scale inhibition may not be possible because of precipitation of metal-inhibitor salt. Glycols have a less adverse effect than methanol on both mineral scale formation and inhibition.
Methanol, ethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol are industrial solvents and raw materials for a variety of processes. In the oil and gas industries, methanol, ethylene glycol, and triethylene glycol are often used to inhibit gas-hydrate formation during production. Gas hydrate is a crystalline solid consisting of a gas molecule surrounded by a cage of water molecules, which forms at certain high-pressure and low-temperature regimes. Gas-hydrate formation is particularly troublesome for offshore gas wells, where the producing temperature is low because of both adiabatic expansion of gas and seawater cooling. Once gas hydrate forms, it can plug up the well and prevent gas production. One economic solution to prevent hydrate formation is to inject a large quantity of methanol, ethylene glycol, or triethylene glycol. These organic solvents are thermodynamic inhibitors (i.e., they increase the thermodynamic solubility of gas hydrate). This type of inhibitor is only effective at high cosolvent concentrations. Unfortunately, the use of high cosolvent concentration has an adverse effect on scale formation.because the mineral salts are generally less soluble in the cosolvent.
Production from reservoir oilfield brines are often close to saturation as they enter a well; therefore, even a small amount of added methanol or ethanol is often sufficient to induce various minerals to precipitate. The scaling tendency of sparingly soluble mineral salts (e.g., calcite and barite) in methanol/brine and ethanol/brine solutions is observed to be orders of magnitude larger than in the brine alone. Halite scaling is also severely affected in the presence of methanol or ethanol. Ethylene glycol and triethylene glycol have less adverse effect on mineral-salt-scaling tendency.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Bates, R.G. 1973. Determination of pH—Theory and Practice, Vol. Secondedition. Wiley-Interscience Publications: Calgary.
Chen, C.C., et al. 1982. Local composition model for excess Gibbs energy ofelectrolyte solutions, Part 1: Single solvent, single completely dissociatedelectrolyte systems. AIChE J. 38(4):588.
Collins, A.G. 1975. Geochemistry of Oilfield Waters. Amsterdam: ElsevierScientific.
Gupta, A.R. 1979. Thermodynamics of electrolytes in mixed solvents.Application of Pitzer's thermodynamic equations to activity coefficients of 1:1electrolytes in methanol-water mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. 83(23):2986-2990.
He, S. 1992. The carbonic acid system and solubility of calcium carbonateand sulfate in aqueous solutions over a wide range of solution composition,temperature, and pressure. Geology. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M U.Press.
He, S.L., Kan, A.T. andTomson, M.B. 1996. Mathematical Inhibitor Model forBarium Sulfate Scale Control. Langmuir 12(7):1901-1905.
Kan, A.T., Fu, G., and Tomson, M.B. 2002a. Effect of methanol on carbonateequilibrium and calcite solubility in a gas/methanol/water/ salt mixedsystem. Langmuir 18(25): 9713-9725.
Kan, A.T., Fu, G., and Tomson, M.B. 2002b. Effect of methanol and ethyleneglycol on sulfates and halite scale formation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
Kan, A.T., Fu, G., and Tomson, M.B. 2003. Effect of methanol and ethyleneglycol on sulfates and halite scale formation . Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.42:2399-2408.
Langmuir, D. 1997. Aqueous Environmental Geochemistry. Upper Saddle River,New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Oddo, J.E. andTomson, M.B. 1994. Why Scale Forms and How to PredictIt. SPEPF 9(1):47-54. SPE-21710.
Pitzer, K.S. 1995. Thermodynamics. Third edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pitzer, K.S. and Kim, J.J. 1974. Thermodynamics ofElectrolytes.IV. Activity and Osmotic Coefficients for MixedElectrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96(18):5701-5707.
Pitzer, K.S. and Mayorga, G. 1973. Thermodynamics of Electrolytes. II.Activity and Osmotic Coefficients for Strong Electrolytes With One or Both IonsUnivalent. J. Phys. Chem. 77(19):2300-2308.
Pitzer, K.S., Peiper, J.C., and Busey, R.H. 1984. Thermodynamic propertiesof aqueous sodium chloride solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 13(1):1-102.
Robinson, R.A. and Stokes, R.H. 1970. Electrolyte Solutions:TheMeasurement and Interpretation of Conductance, Chemical Potential and Diffusionin Solutions of Simple Electrolytes. Second edition. London: Butterworth andCo.
Sen, B. 1978. Computational techniques of ionic processes in water-organicmixed solvents. Thermodynamic behavior of electrolytes in mixed solvents W.F.Furter (ed.). Washington, DC: ACS, 215-248.
Sen, J. and Gibbons, J.J. 1977. Ionic Equilibria in MixedSolvents: Formation of Calcium Lactate. Journal of Chemical and EngineeringData 22(3):309-314.
Stumm, W. and Morgan, J.J. 1996. Aquatic Chemistry Chemical Equilibriua andRates in Natural Water. Second edition. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Tester, J.W. and Modell, M. 1997. Thermodynamics and its Application. Thirdedition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR.
Tomson, M.B. ScaleSoftPitzer Manual. Houston: Rice U.
Xiao, J.A., Kan, A.T. and Tomson, M.B. 2001. Prediction of BaSO4 precipitationin the presence and absence of a polymeric inhibitor: Phosphino-polycarboxylicacid. Langmuir 17(15):4668-4673.
Ye, S., Xans, P., and Lagourette, B. 1994. Modification of the Pitzer modelto calculate the mean activity coefficients of electrolytes in a water-alcoholmixed solvent solution. J. Solution Chem. 23(12):1301-1315.