Generalized Pressure-Volume-Temperature Correlations
- Authors
- Oistein Glaso (SINTEF/NTH Trondheim)
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2118/8016-PA
- Document ID
- SPE-8016-PA
- Publisher
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Source
- Journal of Petroleum Technology
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 05
- Publication Date
- May 1980
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- Pages
- 785 - 795
- Language
- English
- ISSN
- 0149-2136
- Copyright
- 1980. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Disciplines
- 4.1.9 Tanks and storage systems, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 4.5 Offshore Facilities and Subsea Systems, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors
- Keywords
- Downloads
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 2,318 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
| SPE Member Price: | USD 5.00 |
| SPE Non-Member Price: | USD 35.00 |
Empirical equations for estimating saturation pressure, oil formation volume factor (FVF) at saturation pressure, and two-phase FVF were derived as a function of reservoir temperature, total surface-gas gravity, producing GOR, and stock-tank oil gravity. These equations should be producing GOR, and stock-tank oil gravity. These equations should be valid for all types of oil/gas mixtures after correcting for nonhydrocarbons in surface gases and paraffinicity of oil.
Introduction
Pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) correlations are Pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) correlations are important tools in reservoir technology. These measurements form the basis for estimating the amount of oil in the reservoir, production capacity, and variations in produced gas/oil ratios during the reservoir's production life. PVT relations also are a requirement for calculating the recovery efficiency of a reservoir. Especially during the prospection phase, when only produced fluid properties are available from flowing tests, one can resort to empirically derived PVT relations. It is, of course, of great importance PVT relations. It is, of course, of great importance that such estimations be as accurate as possible. From PVT correlations published until now, Standing's work is perhaps the most widely used. His correlations were developed for California oils and make no corrections for oil type or nonhydrocarbon content. Other PVT relations developed for oils from other parts of the world, based on Standing's work, yield "best-fit lines" ordinarily parallel-shifted. Their differences can be understood from two factors not included in Standing's original correlations: (1) crude oils from other regions have different paraffinicity - i.e., they contain varying amounts of paraffinic oil components (saturated hydrocarbons in open chains), and (2) the surface gases from some reservoirs contain relatively large amounts of nonhydrocarbons (CO2, N2, and H2S). By considering the variation in these parameters, this paper develops generalized PVT correlations:
(1)
(2)
(3) These equations were derived from laboratory data, exclusively sampling North Sea oils. However, they should be valid for all types of gas/oil mixtures after correcting for nonhydrocarbons (CO2, N2, and H2S) in the surface gases and paraffinicity of the oil as defined by the Kuop factor.
Procedure Procedure PVT Measurements PVT Measurements Six reservoirs fluid samples were made from two North Sea separator liquid and gas samples. These reservoir samples were labeled A1, B1, and C1 and A2, B2, and C2. Fig. 1 shows the experimental procedure used in the PVT analysis. procedure used in the PVT analysis. JPT
P. 785
| File Size | 619 KB | Number of Pages | 11 |

