A Comparison of Techniques for Coupling Porous Flow and Geomechanics
- Rick H. Dean (Simwulf Systems Inc) | Xiuli Gai (U. of Texas Austin) | Charles M. Stone (Sandia Natl. Labs) | Susan E. Minkoff (U. Of Maryland)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- March 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 132 - 140
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 3.2.5 Produced Sand / Solids Management and Control, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5.1.8 Seismic Modelling, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 1.4.4 Drill string dynamics, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5.3.4 Integration of geomechanics in models, 5.5.1 Simulator Development, 5.1.2 Faults and Fracture Characterisation
- 8 in the last 30 days
- 1,133 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
This paper compares three techniques for coupling multiphase porous flow and geomechanics. Sample simulations are presented to highlight the similarities and differences in the techniques. One technique uses an explicit algorithm to couple porous flow and displacements in which flow calculations are performed every timestep and displacements are calculated only during selected timesteps. A second technique uses an iteratively coupled algorithm in which flow calculations and displacement calculations are performed sequentially for the nonlinear iterations during each timestep. The third technique uses a fully coupled approach in which the program's linear solver must solve simultaneously for fluid flow variables and displacement variables. The techniques for coupling porous flow with displacements are described and comparison problems are presented for single-phase and three-phase flow problems involving poroelastic deformations. All problems in this paper are described in detail, so the results presented here may be used for comparison with other geomechanical/porous-flow simulators.
Many applications in the petroleum industry require both an understanding of the porous flow of reservoir fluids and an understanding of reservoir stresses and displacements. Examples of such processes include subsidence, compaction drive, wellbore stability, sand production, cavity generation, high-pressure breakdown, well surging, thermal fracturing, fault activation, and reservoir failure involving pore collapse or solids disposal. It would be useful to compare porous flow/geomechanics techniques for all of these processes, because some of these processes involve a stronger coupling between porous flow and geomechanics than others. However, this paper looks at a subset of these processes and compares three coupling techniques for problems involving subsidence and compaction drive. All of the sample problems presented in this paper assume that the reservoir absolute permeabilities are constant during a run. Displacements influence fluid flow through the calculation of pore volumes, and fluid pressures enter the displacement calculations through the poroelastic constitutive equations.
Several authors have presented formulations for modeling poroelastic, multiphase flow. Settari and Walters (1999) discuss the different methods that have been used to combine poroelastic calculations with porous flow calculations. They categorize these different methods of coupling poroelastic calculations with porous flow calculations as decoupled (Minkoff et al. 1999a), explicitly coupled, iteratively coupled, and fully coupled. The techniques discussed in this paper are explicitly coupled, iteratively coupled, and fully coupled.
|File Size||594 KB||Number of Pages||9|
Arco Reservoir Simulator Development: "Appendix 30: PoroelasticCalculations," ACRES Reference Manual, Internal Arco Document, Arco, Plano,Texas (1999).
Belylschko, T., Ong, J.S.J., Liu, W.K., and Kennedy, J.M.: "HourglassControl in Linear and Nonlinear Problems," Comp. Methods in Applied Mech.and Eng. (1984) 43, 251.
Biot, M.A.: "General Solutions of the Equations of Elasticity andConsolidation for a Porous Material," J. of Applied Mechanics (1956) 23,91.
Fung, L.S.K., Buchanan, L., and Wan, R.G.: "Coupled Geomechanical-ThermalSimulation for Deforming Heavy-Oil Reservoirs," J. Cdn. Pet. Tech.(1994) 33, No. 4, 22.
Gutierrez, M. and Lewis, R.W.: "The Role of Geomechanics in ReservoirSimulation," paper SPE/ISRM 47392 presented at the 1998 SPE/ISRM RockMechanics in Petroleum Engineering Conference, Trondheim, July 8-10.
Kosloff, D. and Frazier, G.A.: "Treatment of Hourglass Patterns in Low OrderFinite Element Codes," Intl. J. for Num. and Anal. Methods inGeomechanics (1978) 2, 57.
Kuniansky, J. and Hillestad, J.G.: "Reservoir Simulation Using BottomholePressure Boundary Conditions," SPEJ (1980) 20, No. 6, 473.
Lewis, R.W. and Sukirman, Y.: "Finite Element Modelling of Three-Phase Flowin Deforming Saturated Oil Reservoirs," Intl. J. for Num. and Anal. Methodsin Geomech. (1993) 17, 577.
Li, X. and Zienkiewicz, O.C.: "Multiphase Flow in Deforming Porous Media andFinite Element Solutions," Computers and Structures (1992) 45, 211.
Maenchen, G. and Sack, S.: "The Tensor Code," Methods of Comp.Physics, Academic Press, New York City (1964) 3, 181-210.
Minkoff, S.E., Stone, C.M., Arguello, J.G., Bryant, S., Eaton, J.,Peszynska, M., and Wheeler, M.: "Staggered in Time Coupling ofReservoir Flow Simulation and Geomechanical Deformation: Step 1—One-WayCoupling," paper SPE 51920 presented at the 1999 SPE Reservoir SimulationSymposium, Houston, 14-17 February.
Minkoff, S., Stone, C., Arguello, J., Bryant, S., Eaton, J., Peszynska, M.,and Wheeler, M.: "Coupled Geomechanics and Flow Simulation for Time-LapseSeismic Modeling," paper presented at the 1999 Annual International Meeting ofthe Soc. of Exploration Geophysicists, Houston.
Minkoff, S., Stone, C., Bryant, S., Peszynska, M., and Wheeler, M.: "CoupledFluid Flow and Geomechanical Deformation Modeling'," J. of Petroleum Scienceand Eng. (2003) 38, 37.
Settari, A. and Mourits, F.M.: "Coupling of geomechanics and reservoirsimulation models," Comp. Methods and Advances in Geomech., Siriwardaneand Zeman (eds.), Balkema, Rotterdam (1994) 2151-2158.
Settari, A. and Walters, D.A.: "Advances in Coupled Geomechanical andReservoir Modeling With Applications to Reservoir Compaction," paper SPE51927 presented at the 1999 SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 14-17February.
Stone, H.L.: "Estimation of Three-Phase Relative Permeability and ResidualOil Data," J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. (1973) 12, 53.
Tortike, W.S. and Farouq Ali, S.M.: "A Framework for MultiphaseNonisothermal Fluid Flow in a Deforming Heavy Oil Reservoir," paper SPE16030 presented at the 1987 SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, San Antonio,Texas, 1-4 February.