Modeling Coupled Fracture-Matrix Fluid Flow in Geomechanically Simulated Fracture Networks
- Zeno G. Philip (Pinnacle Technologies) | James W. Jennings (U. of Texas at Austin) | Jon E. Olson (U. of Texas at Austin) | Stephen E. Laubach (Bureau of Economic Geology) | Jon Holder (U. of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2005
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 300 - 309
- 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 5.8.6 Naturally Fractured Reservoir, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 4.3.4 Scale, 1.14 Casing and Cementing, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 5.5.8 History Matching, 5.1.8 Seismic Modelling, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 1,075 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In conventional reservoir simulations, gridblock permeabilities arefrequently assigned values larger than those observed in core measurements toobtain reasonable history matches. Even then, accuracy with regard to someaspects of the performance such as water or gas cuts, breakthrough times, andsweep efficiencies may be inadequate. In some cases, this could be caused bythe presence of substantial flow through natural fractures unaccounted for inthe simulation. In this paper, we present a numerical investigation into theeffects of coupled fracture-matrix fluid flow on equivalent permeability.
A fracture-mechanics-based crack-growth simulator, rather than a purelystochastic method, was used to generate fracture networks with realisticclustering, spacing, and fracture lengths dependent on Young's modulus, thesubcritical crack index, the bed thickness, and the tectonic strain. Coupledfracture-matrix fluid-flow simulations of the resulting fracture patterns wereperformed with a finite-difference simulator to obtain equivalentpermeabilities that can be used in a coarse-scale flow simulation. The effectsof diagenetic cements completely filling smaller aperture fractures andpartially filling larger aperture fractures were also studied.
Fractures were represented in finite-difference simulations both explicitlyas grid cells and implicitly using nonneighbor connections (NNCs) between gridcells. The results indicate that even though fracture permeability is highlysensitive to fracture aperture, the computed equivalent permeabilities are moresensitive to fracture patterns and connectivity.
High-permeability fracture networks in a matrix system can createhigh-conductivity channels for the flow of fluids through a reservoir,producing larger flow rates and, therefore, larger apparent permeabilities. Thepresence of fractures can also cause early breakthrough of the displacing fluidand lead to poorer sweep efficiencies in displacement processes.A betterunderstanding of reservoir performance in such cases may be obtained byincluding the details of the fluid flow in fractures in a coupledfracture-matrix reservoir flow model.
It is very difficult to directly measure interwell fracture-network geometryin sufficient detail to model its effect on reservoir behavior. Thus, mostmodeling approaches have been statistical, using data from outcrop and wellboreobservations to determine distributions of fracture attributes such as fracturelength, spacing, and aperture to randomly populate a field. In this paper, weuse a mechanistic approach to generate the fracture patterns. Attributes of thefracture network depend on the applied boundary conditions and materialproperties.
|File Size||349 KB||Number of Pages||10|
1. Kulatilake, P.H.S.W., Wathugala, D.N., and Stephansson, O.: "JointNetwork Modeling with a Validation Exercise in Stripa Mine, Sweden," Intl. J.Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr. (1993) 30, No. 5, 503.
2. Datta-Gupta, A. et al.: "Detailed Characterization of aFractured Limetone Formation by Use of Stochastic Inverse Approaches,"SPEFE (September 1995) 133.
3. Marrett, R.: "Aggregate Properties ofFracture Populations," J. of Structural Geology (1996) 18, No. 2/3,169.
4. Olson, J.E. et al.: "Constraining the Spatial Distributionof Fracture Networks in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Using Fracture Mechanicsand Core Measurements," paper SPE 71342 presented at the 2001 SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September-3 October.
5. Lawn, B.R. and Wilshaw, T.R.: Fracture of Brittle Solids, Cambridge U.Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1975).
6. Segall, P.: "Formation and Growth of Extensional Fracture Sets," Geol.Soc. Am. Bull. (April 1984) 95, No. 4, 454.
7. Atkinson, B.K.: "Subcritical Crack Growth in Geological Materials," J. ofGeophysical Research (June 1984) 89, No. B6, 4077.
8. Atkinson, B.K. and Meredith, P.G.: "The Theory of Subcritical CrackGrowth with Applications to Minerals and Rocks," Fracture Mechanics of Rock,B.K. Atkinson (ed.), Academic, San Diego, California (1987) 111-166.
9. Olson, J.E.: "Joint Pattern Development: Effects of Subcritical CrackGrowth and Mechanical Crack Interaction," J. of Geophysical Research (July1993) 98, No. B7, 12,251.
10. Renshaw, C.E.: "Influenceof Subcritical Fracture Growth on the Connectivity of Fracture Networks,"Water Resources Research (June 1996) 32, No. 6, 1519.
11. Olson, J.E.: "Predicting Fracture Swarms—The Influence of SubcriticalCrack Growth and the Crack-Tip Process Zone on Joint Spacing in Rock," TheInitiation, Propagation and Arrest of Joints and Other Fractures, J.W. Cosgroveand T. Engelder (eds.), Geological Soc. Special Publications, London (2004)231, 73-87.
12. Ingraffea, A.R.: "Theory of Crack Initiation and Propagation in Rock,"Fracture Mechanics of Rock, B.K. Atkinson (ed.), Academic, San Diego,California (1987) 71-110.
13. Williams, D.P. and Evans, A.G.: "A Simple Method for Studying Slow CrackGrowth," J. of Testing and Evaluation (July 1973) 1, No. 4, 264.
14. Pletka, B.J., Fuller, E.R. Jr., and Koepke, B.G.: "An Evaluation ofDouble-Torsion Testing—Experimental," Fracture Mechanics Applied to BrittleMaterials, Proc., 11th Natl. Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, VirginiaPolytechnic Inst. and State U., Blacksburg, Virginia; ASTM STP 678, S.W.Freiman (ed.), American Soc. for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia,Pennsylvania (1979) 19-37.
15. Holder, J., Olson, J.E., and Philip, Z.: "Experimental Determination ofSubcritical Crack Growth Parameters in Sedimentary Rock," Geophysical ResearchLetters (February 2001) 28, No. 4, 599-602.
16. Yale, D.P. and Jamieson, W.H. Jr.: "Static and Dynamic Properties ofCarbonates," Rock Mechanics, P.P. Nelson and S.E. Laubach (eds.), Balkema,Rotterdam, The Netherlands (1994) 463-472.
17. Lucia, F.J. and Jennings, J.W.: "Calculation and Distribution ofPetrophysical Properties in the South Wasson Clear Fork Field," IntegratedOutcrop and Subsurface Studies of the Interwell Environment of CarbonateReservoirs: Clear Fork (Leonardian-Age) Reservoirs, West Texas and New Mexico,F.J. Lucia (ed.), final report, Contract No. DE-AC26-98BC15105, U.S. DOE,Washington, DC (2002) 95-142.
18. Olson, J. and Pollard, D.D.: "Inferring Paleostresses from Natural Fracture Patterns: A New Method,"Geology (April 1989) 17, No. 4, 345.
19. Lamb, H.: Hydrodynamics, sixth edition, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge(1932).
20. Hearn, C.L. et al.: "Improved Oil Recovery in a TightReservoir With Conductive Faults, ISND Shuiaba, Qatar," paper SPE 38908presented at the 1997 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SanAntonio, Texas, 5-8 October.
21. Eclipse Reservoir Simulator, 96A Release, Geoquest, Schlumberger(1995).
22. Chirlin, G.R.: "FlowThrough a Porous Medium With Periodic Barriers or Fractures," SPEJ (June1985) 358.
23. Nakashima, T. et al.: "Effective Permeability Estimation forSimulation of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs," paper SPE 64286 presented atthe 2000 SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane,Australia, 16-18 October.
24. Heffer, K.J. and Lean, J.: "Earth Stress Orientation—A Control on, and aGuide to, Flooding Directionality in a Majority of Reservoirs," ReservoirCharacterization III, W. Linville (ed.), PennWell Books, Tulsa (1993)799-822.
25. Barton, C.A., Zoback, M.D., and Moos, D.: "Fluid Flow Along Potentially Active Faults in Crystalline Rock," Geology(August 1995) 23, No. 8, 683.
26. Dyke, C.: "How Sensitive is Natural Fracture Permeability at Depth toVariation in Effective Stress?," Fractured and Jointed Rock Masses, L.R. Myeret al. (eds.), Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (1995) 81-88.
27. Hanks, C.L. et al.: "Lithologic and Structural Controls on NaturalFracture Distribution and Behavior Within the Lisburne Group, NortheasternBrooks Range and North Slope Subsurface, Alaska," AAPG Bull. (October 1997) 81,No. 10, 1700.
28. Laubach, S.E., Olson, J.E., and Gale, J.F.W.: "Are Open FracturesNecessarily Aligned With Maximum Horizontal Stress?," Earth and PlanetaryScience Letters (May 2004) 222, No. 1, 191-195.
29. Olson, J.E., Laubach, S.E., and Lander, R.H.: "Improving FracturePermeability Prediction by Combining Geomechanics and Diagenesis," paperARMA/NARMS 04-563 presented at the 6th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium,Houston, 5-9 June 2004.
30. Laubach, S.E.: "Practical Approaches to Identifying Sealed and OpenFractures," AAPG Bull. (April 2003) 87, No. 4, 561.
31. Gale, J.F.W. et al.: "Fracture Analysis of Clear Fork Outcrops in ApacheCanyon and Cores from South Wasson Clear Fork Field," Integrated Outcrop andSubsurface Studies of the Interwell Environment of Carbonate Reservoirs: ClearFork (Leonardian-Age) Reservoirs, West Texas and New Mexico, F.J. Lucia (ed.),final report, Contract No. DE-AC26-98BC15105, U.S. DOE, Washington, DC (2002)191-226.