Unconventional Miscible Enhanced Oil Recovery Experience at Prudhoe Bay
- P.L. McGuire (Arco Alaska Inc.) | R.S. Redman (Arco Alaska Inc.) | W.L. Mathews (Arco Alaska Inc.) | S.R. Carhart (Arco Alaska Inc.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- June 1999
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 222 - 229
- 1999. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.6.5 Tracers, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 5.5.8 History Matching, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 2.2.2 Perforating, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 468 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper summarizes the conceptual development, reservoir simulation, and field testing of an unconventional application of the miscible enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process at Prudhoe Bay. The miscible injectant stimulation treatment (MIST) process involves completing a well at the bottom of a thick, continuous, watered-out interval. A horizontal lateral is drilled along the base of the reservoir, and a large slug of miscible injectant (MI) is injected, followed by a small slug of chase water. The MI sweeps rock not contacted by previous MI injection and drives EOR oil to offset producers. MI is injected sequentially into several intervals along the lateral to mobilize EOR oil from previously unswept areas. The lateral well is then returned to normal production or injection service.
Simulation data indicate that each MIST well could recover up to 1,000 MSTB of incremental oil at initial rates of up to 1,000 STB/D. Field results have been encouraging. Incremental EOR from the three MIST lateral wells is over 2.1 MMSTB, with peak production rates of about 6,000 STB/D.
The Prudhoe Bay field, located on the north coast of Alaska, is the largest oilfield in North America, with total estimated reserves of roughly 13 billion barrels and a current production rate of approximately 700 MSTB/D. The field is overlaid by a large gas cap, and the majority of the field is being produced by gravity drainage. Waterflood and miscible enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations at Prudhoe Bay, which are confined to the downstructure and peripheral areas of the field, are producing roughly 300 MSTB/D.
Prudhoe Bay EOR began in late-1982 with an 11-pattern pilot project. The Prudhoe Bay Miscible Gas Project (PBMGP) was initiated in 1987, and now consists of about 130 patterns (Fig. 1). The patterns are typically inverted nine-spots with 80-acre well spacing. The PBMGP currently has a miscible injectant rate of over 500 million scf/D at an average water-alternating-gas (WAG) ratio of about 3:1.
The Sadlerochit Group, the major productive interval of the field, includes a thick section composed of high permeability fluvial sands and interbedded shales. In the Flow Station 2 (FS-2) area, these shales create up to four completely isolated flow intervals. Fig. 2 is a detailed map of the FS-2 area showing the MIST wells. A type log of this area is shown in Fig. 3.
The Victor hydraulic interval, consisting of Zones 2B, 2C, 3, and part of 4A, is typically about 150 ft thick with few, if any, extensive shales or other vertical permeability barriers. MI is injected throughout the section, while producers are typically completed near the top of the reservoir, since the bottom is completely watered out. The WAG flood is strongly gravity dominated, with rapid vertical segregation of the MI. Horizontal flow in the reservoir is dominated by very thin, extremely high permeability thief zones, which usually occur in the upper half of the Victor. The MI sweeps oil near the injection wellbore, but leaves large areas of the reservoir unaffected.
The actual MI sweep efficiency in the Victor was determined by coring well 3-18A, and has been thoroughly documented in a previous paper.1 A history-matched, fully compositional reservoir simulation of WAG in the Victor showed a very limited area in which EOR oil was actually mobilized. Although the entire interval was open to injection, solvent did not contact the bottom 100 ft of the interval. Simulation studies showed that recovery could be increased by utilizing an optimized WAG process. In this optimized WAG, a large MI slug is injected into the bottom 20 to 30 ft of the Victor interval. The entire interval is then perforated for subsequent WAG cycles. Fig. 4 is a cross-section map of oil saturation showing the increased sweep due to optimized WAG. This process was implemented in well 3-18A, which received a 9.5 Bscf solvent slug between September 1994, and June 1995. Well 3-25A responded strongly, with incremental EOR rates of up to 2,000 STB/D, as shown in Fig. 5. Operational issues and wellwork complicated the analysis, but it appears that the large MI slug was responsible for over one million barrels of incremental EOR production from the 3-18A pattern.
Even with the optimized WAG, most of the interval is not affected by MI. This unaffected area is the target for MIST. In the vertical MIST process, a production well is temporarily converted to injection by squeezing the perforations at the top of the Victor, then perforating near the base of the reservoir. A large slug of MI (from 1 to 4 Bscf) is injected at high rates (about 40 MMscf/D). The solvent slug is followed by a short period of water injection, which insures safe well operations and drives the MI slug deeper into the reservoir. The bottom perforations are covered with sand or by a bridge plug, and the well is recompleted as a producer at the top of the Victor.
In the lateral MIST process, a horizontal lateral is drilled along the base of the reservoir from either a production or injection well. MI is injected sequentially into several intervals (MI "bulbs") along the lateral to mobilize EOR oil in unswept areas. Because gravity segregation is dominant, the MI can sweep a much larger reservoir volume by injecting at full well rates into each bulb separately, rather than injecting MI along the entire length of the well at once. This results in multiple point sources, each of which has a high viscous-to-gravity ratio (VGR), rather than a single line source with a low VGR. Each slug of MI is about 3 Bscf, and is injected as quickly as possible (typically about 30 MMscf/D). Each solvent slug is followed by a short period of chase water injection. After injection for each interval is completed, a bridge plug is set and the next interval is perforated. The lateral well is then returned to normal production or injection service. Fig. 6 illustrates both MIST processes.
|File Size||455 KB||Number of Pages||8|