Foam Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media: Effect of Cross Flow
- H.J. Bertin (LEPT-ENSAM) | O.G. Apaydin (Stanford U.) | L.M. Castanier (Stanford U.) | A.R. Kovscek (Stanford U.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 1999
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 75 - 82
- 1999. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 4.5 Offshore Facilities and Subsea Systems, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 4.1.4 Gas Processing
- 9 in the last 30 days
- 612 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Previous experimental studies of foam generation and transport were conducted, mainly, in one-dimensional and homogeneous porous media. However, the field situation is primarily heterogeneous and multidimensional. To begin to bridge this gap, we have studied foam formation and propagation in an annularly heterogeneous porous medium. The experimental system was constructed by centering a 0.050 m diam cylindrical Fontainebleau sandstone core inside an 0.089 m acrylic tube and packing clean Ottawa sand in the annular region. The sandstone permeability is roughly 0.1 ?m2 while the unconsolidated sand permeability is 6.7 ?m2. Experiments with and without cross flow between the two porous media were conducted. To prevent cross flow, the cylindrical face of the sandstone was encased in a heat-shrink Teflon sleeve and the annular region packed with sand as before. Nitrogen is the gas phase and an alpha olefin sulfonate (AOS 1416) in brine is the foamer. The aqueous phase saturation distribution is garnered using X-ray computed tomography (CT).
Results from this study are striking. When the heterogeneous layers are in capillary communication and cross flow is allowed, foam fronts move at identical rates in each porous medium as quantified by the CT-scan images. Desaturation by foam is efficient and typically complete in about 1 PV of gas injection. When cross flow is prohibited, foam partially plugs the high permeability sand and diverts flow into the low permeability sandstone. The foam front moves through the low permeability region faster than in the high permeability region.
Foam is applied broadly as a mobility-control and profile modification agent for flow in porous media. Foams are usually formed by nonwetting gases such as steam, carbon dioxide (CO2) or nitrogen (N2) dispersed within a continuous surfactant-laden liquid phase. Typical applications include aqueous foams for improving steam-drive1-3 and CO2 -flood performance,4 gelled foams for plugging high permeability channels,5 foams for prevention or delay of gas or water coning,6 and surfactant-alternating-gas processes for clean up of ground-water aquifers.7,8 All of these methods have been tested in both the laboratory and the field.
An unfoamed gas displays low viscosity relative to water or crude oil and is thereby very mobile in porous media. However, dispersing the gas phase within a surfactant solution where the surfactant stabilizes the gas/liquid interface can substantially reduce gas mobility in porous media. Mobility is reduced because pore-spanning liquid films (foam lamellae) and lenses block some of the flow channels. Additionally, flowing lamellae encounter significant drag because of the presence of pore walls and constrictions. One aspect of foams that makes them attractive is that a relatively small amount of surfactant chemical can affect the flow properties of a very large volume of gas. The volume fraction of gas in a foam frequently exceeds 80% and stable foams up to 99% volume fraction are not uncommon. Recent reviews of foam flow phenomena and mechanisms are given in Refs. 9-11.
Laboratory studies of foam generation and transport have aided greatly in formulating and improving both our microscopic and macroscopic understanding of foam flow in porous media. They have focused, for the most part, on one-dimensional and homogeneous porous media. These studies, however, leave gaps in our knowledge of foam behavior because the field situation is primarily heterogeneous and multidimensional.
While much work has been conducted in homogeneous systems, the literature on flow in stratified systems is sparse. Notable experiments in stratified systems include Casteel and Djabbarah who performed steam and CO2 displacements with foaming agents in two parallel porous media.12 Robin studied foam generation and transport in layered beadpacks that simulated reservoir strata.13 In these experiments he surmised that foam blocked the high permeability layer. Llave et al. observed that foam can divert gas flow from high permeability layers to low permeability layers when the layers are isolated.14 Yaghoobi and Heller studied CO2 foam in short composite cores composed of sand and sandstone.15 They reported diversion of CO2 to the low permeability section and delay in CO2 breakthrough from the high permeability section.
More recently, Hirasaki et al. performed foam displacements in layered porous media to study the removal of organic liquids from groundwater aquifers.7 Gas was injected at a fixed pressure gradient rather than at a specified rate. By dyeing the various fluids, they observed displacement patterns directly. They found that injection of gas slugs into a porous medium containing surfactant resulted in foam generation and selective mobility reduction in the high permeability layers. In turn, recovery of the organic liquid was greatly enhanced.
For the most part, the effect of flow among parallel layers in capillary communication has not been investigated. We denote this as cross flow. To bridge this gap, we perform foam flow experiments in an axially symmetric, cylindrical, heterogeneous porous medium. A sandstone core fills the center of the heterogeneous pack and a uniform sand fills the annular region between the core and the pressure vessel wall. By the use or absence of a heat-shrink Teflon jacket around the sandstone, fluid communication, or cross flow, is prohibited or allowed. The sandstone is about two orders of magnitude less permeable than the sand to provide a strong permeability and capillary pressure contrast. We interpret the experiments in terms of the evolution of in situ water saturation as a function of time.
In the following sections we first discuss the construction and characterization of the porous medium, characterization of our foamer solution, and then experimental determination of water saturation via X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning. CT provides accurate resolution of the progress of displacement fronts as well as the in situ displacement efficiency. Next, we outline the experimental program and give results. A discussion and conclusions complete the article.
|File Size||385 KB||Number of Pages||8|