Mathematical Modeling of Secondary Precipitation From Sandstone Acidizing
- Y.-H. Li (Arco E&P Technology) | J.D. Fambrough (Arco E&P Technology) | C.T. Montgomery (Arco E&P Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- December 1998
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 393 - 401
- 1998. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.7.1 Completion Fluids, 4.3.1 Hydrates, 2.4.5 Gravel pack design & evaluation, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 4.3.4 Scale, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 3.2.4 Acidising, 4.2.3 Materials and Corrosion, 1.8 Formation Damage, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 526 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Field and laboratory experience clearly demonstrates that, besides primary dissolution, precipitation from both secondary and tertiary reactions with aluminosilicates adversely affects matrix acid treatment success. In the secondary reaction, fluosilicic acid from the primary dissolution will further react with aluminosilicates to form hydrated silica on the matrix surface. In the tertiary reaction, aluminum fluoride also extracts aluminum from aluminosilicates to form silica gel by lowering the fluoride/aluminum (F/Al) ratio in the solution. In the presence of a high concentration of metal ions, metal fluorides and fluosilicates are also likely to precipitate.
An optimum acidizing design package can be derived for a specific formation mineralogy and damage mechanism if this complex reactive system can be modeled properly. A geochemical model for acidizing has been developed for this purpose. The numerical simulator is a reactive flow model that solves the reactive system with both reaction kinetics and chemical equilibrium calculations. All possible reactions among all species in the system are solved simultaneously. As acid spends, the computer simulation shows the progress of aluminosilicate dissolution and the formation of different precipitates as the change of dissolved species along the reaction path occurs. The evolution of the damage skin can be evaluated as simulation continues. On the basis of simulation, different pumping schedules with different types of acids can be quickly evaluated to optimize treatment volume and minimize precipitation of hydrated silica and other precipitates.
To validate the model, a series of laboratory coreflood tests has been fully analyzed. The results indicate that the formation of silica gel is significant, on the basis of hydrofluoric acid (HF) effluent analysis. The same set of kinetic data derived from the laboratory coreflood data adequately predicts and explains a sandstone acidizing field case.
It is always difficult to describe a reactive system that contains numerous species by several reaction equations without including all other possible interactions among the species. Many simplifications to describe sandstone acidizing chemistry have been reported, but a comprehensive solution or a systematic approach to encounter all possible interactions in an acidizing environment requires a geochemical model, especially if secondary and tertiary reactions are to be accounted for in the system. The geochemical model described here integrates both equilibrium and kinetically controlled reactions into a comprehensive framework. The reactive system is based on a Gibbs free energy minimization technique with kinetically controlled mineral dissolution. The numerical simulator has the following features: the model is an isothermal, aqueous-phase, one-dimensional (1D) radial flow simulator; staging is allowed for different injection fluids pumped in sequence; two sets of mineralogy are allowed - one for the rock and one for the damage; and porosity/permeability correlations are used to determine a changing skin factor with pump time and treatment volume.
|File Size||221 KB||Number of Pages||9|