Crack Propagation Hypothesis and a Model To Calculate the Optimum Water-Soaking Period in Shale Gas/Oil Wells for Maximizing Well Productivity
- Boyun Guo (University of Louisiana at Lafayette) | Rashid Shaibu (University of Louisiana at Lafayette) | Xuejun Hou (Chongqing University of Science and Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- May 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- fractured well, shale gas/oil, multistage, shut-in time, water-soaking
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 42 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Currently, researchers and the industry believe that water invasion into a shale matrix should dominate the process of water soaking before flowback of hydraulic fracturing fluids. Based on laboratory observations with Tuscaloosa marine shale (TMS) cores, we postulate a hypothesis that cracks are formed in shale formations during and after hydraulic fracture stimulation and that they later contribute to improved well productivity. The formation of cracks contributes to improving well inflow performance, while the cracks also draw fracturing fluid from the hydraulic fractures, reduce fracture width, and consequently lower well inflow performance. The trade-off between crack development and fracture closure allows for an optimum water-soaking time, which could potentially maximize well productivity. A mathematical model was developed to describe the dynamic propagation of cracks based on the capillary-viscous force balance. The effect of crack formation on the long-term well productivity was analyzed using a previously published mathematical model for well productivity. A combination of the crack propagation and the well productivity models for the first time provides a technique for predicting the optimum fluid soaking time before flowback of hydraulic fracturing fluids. Sensitivity analyses show that reducing the viscosity of fracturing fluid could potentially speed up the optimum water-soaking time, while lowering the water-shale interfacial tension (IFT) could potentially delay the optimum water-soaking time. Real-time shut-in pressure data can be used in the crack propagation model to “monitor” crack development and identify the optimum water-soaking time before the flowback of hydraulic fracturing fluids for maximizing well productivity and the gas/oil recovery factor.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Aston, M. S., Alberty, M. W., Duncum, S. D. et al. 2007. A New Treatment for Wellbore Strengthening in Shale. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11–14 November. SPE-110713-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/110713-MS.
Besov, A., Tinni, A., Sondergeld, C. et al. 2017. Application of Laboratory and Field NMR To Characterize the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale. Petrophysics 58 (3): 221–231. SPWLA-2017-v58n3a1.
Borrok, D. M., Yang, W., Wei, M. et al. 2019. Heterogeneity of the Mineralogy and Organic Content of the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale. Mar Pet Geol 109: 717–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.06.056.
Cheng, Y. 2012. Impact of Water Dynamics in Fractures on the Performance of Hydraulically Fractured Wells in Gas-Shale Reservoirs. J Can Pet Technol 51 (2): 143–151. SPE-127863-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/127863-PA.
Contreras, O., Hareland, G., Husein, M. et al. 2014. Experimental Investigation on Wellbore Strengthening in Shales by Means of Nanoparticle-Based Drilling Fluids. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27–29 October. SPE-170589-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170589-MS.
Ehlig-Economides, C. A. and Economides, M. J. 2011. Water as Proppant. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, 30 October–2 November. SPE-147603-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/147603-MS.
Fakcharoenphol, P., Torcuk, M. A., Wallace, J. et al. 2013. Managing Shut-In Time To Enhance Gas Flow Rate in Hydraulic Fractured Shale Reservoirs: A Simulation Study. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166098-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166098-MS.
Fan, L., Thompson, J. W., and Robinson, J. R. 2010. Understanding Gas Production Mechanism and Effectiveness of Well Stimulation in the Haynesville Shale Through Reservoir Simulation. Paper presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 19–21 October. SPE-136696-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/136696-MS.
Ghanbari, E., Abbasi, M. A., Dehghanpour, H. et al. 2013. Flowback Volumetric and Chemical Analysis for Evaluating Load Recovery and Its Impact on Early-Time Production. Paper presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 5–7 November. SPE-167165-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167165-MS.
Ghanbari, E. and Dehghanpour, H. 2016. The Fate of Fracturing Water: A Field and Simulation Study. Fuel 163: 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.040.
Gupta, A., Xu, M., Dehghanpour, H. et al. 2017. Experimental Investigation for Microscale Stimulation of Shales by Water Imbibition during the Shut-In Periods. Paper presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15–16 February. SPE-185058-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185058-MS.
Ibrahim, A. F., Ibrahim, M., and Chester, P. 2019a. Developing New Soaking Correlation for Shale Gas Wells. Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 22–24 July. URTEC-2019-393-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2019-393.
Ibrahim, A. F., Ibrahim, M., and Pieprzica, C. 2019b. Developing a New Workflow To Study the Effect of Soaking Process on Shale Well. Paper presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Charleston, West Virginia, USA, 15–17 October. SPE-196611-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/196611-MS.
Javadpour, F., Fisher, D., and Unsworth, M. 2007. Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments. J Can Pet Technol 46 (10): 55–61. PETSOC-07-10-06. https://doi.org/10.2118/07-10-06.
John, C. J., Jones, B. L., Moncrief, J. E. et al. 1997. An Unproven Unconventional Seven Billion Barrel Oil Resource—The Tuscaloosa Marine Shale. BRI Bull 7: 1–22.
Kholy, S. M., Mohamed, I. M., Loloi, M. et al. 2017. Development of an Empirical Equation To Predict Hydraulic Fracture Closure Pressure from the Initial Shut-In Pressure after Treatment. Paper presented at the SPE Liquids-Rich Basins Conference—North America, Midland, Texas, USA, 13–14 September. SPE-187495-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/187495-MS.
Kuru, E., Parmar, J. S., and Dehghanpour, H. 2013. Drainage Against Gravity: Factors Impacting the Load Recovery in Fractures. Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 10–12 April. SPE-164530-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/164530-MS.
Lan, Q., Ghanbari, E., Dehghanpour, H. et al. 2014. Water Loss versus Soaking Time: Spontaneous Imbibition in Tight Rocks. Paper presented at the SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 25–27 February. SPE-167713-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167713-MS.
Li, G., Guo, B., Li, J. et al. 2019. A Mathematical Model for Predicting Long-Term Productivity of Modern Multifractured Shale-Gas/Oil Wells. SPE Drill & Compl 34 (2): 114–127. SPE-194495-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/194495-PA.
Liu, Y., Leung, J. Y., Chalaturnyk, R. J. et al. 2019. New Insights on Mechanisms Controlling Fracturing-Fluid Distribution and Their Effects on Well Performance in Shale-Gas Reservoirs. SPE Prod & Oper 34 (3): 564–585. SPE-185043-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/185043-PA.
Makhanov, K., Dehghanpour, H., and Kuru, E. 2013. Measuring Liquid Uptake of Organic Shales: A Workflow To Estimate Water Loss during Shut-In Periods. Paper presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 5–7 November. SPE-167157-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167157-MS.
Myers, B. 2018. UL-Lafayette to Lead Research Effort Aimed at Unlocking Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Potential, https://www.theadvocate.com/acadiana/news/business/article_60a78ae8-fc80-11e7-af86-470d77640802.html (assessed 7 February 2020).
Noe, S. and Crafton, J. W. 2013. Impact of Delays and Shut-Ins on Well Productivity. Paper presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 20–22 August. SPE-165705-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/165705-MS.
Parmar, J., Dehghanpour, H., and Kuru, E. 2012. Unstable Displacement: A Missing Factor in Fracturing Fluid Recovery. Paper presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 30 October–1 November. SPE-162649-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162649-MS.
Sharma, M. and Agrawal, S. 2013. Impact of Liquid Loading in Hydraulic Fractures on Well Productivity. Paper presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 4–6 February. SPE-163837-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163837-MS.
Sinha, S., Marfurt, K. J., and Deka, B. 2017. Effect of Frequent Well Shut-In’s on Well Productivity: Marcellus Shale Case Study. Paper presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Lexington, Kentucky, USA, 4–6 October. SPE-187506-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/187506-MS.
Wang, J. and Rahman, S. S. 2016. Investigation of Water Leakoff Considering the Component Variation and Gas Entrapment in Shale during Hydraulic-Fracturing Stimulation. SPE Res Eval & Eng 19 (3): 511–519. SPE-174392-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/174392-PA.
Wu, Q., Xu, Y., Wang, X. et al. 2012. Volume Fracturing Technology of Unconventional Reservoirs: Connotation, Design Optimization and Implementation. Pet Explor Dev 39 (3): 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60054-8.
Zhou, Z., Hoffman, T., Bearinger, D. et al. 2016. Experimental and Numerical Study on Spontaneous Imbibition of Fracturing Fluids in the Horn River Shale Gas Formation. SPE Drill & Compl 31 (3): 168–177. SPE-171600-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/171600-PA.
Zolfaghari, A., Dehghanpour, H., and Holyk, J. 2017. Water Sorption Behaviour of Gas Shales: I. Role of Clays. Int J Coal Geol 179: 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.05.008.