Experimental Investigation of Bubble Size in Flotation: Effect of Salt, Coagulant, Temperature, and Organic Compound
- Farhad Sadeghi (National Oilwell Varco) | Arno J. W. H. Vissers (National Oilwell Varco)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- May 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 384 - 392
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- produced water, flotation, bubble size
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 38 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Flotation is an important segment of water treatment. Bubbles are generated and dispersed in water where they capture oil and solids residuals and lift them up to the surface. Bubbles are generated either mechanically by agitation or hydraulically by induced gas ejectors. The bubble size has a crucial role in this kind of separation. In general, the smaller the bubbles, the better separation. Water chemistry has an important role in bubble formation and size. A laboratory scale flotation unit was developed to generate the microbubbles with diameters of 10 to 100 µm. The effects of salinity, coagulant, temperature, and ethanol on bubble size were investigated. The addition of 5000 mg/L of sodium chloride (NaCl) affected mainly bubble size with 50 µm diameter, whereas bubble size reduced and diameter decreased by one-half with the addition of NaCl. The bigger bubbles (100 µm size) were affected only at a salinity of 40 000 mg/L, whereas the smaller bubbles (20 to 30 µm) remained stable and did not change with the further increase of salinity. Coagulant affected the water chemistry with a high effect on pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), creating a more acidic and oxidant environment; however, the effect on bubble size was not very significant. Increasing water temperature from 20 to 55°C slightly decreased the bubble size, especially for larger bubbles (diameter of 100 µm). The effect of organic compounds such as ethanol on bubble size reduction was significant. The effect of the hydrostatic level of a water column on bubble size was also investigated. The bubble size did not change with increasing the water level; however, the frequency of bubble generation reduced and reached zero at high water elevation. The effect of flotation in oil removal was investigated, and it was observed that ratio of bubble to droplet size was an important factor. The oil coating of bubbles was the main mechanism of oil removal. The smaller bubbles were more readily coated with oil droplets, whereas bigger bubbles tended to attach to clusters.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Arnold, K. and Stewart, M. 2008. Surface Production Operations: Design of Oil Handling Systems and Facilities, third edition. Burlington, Massachusetts, USA: Gulf Professional Publishing (Elsevier).
Bensadok, K., Belkacem, M., and Nezzal, G. 2007. Treatment of Cutting Oil/Water Emulsion by Coupling Coagulation and Dissolved Air Flotation. Desalination 206 (1–3): 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.070.
Botello-Alvarez, J. E., Baz-Rodríguez, S. A., Gonzalez-García, R. et al. 2011. Effect of Electrolytes in Aqueous Solution on Bubble Size in Gas Liquid Bubble Columns. Ind Eng Chem Res 50 (21):12203–12207. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie200452q.
Cassell, E. A., Kaufman, K. M., and Matuevic, E. 1974. The Effects of Bubble Size on Microflotation. Water Res 9 (12): 1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(75)90095-0.
Jamialahmadi, M. and Müller-Steinhagen, H. 1992. Effect of Alcohol, Organic Acid and Potassium Chloride Concentration on Bubble Size, Bubble Rise Velocity and Gas Hold-Up in Bubble Columns. Chem Eng J 50 (1): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9467(92)80005-U.
Jia, W., Ren, S., and Hu, B. 2013. Effect of Water Chemistry on Zeta Potential of Air Bubbles. Int J Electrochem Sci 8 (4): 5828–5837.
Keitel, G. and Onken, U. 1982. The Effect of Solutes on Bubble Size in Air-Water Dispersions. Chem Eng Commun 17 (1–6): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986448208911616.
Malhotra, D., Taylor, P., Spiller, E. et al. 2009. Recent Advances in Mineral Processing Plant Design. Littleton, Colorado, USA: Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration.
Mândrea, L., Oprina, G., Chihaia, R.-A. et al. 2017. Theoretical and Experimental Study of Gas Bubbles Behavior. Int J Model and Optim 7 (3): 145–151. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMO.2017.V7.574.
Moosai, R. and Dawe, R. A. 2003. Gas Attachment of Oil Droplets for Gas Flotation for Oily Wastewater Cleanup. Sep Purif Technol 33 (3): 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00091-1.
O’Connor, C. T., Randall, E. W., and Goodall, C. M. 1990. Measurement of the Effects of Physical and Chemical Variables on Bubble Size. Int J Miner Process 28 (1–2): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(90)90032-T.
Parkinson, L., Sedev, R., Fornasiero, D. et al. 2008. The Terminal Rise Velocity of 10–100 µm Diameter Bubbles in Water. J Colloid Interface Sci 322 (1): 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.02.072.
Rawlins, C. H. and Sadeghi, F. 2018. Experimental Study on Oil Removal in Nutshell Filters for Produced-Water Treatment. SPE Prod & Oper 33 (1): 145–153. SPE-186104 PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/186104-PA.
Rodrigues, R. T. and Rubio, J. 2003. New Basis for Measuring the Size Distribution of Bubbles. Miner Eng 16 (8): 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(03)00181-X.
Rubio, J., Souza, M. L., and Smith, R. W. 2002. Overview of Flotation as a Wastewater Treatment Technique. Miner Eng 15 (3): 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00216-3.
Taylor, S. F. R., Brittle, S. A., Desai, P. et al. 2017. Factors Affecting Bubble Size in Ionic Liquids. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19 (22): 14306–14318. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP01725A.
Yoon, R. H. and Luttrell, G. H. 1989. The Effect of Bubble Size on Fine Particle Flotation. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 5 (1–4): 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508908952646.