On the Negative Excess Isotherms for Methane Adsorption at High Pressure: Modeling and Experiment
- Jing Li (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing) and University of Calgary) | Keliu Wu (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing) and University of Calgary) | Zhangxing Chen (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing) and University of Calgary) | Kun Wang (University of Calgary) | Jia Luo (University of Calgary) | Jinze Xu (University of Calgary) | Ran Li (University of Calgary) | Renjie Yu (University of Calgary) | Xiangfang Li (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing))
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- December 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 2,504 - 2,525
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- negative adsorption, high pressure, excess isotherms, methane, shale
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 141 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
An excess adsorption amount obtained in experiments is always determined by mass balance with a void volume measured by helium (He) -expansion tests. However, He, with a small kinetic diameter, can penetrate into narrow pores in porous media that are inaccessible to adsorbate gases [e.g., methane (CH4)]. Thus, the actual accessible volume for a specific adsorbate is always overestimated by an He-based void volume; such overestimation directly leads to errors in the determination of excess isotherms in the laboratory, such as “negative isotherms” for gas adsorption at high pressures, which further affects an accurate description of total gas in place (GIP) for shale-gas reservoirs.
In this work, the mass balance for determining the adsorbed amount is rewritten, and two particular concepts, an “apparent excess adsorption” and an “actual excess adsorption,” are considered. Apparent adsorption is directly determined by an He-based volume, corresponding to the traditional treatment in experimental conditions, whereas actual adsorption is determined by an adsorbate-accessible volume, where pore-wall potential is always nonpositive (i.e., an attractive molecule/pore-wall interaction). Results show the following:
1. The apparent excess isotherm determined by the He-based volume gradually becomes negative at high pressures, but the actual one determined by the adsorbate-accessible volume always remains positive.
2. The negative adsorption phenomenon in the apparent excess isotherm is a result of the overestimation in the adsorbate-accessible volume, and a larger overestimation leads to an earlier appearance of this negative adsorption.
3. The positive amount in the actual excess isotherm indicates that the adsorbed phase is always denser than the bulk gas because of the molecule/pore-wall attraction aiding the compression of the adsorbed molecules.
Practically, an overestimation in pore volume (PV) is only 3.74% for our studied sample, but it leads to an underestimation reaching up to 22.1% in the actual excess amount at geologic conditions (i.e., approximately 47 MPa and approximately 384 K). Such an overestimation in PV also underestimates the proportions of the adsorbed-gas amount to the free-gas amount and to the total GIP. Therefore, our present work underlines the importance of a void volume in the determination of adsorption isotherms; moreover, we establish a path for a more-accurate evaluation of gas storage in geologic shale reservoirs with high pressure.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||22|
Adisa, O. O., Cox, B. J., and Hill, J. M. 2012. Methane Storage in Molecular Nanostructures. Nanoscale 4 (11): 3295–3307. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2NR00042C.
Ambrose, R. J., Hartman, R. C., Diaz-Campos M. et al. 2012. Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations Part I: New Pore-Scale Considerations. SPE J. 17 (1): 219–229. SPE-131772-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/131772-PA.
Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L. G., and Halenda, P. P. 1951. The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations From Nitrogen Isotherms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73 (1): 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01145a126.
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., and Teller, E. 1938. Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60 (2): 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a023.
Chareonsuppanimit, P., Mohammad, S. A., Robinson, R. L. Jr. et al. 2012. High-Pressure Adsorption of Gases on Shales: Measurements and Modeling. Int J Coal Geol 95 (1 June): 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.02.005.
Chen, G., Lu, S., Zhang, J. et al. 2017. Keys to Linking GCMC Simulations and Shale Gas Adsorption Experiments. Fuel 199 (1 July): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.063.
Chen, J. H., Wong, D. S. H., Tan, C. S. et al. 1997. Adsorption and Desorption of Carbon Dioxide Onto and From Activated Carbon at High Pressures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36 (7): 2808–2815. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie960227w.
Curtis, J. B. 2002. Fractured Shale-Gas Systems. AAPG Bull 86 (11): 1921–1938. https://doi.org/10.1306/61EEDDBE-173E-11D7-8645000102C1865D.
Do, D. D. and Do, H. D. 2005. Adsorption of Argon From Sub- to Supercritical Conditions on Graphitized Thermal Carbon Black and in Graphitic Slit Pores: A Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulation Study. J Chem Phys 123 (8): 084701. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1996573.
Do, D. D., Do, H. D., Fan, C. et al. 2010. On the Existence of Negative Excess Isotherms for Argon Adsorption on Graphite Surfaces and in Graphitic Pores Under Supercritical Conditions at Pressures up to 10,000 atm. Langmuir 26 (7): 4796–4806. https://doi.org/10.1021/la903549f.
Do, D. D., Nicholson, D., and Do, H. D. 2008. On the Henry Constant and Isosteric Heat at Zero Loading in Gas Phase Adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 324 (1–2): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.05.028.
Dong, Z., Holditch, S., and McVay, D. 2013. Resource Evaluation for Shale Gas Reservoirs. SPE Econ & Mgmt 5 (1): 5–16. SPE-152066-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/152066-PA.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2015. EIA World Shale Resource Assessments, https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/ (accessed July 2019).
Fitzgerald, J. E., Sudibandriyo, M., Pan, Z. et al. 2003. Modeling the Adsorption of Pure Gases on Coals With the SLD Model. Carbon 41 (12): 2203–2216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00202-1.
Franzini, M. and Lezzerini, M. 2003. A Mercury-Displacement Method for Stone Bulk-Density Determinations. Eur J Mineral 15 (1): 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1127/0935-1221/2003/0001-0225.
García, E. J., Pérez-Pellitero, J., Jallut, C. et al. 2013. Modeling Adsorption Properties on the Basis of Microscopic, Molecular, and Structural Descriptors for Nonpolar Adsorbents. Langmuir 29 (30): 9398–9409. https://doi.org/10.1021/la401178u.
Gasparik, M., Bertier, P., Gensterblum, Y. et al. 2014. Geological Controls on the Methane Storage Capacity in Organic-Rich Shales. Int J Coal Geol 123 (1 March): 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.06.010.
Gasparik, M., Ghanizadeh, A., Bertier, P. et al. 2012. High-Pressure Methane Sorption Isotherms of Black Shales From The Netherlands. Energy Fuels 26 (8): 4995–5004. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef300405g.
Huang, H., Zhang, W., Liu, D. et al. 2011. Effect of Temperature on Gas Adsorption and Separation in ZIF-8: A Combined Experimental and Molecular Simulation Study. Chem Eng Sci 66 (23): 6297–6305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.09.009.
Huang, L., Ning, Z., Wang, Q. et al. 2018. Molecular Simulation of Adsorption Behaviors of Methane, Carbon Dioxide and Their Mixtures on Kerogen: Effect of Kerogen Maturity and Moisture Content. Fuel 211 (1 January): 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.060.
International Energy Agency (IEA). 2017. IEA Outlook for Natural Gas, https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2017Excerpt_Outlook_for_Natural_Gas.pdf (accessed July 2019).
Jacob, H. 1989. Classification, Structure, Genesis and Practical Importance of Natural Solid Oil Bitumen (“Migrabitumen”). Int J Coal Geol 11 (1): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-5162(89)90113-4.
Ji, L., Zhang, T., Milliken, K. L. et al. 2012. Experimental Investigation of Main Controls to Methane Adsorption in Clay-Rich Rocks. Appl Geochem 27 (12): 2533–2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.08.027.
Kang, S. M., Fathi, E., Ambrose, R. J. et al. 2011. Carbon Dioxide Storage Capacity of Organic-Rich Shales. SPE J. 16 (4): 842–855. SPE-134583-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/134583-PA.
Krooss, B. M., van Bergen, F., Gensterblum, Y. et al. 2002. High-Pressure Methane and Carbon Dioxide Adsorption on Dry and Moisture-Equilibrated Pennsylvanian Coals. Int J Coal Geol 51 (2): 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-5162(02)00078-2.
Langmuir, I. 1918. The Adsorption of Gases on Plane Surfaces of Glass, Mica and Platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40 (9): 1361–1403. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02242a004.
Lee, L. L. 2016. Molecular Thermodynamics of Nonideal Fluids. Stoneham, Massachusetts: Butterworth Publishers.
Li, J., Chen, Z., Wu, K. et al. 2018a. A Multi-Site Model to Determine Supercritical Methane Adsorption in Energetically Heterogeneous Shales. Chem Eng J 349 (1 October): 438–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.105.
Li, J., Chen, Z., Wu, K. et al. 2018b. Effect of Water Saturation on Gas Slippage in Circular and Angular Pores. AIChE J. 64 (9): 3529–3541. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16196.
Li, J., Chen, Z., Wu, K. et al. 2018c. Effect of Water Saturation on Gas Slippage in Tight Rocks. Fuel 225 (1 August): 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.186.
Li, J., Li, X., Wang, X. et al. 2016. Water Distribution Characteristic and Effect on Methane Adsorption Capacity in Shale Clay. Int J Coal Geol 159 (1 April): 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2016.03.012.
Li, J., Li, X., Wu, K. et al. 2017. Thickness and Stability of Water Film Confined Inside Nanoslits and Nanocapillaries of Shale and Clay. Int J Coal Geol 179 (15 June): 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.06.008.
Liu, Y., Li, H. A., Tian, Y. et al. 2018. Determination of the Absolute Adsorption/Desorption Isotherms of CH4 and n-C4H10 on Shale From a Nano-Scale Perspective. Fuel 218 (15 April): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.012.
Lu, X. C., Li, F.-C., and Watson, A. T. 1995. Adsorption Measurements in Devonian Shales. Fuel 74 (4): 599–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(95)98364-K.
Malbrunot, P., Vidal, D., Vermesse, J. et al. 1992. Adsorption Measurements of Argon, Neon, Krypton, Nitrogen, and Methane on Activated Carbon Up to 650 MPa. Langmuir 8 (2): 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00038a044.
Malbrunot, P., Vidal, D., Vermesse, J. et al. 1997. Adsorbent Helium Density Measurement and Its Effect on Adsorption Isotherms at High Pressure. Langmuir 13 (3): 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1021/la950969e.
Mehta, S. D. and Danner, R. P. 1985. An Improved Potential Theory Method for Predicting Gas-Mixture Adsorption Equilibria. Ind. End. Chem. Fund. 24 (3): 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1021/i100019a008.
Mertens, F. O. 2009. Determination of Absolute Adsorption in Highly Ordered Porous Media]. Surf Sci 603 (10–12): 1979–1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2008.10.054.
Myers, A. L. 2002. Thermodynamics of Adsorption in Porous Materials. AIChE J. 48 (1): 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690480115.
Myers, A. L. and Monson, P. A. 2002. Adsorption in Porous Materials at High Pressure: Theory and Experiment. Langmuir 18 (26): 10261–10273. https://doi.org/10.1021/la026399h.
Nicholson, D. 1982. Computer Simulation and the Statistical Mechanics of Adsorption. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press.
Pan, H., Ritter, J. A., and Balbuena, P. B. 1998. Examination of the Approximations Used in Determining the Isosteric Heat of Adsorption From the Clausius_Clapeyron Equation. Langmuir 14 (21): 6323–6327. https://doi.org/10.1021/la9803373.
Pang, Y., Soliman, M. Y., and Sheng, J. 2018. Investigating Gas-Adsorption, Stress-Dependence, and Non-Darcy-Flow Effects on Gas Storage and Transfer in Nanopores by Use of Simplified Local Density Model. SPE Res Eval & Eng 21 (1): 73–95. SPE-187961-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/187961-PA.
Perez, F. and Devegowda, D. 2017. Estimation of Adsorbed-Phase Density of Methane in Realistic Overmature Kerogen Models Using Molecular Simulations for Accurate Gas in Place Calculations. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 46 (October): 865–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.08.008.
Poirier, E. 2014. Ultimate H2 and CH4 Adsorption in Slit-Like Carbon Nanopores at 298 K: A Molecular Dynamics Study. RSC Adv. 4 (44): 22848–22855. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA02553A.
Quantachrome Nova are registered trademarks (in the USA) of Anton Paar QuantaTec Inc.
Rangarajan, B., Lira, C. T., and Subramanian, R. 1995. Simplified Local Density Model for Adsorption Over Large Pressure Ranges. AIChE J. 41 (4): 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690410411.
Redlich, O. and Kwong, J. N. S. 1949. On the Thermodynamics of Solutions. V. An Equation of State. Fugacities of Gaseous Solutions. Chem Rev 44 (1): 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60137a013.
Reich, R., Ziegler, W. T., and Rogers, K. A. 1980. Adsorption of Methane, Ethane, and Ethylene Gases and Their Binary and Ternary Mixtures and Carbon Dioxide on Activated Carbon at 212-301 K and Pressures to 35 Atmospheres. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 19 (3): 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1021/i260075a002.
Rexer, T. F., Mathia, E. J., Aplin, A. C. et al. 2014. High-Pressure Methane Adsorption and Characterization of Pores in Posidonia Shales and Isolated Kerogens. Energy Fuels 28 (5): 2886–2901. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef402466m.
Richardson, J. and Yu, W. 2018. Calculation of Estimated Ultimate Recovery and Recovery Factors of Shale-Gas Wells Using a Probabilistic Model of Original Gas in Place. SPE Res Eval & Eng 21 (3): 638–653. SPE-189461-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/189461-PA.
Riewchotisakul, S. and Akkutlu, I. Y. 2016. Adsorption-Enhanced Transport of Hydrocarbons in Organic Nanopores. SPE J. 21 (6): 1960–1969. SPE-175107-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/175107-PA.
Ross, D. J. K. and Bustin, R. M. 2007. Impact of Mass Balance Calculations on Adsorption Capacities in Microporous Shale-Gas Reservoirs. Fuel 86 (17–18): 2696–2706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.02.036.
Ross, D. J. K. and Bustin, R. M. 2008. Characterizing the Shale Gas Resource Potential of Devonian–Mississippian Strata in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin: Application of an Integrated Formation Evaluation. AAPG Bull 92 (1): 87–125. https://doi.org/10.1306/09040707048.
Rouquerol, J., Rouquerol, F., Llewellyn, P. et al. 2016. Surface Excess Amounts in High-Pressure Gas Adsorption: Issues and Benefits. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 496 (5 May): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.10.045.
Santos, J. M. and Akkutlu, I. Y. 2013. Laboratory Measurement of Sorption Isotherm Under Confining Stress With Pore-Volume Effects. SPE J. 18 (5): 924–931. SPE-162595-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/162595-PA.
Setzmann, U. and Wagner, W. 1991. A New Equation of State and Tables of Thermodynamic Properties for Methane Covering the Range From the Melting Line to 625 K at Pressures up to 100 MPa. J Phys Chem Ref Data 20 (6): 1061–1155. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555898.
Shabani, M., Moallemi, S. A., Krooss, B. M. et al. 2018. Methane Sorption and Storage Characteristics of Organic-Rich Carbonaceous Rocks, Lurestan Province, Southwest Iran. Int J Coal Geol 186 (1 February): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.12.005.
Tian, Y., Yan, C., and Jin, Z. 2017. Characterization of Methane Excess and Absolute Adsorption in Various Clay Nanopores From Molecular Simulation. Sci Rep 7 (1): 12040. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12123-x.
Tissot, B. and Welte, D. 2012. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence: A New Approach to Oil and Gas Exploration. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Ungerer, P., Collell, J., and Yiannourakou, M. 2015. Molecular Modeling of the Volumetric and Thermodynamic Properties of Kerogen: Influence of Organic Type and Maturity. Energy Fuels 29 (1): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef502154k.
Vidal, D., Malbrunot, P., Guengant, L. et al. 1990. Measurement of Physical Adsorption of Gases at High Pressure. Rev Sci Instrum 61 (4): 1314–1318. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1141179.
Wu, K., Li, X., Wang, C. et al. 2015. Model for Surface Diffusion of Adsorbed Gas in Nanopores of Shale Gas Reservoirs. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54 (12): 3225–3236. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie504030v.
Wu, K., Chen, Z., Li, X. et al. 2016a. Methane Storage in Nanoporous Material at Supercritical Temperature Over a Wide Range of Pressures. Sci Rep 6: 33461. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33461.
Wu, K., Chen, Z., Li, X. et al. 2016b. A Model for Multiple Transport Mechanisms Through Nanopores of Shale-Gas Reservoirs With Real Gas Effect–Adsorption-Mechanic Coupling. Int J Heat Mass Transf 93 (February): 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.10.003.
Wu, K., Li, X., Guo, C. et al. 2016c. A Unified Model for Gas Transfer in Nanopores of Shale-Gas Reservoirs: Coupling Pore Diffusion and Surface Diffusion. SPE J. 21 (5): 1583–1611. SPE-2014-1921039-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/2014-1921039-PA.
Xu, J., Wu, K., Li, R. et al. 2018. Real Gas Transport in Shale Matrix With Fractal Structures. Fuel 219 (1): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.114.
Yang, F., Ning, Z., Zhang, R. et al. 2015. Investigations on the Methane Sorption Capacity of Marine Shales From Sichuan Basin, China. Int J Coal Geol 146 (1 July): 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2015.05.009.
Zhang, J., Clennell, M. B., Liu, K. et al. 2016. Methane and Carbon Dioxide Adsorption on Illite. Energy Fuels 30 (12): 10643–10652. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01776.
Zhou, W., Wu, H., Hartman, M. R. et al. 2007. Hydrogen and Methane Adsorption in Metal_Organic Frameworks: A High-Pressure Volumetric Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (44): 16131–16137. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp074889i.
Zhu, X. and Zhao, Y. P. 2014. Atomic Mechanisms and Equation of State of Methane Adsorption in Carbon Nanopores. J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (31): 17737–17744. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5047003.