Biological Treatments of Oilfield Produced Water: A Comprehensive Review
- Nicolas Lusinier (Aix-Marseille University) | Isabelle Seyssiecq (Aix-Marseille University) | Cecilia Sambusiti (Total) | Matthieu Jacob (Total) | Nicolas Lesage (Total) | Nicolas Roche (Aix-Marseille University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- April 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- hypersaline wastewater, hydraulic retention time, hybrid process, produced water, biological treatments
- 28 in the last 30 days
- 111 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Crude-oil extraction leads to the production of water, called produced water (PW). PW-flow rate increases along with the time of operation, up to more than 20 times the flow rate of crude oil. PW is often considered toxic because of its complex composition. At the moment, only dispersed hydrocarbons are targeted by water regulation. However, as regulations are becoming more stringent, they are also targeting dissolved compounds and/or the whole effluent toxicity. Consequently, PW treatments have to be more efficient, also allowing for high reliability of installations and high compactness (offshore processes). Biological treatments are often considered to offer the best compromise between removal performances and operating costs. However, their lack of compactness is unsuitable for offshore implementation. Hybrid processes, defined here as the combination of two or more processes, show promising performance and should be further studied to overcome the drawbacks noted in the case of other technologies.
Correction Notice: This paper has been modified from its original version. In the last full paragraph on page 2, the abbreviation "C/N/P" has been updated to "COD/N/P." On pages 8 and 9, the abbreviation "COD/m/d" has been corrected to "COD/m3/d."
|File Size||434 KB||Number of Pages||13|
Alboussiere, M.-C. and Cailleaud, K. 2014. Monitoring Total Dissolved Hydrocarbons in Seawater Around Offshore Oil and Gas Facilities. Presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment, Long Beach, California, 17–19 March. SPE-168408-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168408-MS.
Aljuboury, D. A. D. A., Palaniandy, P., Abdul Aziz, H. B. et al. 2017. Treatment of Petroleum Wastewater by Conventional and New Technologies—A Review. Global NEST J. 19 (3): 439–452.
Alley, B., Beebe, A., Rodgers, J. Jr. et al. 2011. Chemical and Physical Characterization of Produced Waters From Conventional and Unconventional Fossil Fuel Resources. Chemosphere 85 (1): 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.043.
Aroswoshola, L. 2011. Produced Water Market: Opportunities in the Oil, Shale and Gas Sectors in North America. Oxford, UK: Media Analytics.
Arthur, J. D., Dillon, L. W., and Drazan, D. J. 2011. Management of Produced Water From Oil and Gas Wells. Paper #2-17, working document of the NPC North American Resource Development Study, September 2011.
Bakke, T., Klungsøyr, J., and Sanni, S. 2013. Environmental Impacts of Produced Water and Drilling Waste Discharges From the Norwegian Offshore Petroleum Industry. Mar. Environ. Res. 92 (December): 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.09.012.
Baldoni-Andrey, P., Pedenaud, P., Dehaene, P.-L. et al. 2006. Impact of High Salinity of Produced Water on the Technical Feasibility of Biotreatment for E&P Onshore Applications. Presented at the SPE International Health, Safety & Environment Conference, Abu Dhabi, 2–4 April. SPE-98751-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/98751-MS.
Barrios-Martinez, A., Barbot, E., Marrot, B. et al. 2006. Degradation of Synthetic Phenol-Containing Wastewaters by MBR. J Memb Sci 281 (1–2): 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.048.
Blanc, P., Ducastel, B., Cazin, J. et al. 2017. First-Time Implementation of Innovative In Situ Biotechnology on an Offshore Platform in Arabian Gulf for Continuous Water Quality Monitoring and Early Leak Detection. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, 13–16 November. SPE-188821-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/188821-MS.
Boeglin, J.-C. and Roubaty, J.-L. 2007. Industrial Pollution of Water–Characterization, Classification, Measurement (Pollution Industrielle de L’eaur–Caractérisation, Classification, Mesure, in French). Techniques de L’Ingénieur G1210 V2.
BP. 2016. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2016. London: BP p.l.c.
Burgos, M. and Cailleaud, K. 2016. Assessment of Alternative Devices for Trace Hydrocarbon Monitoring in the Environment Around Offshore Oil and Gas Facilities. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, 7–10 November. SPE-183525-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/183525-MS.
Campos, J. C., Borges, R. M. H., Oliveira Filho, A. M. et al. 2002. Oilfield Wastewater Treatment by Combined Microfiltration and Biological Processes. Water Res 36 (1): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00203-2.
Capodici, M., Cosenza, A., Di Trapani, D. et al. 2017. Treatment of Oily Wastewater With Membrane Bioreactor Systems. Water 9 (6): 412. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060412.
Cohen, Y. 2001. Biofiltration—The Treatment of Fluids by Microorganisms Immobilized Into the Filter Bedding Material: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 77 (3): 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00074-2.
Di Bella, G., Di Prima, N., Di Trapani, D. et al. 2015. Performance of Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Systems for the Treatment of Shipboard Slops: Assessment of Hydrocarbon Biodegradation and Biomass Activity Under Salinity Variation. J. Hazard. Mater. 300 (30 December): 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.08.021.
Dong, Z., Lu, M., Huang, W. et al. 2011. Treatment of Oilfield Wastewater in Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors Using a Novel Suspended Ceramic Biocarrier. J. Hazard. Mater. 196 (30 November): 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.001.
Dores, R., Hussain, A., Katebah, M. et al. 2012. Using Advanced Water Treatment Technologies to Treat Produced Water From the Petroleum Industry. Presented at the SPE International Production and Operations Conference & Exhibition, Doha, 14–16 May. SPE-157108-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/157108-MS.
El-Naas, M. H., Acio, J. A., and El Telib, A. E. 2014. Aerobic Biodegradation of BTEX: Progresses and Prospects. J Environ Chem Eng 2 (2): 1104–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.04.009.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Pendashteh, A., Abdullah, L. C. et al. 2009. Review of Technologies for Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 170 (2–3): 530–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Pendashteh, A., Abidin, Z. Z. et al. 2010. Application of Membrane-Coupled Sequencing Batch Reactor for Oilfield Produced Water Recycle and Beneficial Re-Use. Bioresour Technol 101 (18): 6942–6949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.005.
Farhadian, M., Duchez, D., Vachelard, C. et al. 2008. Monoaromatics Removal From Polluted Water Through Bioreactors—A Review. Water Res 42 (6–7): 1325–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.021.
Fatone, F., Di Fabio, S., Bolzonella, D. et al. 2011. Fate of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Italian Municipal Wastewater Systems: An Overview of Wastewater Treatment Using Conventional Activated-Sludge Processes (CASP) and Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs). Water Res 45 (1): 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.011.
Freedman, D. E., Riley, S. M., Jones, Z. L. et al. 2017. Biologically Active Filtration for Fracturing Flowback and Produced Water Treatment. J Water Process Eng 18 (August): 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.05.008.
Freire, D. D. C., Cammarota, M. C., and Sant’Anna, G. L. 2001. Biological Treatment of Oil Field Wastewater in a Sequencing Batch Reactor. Environ Technol 22 (10): 1125–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332208618203.
Grandclément, C., Seyssiecq, I., Piram, A. et al. 2017. From the Conventional Biological Wastewater Treatment to Hybrid Processes, the Evaluation of Organic Micropollutant Removal: A Review. Water Res 111 (15 March): 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.005.
Henderson, S. B., Grigson, S. J. W., Johnson, P. et al. 1999. Potential Impact of Production Chemicals on the Toxicity of Produced Water Discharges From North Sea Oil Platforms. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 38 (12): 1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00144-7.
Hussain, A., Minier-Matar, J., Gharfeh, S. et al. 2014. Advanced Technologies for Produced Water Treatment. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 25–28 March. OTC-24749-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/24749-MS.
Igunnu, E. T. and Chen, G. Z. 2014. Produced Water Treatment Technologies. IJLCT 9 (3): 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/cts049.
Igwe, C. O. and Al Saadi, A. 2013. Optimal Options for Treatment of Produced Water in Offshore Petroleum Platforms. J Pollut Eff Cont 1: 102. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4397.1000102.
Jiménez, S., Micó, M. M., Arnaldos, M. et al. 2018. State of the Art of Produced Water Treatment. Chemosphere 192 (February): 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.139.
Judd, S. J. 2016. The Status of Industrial and Municipal Effluent Treatment With Membrane Bioreactor Technology. Chem Eng J 305 (1 December): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.141.
Kose, B., Ozgun, H., Ersahin, M. E. et al. 2012. Performance Evaluation of a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of Brackish Oil and Natural Gas Field Produced Water. Desalination 285 (31 January): 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.016.
Kraume, M. and Drews, A. 2010. Membrane Bioreactors in Waste Water Treatment—Status and Trends. Chem Eng Technol 33 (8): 1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000104.
Krzeminski, P., Leverette, L., Malamis, S. et al. 2017. Membrane Bioreactors—A Review on Recent Developments in Energy Reduction, Fouling Control, Novel Configurations, LCA and Market Prospects. J Memb Sci 527 (1 April): 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.010.
Kwon, S., Sullivan, E. J., Katz, L. et al. 2008. Pilot Scale Test of a Produced Water-Treatment System for Initial Removal of Organic Compounds. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 21–24 September. SPE-116209-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/116209-MS.
Lefebvre, O. and Moletta, R. 2006. Treatment of Organic Pollution in Industrial Saline Wastewater: A Literature Review. Water Res 40 (20): 3671–3682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.027.
Lesage, N., Sperandio, M., and Cabassud, C. 2008. Study of a Hybrid Process: Adsorption on Activated Carbon/Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of an Industrial Wastewater. Chem. Eng. Process. 47 (3): 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.01.021.
Marrot, B., Barrios-Martinez, A., Moulin, P. et al. 2004. Industrial Wastewater Treatment in a Membrane Bioreactor: A Review. Environ Prog 23 (1): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10001.
Massabuau, J.-C., Gudimov, A., and Blanc, P. 2015. Environmental Monitoring of Arctic Waters With Unmanned Bivalve Biosensor Technology: One Year of Background Data Acquisition in the Barents Sea. Presented at the SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Moscow, 26–28 October. SPE-176681-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/176681-MS.
Munirasu, S., Haija, M. A., and Banat, F. 2016. Use of Membrane Technology for Oil Field and Refinery Produced Water Treatment—A Review. Process Saf Environ Prot 100 (March): 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.01.010.
Mutamim, N. S. A., Noor, Z. Z., Hassan, M. A. A. et al. 2012. Application of Membrane Bioreactor Technology in Treating High Strength Industrial Wastewater: A Performance Review. Desalination 305 (1 November): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.033.
OSPAR Commission. 2007. Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic, https://www.ospar.org/convention/text (accessed 29 May 2018).
OSPAR Commission. 2012. OSPAR Recommendation 2012/5, Risk Based Approach to the Management of Reduced Water Discharges From Offshore Installations: Decisions, Recommendations & Agreements, https://www.ospar.org/convention/agreements (accessed 29 May 2018).
OSPAR Commission. 2014. OSPAR Agreement 2014/5, Establishment of a List of Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNECs) for Naturally Occurring Substances in Produced Water: Decisions, Recommendations & Agreements, https://www.ospar.org/convention/agreements (accessed 20 May 2018).
Pedenaud, P., Baldoni-Andrey, P., Breton, A. et al. 2018. Improving Produced Water Quality Discharge Into the Sea by Using Hungry Bacteria. Presented at the SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Security, Environment, and Social Responsibility, Abu Dhabi, 16–18 April. SPE-190644-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/190644-MS.
Pedenaud, P., Wayne, E., Samuel, H. et al. 2011. Ceramic Membrane and Core Pilot Results for Produced Water Management. Presented at OTC Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, 4–6 October. OTC-22371-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/22371-MS.
Pendashteh, A. R., Abdullah, L. C., Fakhru’l-Razi, A. et al. 2012. Evaluation of Membrane Bioreactor for Hypersaline Oily Wastewater Treatment. Process Saf Environ Prot 90 (1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.07.006.
Qin, J.-J., Oo, M. H., Tao, G. et al. 2007. Feasibility Study on Petrochemical Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Using Submerged MBR. J Memb Sci 293 (1–2): 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.012.
Riley, S. M., Oliveira, J. M. S., Regnery, J. et al. 2016. Hybrid Membrane Bio-Systems for Sustainable Treatment of Oil and Gas Produced Water and Fracturing Flowback Water. Sep Purif Technol 171 (17 October): 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.07.008.
Røe Utvik, T. I. 1999. Chemical Characterisation of Produced Water From Four Offshore Oil Production Platforms in the North Sea. Chemosphere 39 (15): 2593–2606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00171-X.
Ruys, V. S., Zerari, K., Seyssiecq, I. et al. 2017. Study of Carbonaceous and Nitrogenous Pollutant Removal Efficiencies in a Hybrid Membrane Bioreactor. J Chem 2017: 4080847. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4080847.
Seybold, A., Cook, J., Rajan, R. V. et al. 1997. Demonstration of Dissolved Organics Removal From Produced Water. Presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 9–11 March. SPE-37420-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/37420-MS.
Sharghi, E. A. and Bonakdarpour, B. 2013. The Study of Organic Removal Efficiency and Halophilic Bacterial Mixed Liquor Characteristics in a Membrane Bioreactor Treating Hypersaline Produced Water at Varying Organic Loading Rates. Bioresour. Technol. 149 (December): 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.110.
Sharghi, E. A., Bonakdarpour, B., and Pakzadeh, M. 2014. Treatment of Hypersaline Produced Water Employing a Moderately Halophilic Bacterial Consortium in a Membrane Bioreactor: Effect of Salt Concentration on Organic Removal Performance, Mixed Liquor Characteristics and Membrane Fouling. Bioresour. Technol. 164 (July): 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.099.
Sholtes, D. G., Young, M. A., and Jones, J. S. 1997. Lower Cost Produced Water Treatment in the Gulf Coast Region: Investigation of Biotreatment Methods. Presented at the SPE/EPA Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, Dallas, 3–5 March. SPE-37902-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/37902-MS.
Su, D., Wang, J., Liu, K. et al. 2007. Kinetic Performance of Oil-Field Produced Water Treatment by Biological Aerated Filter. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 15 (4): 591–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(07)60129-3.
Sun, C., Leiknes, T., Weitzenbo¨ck, J. et al. 2010. Salinity Effect on a Biofilm-MBR Process for Shipboard Wastewater Treatment. Sep Purif Technol 72 (3): 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.03.010.
Tellez, G. T., Nirmalakhandan, N., and Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. 2002. Performance Evaluation of an Activated Sludge System for Removing Petroleum Hydrocarbons From Oilfield Produced Water. Adv. Environ. Res. 6 (4): 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(01)00073-9.
Tellez, G. T., Nirmalakhandan, N., and Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. 2005. Kinetic Evaluation of a Field-Scale Activated Sludge System for Removing Petroleum Hydrocarbons From Oilfield-Produced Water. Environ Prog 24 (1): 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10042.
Tong, K., Zhang, Y., Liu, G. et al. 2013. Treatment of Heavy Oil Wastewater by a Conventional Activated Sludge Process Coupled With an Immobilized Biological Filter. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 84 (October): 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.002.
Travers, C. and Tocqué, E. 2016. Oil (Pétrole, in French). Techniques de L’Ingénieur BE8520 V2.
Veil, J. A., Puder, M. G., Elcock, D. et al. 2004. A White Paper Describing Produced Water From Production of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Coal Bed Methane. Technical report, No. ANL/EA/RP-112631, US Department of Energy. https://doi.org/10.2172/821666.
Wang, Z., Lin, B., Sha, G. et al. 2011. A Combination of Biodegradation and Microfiltration for Removal of Oil and Suspended Solids From Polymer-Containing Produced Water. Presented at the SPE Americas E&P Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental Conference, Houston, 21–23 March. SPE-140916-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/140916-MS.
Woolard, C. R. and Irvine, R. L. 1994. Biological Treatment of Hypersaline Wastewater by a Biofilm of Halophilic Bacteria. Water Environ. Res. 66 (3): 230–235. https://doi.org/10.2175/WER.66.3.8.
Woolard, C. R. and Irvine, R. L. 1995. Treatment of Hypersaline Wastewater in the Sequencing Batch Reactor. Water Res 29 (4): 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)00239-4.
Zerari, K., Seyssieq, I., Akretche, D.-E. et al. 2013. Enhancement of Oxygen Mass Transfer Coefficients in a Hybrid Membrane Bioreactor. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88 (6): 1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4062.
Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Ye, Z. et al. 2006. Oil Field Wastewater Treatment in Biological Aerated Filter by Immobilized Microorganisms. Process Biochem 41 (7): 1475–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.02.006.
Zheng, J., Chen, B., Thanyamanta, W. et al. 2016. Offshore Produced Water Management: A Review of Current Practice and Challenges in Harsh/Arctic Environments. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 104 (1–2): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.01.004.