Probabilistically Mapping Well Performance in Unconventional Reservoirs With a Physics-Based Decline-Curve Model
- Rafael Wanderley de Holanda (Texas A&M University) | Eduardo Gildin (Texas A&M University) | Peter P. Valkó (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- April 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Jacobi theta functions, automatic decline curve analysis, well placement, unconventional reservoirs, Bayesian estimation
- 16 in the last 30 days
- 131 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Decline curves are the simplest type of model to use to forecast production from oil and gas reservoirs. Using a selected decline model and observed production data, a trend is projected to predict future well performance and reserves. Despite capturing general trends, these models are not sufficient at describing the underlying physics of complex multiphase porous-media flow phenomena and at explaining variations in production caused by changes in operational conditions. The application of these models within a Bayesian framework is a feasible alternative to mitigate this issue and obtain more-robust forecasts by representing the possible outcomes with probability distributions. However, one important aspect that conditions the production forecasts and their uncertainty is the design of a suitable prior distribution, which can be subjective.
To address the aforementioned issue, this paper presents a workflow for the development of a localized prior distribution for new wells drilled in shale formations that combines production data from pre-existing surrounding wells and spatial data, specifically well-surface/bottom coordinates. This workflow aims to establish engineering criteria to reduce the subjectivity in the design of a prior distribution, assessing spatial continuity of the parameters of a physics-based decline-curve model (θ2 model), automatically identifying regions where uncertainty can be reduced a priori, and reliably quantifying the uncertainty.
A case study of 814 gas wells in the Barnett Shale is presented, and several maps are generated for the analysis of important properties to be considered during field development. The dry-gas window presented more-continuous decline-curve parameters than the wet-gas and gas/condensate windows, which resulted in lower uncertainty with the localized prior approach. As more data are acquired with time, the uncertainty in the production forecasts is further reduced and the localized prior becomes more informative, especially in the dry-gas window. The localized prior can then serve as an indicator for the performance of new infill wells in different locations.
Portions of the content of this paper were initially presented in Holanda et al. (2018b), and are further developed and reviewed here.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||24|
Arps, J. J. 1945. Analysis of Decline Curves. In Transactions of the AIME, Vol. 160, Part 1, 228–247. SPE-945228-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/945228-G.
Barber, D. 2012. Bayesian Reasoning and Machine Learning. New York City: Cambridge University Press.
Browning, J., Ikonnikova, S., Gu¨len, G. et al. 2013. Barnett Shale Production Outlook. SPE Econ & Mgmt 5 (3): 89–104. SPE-165585-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/165585-PA.
Camacho-Velázquez, R. G. 1987. Well Performance Under Solution Gas Drive. PhD dissertation, University of Tulsa, Tulsa.
Camacho-Velázquez, R. G. and Raghavan, R. 1989. Boundary-Dominated Flow in Solutions-Gas-Drive Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng 4 (4): 503–512. SPE-18562-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/18562-PA.
Chaudhary, N. L. and Lee, W. J. 2017. Constructing Enhanced Type Wells Using Cluster-Weighted Modelling. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Austin, Texas, 24–26 July. URTEC-2697554-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2017-2697554.
Clark, A. J., Lake, L. W., and Patzek, T. W. 2011. Production Forecasting With Logistic Growth Models. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October–2 November. SPE-144790-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/144790-MS.
DrillingInfo. 2018. https://info.drillinginfo.com/ (accessed 30 April 2018).
Duong, A. N. 2011. Rate-Decline Analysis for Fracture-Dominated Shale Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng 14 (3): 377–387. SPE-137748-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/137748-PA.
Ezisi, I., Hale, B. W., Watson, M. C. et al. 2012. Assessment of Probabilistic Parameters for Barnett Shale Recoverable Volumes. Presented at the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Calgary, 24–25 September. SPE-162915-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162915-MS.
Fetkovich, M. 1980. Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves. J Pet Technol 32 (6): 1065–1077. SPE-4629-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/4629-PA.
Freeborn, R. and Russell, B. 2016. Creating More Representative Type Wells. SPE Econ & Mgmt 8 (2): 50–58. SPE-175967-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175967-MS.
Fulford, D. S. and Blasingame, T. A. 2013. Evaluation of Time-Rate Performance of Shale Wells Using the Transient Hyperbolic Relation. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, Calgary, 5–7 November. SPE-167242-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167242-MS.
Fulford, D. S., Bowie, B., Berry, M. E. et al. 2016. Machine Learning as a Reliable Technology for Evaluating Time/Rate Performance of Unconventional Wells. SPE Econ & Mgmt 8 (1): 23–39. SPE-174784-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/174784-PA.
Gong, X., Gonzalez, R., McVay, D. A. et al. 2014. Bayesian Probabilistic Decline-Curve Analysis Reliably Quantifies Uncertainty in Shale-Well-Production Forecasts. SPE J. 19 (6): 1047–1057. SPE-147588-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/147588-PA.
Gringarten, E. and Deutsch, C. 1999. Methodology for Variogram Interpretation and Modeling for Improved Reservoir Characterization. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3–6 October. SPE-56654-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/56654-MS.
Holanda, R. W., Gildin, E., and Valkó, P. P. 2018a. Combining Physics, Statistics, and Heuristics in the Decline-Curve Analysis of Large Data Sets in Unconventional Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng 21 (3): 683–702. SPE-185589-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/185589-PA.
Holanda, R. W., Gildin, E., and Valkó, P. P. 2018b. Mapping the Barnett Shale Gas With Probabilistic Physics-Based Decline Curve Models and the Development of a Localized Prior Distribution. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, 23–25 July. URTEC-2902792-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2018-2902792.
Igor, M. 2007. Theta Function of Four Types, Version 22.214.171.124, MathWorks, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/18140-thetafunction-of-four-types (accessed 13 January 2017).
Johansson, F. and others. 2013. mpmath: A Python Library for Arbitrary-Precision Floating-Point Arithmetic, Version 0.18, http://mpmath.org (accessed 14 April 2019).
Kale, S. V., Rai, C. S., Sondergeld, C. H. et al. 2010. Petrophysical Characterization of Barnett Shale. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 23–25 February. SPE-131770-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/131770-MS.
Lee, W. J. and Sidle, R. 2010. Gas-Reserves Estimation in Resource Plays. SPE Econ & Mgmt 2 (2): 86–91. SPE-130102-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/130102-PA.
Martineau, D. F. 2007. History of the Newark East Field and the Barnett Shale as a Gas Reservoir. AAPG Bull. 91 (4): 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1306/intro910407.
McCain, W. D. 1990. The Properties of Petroleum Fluids, first edition. Tulsa: PennWell.
Miller, P., Frechette, N., and Kellett, K. D. 2017. Building Type Wells for Appraisal of Unconventional Resource Plays. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 15–16 February. SPE-185053-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185053-MS.
Ogunyomi, B. A., Patzek, T. W., Lake, L. W. et al. 2016. History Matching and Rate Forecasting in Unconventional Oil Reservoirs With an Approximate Analytical Solution to the Double-Porosity Model. SPE Res Eval & Eng 19 (1): 70–82. SPE-171031-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/171031-PA.
Pollastro, R. M., Hill, R. J., Jarvie, D. M. et al. 2003. Assessing Undiscovered Resources of the Barnett-Paleozoic Total Petroleum System, Bend Arch–Fort Worth Basin Province, Texas. Oral presentation given at the AAPG Southwest Section Meeting, Fort Worth, Texas, 1–4 March.
Pyrcz, M. J. and Deutsch, C. V. 2014. Geostatistical Reservoir Modeling, second edition. New York City: Oxford University Press.
Rastogi, A. and Lee, W. J. 2015.Methodology for Construction of Type Wells for Production Forecasting in Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at theUnconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July. URTEC-2152273-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2015-2152273.
Remy, N. 2005. S-GeMS: The Stanford Geostatistical Modeling Software: A Tool for New Algorithms Development. In Geostatistics Banff 2004, ed. O. Leuangthong and C. V. Deutsch, 865–871. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Rexilius, J. 2015. The Well Factory Approach to Developing Unconventionals: A Case Study From the Permian Basin Wolfcamp Play. Presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 20–22 October. SPE-175916-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175916-MS.
Robertson, S. 1988. Generalized Hyperbolic Equations. SPE-18731-MS.
Valkó, P. P. 2009. Assigning Value to Stimulation in the Barnett Shale: A Simultaneous Analysis of 7000 Plus Production Histories and Well Completion Records. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 19–21 January. SPE-119369-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/119369-MS.
Wolfram Research. 1988. EllipticTheta. http://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/EllipticTheta.html (accessed 13 January 2017).
Wolfram Research. 2015. Mathematica, Version 10.3. Champaign, Illinois: Wolfram Research.