Computation of Surge-Pressure-Wave Propagation During Cementation Process
- Wissam Assaad (Shell Global Solutions International B.V.) | Daniele Di Crescenzo (Shell Exploration & Production Company) | Darren Murphy (Shell Exploration & Production Company) | John Boyd (Shell Exploration & Production Company)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- March 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 114 - 124
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- cementation, pressure wave, formation fracture, mud losses, transient model
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 144 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In this paper, we present a method of modeling surge pressures and wave propagation that can occur during well execution. The surge pressures have an effect on formations [i.e., formation fracture resulting in mud losses and nonproductive time (NPT)]. Knowing the amplitude of surge pressure in advance can lead to operation redesign to avoid losses. Swab- and surge-pressure waves can occur at numerous events during well execution. For example, during liner operations, pressure waves can occur at dart landing or plug shearing, liner-hanger setting, or clearing a plugged shoe-track component. It is possible for surge-pressure waves to create fractures in shale and sand layers (i.e., when surge-pressure-wave amplitude exceeds formation fracturing resistance).
A transient-state physical model is built to compute pressure-wave propagation through drillstring, casing, and open hole to predict the amplitude of a surge-pressure wave and to warn when a fracture might occur in the formation, to avoid mud losses and NPT.
In the model, continuity and energy partial-differential equations (PDEs) are built for a cylindrical fluid element contained in an elastic hollow cylinder. The method of characteristics is applied to convert the PDEs to ordinary-differential equations (ODEs). The ODEs are solved numerically to compute pressure distribution along well depth and in time. The model is implemented as a graphical-user-interface (GUI) tool to be used by drilling engineers at the design phase of a well to avoid losses. The GUI tool is targeted to address different scenarios that take place during the cementation process. To date, the transient-state physical model has been applied successfully in various applications, such as monodiameter technology, running casing, and perforating operations. Two cases are studied, one for a well in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) where mud losses have been reported, and the other for a well in Malaysia where no mud losses have occurred. Pressure-wave computations are performed with the GUI tool for the two cases. The results of both cases are presented in this paper and show that formation fracture can be predicted by the GUI tool and subsequent losses can be avoided.
|File Size||722 KB||Number of Pages||11|
Assaad, W., Pasaribu, H. R., Zijsling, D. et al. 2017. Transient Calculation of Pressure Waves in a Well Induced by Tubular Expansion. Procedia Eng 199: 1276–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.281.
Bruton, J. R., Ivan, C. D., and Heinz, T. J. 2001. Lost Circulation Control: Evolving Techniques and Strategies to Reduce Downhole Mud Losses. Paper presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27 February–1March. SPE-67735-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/67735-MS.
Cengel, Y. and Cimbala, J. M. 2006. Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
Chaudhry, M. H. 2014. Applied Hydraulic Transients, third edition. New York City: Springer.
Daugherty, R., Franzini, J. B., and Finnemore, E. J. 1989. Fluid Mechanics with Engineering Applications. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
Feng, Y. and Gray, K. E. 2018. Modeling Lost Circulation Through Drilling-Induced Fractures. SPE J. 23 (1): 205–223. SPE-187945-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/187945-PA.
Luzardo, J., Oliveira, E. P., Derks, P. W. J. et al. 2015. Alternative Lost Circulation Material for Depleted Reservoirs. Paper presented at OTC Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 27–29 October. OTC-26188-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/26188-MS.
Mehrabian, A., Jamison, D., and Teodorrescu, S. G. 2015. Geomechanics of Lost-Circulation Events and Wellbore-Strengthening Operations. SPE J. 20 (6): 1305–1316. SPE-174088-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/174088-PA.
Mitchell, R. F. 1988a. Dynamic Surge/Swab Pressure Predictions. SPE Drill Eng 3 (3): 325–333. SPE-16156-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/16156-PA.
Mitchell, R. F. 1988b. Surge Pressures: Are Steady-State Models Adequate? Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 2–5 October. SPE-18021-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/18021-MS.
Mitchell, R. F. 2004. Surge Pressures in Low-Clearance Liners. Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, Texas, USA, 2–4 March. SPE-87181-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/87181-MS.
Mofunlewi, S. S. and Okoto, F. 2016. Curing Lost Circulation with an Engineered Spacer During Cement Placement. Paper presented at the SPE Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria, 2–4 August. SPE-184350-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/184350-MS.
Onyia, E. C. 1991. An Analysis of Experimental Data on Lost Circulation Problems While Drilling with Oil-Base Mud. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 6–9 October. SPE-22581-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/22581-MS.
Scott, T., LoGiudice, M., Gaspard, G. et al. 2010. Multiple-Opening Diverter Tool Reduces Formation Surge Pressure and Increases Running Speeds for Casing and Liners. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-135178-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/135178-MS.
Therond, E., Taoutaou, S., James, S. G. et al. 2018. Understanding Lost Circulation While Cementing: Field Study and Laboratory Research. SPE Drill & Compl 33 (1): 77–86. SPE-184673-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/184673-PA.
Wang, R., Wang, Z., Wang, X. et al. 2014. Water Hammer Assessment Techniques for Water Distribution Systems. Procedia Eng 70: 1717–1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.189.
Whitfill, D. and Wang, H. 2005. Making Economic Decisions to Mitigate Lost Circulation. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Dallas, Texas, USA, 9–12 October. SPE-95561-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/95561-MS.
Whitfill, D., Wang, M., Jamison, D. et al. 2007. Preventing Lost Circulation Requires Planning Ahead. Paper presented at the International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Veracruz, Mexico, 27–30 June. SPE-108647-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/108647-MS.
Wichowski, R. 1991. Comparative Analysis of Water-Hammer Calculation by the Approximate and the Complete Methods of Characteristics. Period Polytech-Civ. 35 (1–2): 107–125.
Willemse, J. J. F. M. 2018. Surge and Swab Pressure: A Transient Approach to Running Expandable Assemblies. Master’s thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands (January 2018).