Laboratory Foamed-Cement-Curing Evolution Using CT Scanning: Insights From Elevated-Pressure Generation
- Laura E. Dalton (US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory and Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education) | Sarah Brown (US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory, AECOM) | Johnathan Moore (US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory, AECOM) | Dustin Crandall (US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory) | Magdalena Gill (US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory, AECOM)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- March 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 81 - 91
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- foamed cement generator, wellbore integrity, computed tomography, API RP 10B-4
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 157 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Andrade, J. D., Sangesland, S., Skorpa, R. et al. 2016. Experimental Laboratory Setup for Visualization and Quantification of Cement-Sheath Integrity. SPE Drill & Compl 31 (4): 317–326. SPE-173871-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/173871-PA.
API RP 10B-4, RP for Preparation and Testing of Foamed Cement Formulations at Atmospheric Pressure. 2015. Washington, DC: API.
Baker, D. R., Mancini, L., Polacci, M. et al. 2012. An Introduction to the Application of X-Ray Microtomography to the Three-Dimensional Study of Igneous Rocks. Lithos 148: 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.06.008.
Benge, G. O., McDermott, J. R., Langlinais, J. C. et al. 1996. Foamed Cement Job Successful in Deep HTHP Offshore Well. Oil & Gas Journal 94 (11): 58–63. TREX–31003.
Benge, G. 2011. Evaluation of the Cementing of the 9 7/8-x7-in. Production String on the Macondo Well. Expert report, Oil Rig MDL No. 2179, TREX-05990, US District Court of the Eastern District of Louisiana, 26 April 2011, http://www.mdl2179trialdocs.com/releases/release201303060945007/TREX-05990.pdf (accessed 8 June 2018).
Brandon, M. T. 1995. Analysis of Geologic Strain Data in Strain-Magnitude Space. Journal of Structural Geology 17 (10): 1375–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(95)0032-9.
Buades, A., Coll, B., and Morel, J. M. 2005. A Non-Local Algorithm for Image Denoising. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2: 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2005.38.
Buades, A., Coll, B., and Morel, J. M. 2008. Nonlocal Image and Movie Denoising. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 76: 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-007-0052-1.
Carlson, W. D., Denison, C., and Ketcham, R. A. 2000. High-Resolution X-Ray Computed Tomography as a Tool for Visualization and Quantitative Analysis of Igneous Textures in Three Dimensions. Visual Geosciences 4 (3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10069-999-0003-9.
Cnudde, V. and Boone, N. M. 2013. Higher Resolution X-Ray Computed Tomography in Geosciences: A Review of the Current Technology and Applications. Earth-Science Reviews 123: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erscirev.2013.04.003.
Crandall, D., Gill, M., Moore, J. et al. 2014. Foamed Cement Analysis With Computed Tomography. Presented at the ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 3–7 August. FEDSM2014-21589. https://doi.org/10.1115/FEDSM2014-21589.
Cunningham, E., Heathman, J., Kutchko, B. et al. 2017. Defining the Difference Between Laboratory and Field-Generated Foamed Cement. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 1–4 May. OTC-27581-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/27581-MS.
Dalton, L. E., Crandall, D., Shanley, K. T. et al. 2018. Foamed Cement Generation Methods: Insights From Macro-Porosity and Void Distribution. ACI Materials Journal 115 (1): 89–103. https://doi.org/10.14359/51701101.
de Rozières, J. and Ferrière, R. 1991. Foamed Cement Characterization Under Downhole Conditions and Its Impact on Job Design. SPE Prod Eng 6 (3): 297304. SPE-19935-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/19935-PA.
Deepwater Horizon Study Group (DHSG). 2011. Final Report on the Investigation of the Macondo Well Blowout, 124.
Doube, M., Kiosowski, M. M., Arganda-Carreras, I. et al. 2010. BoneJ: Free and Extensible Image Analysis in ImageJ. Bone 47 (6): 1076–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.08.023.
Economides, M. J., Watters, L.T., and Dunn-Norman, S. 1998. Petroleum Well Construction. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
FEI. 2013. AvizoVR 8.0 User’s Guide. Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin (ZIB), Germany, and Visualization Sciences Group, SAS.
Gieger, C., Fazio, J., Spaulding, R. et al. 2016. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Field-Generated Foam Cements: Implications for Cement Property Prediction and Modeling. Presented at the SPE Deepwater Drilling & Completions Conference, Galveston, Texas, 14–15 September. SPE-180333-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180333-MS.
Glosser, D., Kutchko, B., Benge, G. et al. 2016. Relationship Between Operational Variables, Fundamental Physics and Foamed Cement Properties in Lab and Field Generated Foamed Cement Slurries. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 145: 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.03.014.
Goodwin, K. J. and Crook, R. J. 1992. Cement Sheath Stress Failure. SPE Drill Eng 7 (4): 291–296. SPE-20453-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/20453-PA.
Griffith, J. E., Lende, G., Ravi, K. et al. 2004. Foamed Cement Engineering and Implementation for Cement Sheath Integrity at High Temperature and High Pressure. Presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, 2–4 March. SPE-87194-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/87194-MS.
Kutchko, B., Pike, W., Lang, K. et al. 2012. An Assessment of Research Needs Related to Improving Primary Cement Isolation of Formations in Deep Offshore Wells. In EPAct Technical Report Series, US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory, 1–20. NETL-TRS-3-2012.
Kutchko, B., Crandall, D., Gill, M. et al. 2013. Computed Tomography and Statistical Analysis of Bubble Size Distributions in Atmospheric-Generated Foamed Cement. In EPAct Technical Report Series, US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory, 1–22. NETLTRS-2-2013.
Kutchko, B., Moore, J., Crandall, D. et al. 2014a. Addendum 1 to Computed Tomography and Statistical Analysis of Bubble Size Distributions in Atmospheric-Generated Foamed Cement. In EPAct Technical Report Series, US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory, 1–12. NETL-TRS-2-2014.
Kutchko, B., Crandall, D., Moore, J. et al. 2014b. Assessment of Foamed Cement Used in Deep Offshore Wells. Presented at the SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference, Galveston, Texas, 10–11 September. SPE-170298-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170298-MS.
Kutchko, B., Crandall, D., Moore, J. et al. 2015a. Field-Generated Foamed Cement: Initial Collection, Computed Tomography, and Analysis. In EPAct Technical Report Series, US Department of Energy National Energy Technology, 1–40. NETL-TRS-5-2015.
Kutchko, B., Crandall, D., Moore, J. et al. 2015b. Assessment of Pressurized Foamed Cement Used in Deep Offshore Wells. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 4–7 May. OTC-25994-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/25994-MS.
Kutchko, B., Crandall, D., Spaulding, R. et al. 2016. A Look at Processes Impacting Foamed Cements. Presented at the SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference, Galveston, Texas, 14–15 September. SPE-180337-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180337-MS.
Mookerjee, M. and Peek, S. 2014. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Flinn’s k-Value Versus Lode’s Ratio. Journal of Structural Geology 68: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.08.008.
Moore, S., Miller, M., Faul, R. et al. 2000. Foam Cementing Applications of a Deepwater Subsalt Well—Case History. Presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, New Orleans, 23–25 February. SPE-59170-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/59170-MS.
National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). 2017. Time Series Video. YouTube, 22 December 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFvw1i0y6XA&feature=youtu.be (accessed 23 December 2017).
Pang, X., Maxson, J. K., Jimenez, W. C. et al. 2016a. Multiscale Characterization of Foamed Cement Using X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography. Presented at the SPE Deepwater Drilling & Completions Conference, Galveston, Texas, 14–15 September. SPE-180278-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180278-MS.
Pang, X., Singh, J. P., Jimenez, W. C. et al. 2016b. Influencing Factors of the Microstructure and Macroscopic Performance of Foamed Cement. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, 26–28 September. SPE-181364-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/181364-MS.
Pang, X., Maxson, J. K., Jimenez, W. C. et al. 2017. Microscale Characterization of Field and Laboratory Foamed Cement by Use of X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography. SPE J. 22 (5): 1690–1703. SPE-180278-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/180278-PA.
Patterson, B. M., Henderson, K., Smith, Z. et al. 2012. Applications of Micro-CT to In-Situ Foam Compression and Numerical Modeling. Microscopy and Analysis 26 (2): S4–S7 (AM).
Polacci, M., Baker, D. R., Mancini, L. et al. 2006. Three-Dimensional Investigation of Volcanic Textures by X-Ray Microtomography and Implications for Conduit Processes. Geophysical Research Letters 33: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026241.
Schmitt, M., Halisch, M., Muller, C. et al. 2016. Classification and Quantification of Pore Shapes in Sandstone Reservoir Rocks With 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography. Solid Earth 7: 285–300. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-7-285-2016.
Schneider, C. A., Rausband, W. S., and Eliceiri, K. W. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of Image Analysis. Nature Methods 9 (7): 671–675. PMID 22930834.
Stark, J. 2011. Recent Advances in the Field of Cement Hydration and Microstructure Analysis. Cement and Concrete Research 41: 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.028.
Ventura, G. 2004. The Strain Path and Kinematics of Lava Domes: An Example From Lipari (Aeolian Islands, Southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Journal of Geophysical Research 109: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002740.
Vollmer, F. W. 2017. EllipseFit 3.3.0 Strain Analysis Software. EllipseFit, 14 July 2017, http://www.frederickvollmer.com/ellipsefit/ (accessed 23 November 2017).
Wadell, H. 1935. Volume, Shape, and Roundness of Quartz Particles. The Journal of Geology 43 (3): 250–280.
Wildenschild, D. and Sheppard, A. 2013. X-Ray Imaging and Analysis Techniques for Quantifying Pore-Scale Structure and Processes in Subsurface Porous Medium Systems. Advances in Water Resources 51: 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018.
Zandomeneghi, D., Voltolini, M., Mancini, L. et al. 2010. Quantitative Analysis of X-Ray Microtomography Images of Geomaterials: Application to Volcanic Rocks. Geosphere 6 (6): 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00561.1.