Bayesian-Based Approach for Hydraulic Flow Unit Identification and Permeability Prediction: A Field Case Application in a Tight Carbonate Reservoir
- Adolfo D'Windt (KOC) | Edwin Quint (Shell) | Anwar Al-Saleh (KOC) | Qasem Dashti (KOC)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 843 - 853
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Bayesian inversion, Bayes clustering, core-log integration
- 21 in the last 30 days
- 129 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Flow zonation and permeability estimation is a common task in reservoir characterization. Typically, integration of openhole log data with a conventional and special core analysis solves this problem. We present a Bayesian-based method for identifying hydraulic flow units in uncored wells using the theory of hydraulic flow units (HFUs) and subsequently compute permeability using wireline log data.
We use a nonlinear optimization scheme on the basis of the probability plot to determine pertinent statistical parameters of each flow unit. Next, we couple these results with the F-test and the Akaike’s criteria with the purpose of establishing the optimal number of HFUs present in the core data set. Then, we allocate the core data into their respective HFUs using the Bayes’ theorem as clustering rule. Finally, we apply an inversion algorithm on the basis of Bayesian inference to predict permeability using only wireline data.
We illustrate the application of the procedure with a carbonate reservoir having extensive conventional core data. The results show that the Bayesian-based clustering and inversion technique delivers permeability estimates that agree with the core data and with the results obtained from a pressure transient analysis.
|File Size||6 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Abbaszadeh, M. 2000. Integrated Characterization and Flow Modeling of a Heterogeneous Carbonated Reservoir in Daleel Field, Oman. SPE Res Eval & Eng 3 (2): 150–159. SPE-62514-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/62514-PA.
Abbaszadeh, M., Fujii, H., and Fujimoto, F. 1996. Permeability Prediction by Hydraulic Flow Units—Theory and Applications. SPE Form Eval 11 (4): 263–271. SPE-30158-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/30158-PA.
Al-Ajmi, F. and Holditch, S. 2000. Permeability Estimation Using Hydraulic Flow Units in a Central Arabia Reservoir. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 1–4 October. SPE-63254-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/63254-MS.
Altunbay, M., Barr, D., Kennaird, A. et al. 1994. Numerical Geology: Predicting Depositional and Diagenetic Facies from Wireline Logs Using Core Data. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 7–10 November. SPE-28794-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/28794-MS.
Amaefule, J. 1993. Enhanced Reservoir Description: Using Core and Log Data to Identify Hydraulic Flow Units and Predict Permeability in Uncored Intervals/Wells. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 3–6 October. SPE-26436-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/26436-MS.
Amyx, J., Bass, D., and Whiting, R. 1960. Petroleum Reservoir Engineering. New York, New York, USA: McGraw & Hill.
Basbug, Z. and Karpyn, Z. 2007. Estimation of Permeability from Porosity, Specific Surface Area, and Irreducible Water Saturation Using an Artificial Neural Network. Paper presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 15–18 April. SPE-107909-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/107909-MS.
Civan, F. 2005. Improved Permeability Equation from the Bundle-of-Leaky-Capillary-Tubes Model. Paper presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 16–19 April. SPE-94271-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/94271-MS.
Davies, D. and Vessell, R. 1996. Flow Unit Characterization of a Shallow Shelf Carbonate Reservoir: North Robertson Unit, West Texas. Paper presented at the SPE/DOE 10th Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 21–24 April. SPE-35433-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/35433-MS.
Delfiner, P., Peyret, O., and Serra, O. 1987. Automatic Determination of Lithology from Well Logs. SPE Form Eval 2 (3): 303–310. SPE-13290-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/13290-PA.
D'Windt, A. A. 2007. Reservoir Zonation and Permeability Estimation: A Bayesian Approach. Paper presented at the SPWLA 48th Annual Logging Symposium, Austin, Texas, USA, 3–6 June. SPWLA-2007-UUU.
Isaaks, E. and Srivastava, R. 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. New York, New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, J. L., Lake, L. W., Corbett, P. W. M. et al. 1997. Statistics for Petroleum Engineers and Geoscientists. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.
John, A., Torres-Verdin, C., and Srinivasan, U. 2008. Seismic Facies Identification and Classification Using Simple Statistics. SPE Res Eval & Eng 11 (8): 984–990. SPE-96577-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/96577-PA.
Johnson, W. 1994. Permeability Determination from Well Logs and Core Data. Paper presented at the SPE Permian Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, USA, 16–18 March. SPE-27647-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/27647-MS.
Kapur, L. and Lake, L. W. 2000. Probability Logs for Facies Classification. In Situ 24 (1): 57–78.
Lucia, J. 1995. Rock-Fabric/Petrophysical Classification of Carbonate Pore Space for Reservoir Characterization. AAPG Bull 79 (9): 1275–1300. https://doi.org/10.1306/7834D4A4-1721-11D7-8645000102C1865D.
Mardani, A., Rezaee, R., and Eskandar, A. 2013. NMR Facies Definition for Permo-Triassic Kangan/Dalan Carbonate Formation by Use of Core/Log and Pore-Scale Measurements. SPE Res Eval & Eng 16 (1): 8–17. SPE-163102-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/163102-PA.
Mishra, S. 1988. On the Use of Akaike's Information Criterion for Model Selection in Well Test Analysis. SPE-18578-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/18578-MS.
Ohen, H. and Ajufo, A. 1995. A Hydraulic (Flow) Unit Based Model for the Determination of Petrophysical Properties from NMR Relaxation Measurements. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 22–25 October. SPE-35683-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/35683-MS.
Ohen, H., Enwere, P., and Egwin, R. 1999. An Effective Technique to Integrate Core and Wireline NMR Log Data through Relaxivity Grouping or NMR Facies Identification. Paper presented at the SPE Nigerian Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Warri, Nigeria, 4–6 August. SPE-57859-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/57859-MS.
Soto, R., Torres, F., Arango, S. et al. 2001. Improved Reservoir Permeability Models from Flow Units and Soft Computing Techniques: A Case Study, Suria and Reforma-Libertad Fields, Colombia. Paper presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25–28 March. SPE-69625-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/69625-MS.
Stundner, M. and Oberwinkier, C. 2004. Self-Organizing Maps for Lithofacies Identification and Permeability Prediction. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 26–29 September. SPE-90720-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/90720-MS.
Svirsky, D., Ryazanov, A., Pankov, M. et al. 2004. Hydraulic Flow Units Resolve Reservoir Description Challenges in a Siberian Oil Field. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modeling for Asset Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 29–30 March. SPE-87056-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/87056-MS.
Tiab, D. and Donaldson, E. 2004. Petrophysics, second edition. Burlington, Massachusetts, USA: Gulf Publishing.
Watson, A., Gatens, J., and Lane, H. 1988. Model Selection for Well Test and Production Data Analysis. SPE Form Eval 3 (1): 215–221. SPE-15926-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/15926-PA.