On Subcool Control in SAGD Producers—Part II: Localized-Hot-Spots Effects and Optimization of Flow-Control Devices
- Mazda Irani (Ashaw Energy)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- August 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,613 - 1,629
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- steam-assisted gravity drainage, virtual skin factor, localized hot spot, steam trap control, subcool
- 21 in the last 30 days
- 67 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
At the base of a steam-assisted-gravity-drainage (SAGD) steam chamber, a liquid pool is developed, which is a key component for bitumen production. A producer is placed in the liquid pool, and its production is mainly controlled by its liquid level and the temperature gradient across its depth. A “subcool control” or “thermodynamic steam-trap control” is a typical operating strategy to control steam coning to the producer. Part I of this study (Irani 2018) presented a methodology to evaluate the production rate for a given pressure drawdown and subcool in a SAGD liquid pool; and Part III (Irani and Gates 2018) modified such a formulation for a stability analysis of the NsolvTM (Nenniger and Nenniger 2000, 2001) process that contained a large fraction of liquid butane. In this study, first, the effect of localized hot spots on well control is formulated as a virtual skin factor in the liquid-pool deliverability equation. The results of this work suggest that a longer hot spot will yield to lower differential pressure and make it more challenging to control the steam breakthrough by choking the well at a given rate. Another key finding is that the steam coning becomes less controllable for higher-permeability reservoirs.
Flow-control devices (FCDs) have been used extensively in horizontal wells for conventional oil and gas production to prevent early water breakthrough or gas coning. Although FCDs are commonly installed to prevent steam coning after steam breakthrough and to manage hot spots as retrofit completions by SAGD operators, in recent years, FCDs have been often installed to improve SAGD well-pair performance as part of the initial completion. The benefits associated with this technology in the SAGD industry have been studied with reservoir simulations and validated with field experience, but a theoretical study that discusses the main factors for a correct FCD selection on the basis of operational conditions and reservoir heterogeneity is required. In this study, the liner-deployed FCD and liquid-pool systems are coupled, and two criteria are suggested for a design of liner-deployed FCDs on the basis of the pressure-drop ratio of the FCD relative to the liquid pool (ΔPFCD = ΔPpool) and the coefficient of variation (CoV) of inflow for the liner-deployed-FCD wellbore (CoVFCD). The results of this study show that in higher-permeability reservoirs, the ideal FCD design should have more ports to reduce the differential pressure to flow response. While FCDs will improve inflow conformance relative to completions without FCDs, the effect of permeability in this improvement is minimal. This improvement is larger in applications operating at lower target subcool values. Reducing the target-wellbore subcool value can improve well deliverability twofold: First, FCD-completed wells produce more at lower subcools and, second, reducing the subcool value helps to improve inflow uniformity along the length of the lateral. By effectively removing the fluids available to the producer, the growth of the steam chamber can be maximized through accelerated injection rates.
|File Size||766 KB||Number of Pages||17|
Banerjee, S. and Hascakir, B. 2017. Design of Flow Control Devices in Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) Completion. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 8 (3): 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-017-0393-4.
Becerra, O., Kearl, B., and Sanwoolu, A. 2014. A Systematic Approach for Inflow Control Devices Testing in MacKay River SAGD Wells. Presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 10–12 June. SPE-170055-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170055-MS.
Becerra, O., Kearl, B. J., Zaini, F. et al. 2018. Liner Deployed Inflow Control Devices (ICD) Production Results in MacKay River SAGD Wells. Presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13–14 March. SPE-189775-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189775-MS.
Birchenko, V. M. 2010. Analytical Modelling of Wells with Inflow Control Devices. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Heriot-Watt University.
Boone, T. J., Youck, D. G., and Sun, S. 2001. Targeted Steam Injection Using Horizontal Wells With Limited Entry Perforations. J Can Pet Technol 40 (1): 25–30. PETSOC-01-01-01. https://doi.org/10.2118/01-01-01.
Chase, R. W., Marietta, C., and Anthony, T. M. 1988. A Simplified Method for Determining Gas-Well Deliverability. SPE Res Eng 3 (3): 1090–1096. SPE-14507-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/14507-PA.
Chien, S. F. 1990. Critical Flow of Wet Steam Through Chokes. J Pet Technol 42 (3): 363–370. SPE-17575-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/17575-PA.
Chien, S. F. and Schrodt, J. L. G. 1995. Determination of Steam Quality and Flow-Rate Using Pressure Data from an Orifice Meter and a Critical Flowmeter. SPE Prod & Fac 10 (2): 76–81. SPE-24832-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/24832-PA.
Fetkovich, M. J. 1973. The Isochronal Testing of Oil Wells. Presented at the SPE Annual Meeting (AIME), Las Vegas, Nevada, 30 September–3 October. SPE-4529-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/4529-MS.
Furui, K., Zhu, D., and Hill, A. D. 2003. A Rigorous Formation Damage Skin Factor and Reservoir Inflow Model for a Horizontal Well. SPE Prod & Fac 18 (3): 151–157. SPE-84964-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/84964-PA.
Gallice, F. and Wiggins, M. L. 2004. A Comparison of Two-Phase Inflow Performance Relationships. SPE Prod & Oper 19 (2): 100–104. SPE-88445-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/88445-PA.
Ghesmat, K. and Zhao, L. 2015. SAGD Well-Pair Completion Optimization Using Scab Liner and Steam Splitters. J Can Pet Technol 54 (6): 387–393. SPE-170076-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/170076-PA.
Hawkins, Jr., M. F. 1956. A Note on the Skin Effect. J Pet Technol 8 (12): 65–66. SPE-732-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/732-G.
Horner, D. R. 1951. Pressure Build-up in Wells. Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd World Petroleum Congress, Hague, The Netherlands, 28 May–6 June. WPC-4135.
Irani, M. 2013. Understanding the Steam-Hammer Mechanism in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Wells. SPE J. 18 (6): 1181–1201. SPE-165456-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/165456-PA.
Irani, M. 2018. On Subcool Control in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Producers—Part I: Stability Envelopes. SPE J. 23 (3): 841–867. SPE-187956-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/187956-PA.
Irani, M. and Gates, I. 2018. On Subcool Control in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Producers—Part III: Efficiency of Subcool Trapping in Nsolv Process. SPE J. 23 (5): 1957–1976. SPE-191355-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/191355-PA.
Irani, M. and Ghannadi, S. 2018. On Temperature Fall-Off Interpretation in Circulation Phase of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process. SPE J. 24 (3): 1002–1015. SPE-189740-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/189740-PA.
Jones, L. G., Blount, E. M., and Glaze, O. H. 1976. Use of Short Term Multiple Rate Flow Tests to Predict Performance of Wells Having Turbulence. Presented at the SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 3–6 October. SPE-6133-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/6133-PA.
Klins, M. A. and Majcher, M. W. 1992. Inflow Performance Relationships for Damaged or Improved Wells Producing Under Solution-Gas Drive. J Pet Technol 44 (12): 1357–1363. SPE-19852-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/19852-PA.
Li, L., Ma, Y., Mahmoudi, M. et al. 2018. Steps Toward Designing the Optimum Outflow Control Device for SAGD using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation. Presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13–14 March. SPE-189718-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189718-MS.
Miersma, M., Mahmoudi, M., Fattahpour, V. et al. 2018. Evaluation of Inflow Control Device Performance Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13–14 March. SPE-189721-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189721-MS.
Nenniger, J. and Nenniger, E. 2000. Method and Apparatus for Stimulating Heavy Oil Production, Canada Patent No. 2,299,790C.
Nenniger, J. and Nenniger, E. 2001. Method and Apparatus for Stimulating Heavy Oil Production, Canada Patent No. 2,351,148C.
Peaceman, D. W. 1978. Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation. SPE J. 18 (3):183–194. SPE-6893-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/6893-PA.
Peaceman, D. W. 1983. Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation With Nonsquare Grid Blocks and Anisotropic Permeability. SPE J. 23 (3): 531–543. SPE-6893-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/10528-PA.
Perkins, T. K. 1993. Critical and Subcritical Flow of Multiphase Mixtures Through Chokes. SPE Drill & Compl 8 (4): 271–276. SPE-20633-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/20633-PA.
Standing, M. B. 1970. Inflow Performance Relationships for Damaged Wells Producing by Solution-Gas Drive. J Pet Technol 22 (11): 1399–1400. SPE-3237-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/3237-PA.
Sukarno, P. and Wisnogroho, A. 1995. Generalized Two-Phase IPR Curve Equation Under Influence of Non-Linear Flow Efficiency. Proc., Society of Indonesian Petroleum Engineers Production Optimization International Symposium, Bandung, Indonesia, 24–26 July, 31–43.
Vachon, G. P., Klaczek, W., Erickson, P. J. et al. 2015. Use of Flow Control Devices (FCDs) to Enforce Conformance in Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) Completions. Presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 9–11 June. SPE-174416-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174416-MS.
Vogel, J. V. 1968. Inflow Performance Relationships for Solution-Gas Drive Wells. J Pet Technol 20 (1): 83–92. SPE 1476-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/1476-PA.
Wiggins, M. L. 1994. Generalized Inflow Performance Relationships for Three-Phase Flow. SPE Res Eng 9 (3): 181–182. SPE-25458-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/25458-PA.
Zeng, Q., Wang, Z., Yang, G. et al. 2013. Selection and Optimization Study on Passive Inflow Control Devices by Numerical Simulation. Presented at the SPE Middle East Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain, 28–30 October. SPE-167443-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167443-MS.