Discrete-NTG Truncated Gaussian Simulation: An Alternative Modeling Approach for Coal-Seam-Gas Unconventional Reservoirs, Bowen Basin, Eastern Australia
- Simone Rattazzi (Santos Ltd.) | Alan Hansen (Santos Ltd.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 854 - 864
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- CSG, static modeling, discrete NTG, truncated Gaussian model, coal seam gas
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 53 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Building a representative static model for predicting and monitoring the performance of coal-seam gas (CSG) fields presents several complex and unique challenges. The individual reservoirs possess different coal architectures, often with highly complex seam splitting, amalgamating, and structural deformation. Our objective was to develop an alternative approach that honored log and core data capturing both the lateral heterogeneity and the vertical signature of the Bowen Basin coals in Central Queensland.
In some areas of the Bowen Basin, coals can be thick and laterally continuous; picking the top and base of each seam works well in small models with homogeneous coals. As seam geometries begin to increase in complexity and coals become more heterogeneous in nature with thinner seams in multiple packages, then a net-to-gross (NTG) approach is often more appropriate. Each method has its merits. The former approach describes the reservoir architecture but implies a certain degree of confidence in coal correlation. In a vast field with complex seam splitting and merging with abundant drilling data, it might not be a practical technique. The NTG method disregards coal-seam architecture and reservoir connectivity.
The proposed workflow is a hybrid approach using discrete modeling algorithms and data-analysis tools on continuous NTG properties. The process operates on a relatively coarse chronostratigraphic framework in which coal is captured as contiguous discrete-NTG “facies.” The use of the truncated Gaussian model ensures the ordering of NTG facies and mimics transitions between coals and the surrounding interburdens. With the adoption of facies vertical proportion trends, we are able to replicate a similar coal-seam signature laterally away from the wellbore. The definition of a categorical coal model allows the proper scaling of seams with different coalquality characteristics.
With the successful geocellular-model construction and history match of two historical CSG fields in the Bowen Basin, the discrete- NTG truncated Gaussian simulation (TGS) approach has proved to be a valid alternative CSG-modeling technique.
|File Size||12 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Alqassab, H. and Vaughan, L. 2012. Impact of Facies Modeling on Reservoir Performance Forecasting: A Comparison Between Discrete Modeling and Mixed Lithology Approaches. Paper presented at the SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait, 10–12 December. SPE-163293-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163293-MS.
Armstrong, M., Galli, A., Beucher, H. et al. 2011. Plurigaussian Simulations in Geosciences. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Department of Natural Resources and Mines. 2017. Queensland’s Petroleum and Coal Seam Gas 2015–2016, http://www.australiaminerals.gov.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0003/47622/Queenslands-petroleum-and-coal-seam-gas-2017.pdf (accessed 6 July 2018).
Esterle, J. and Sliwa, R. 2008. Sediment Stacking Patterns in Coal Measure Sequences: Examples from the Permian Bowen Basin. Paper presented at the PESA Eastern Australian Basins Symposium III, Sydney, Australia, 14–17 September.
Fielding, C. R. 1987. Coal Depositional Models for Deltaic and Alluvial Plain Sequences. Geology 15 (7): 661–664. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<661:CDMFDA>2.0.CO;2.
Lowe-Young, B. 2001. The Scotia Field: An Emerging Coal Seam Gas Development. Paper presented at the PESA (QLD) Petroleum Symposium. Matheron, G., Beucher, H., de Fouquet, C. et al. 1987. Conditional Simulation of the Geometry of Fluvio-Deltaic Reservoirs. Proc., SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 27–30 September, 123–131. SPE-16753-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/16753-MS.
Michaelsen, P., Henderson, R. A., Crosdale, P. J. et al. 2000. Facies Architecture and Depositional Dynamics of the Upper Permian Rangal Coal Measures, Bowen Basin, Australia. J Sediment Res 70 (4): 879–895. https://doi.org/10.1306/2DC4093F-0E47-11D7-8643000102C1865D.
Ramandi, H. L., Mostaghimi, P., Armstrong, R. T. et al. 2016. Porosity and Permeability Characterization of Coal: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study. Int J Coal Geol 154–155: 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2015.10.001.
Santos GLNG. 2016. Scotia PL176 Reservoir Management Plan CF1 Sanction Gate. Document 1790-375-FDP-0002. Santos GLNG internal archive. Brisbane, Australia: Santos GLNG.
Sliwa, R., Esterle, J., Phillips, L. et al. 2017. Rangal Supermodel 2015: The Rangal-Baralaba-Bandanna Coal Measures in the Bowen and Galilee Basins. ACARP Project C22028, The University of Queensland, https://www.acarp.com.au/abstracts.aspx?repId=C22028.
Weniger, S., Weniger, P., and Littke, R. 2016. Characterizing Coal Cleats from Optical Measurements for CBM Evaluation. Int J Coal Geol 154–155: 176–192.