Geochemical Productivity Index (Igp): An Innovative Way To Identify Potential Zones With Moveable Oil in Shale Reservoirs
- Jaime Piedrahita (Ecopetrol S.A.) | Roberto Aguilera (Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- November 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,256 - 1,264
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- moveable hydrocarbons, geochemical productivity index, shale oil reservoirs, rock-eval pyrolysis, oil saturation index
- 14 in the last 30 days
- 139 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In this paper we present a method for identifying intervals in shale oil reservoirs that contain moveable hydrocarbons with a novel geochemical productivity index (PI), Igp. This index merges three important rock properties that must always be considered for sound shale oil reservoir characterization: vitrinite reflectance (%Ro), oil-saturation index (OSI), and free-water porosity (φFW). Integrating this index with other petrophysical properties and geomechanical parameters defines intervals with high moveable oil content.
Shale oil is both a source rock and an unconventional reservoir rock. Hence, it is critical to know both its organic-matter (OM) maturity and its oil/water flow capacity. The introduced Igp considered these features simultaneously; maturity was evaluated by discretizing %Ro from 0 to 1, depending on whether the rock was immature or not; free oil flow capacity modeled the normalizing OSI between 0 and 1 on the basis of results from the Rock-Eval VI pyrolysis (REP) obtained in the laboratory or by electric logs; and water flow capacity was estimated from φFW, obtained using a nuclear-magnetic-resonance (NMR) log, which was transformed into an index between 0 and 1. Flow oil capacity was defined as the amount of moveable oil that exceeded the sorption capacity of the source rock.
Using the Igp is explained with real data from a vertical well that penetrates several stacked shale oil reservoirs. However, the same approach can be used in any other type of wellbore architecture (i.e., deviated, horizontal, geosteered). Initially, a correlation between vertical depth and %Ro was developed. This resulted in a continuous OM-maturity curve along the well section. Next, OSI was simulated by using a bin porosity from an NMR log, where T2 was between 33 and 80 milliseconds and was correlated with OSI data from REP. As a result, a good match between the simulated and the real OSI data was achieved. Similar to OSI, φFW was also calculated from the NMR log, but it used a bin porosity when T2 was greater than 80 milliseconds. These three parameters were then transformed to fractional indices, which were combined into a unique index, Igp. When the index was greater than 0.66, there was a good chance that the three conditions mentioned above would be met. For the example well considered in this study, it was found that almost 30% of the total vertical section had good moveable oil potential. This corresponded to 10 intervals in the well.
The key novelty of this paper is that we have developed a continuous curve of an index that is easy to use and is powerful for identifying intervals with moveable hydrocarbon potential. This is true even in those intervals without laboratory data because of the continuity of the Igp curve, in addition to the Igp integrated criteria that are usually applied independently. The Igp index is a simple-to-use approach. However, because it is a new method, an explorationist should validate it against real oil production information.
|File Size||606 KB||Number of Pages||9|
Ahmed, U. and Meehan, D. 2016. Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources Exploitation and Development. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., and Mavko, G. 2005. Quantitative Seismic Interpretation, first edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Burrus, J., Osadetz, K., Gaulier, M. et al. 2015. Source Rock Permeability and Petroleum Expulsion Efficiency: Modelling Examples From the MahakamDelta, the Williston Basin and the Paris Basin. http://pgc.lyellcollection.org/ (accessed 23 July 2015).
Carvajal-Ortiz, H. and Gentzis, T. 2015. Critical Considerations When Assessing Hydrocarbon Plays Using Rock-Eval Pyrolysis and Organic Petrology Data: Data Quality Revisited. Int J Coal Geol 152: 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2015.06.001.
Cooles, G. P., Mackenzie, A. S., and Quigley, T. M. 1986. Calculation of Petroleum Masses Generated and Expelled From Source Rocks. Org Geochem 10 (1–3): 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(86)90026-4.
Craddock, P. R., Reeder, S. L., Rylander, E. et al. 2016. Assessing Reservoir Quality in Tight Oil Plays With the Downhole Reservoir Producibility Index (RPI). Presented at the SPWLA 57th Annual Logging Symposium, Reykjavik, Iceland, 25–29 June. SPWLA-2016-VVV. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPWLA-2016-VVV.
Dastidar, R., Rai, C. S., Sondergeld, C. et al. 2006. NMR Response of Two Clastic Reservoirs: Influence of Depositional Environment. Petrophysics 47 (3): 214–222. https://www.onepetro.org/journal-paper/SPWLA-2006-v47n3a2.
Espitalie, J., Marquis, F., and Sage, L. 1987. Organic Geochemistry of the Paris Basin. In Petroleum Geology of North West Europe, ed. J. Brooks and K. Glennie, 71–86. London: Graham & Trotman.
Hou, Q., Jin, Q., Li, P. et al. 2017. A Computational Method for Determining Oil Expulsion Efficiency Based on the Ideal Effective Oil Expulsion Mode. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 7: 925–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-017-0337-z.
ISO 7404-5:2009, Methods for the Petrographic Analysis of Coals—Part 5, Method of Determining Microscopically the Reflectance of Vitrinite. 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
Jarvie, D. M. 1991. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analysis. In Source and Migration Processes and Evaluation Techniques, ed. R. Merrill, 113–118. Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Jarvie, D. M., Claxton, B. L., Henk, F. et al. 2001. Oil and Shale Gas From the Barnett Shale, Ft. Worth Basin Texas. Presented at the AAPG National Convention, Denver, Colorado, 3–6 June. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284054726_Oil_and_shale_gas_from_the_Barnett_Shale_Ft_Worth_Basin_Texas.
Jarvie, D. M. 2012a. Shale Resource Systems for Oil and Gas: Part 1—Shale-Gas Resource Systems. In Shale Reservoirs—Giant Resources for the 21st Century: AAPG Memoir 97, ed. J. A. Breyer, Vol. 97, 69–87. Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. https://doi.org/10.1306/13321446M973489.
Jarvie, D. M. 2012b. Shale Resource Systems for Oil and Gas: Part 2—Shale-Oil Resource Systems. In Shale Reservoirs—Giant Resources for the 21st Century: AAPG Memoir 97, ed. J. A. Breyer, Vol. 97, 89–119. Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. https://doi.org/10.1306/13321447M973489.
Jiang, T., Jain, V., Belotserkovskaya, A. et al. 2015. Evaluating Producible Hydrocarbons and Reservoir Quality in Organic Shale Reservoirs Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Factor Analysis. Presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 20–22 October. SPE-175893-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175893-MS.
Kausik, R., Craddock, P. R., Reeder, S. L. et al. 2015. Novel Reservoir Quality Indices for Tight Oil. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July. URTeC 2154859. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2015-2154859.
Law, C. A. 1999. Evaluating Source Rocks. In Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps: AAPG Treatise of Petroleum Geology, Handbook of Petroleum Geology, ed. E. A. Beaumont and N. H. Foster, Chap. 6, 6-1–6-41. Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. https://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=DD0162.
Mackenzie, A. S., Price, I., Leythaeuser, D. et al. 1987. The Expulsion of Petroleum From Kimmeridge Clay Source-Rocks in the Area of the Brae Oilfield, UK Continental Shelf. In Petroleum Geology of North West Europe, ed. J. Brooks and K. Glennie, p. 865–877. London: Graham & Trotman.
Maende, A., Pepper, A., Jarvie, D. et al. 2017. Advanced Pyrolysis Data and Interpretation Methods To Identify Unconventional Reservoir Sweet Spots in Fluid Phase Saturation and Fluid Properties (API Gravity) From Drilling Cuttings and Cores. Presented at the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Houston, 2–5 April. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/pdfz/documents/2017/80596maende/ndx_maende.pdf.html.
Magara, K. 1980. Evidences of Primary Oil Migration. AAPG Bull. 64 (12): 2108–2117. http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1980-81/data/pg/0064/0012/2100/2108.htm.
Matthews, M. D. 1999. Migration of Petroleum. In Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps: AAPG Treatise of Petroleum Geology, Handbook of Petroleum Geology, ed. E. A. Beaumont and N. H. Foster, Chap. 7, 7–35. Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. https://store.aapg.org/detail.aspx?id=DD0162.
Passey, Q. R., Creaney, S., Kulla, J. B. et al. 1990. A Practical Model for Organic Richness From Porosity and Resistivity Logs. AAPG Bull. 74 (12): 1777–1794. http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/1990-91/data/pg/0074/0012/0000/1777.htm.
Peters, K. E. and Cassa, M. R. 1994. Applied Source Rock Geochemistry. In The Petroleum System—From Source to Trap, ed. L. B. Magoon and W. G. Dow, Vol. 60, 93–120. Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Peters, K. E., Walters, C. C., and Moldowan, J. M. 2005. The Biomarker Guide, second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Piedrahita, J. and Aguilera, R. 2017a. Estimating Oil Saturation Index (OSI) From NMR Logging and Comparison With Rock-Eval Pyrolysis Measurements in a Shale Oil Reservoir. Presented at the SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 15–16 February. SPE-185073-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185073-MS.
Piedrahita, J. and Aguilera, R. 2017b. Moveable Oil Detection in a Shale Reservoir by Integrating Simultaneously Geochemical, Petrophysical, and Geomechanical Models Developed From Well Logs and Laboratory Tests. Presented at the ACIPET XVII Colombian Petroleum Congress, Bogota´, Colombia, 18–20 October.
Ramirez, J. and Aguilera, R. 2016. Factors Controlling Fluid Migration and Distribution in the Eagle Ford Shale. SPE Res Eval & Eng 19 (3): 403–414. SPE-171626-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/171626-PA.
Reeder, S., Craddock, P. R., Rylander, E. et al. 2016. The Reservoir Producibility Index: A Metric To Assess Reservoir Quality in Tight-Oil Plays From Logs. Petrophysics 57 (2): 83–95. SPWLA-2016-v57n2a1.
Romero-Sarmiento, M., Daniel, P., Letort, G. et al. 2015. New Rock-Eval Method for Characterization of Unconventional Shale Resource Systems. Oil Gas Sci Technol 71 (3): 37. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2015007.
Simpson, G., Fishman, N., and Hari-Roy, S. 2018. New Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Log T2 Cut-Off Interpret Parameters for the Unconventional Tight Oil of the Bakken Petroleum System Using 2-D NMR Core Laboratory Measurements on Native State and Post-Cleaned Core Samples. Presented at the SPWLA 59th Annual Logging Symposium, London, 2–6 June. SPWLA-2018-GGGG. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPWLA-2018-GGGG.
Testamanti, M., Rezaee, R., and Saeedi, A. 2016. NMR T2 Cut-Off Determination for Shales. Presented at the AAPG/SPE International Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 3–6 April. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2017/80583testamanti/ndx_testamanti.pdf.
Tissot, B. P. and Welte, D. H. 1984. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence, second edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.