Evaluating Cement-Plug Mechanical and Hydraulic Integrity
- Axel-Pierre Bois (CURISTEC) | Manh-Huyen Vu (CURISTEC) | Kim Noël (CURISTEC) | Anthony Badalamenti (CURISTEC) | Laurent Delabroy (AkerBP) | Emmanuel Thérond (BP) | Knut Hansen (BP)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- June 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 92 - 102
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Modeling, Cement hydraulic integrity, P&A, Cement plug, Cement mechanical integrity
- 37 in the last 30 days
- 266 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
In past years, the industry has focused on ensuring that cement is efficiently placed in the wellbore and that it does not become mechanically damaged during the life of the well. However, few efforts have been made to determine how cement mechanical integrity (CMI) relates to cement hydraulic integrity (CHI) (i.e., evaluating the flow rate that could occur through the cement barrier), even though CHI is one of the main objectives of placing a cement plug in a wellbore.
The analysis of hydraulic integrity requires that a CMI model be used to compute the state of stress and pore pressure in the cement and to estimate which type of mechanical failure might occur during the life of the well. It also requires that a CHI model be integrated with the CMI model to estimate the rate of fluid that might flow through a cement barrier, should it mechanically fail. This provides the engineer with insight into the long-term integrity of a cement plug.
This paper describes the work conducted on CMI/CHI models for cement plugs, and it presents a sensitivity analysis that demonstrates the value of an integrated CMI/CHI model. The study indicates that (1) well geometry, cement properties, reservoir pressures, cement heat of hydration, and fluid properties are required inputs for proper analysis; (2) the changes of stresses and pore pressure over time need to be computed along the length of the cement plug, with sensitivity analysis to consider the existing uncertainties; (3) a cement plug might preserve its sealing capability, even if the CMI model shows the existence of a microannulus (e.g., when the fluid viscosity is very high); and (4) a cement plug might lose its sealing capacity, even if the CMI model shows no induced defect (e.g., when a microannulus is propagated as a hydraulic fracture).
These last two observations are important because they show that what a CMI model cannot predict, a CHI model can.
|File Size||666 KB||Number of Pages||11|
Agkun, H. and Daemen, J. J. K. 1994. Performance Assessment of Cement Grout Borehole Plugs in Basalt. Eng. Geol. 37 (2): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(94)90048-5.
Agkun, H. and Daemen, J. J. K. 1997. Analytical and Experimental Assessment of Mechanical Borehole Sealing Performance in Rock. Eng. Geol. 47 (3): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00013-7952(97)00021-5.
ASTM C204-18, Standard Test Methods for Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by Air-Permeability Apparatus. 2018. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0204-18.
Bois, A.-P., Garnier, A., Rodot, F. et al. 2011. How to Prevent Loss of Zonal Isolation Through a Comprehensive Analysis of Microannulus Formation. SPE Drill & Compl 26 (1): 13–31. SPE-124719-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/124719-PA.
Bois, A.-P., Galdiolo, G., and Badalamenti, A. 2015. Taking Holistic Approach to Designing Cement Sheaths Helps Maintain Zonal Isolation for Life of Well, Increases ROI. Drill Contr (November/December): 82–87.
Daccord, G., Guillot, D., and James, S. 2006. Remedial Cementing. In Well Cementing, second edition, ed. E. B. Nelson and D. Guillot, Chap. 14, 503–547. Sugar Land: Schlumberger.
Delabroy, L., Rodrigues, D., Straume, M. et al. 2017, Perforate, Wash, and Cement PWC Verification Process and an Industry Standard for Barrier Acceptance Criteria. Presented at the SPE Bergen One-Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, 5 April. SPE-185938-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185938-MS.
Dormieux, L., Kondo, D., and Ulm, F.-J. 2006. Microporomechanics. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Ferg, T. E., Lund, H.-J., Mueller, D. T. et al. 2011. Novel Approach to More Effective Plug and Abandonment Cementing Techniques. Presented at the SPE Arctic and Extreme Environments Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, 18–20 October. SPE-148640-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/148640-MS.
Guillot, D. 2006. Rheology and Flow of Well Cement Slurries. In Well Cementing, second edition, ed. E. B. Nelson and D. Guillot, Chap. 4, 93–142. Sugar Land: Schlumberger.
Mainguy, M., Longuemare, P., Audibert, A. et al. 2007. Analyzing the Risk of Well Plug Failure After Abandonment. Oil & Gas Sci. and Techn. 63 (3): 311–324. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst.2007026.
Mura, T. 1987. Micromechanics of Defects in Solids, second edition. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Nagelhout, A. C. G., Bosma, M. G. R., Mul, P. J. et al. 2010. Laboratory and Field Validation of a Sealant System for Critical Plug and Abandon Situations. SPE Drill & Compl 22 (3): 314–321. SPE-97347-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/97347-PA.
Nelson, E. B. and Barlet-Gouédard, V. 2006. Thermal Cements. In Well Cementing, second edition, ed. E. B. Nelson and D. Guillot, Chap. 10, 319–341. Sugar Land: Schlumberger.
Opedal, N., Corina, A. N., and Vrålstad, T. 2018. Laboratory Test on Cement Plug Integrity. Presented at the 37th ASME International Conference on Ocean, Offshore & Artic Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 17–22 June. OMAE-2018-78347.
Powers, T. C. and Brownyard, T. L. 1947. Studies of Physical Properties of Hardened Portland Cement Paste. J. Am. Concr. Inst. 43: 101–132, 249–336, 469–505, 549–602, 669–712, 845–880, 933–992.
Skorpa, R. and Vrålstad, T. 2018. Visualization of Fluid Flow Through Cracks and Microannuli in Cement Sheaths. SPE J. 23 (4): 1067–1074. SPE-180019-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/180019-PA.
Thérond, E., Bois, A.-P., Whaley, K. et al. 2017. Large-Scale Testing and Modeling for Cement Zonal Isolation in Water-Injection Wells. SPE Drill & Compl 32 (4): 290–300. SPE-181428-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/181428-PA.