Predicting Breakdown Pressure and Breakdown Cycle in Cyclic Fracturing
- Ahmad Sakhaee-Pour (University of Houston) | Abhishek Agrawal (University of Oklahoma)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 761 - 769
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Paris law, geomechanics, Cyclic fraturing
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 273 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In hydraulic fracturing, large volumes of fluid and sand are injected into the formation to enhance its transport properties. In conventional fracturing, the fluid pressure is increased monotonically to reach failure in a single cycle. The breakdown pressure can be reduced if we increase and decrease the fluid pressure cyclically (cyclic fracturing). This phenomenon has been tested in other engineering fields, but it is not yet possible to predict the breakdown pressure and cycle in petroleum engineering in the context of hydraulic fracturing. In the present study, we propose a workflow that is based on a modified Paris law to predict the breakdown pressure and the number of cycles in cyclic fracturing. The modified Paris law is based on linear-elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM), which treats the solid domain as an isotropic and linear-elastic medium. We use the data available in the literature for dry Tennessee Sandstone. The samples were hydraulically fractured under triaxial stress, two with conventional and two with cyclic methods. The results show that the tuned Paris law can predict the breakdown pressure and cycle with a good accuracy. The tuned model can help us to design an optimal scenario that is fundamentally different from the conventional method for formation stimulation.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Atkinson, B. K. 1979. Fracture Toughness of Tennessee Sandstone and Carrara Marble Using the Double Torsion Testing Method. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 16 (1): 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)90774-5.
Barree, R. D., Miskimins, J., and Gilbert, J. 2015. Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests: Common Mistakes, Misfires, and Misdiagnoses. SPE Prod & Oper 30 (2): 84–98. SPE-169539-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/169539-PA.
Damani, A., Sharma, A., Sondergeld, C. et al. 2012. Acoustic Emission and SEM Analyses of Hydraulic Fractures Under Triaxial Stress Conditions. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012, 1–5. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-1585.1.
Donahue, R. J., Clark, H. M., Atanmo, P. et al. 1972. Crack Opening Displacement and the Rate of Fatigue Crack Growth. International Journal of Fracture 8 (2): 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00703882.
Elber, W. 1971. The Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure. In Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures. STP 486, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International, 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP486-EB.
Erdogan, F. and Ratwani, M. 1970. Fatigue and Fracture of Cylindrical Shells Containing a Circumferential Crack. International Journal of Fracture Mechanics 6 (4): 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182626.
Farahmand, B. 2001. Fracture Mechanics of Metals, Composites, Welds, and Bolted Joints: Application of LEFM, EPFM, and FMDM Theory. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1585-2.
Forman, R. G., Keamey, V. E., and Engle, R. M. 1967. Numerical Analysis of Crack Propagation in a Cyclic-Loaded Structure. J. Basic Engineering Trans ASME 89: 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3609637.
Griffith, A. A. 1920. The Phenomena of Flow and Rupture in Solids. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, 221: 163–198. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1921.0006.
Inglis, C. E. 1913. Stresses in a Plate Due to the Presence of Cracks and Sharp Corners. Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects 55: 219–242.
Irwin, G. R. 1957. Analysis of Stresses and Strains Near the End of a Crack Traversing a Plate. Journal of Applied Mechanics 24: 361–364.
Paris, P. C., Gomez, M. P., and Anderson, W. E. 1961. A Rational Analytic Theory of Fatigue. The Trend in Engineering 13 (1): 9–14.
Patel, S. M., Sondergeld, C. H., and Rai, C. S. 2017. Laboratory Studies of Hydraulic Fracturing by Cyclic Injection. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 95: 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.03.008.
Sakhaee-Pour, A., Gowhari-Anaraki, A. R., and Hardy, S. J. 2010. The Effect of Stiffness on Stress Intensity Factor for a Crack in Annular Disc Under Constant Central Torque. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 19 (8): 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789509351835.
Sakhaee-Pour, A. and Agrawal, A. 2018. Integrating Acoustic Emission Into Percolation Theory to Predict Permeability Enhancement. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 160: 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.003.
Shigley, J. E., Mischke, C. R., and Budynas, R. G. 2004. Mechanical Engineering Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stephens, R. I., Fatemi, A., Stephens, R. R. et al. 2000. Metal Fatigue in Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Zhuang, L., Kim, K. Y., Jung, S. G. et al. 2017. Laboratory Evaluation of Induced Seismicity Reduction and Permeability Enhancement Effects of Cyclic Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at the Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, 25–28 June. American Rock Mechanics Association. ARMA-2017-0757.