Experimental Investigation of Propellant Fracturing in a Large Sandstone Block
- Sahil Malhotra (Chevron) | Peggy Rijken (Chevron) | Alicia Sanchez (Chevron)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- June 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 87 - 99
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- fractures, stimulation, stress, propellant, completion
- 12 in the last 30 days
- 180 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Propellants have been used in oil and gas wells to assist with perforating and creating near-wellbore stimulation. Propellants are electrically ignited in the wellbore at the perforated interval. Upon ignition, they rapidly create a large amount of gas, and the pressurization leads to breakdown of the formation. It has been postulated that the pressurization leads to creation of multiple fractures in the formation. This paper describes an experimental study with a new propellant and aims to understand the pattern of fracture creation with these propellants. The results are also compared with an older generation of propellant tested by Wieland et al. (2006).
A large-scale laboratory test was performed in a sandstone block (30×30×54 in.) with a 2-in.-diameter vertical centralized wellbore extending the full block height. The block was loaded in a polyaxial stress frame. A propellant cartridge was positioned in the center of the wellbore. Small holes were drilled in the rock to intersect the expected primary fracture and were instrumented with high-resolution pressure gauges to enable fracture-timing and -growth-rate analysis. Anisotropic stresses representative of field conditions were applied on the block, and the wellbore was pressurized before ignition.
The propellant ignition produced an initial peak pressure of 5,790 psi in 1.4 ms followed by an oscillatory pattern of pressure increase to a maximum pressure of 6,660 psi before decaying because of fracture growth and gas leakoff. The block was removed from the test frame and cut vertically and horizontally to examine the fracture pattern generated by the propellant. A dominant planar fracture was observed on either side of the wellbore, which propagated in the direction perpendicular to the minimum-horizontal-stress direction. It was verified that the propellant had a much-higher burn rate than the propellant tested by Wieland et al. (2006).
The large-scale block test provides critical insights and data that can serve as inputs to calibrate physics-based models for modeling propellant ignition and stimulation. The results help in understanding the benefits and limitations of using propellants for stimulation.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Chu, T. Y., Warpinski, N. R., and Jacobson, R. D. 1988. In Situ Experiments of Geothermal Gas Well Stimulation Using Gas Fracturing Technology. Report No. SAND-087-2241, Sandia National Laboratories Report, Albuquerque, New Mexico, July 1988.
Cuderman, J. F. 1982. Multiple Fracturing Experiments—Propellant and Borehole Considerations. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 16–18 May. SPE-10845-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/10845-MS.
Cuderman, J. F. 1984. High Energy Gas Fracturing Development. Report No. SAND84-0247, Final Report to the Gas Research Institute, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 1984.
Cuderman, J. F. and Northrop, D. A. 1986. A Propellant-Based Technology for Multiple Fracturing Wellbores to Enhance Gas Recovery: Application and Results in Devonian Shale. SPE J. 1 (2): 97–103. SPE-12838-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/12838-PA.
Cuderman, J. F., Cooper, P. W., Chen, E. P. et al. 1981. A Multiple Fracturing Technique for Enhanced Gas Recovery. Report No. SAND-81-1399C presented at the International Gas Research Conference, Los Angeles, 28 September.
Culick, F. E. C. 1968. A Review of Calculations for Unsteady Burning of a Solid Propellant. AIAA J. 6 (12): 2241–2255. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4980.
Dillen, M. W. P., Cruts, H. M. A., Groenenboom, J. et al. 1999. Ultrasonic and Shear-Wave Splitting Behavior of a Colton Sandstone Under a Changing Triaxial Stress. Geophysics 64 (5): 1603–1607. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444664.
Fletcher, E. A. and Foley, J. 1971. Amplification of Pressure Oscillations in Solid-Propellant Combustion. Symp. Int. Combust. 13 (1): 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(71)80055-3.
Gilliat, J., Snider, P., and Haney, B. 1999. A Review of Field Performance of New Propellant/Perforating Technologies. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3–6 October. SPE-56469-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/56469-MS.
Hamdan, V. H., Jumaat, M. S., Samsu, M. et al. 2012. Propellant Treatment to Clean Out Gravel-Pack Wells. Presented at the SPE International Production and Operations Conference and Exhibition, Doha, 14–16 May. SPE-157459-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/157459-MS.
Klein, N., Coffee, T. P., and Leveritt, C. S. 1992. Pressure Oscillations in a Liquid Propellant Gun—Possible Dependence on Propellant Burning Rate. Report No. BRL-TR-3361, Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground Report, Maryland, June 1992.
Kubota, N. 2015. Propellants and Explosives—Thermochemical Aspects of Combustion, third edition. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
Nilson, R. H., Proffer, W. J., and Duff, R. E. 1985. Modeling of Gas-Driven Fractures Induced by Propellant Combustion Within a Borehole. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 22 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(85)92589-6.
Page, J. C. and Miskimins, J. L. 2009. A Comparison of Hydraulic and Propellant Fracture Propagation in a Shale Gas Reservoir. 2009. J Can Pet Technol 48 (5): 26–30. PETSOC-09-05-26. https://doi.org/10.2118/09-05-26.
Rao, K. V. N., Brinsden, M. S., Gilliat J. et al. 2014. World’s First Deepwater Propellant Perforation for a Depleted Carbonate Subsea Gas Well in Malampaya. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide, Australia, 14–16 October. SPE-171527-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/171527-MS.
Schatz, J. F. 1992. Improved Modeling of the Dynamic Fracturing of Rock With Propellants. Presented at the 33rd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 3–5 June. ARMA-92-0305.
Schatz, J. F., Zeigler, B. J., Hanson, J. et al. 1987. Multiple Radial Fracturing From a Wellbore—Experimental and Theoretical Results. Presented at the 28th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Tucson, Arizona, 29 June–1 July. ARMA-87-0821.
Schmidt, R. A., Warpinski, N. R., Finley, S. J. et al. 1981. Multi-Frac Test Series: Final Report. Report No. SAND81-1249, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, November 1981.
Swenson, D. V. and Taylor, L. M. 1982. Analysis of Gas Fracturing Experiments. Report No. SAND82-0633, Sandia National Laboratories Report, Albuquerque, New Mexico, July 1982.
Waesche, R. H. W. and Summerfield. M. 1965. Solid Propellant Combustion Instability: Oscillatory Burning of Solid Rocket Propellants. Report No. 751, Guggenheim Laboratories for the Aerospace Propulsion Sciences, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences, Princeton University, August 1965.
Warpinski, N. R., Schmidt, R. A. Cooper, P. W. et al. 1979. High-Energy Gas Frac: Multiple Fracturing in a Wellbore. Presented at the 20th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Austin, Texas, 4–6 June. ARMA-79-0143.
Wieland, C. W., Miskimins, J. L., Black, A. D. et al. 2006. Results of a Laboratory Propellant Fracturing Test in a Colton Sandstone Block. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24–27 September. SPE-102907-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/102907-MS.
Wren, G. P., Coffee, T. P., DeSpirito, J. et al. 1995. Pressure Oscillations in Regenerative Liquid Propellant Guns. Propell. Explos. Pyrot. 20 (5): 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.19950200502.
Zazovsky, A. F. 2004. Propellant Fracturing Revisited. Presented at the North America Rock Mechanics Symposium (NARMS): Rock Mechanics Across Borders and Disciplines, Houston, 5–9 June. ARMA/NARMS 04-612.