An Accurate Parametric Method for Assessing Hydrocarbon Volumetrics: Revisiting the Volumetric Equation
- Y. Z. Ma (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- October 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,566 - 1,579
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3D Reservoir modeling, Correlation analysis, Porosity-Water saturation, Dependency of reservoir properties, Hydrocarbon volumetrics
- 19 in the last 30 days
- 422 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
One of the most-important bases for field-development planning is the estimate of hydrocarbon initially in place (HIIP), which has been traditionally estimated either deterministically or by Monte Carlo simulation. The classical volumetric calculation is the most-common deterministic method, and it requires the use of the averages of the reservoir variables and thus does not model the correlations of the input variables. It is well-known that ignoring the correlations among the reservoir variables can lead to incorrect estimations of hydrocarbon volumetrics. The Monte Carlo method uses the input means in the volumetric equation for random simulation of hydrocarbon volumes, yet allows modeling of the correlation between the input parameters. However, using the means and modeling the correlation of the properties are theoretically conflicting. This paper presents new parametric equations for volumetric calculation using mathematical correlation. Unlike the classical volumetric calculation, these equations are the exact expressions of the rigorous hydrocarbon volumetric equation. We discuss how these new equations enable the quantification of inaccuracy in hydrocarbon volumetric estimation by the classical method. Our examples will further show that the magnitude of inaccuracy of the traditional volumetrics depends on the reservoir characteristics; the inaccuracy is generally more significant for heterogeneous, low-quality, and tight reservoirs than for relatively homogeneous high-quality reservoirs.
|File Size||665 KB||Number of Pages||14|
Abrahamsen, P., Egeland, T., Lia, O. et al. 1992. An Integrated Approach to Prediction of Hydrocarbon in Place and Recoverable Reserve With Uncertainty Measures. Presented at the European Petroleum Computer Conference, Stavanger, Norway, 24–27 May. SPE-24276-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/24276-MS.
Ahmed, T. 2010. Reservoir Engineering Handbook, fourth edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Berteig V., Halvorsen, K. B., More, H. et al. 1988. Prediction of Hydrocarbon Pore Volume With Uncertainties. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 2–5 October. SPE-18325-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/18325-MS.
Cao, R., Ma, Y. Z., and Gomez, E. 2014. Geostatistical Applications in Petroleum Reservoir Modeling. J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 114 (August): 625–629.
Capen, E. C. 1976. The Difficulty of Assessing Uncertainty. J Pet Technol 28 (8): 843–850. SPE-5579-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/5579-PA.
Cluff, S. G. and Cluff R. M. 2004. Petrophysics of the Lance Sandstone Reservoirs in Jonah Field, Sublette County, Wyoming. In Jonah Field: Case Study of a Tight-Gas Fluvial Reservoir, AAPG Studies in Geology 52, ed. Robinson J. W. and K. Shanley, Chap. 12, 215–241. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Cressie, N. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. New York City: John Wiley & Sons.
Deutsch, C. V. and Journel, A. G. 1992. Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Feller, W. 1968. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol. 1, third edition. New York City: John Wiley & Sons.
Fletcher, S. 2017. Data Assimilation for the Geosciences: From Theory to Application. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Friend, I. and Westerfield, R. 1980. Co-Skewness and Capital Asset Pricing. J. Financ. 35 (4): 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1980.tb03508.x.
Fylling, A. 2002. Quantification of Petrophysical Uncertainty and Its Effect on In-Place Volume Estimates: Numerous Challenges and Some Solutions. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September–2 October. SPE-77637-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/77637-MS.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. 2016. Deep Learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Gray, R. M. 2009. Probability, Random Processes, and Ergodic Properties, second edition, https://ee.stanford.edu/~gray/arp.html (accessed 27 November 2017).
Holtz, M. H. 1993. Estimating Oil Reserve Variability by Combining Geologic and Engineering Parameters. Presented at the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Dallas, 29–30 March. SPE-25827-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/25827-MS.
Isaaks, E. H. and Srivastava, R. M. 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, J. L., Lake, L. W., Corbett, P. et al. 1997. Statistics for Petroleum Engineers and Geoscientists. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Karacaer, C. and Onur, M. 2012. Analytical Probabilistic Reserve Estimation by Volumetric Method and Aggregation of Resources. Presented at the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Calgary, 24–25 September. SPE-162875-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162875-MS.
Kennedy, M. 2015. Practical Petrophysics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lee, Y. W. 1967. Statistical Theory of Communication. New York City: John Wiley & Sons.
Lebowitz, J. L. and Penrose, O. 1973. Modern Ergodicity Theory. Physics Today February: 23–29.
Leverett, M. C. 1941. Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids. Trans. AIME 142 (1): 152–169. SPE-941152-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/941152-G.
Li, Y.-L., Tang, J.-S., Wang, Y.-T. et al. 2013. Experimental Investigation of Quantum Simpson’s Paradox. Phys. Rev. A 88 (1): 015804. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.015804.
Ma, Y. Z. 2009. Propensity and Probability in Depositional Facies Analysis and Modeling. Math. Geosci. 41 (7): 737–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9239-z.
Ma, Y. Z. 2010. Error Types in Reservoir Characterization and Management. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 72 (3–4): 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.03.030.
Ma, Y. Z. 2015. Simpson’s Paradox in GDP and Per Capita GDP Growths. Empir. Econ. 49 (4): 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-015-0921-3.
Ma, Y. Z. 2018. Quantitative Geosciences. Springer.
Ma, Y. Z. and La Pointe, P. 2011. Uncertainty Analysis and Reservoir Modeling, AAPG Memoir 96. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Martinelli, G. and Chugunov, N. 2014. Sensitivity Analysis with Correlated Inputs for Volumetric Analysis of Hydrocarbon Prospects. Oral presentation given at ECMOR XIV–14th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Catania, Sicily, Italy, 81–11 September.
Matheron, G. 1989. Estimating and Choosing: An Essay on Probability in Practice. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Moore, W. R., Ma, Y. Z., Pirie I. et al. 2015. Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs, Part 2: Petrophysical Analysis and Reservoir Modeling, In Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources Handbook: Evaluation and Development, ed. Ma Y. Z. and Holditch S., Chap. 15, 429–449. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Murtha, J. and Ross, J. 2009. Uncertainty and the Volumetric Equation. J Pet Technol 61 (9): 20–22. SPE-0909-0020-JPT. https://doi.org/10.2118/0909-0020-JPT.
Ovreberg, O., Damaleth, E., and Haldorsen, H. H. 1992. Putting Error Bars on Reservoir Engineering Forecasts. J Pet Technol 44 (6): 732–738. SPE-20512-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/20512-PA.
Papoulis, A. 1965. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
Paris, M. G. 2012. Two Quantum Simpson’s Paradoxes. J. Phys. A 45: 132001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/45/13/132001.
Smith, P. J. and Buckee, J. W. 1985. Calculating In-Place and Recoverable Hydrocarbons: A Comparison of Alternative Methods. Presented at the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Dallas, 14–15 March. SPE-13776-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/13776-MS.
Strebelle, S. 2002. Conditional Simulation of Complex Geological Structures Using Multiple-Point Statistics. Math. Geol. 34 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014009426274.
Sykes, M. A., Welsh, M. B., and Begg, S. H. 2011. Don’t Drop the Anchor: Recognizing and Mitigating Human Factors When Making Assessment Judgments Under Uncertainty. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October–2 November. SPE-146230-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/146230-MS.
Tiab, D. and Donaldson, E. C. 2012. Petrophysics, third edition. Houston: Gulf Professional Publishing.
Tugan, M. F. and Onur, M. 2015. Selection of Best Reserves Estimation Methodology to Quantify and Reduce the Uncertainty—Accompanied by Çayirdere Gas Field Case Study. Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, 8–11 March. SPE-172590-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/172590-MS.
Vargas-Guzman, J. A. 2007. Spatial Modeling of Heterogeneous Initial Water Saturation. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 58 (1–2): 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2007.02.001.
Worthington, P. F. 2002. Application of Saturation-Height Functions in Integrated Reservoir Description. In Geological Applications of Well Logs, AAPG Methods in Exploration No. 13, ed. Lovell M. and Parkinson N., Chap. 7, 75–89. Tulsa: American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Worthington, P. F. and Cosentino, L. 2005. The Role of Cut-Offs in Integrated Reservoir Studies. SPE Res Eval & Eng 8 (4): 276–290. SPE-84387-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/84387-PA.
Zhan, H. 1999. On the Ergodicity Hypothesis in Heterogeneous Formations. Math. Geol. 31 (1): 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007549532023.