Relative Permeability and Production-Performance Estimations for Bakken, Wolfcamp, Eagle Ford, and Woodford Shale Formations
- Shiv Prakash Ojha (University of Oklahoma) | Siddharth Misra (University of Oklahoma) | Ankita Sinha (University of Oklahoma) | Son Dang (University of Oklahoma) | Ali Tinni (University of Oklahoma) | Carl Sondergeld (University of Oklahoma) | Chandra Rai (University of Oklahoma)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- May 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 307 - 324
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Relative Permeability, Production Performance, Transport, Shale Gas
- 47 in the last 30 days
- 607 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Relative permeability and residual water/gas saturations of organic-rich samples were determined from low-pressure nitrogen-adsorption/desorption measurements on shale samples. Adsorption/desorption isotherm measurements were performed on 100 organic-rich shale samples from the Bakken, Wolfcamp, Eagle Ford, and Woodford Formations, and were then interpreted to obtain pore-size distribution (PSD) using a modified Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method (Barrett et al. 1951). A bimodal-fractal model was then applied to the PSD estimates to compute percolation and fractal parameters, which were incorporated in percolation theory (PT), effective-medium theory (EMT), and critical-path analysis (CPA) models to generate the relative permeability curves and residual saturations of the 100 samples. Robustness of this relatively new estimation technique for shale-reservoir samples is evaluated in this study. Petrophysical correlations of relative permeability and residual saturations with kerogen maturity, kerogen content, and kerogen removal through sample cleaning are developed for improved understanding of the saturation-dependent transport behavior of shale reservoirs. These correlations enable comparative predictions of intrawell- and interwell-production performance.
Kerogen maturity was found to be the dominant factor affecting the relative permeability and residual-saturation estimates. Irreducible-water-saturation and residual-hydrocarbon-saturation estimates increased from 30 to 60% and 20 to 40%, respectively, with an increase in maturity from oil window to late-condensate window. Estimates of relative permeability of hydrocarbon and aqueous phases at 80% saturation of the corresponding phases increased from 0.7 to 0.75 and 0.05 to 0.2, respectively, with the decrease in kerogen maturity. When the samples were cleaned with a toluene/methanol mixture to remove soluble, dead hydrocarbons and bitumen from the samples, the hydrocarbon-phase residual-saturation estimates decreased by 20%, whereas the aqueous-phase irreducible-saturation estimates increased by 9%.
The estimated relative permeability curves allow us to predict the production performance using a numerical simulator. Lower Bakken and Wolfcamp oil formations have the best hydrocarbon-transport characteristics because of lower thermal maturity. These formations show slower decline in hydrocarbon-production rates and more-uniform increase in water production. Hydrocarbon-phase production of the Lower Bakken oil formation is better than that of the Wolfcamp oil formation, but the water-production trend is significantly reversed. On the contrary, Wolfcamp and Woodford late-condensate formations exhibit the poorest transport characteristics and lower cumulative hydrocarbon and water production because of higher thermal maturity. Wells in these higher-maturity formations should show steeper decline in hydrocarbon-production rates and faster and sudden increase in water production after longer periods of sustained lower water production.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L. G., and Halenda, P. P. 1951. The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations from Nitrogen Isotherms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73 (1): 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01145a126.
Behrenbruch, P. and Goda, H. M. 2006. Two-Phase Relative Permeability Prediction: A Comparison of the Modified Brooks-Corey Methodology with a New Carman-Kozeny Based Flow Formulation. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide, Australia, 11–13 September. SPE-101150-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/101150-MS.
Bennion, D. B. and Bachu, S. 2007. Permeability and Relative Permeability Measurements at Reservoir Conditions for CO2-Water Systems in Ultra Low Permeability Confining Caprocks. Presented at the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, London, 11–14 June. SPE-106995-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/106995-MS.
Cluff, R. M. and Byrnes, A. P. 2010. Relative Permeability in Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs—The “Permeability Jail” Model. Presented at the SPWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium, Perth, Australia, 19–23 June. SPWLA-2010-58470.
Cohan, L. H. 1938. Sorption Hysteresis and the Vapor Pressure of Concave Surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60 (2): 433–435. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a058.
Dacy, J. M. 2010. Core Tests for Relative Permeability of Unconventional Gas Reservoirs. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-135427-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/135427-MS.
Dadmohammadi, Y., Misra, S., Sondergeld, C. H. et al. 2016a. Simultaneous Estimation of Intrinsic Permeability, Effective Porosity, Pore Volume Compressibility, and Klinkenberg-Slip Factor of Ultra-Tight Rock Samples Based on Laboratory Pressure-Step-Decay Method. Presented at SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, 5–6 May. SPE-180266-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180266-MS.
Dadmohammadi, Y., Misra, S., Sondergeld, C. H. et al. 2016b. Improved Petrophysical Interpretation of Laboratory Pressure-Step-Decay Measurements on Ultra-Tight Rock Samples. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1–3 August. URTEC-2441857-MS.
Daigle, H., Ezidiegwu, S., and Turner, R. 2015. Determining Relative Permeability in Shales By Including the Effects of Pore Structure on Unsaturated Diffusion and Advection. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 28–30 September. SPE-175019-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175019-MS.
Fathi, E., Tinni, A., and Akkutlu, I. Y. 2012. Shale Gas Correction to Klinkenberg Slip Theory. Presented at the SPE Americas Unconventional Resources Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 5–7 June. SPE-154977-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/154977-MS.
Ghanbarian, B., Daigle, H., Hunt, A. G. et al. 2015. Gas and Solute Diffusion in Partially Saturated Porous Media: Percolation Theory and Effective Medium Approximation Compared with Lattice Boltzmann Simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Sol. Ea. 120 (1): 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011645.
Gobin, O. C. 2006. SBA-16 Materials: Synthesis, Diffusion and Sorption Properties. PhD dissertation, Laval University, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada (January 2006).
Harkins, W. D. and Jura, G. 1944. Surface of Solids. X. Extension of the Attractive Energy of a Solid Into an Adjacent Liquid or Film, the Decrease of Energy With Distance, and the Thickness of Films. Journal of the American Chemical Society 66 (6): 919–927. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01234a024.
Hunt, A. G., Ghanbarian, B., and Saville, K. C. 2013. Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity Modeling for Porous Media with Two Fractal Regimes. Geoderma 207–208 (October): 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.05.023.
Klaver, J., Hemes, S., Houben, M. et al. 2015. The Connectivity of Pore Space in Mudstones: Insights from High-Pressure Wood’s Metal Injection, BIBSEM Imaging, and Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry. Geofluids 15 (4): 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfl.12128.
Kruk, M., Antochshuk, V., Jaroniec, M. et al. 1999. New Approach to Evaluate Pore Size Distributions and Surface Areas for Hydrophobic Mesoporous Solids. J. Phys. Chem. B 103 (48): 10670–10678. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp992264h.
Kruk, M., Jaroniec, M., and Sayari, A. 1997. Application of Large Pore MCM-41 Molecular Sieves To Improve Pore Size Analysis Using Nitrogen Adsorption Measurements. Langmuir 13 (23): 6267–6273. https://doi.org/10.1021/la970776m.
Kuila, U. and Prasad, M. 2013b. Specific Surface Area and Pore-Size Distribution in Clays and Shales. Geophys. Prospect. 61 (2): 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12028.
Kuila, U. and Prasad, M. 2013a. Application of Nitrogen Gas-Adsorption Technique for Characterization of Pore Structure of Mudrocks. The Leading Edge 32 (12): 1478–1485. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle32121478.1.
Liu, H., Zhang, L., and Seaton, N. A. 1992. Determination of the Connectivity of Porous Solids from Nitrogen Sorption Measurements—II. Generalisation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 47 (17): 4393–4404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(92)85117-T.
Liu, H., Zhang, L., and Seaton, N. A. 1994. Characterisation of Mesoporous Solids Using Sorption Hysteresis Measurements. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 87: 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(08)63072-4.
Mathur, A., Sondergeld, C. H., and Rai, C. S. 2016. Comparison of Steady-State and Transient Methods for Measuring Shale Permeability. Presented at the SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, 5–6 May. SPE-180259-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180259-MS.
Nassef, E., Soliman, A., Al-Alla, R. A. et al. 2015. Experimental Study on Solvent Extraction of Quseir Oil Shale in Egypt. J. Surf. Eng. Mat. Adv. Technol. 5 (3): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsemat.2015.53016.
Odusina, E. O., Sondergeld, C. H., and Rai, C. S. 2011. NMR Study of Shale Wettability. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 15–17 November. SPE-147371-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/147371-MS.
Ojha, S. P., Misra, S., Tinni, A. O. et al. 2016. Estimation of Saturation-Dependent Relative Permeability in Shales based on Adsorption-Desorption Isotherm. Oral presentation given at the AAPG Eastern Section Meeting, Lexington, Kentucky, 25–27 September.
Ojha, S. P., Misra, S., Sinha, A. et al. 2017a. Estimation of Pore Network Characteristics and Saturation-Dependent Relative Permeability in Organic-Rich Shale Samples Obtained From Bakken, Wolfcamp, and Woodford Shale Formations. Presented at the SPWLA 58th Annual Logging Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 17–21 June. SPWLA-2017-F.
Ojha, S. P., Misra, S., Tinni, A. et al. 2017b. Alterations in Pore Topology of Organic-Rich Shale Samples Due to the Removal of Dead Oil, Bitumen, and Kerogen. Presented at the SPWLA 58th Annual Logging Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 17–21 June. SPWLA-2017-WWW.
Perfect, E. 2005. Modeling the Primary Drainage Curve of Prefractal Porous Media. Vadose Zone J. 4 (4): 959–966. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2005.0012.
Sahimi, M. 1993. Fractal and Superdiffusive Transport and Hydrodynamic Dispersion in Heterogeneous Porous Media. Transport Porous Med. 13 (1): 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00613269.
Seaton, N. A. 1991. Determination of the Connectivity of Porous Solids from Nitrogen Sorption Measurements. Chem. Eng. Sci. 46 (8): 1895–1909. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(91)80151-N.
Shanley, K. W., Cluff, R. M., and Robinson, J. W. 2004. Factors Controlling Prolific Gas Production from Low-Permeability Sandstone Reservoirs: Implications for Resource Assessment, Prospect Development, and Risk Analysis. AAPG Bull. 88 (8): 1083–1121.
Tinni, A., Fathi, E., Agarwal, R. et al. 2012. Shale Permeability Measurements on Plugs and Crushed Samples. Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 October–1 November. SPE-162235-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162235-MS.
Vassilev, S. V. and Tasco´n, J. M. 2003. Methods for Characterization of Inorganic and Mineral Matter in Coal: A Critical Overview. Energy Fuels 17 (2): 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020113z.