Assessment of Hydrocarbon in Place and Recovery Factors in the Eagle Ford Shale Play
- S. Amin Gherabati (Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin) | Ursula Hammes (Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin) | Frank Male (Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin) | John Browning (Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- May 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 291 - 306
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Eagle Ford
- 39 in the last 30 days
- 532 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Correction Notice: This paper has been modified from its original version to include the following corrections: Katie M. Smye was added as the fourth author in the byline on page 291 and the author biographies on page 306. An Acknowledgments section was also added to page 305. No other content was changed and page numbering was not affected.
In a low-price environment, experts raise concerns about the economic viability of drilling in many locations across the Eagle Ford Shale play area. Although advances in drilling and completion technologies have helped to reduce the cost of production, reservoir quality still plays the pivotal role in drilling decisions. Eagle Ford reservoir quality is controlled by thermal maturity, which affects fluid composition, initial pressure, and petrophysical properties of the rock. This paper—which estimates original oil in place (OOIP), original gas in place (OGIP), and recovery factors (RFs) driven by reservoir quality—integrates geological and petrophysical analyses, fluid-properties characterization, and decline-curve analysis.
For our petrophysical analysis, we calculated total organic carbon (TOC), lithology, porosity, pay-zone thickness, and water saturation for each square mile of the Eagle Ford play. We divided the play into 12 fluid regions on the basis of reported American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity and gas/oil-ratio (GOR) values and available temperature and pressure maps, developing a representative fluid model for each region to calculate a formation volume factor (FVF). The resulting OOIP and OGIP maps show regions of hydrocarbon accumulation. Our decline-curve forecast uses two-parameter scaling curves that are based on 1D, one-phase flow to predict the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) of approximately 15,500 existing wells with at least 16 months of oil or gas production. We calculated oil and gas RFs for all the wells, and present a map of their distribution across the Eagle Ford play area.
We generated OOIP and OGIP and RF distribution maps that help to improve the estimation of the amount of recoverable hydrocarbon. The maps reveal the areas with the greatest potential for recovery improvement as well as regions with high-recovery success. RFs calculated on the basis of EUR and well spacing are compared with a material-balance RF that is based on pressure and fluid properties. The Upper Eagle Ford can contribute to production, as indicated through RF plots.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||16|
Allan, A. M., Vanorio, T., and Dahl, J. E. P. 2013. Thermal Maturation-Induced Variation of P-wave Anisotropy of Organic-Rich S-shale. In Society of Exploration Geophysicists Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2767–2772. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-0064.1.
Billingsley, L., Layton, B., and Finger, L. 2015. Geoscience Applications to Economic Development of a Relatively Shallow, Low-Gravity, Structurally Complex Eagle Ford Oil Development, Atascosa County, Texas. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July. SPE-178623-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/178623-MS.
Breyer, J. A., Denne, R., Funk, J. et al. 2013. Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Facies of the Eagle Ford Shale (Cretaceous) Between the Maverick Basin and the San Marcos Arch, Texas: Search and Discovery Article No. 50899.
Browning, J., Ikonnikova, S., Gülen, G. et al. 2013a. Barnett Shale Production Outlook. SPE Econ & Mgmt 5 (3): 89–104. SPE-165585-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/165585-PA.
Browning, J., Tinker, S. W., Ikonnikova, S. et al. 2013b. Barnett Shale Model–1: Study Develops Decline Analysis, Geologic Parameters for Reserves, Production Forecast. Oil & Gas Journal 111 (8): 63–71. http://gaia.pge.utexas.edu/papers/OGJPart-1.pdf.
Cardneaux, A. and Nunn, J. A. 2013. Estimates of Maturation and TOC From Log Data in the Eagle Ford Shale, Maverick Basin of South Texas. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Trans. 63: 111–124.
Clark, A. J. 2009. Determination of Recovery Factor in the Bakken Formation, Mountrail County, ND. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4–7 October. SPE-133719-STU. https://doi.org/10.2118/133719-STU.
Craft, B. C., Hawkins, M., and Terry, R. E. 1991. Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering. Englewood Cliffs.
Dawson, W. C. 2000. Shale Microfacies: Eagle Ford Group (Cenomanian-Turonian) North-Central Texas Outcrops and Subsurface Equivalents. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Trans 50: 607–621.
Donovan, A. D., Staerker, T. S., Pramudity, A. et al. 2012. The Eagle Ford Outcrops of East Texas: Understanding Heterogeneities Within Unconventional Mudstone Reservoirs. GCAGS Journal 1: 162–185.
Ewing, T. E. 2001. Review of Late Jurassic Depositional Systems and Potential Hydrocarbon Plays, Northern Gulf of Mexico Basin. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Trans 51: 85–96.
Gherabati, S. A., Browning, J., Male, F. et al. 2016. The Impact of Pressure and Fluid Property Variation on Well Performance of Liquid-Rich Eagle Ford Shale. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 33: 1056–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.019.
Gong, X., Tian, Y., McVay, D. A. et al. 2013. Assessment of Eagle Ford Shale Oil and Gas Resources. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 5–7 November. SPE-167241-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167241-MS.
Grossi, P., Neumann, D., and Lalehrokh, F. 2015. New Findings in Expected Ultimate Field Recoveries: Implications of Staggered Lateral Downspacing in the Eagle Ford Shale. Proc., Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 20–22 July: 611–623. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2015-2153935.
Hammes, U., Eastwood, R., McDaid, G. et al. 2016. Regional Assessment of the Eagle Ford Group of South Texas: Insights From Lithology, Pore Volume, Water Saturation, Organic Richness and Productivity Correlations. IGARSS 2014 1: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.
Hentz, T. F., and Ruppel, S. C. 2010. Regional Lithostratigraphy of the Eagle Ford Shale: Maverick Basin to East Texas Basin. Trans. of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies 60: 325–337.
Information Handling Services (IHS). 2016. https://global.ihs.com/.
Male, F., Marder, M. P., Browning, J. et al. 2016. Marcellus Wells’ Ultimate Production Accurately Predicted From Initial Production. Presented at the SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, 5–6 May. SPE-180234-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180234-MS.
Martin, R., Baihly, J., and Malpani, R. 2011. Understanding Production From Eagle Ford-Austin Chalk System. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October–2 November. SPE-145117-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/145117-MS.
McCain, W. D. 1990. The Properties of Petroleum Fluids. PennWell Books.
Nobakht, M., Clarkson, C., and Kaviani, D. 2011. New and Improved Methods for Performing Rate Transient Analysis of Shale Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Jakarta, 20–22 September. SPE-147869-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/147869-MS.
Patzek, T. W., Male, F., and Marder, M. 2013. From the Cover: Cozzarelli Prize Winner: Gas Production in the Barnett Shale Obeys a Simple Scaling Theory. In Proc., National Academy of Sciences 110 (49): 19731–19736. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313380110.
Pommer, M. E., Milliken, K. L., and Ozkan, A. 2014. Pore Types Across Thermal Maturity Within the: Eagle-Ford Formation, South Texas. Presented at the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Houston, 6–9 April.
Robinson, D. B. and Peng, D. Y. 1978. The Characterization of the Heptanes and Heavier Fractions for the GPA Peng–Robinson Programs. Gas Processors Association.
Silin, D. B. and Kneafsey, T. J. 2012. Gas Shale: Nanometer-Scale Observations and Well Modeling. J Can Pet Technol 51 (6): 464–475. SPE-149489-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/149489-PA.
Standing, M. B. and Katz, D. L. 1942. Density of Natural Gases. Trans. AIME 146 (1): 140–149.
Tian, Y., Ayers, W. B., McCain, W. D. et al. 2014. Regional Impacts of Lithologic Cyclicity and Reservoir and Fluid Properties on Eagle Ford Shale Well Performance. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 1–3 April. SPE-169007-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169007-MS.
Tinnin, B., Hildred, G., and Martinez, N. 2013. Expanding the Application of Chemostratigraphy Within Cretaceous Mudrocks: Estimating Total Organic Carbon and Paleoredox Facies Using Major, Minor and Trace Element Geochemistry. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, 12–14 August. URTeC 1579472. https://doi.org/10.1190/urtec2013-123.
Wattenbarger, R., El-Banbi, A. H., Villegas, M. E. et al. 1998. Production Analysis of Linear Flow Into Fractured Tight Gas Wells. Presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 5–8 April. SPE-39931-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/39931-MS.
Whitson, C. H. and Sunjerga, S. 2012. PVT in Liquid-Rich Shale Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-155499-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/155499-MS.
Yang, T., Basquet, R., Callejon, A. et al. 2014. Shale PVT Estimation Based on Readily Available Field Data. Proc., Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, 25–27 August. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2014-1884129.