Effect of Confinement and Well Interference on SAGD Performance: An Analytical Assessment
- Zeinab Zargar (University of Calgary) | S. M. Farouq Ali (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- August 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,595 - 1,612
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- confinement phase, analytical modelling, steam chamber development, heavy oil and bitumen, thermal recovery
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 112 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In this paper, we introduce, for the first time, an analytical approach for evaluating the effect of confinement and well interference on the SAGD process and achieving a better understanding of the situation. In the well-confinement stage of SAGD, there is adjacent-chamber interference, the effective head of drainage decreases, and the heat-loss rate decreases or, in a conservative design, remains constant. Our objectives were to predict the oil-production rate, steam-injection rate, thermal efficiency, steam-chamber velocity, unsteady temperature profile, heat distribution, and the cumulative steam/oil ratio (CSOR). In this approach, heat transfer was coupled with fluid flow. The governing equations were Darcy’s law, volumetric balance, and heat conduction—constitutive equations indicating the temperature dependence of some physical properties. Our model was developed on the basis of a moving-boundary problem.
The predicted oil rate remained constant during the sideways-expansion phase, while the steam-injection rate had to be constantly increased. After a determined confinement time, the oil rate started to decline with time because the decreasing steam-chamber interface length was offset by a decreasing head. The unsteady temperature profiles from the model showed that lower temperatures were predicted ahead of the interface owing to the confinement effect. Also, the model showed that, for a small lateral well spacing, confinement occurred earlier and heat loss started decreasing sooner, resulting in a lower CSOR than for a large spacing. It was shown that, even though the oil rate declined faster in a confined model rather than in an unconfined model, the reservoir depleted faster, just like the angle between the steam-chamber interface and the horizon. The results were validated using experimental data reported in the literature.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Butler, R. 1985. A New Approach to the Modelling of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. J Can Pet Technol 24 (3): 42–51. PETSOC-85-03-01. https://doi.org/10.2118/85-03-01.
Butler, R. M., McNab, G. S., and Lo, H. Y. 1981. Theoretical Studies on the Gravity Drainage of Heavy Oil During In-Situ Steam Heating. Can J Chem Eng 59 (4): 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450590407.
Butler, R. M. and Stephens, D. J. 1981. The Gravity Drainage of Steam-Heated Heavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells. J Can Pet Technol 20 (2): 90–96. PETSOC-81-02-07. https://doi.org/10.2118/81-02-07.
Butler, R. M. 1991. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Cenovus Energy. 2015. Cenovus Christina Lake In-Situ Oil Sands Scheme 8591 2015 Update. Alberta Energy Regulator, https://www.aer.ca/documents/oilsands/insitu-presentations/2015AthabascaCenovusChristinaSAGD8591.pdf (accessed 25 February 2016).
Chung, K. H. and Butler, R. M. 1987. Geometrical Effect of Steam Injection on the Formation of Emulsions in the Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process. Presented at the Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, 7–10 June. PETSOC-87-38-22. https://doi.org/10.2118/87-38-22.
Edmunds, N. and Peterson, J. 2007. A Unified Model for Prediction of CSOR in Steam-Based Bitumen Recovery. Presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 12–14 June. PETSOC-2007-027. https://doi.org/10.2118/2007-027.
Ito, Y., Suzuki, S., and Yamada, H. 1998. Effect of Reservoir Parameter on Oil Rates and Steam Oil Ratios in SAGD Projects. Proc., 7th UNITAR International Conference on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands, Beijing, China, 27–30 October. https://books.google.com/books/about/Proceedings_7th_UNITAR_International_Con.html?id=aeHdygAACAAJ.
Reis, J. C. 1992. A Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands: Linear Geometry. J Can Petrol Technol 31 (10): 14–20. PETSOC-92-10-01. https://doi.org/10.2118/92-10-01.
Reis, J. C. 1993. A Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Model for Tar Sands: Radial Geometry. J Can Petrol Technol 32 (8): 43–48. PETSOC-93-08-05. https://doi.org/10.2118/93-08-05.
Vogel, J. 1984. Simplified Heat Calculations for Steamfloods. J Pet Technol 36 (7): 1127–1136. SPE-11219-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/11219-PA.
Zargar, Z. and Farouq Ali, S. M. 2017. Analytical Treatment of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage: Old and New. SPE J. 23 (1): 117–127. SPE-180748-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/180748-PA.
Zargar, Z. and Farouq Ali, S. M. 2018a. Analytical Modelling of Steam Chamber Rise Stage of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) Process. Fuel 233: 732–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.106.
Zargar, Z. and Farouq Ali, S. M. 2018b. Comprehensive Multi-Stage Analytical Treatment of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD). Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 24–26 September. SPE-191533-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/191533-MS.