Determination of Maximum Allowable Safe-Core-Retrieval Rates
- Rahman Ashena (University of Leoben) | Gerhard Thonhauser (University of Leoben) | Ali Ghalambor (Oil Center Research International) | Vamegh Rasouli (University of North Dakota) | Roman Manasipov (University of Leoben)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- May 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 548 - 564
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- maximum allowable retrieval rate, fluid type, core mechanical damage, safe core retrieval, hydraulic diffusivity
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 131 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Cores can be considered the ground truth only if we eliminate or minimize their damage during core cutting, tripping, and surface handling. Such damage would adversely alter their properties. An important source of core damage is during tripping, when quick decompression might cause damage because of the induced microfractures. In this paper, a state-of-the-art geomechanical model is introduced and applied for determining the safe-tripping rates.
The thermo-poroelastic (T-P-E) geomechanical approach used in this study includes the mathematical derivation of the diffusion time required for the imposed pore-pressure difference to dissipate while also considering the effects caused by the temperature changes, mudcake, and swabbing. The work uses different approaches for fluid modeling in a transient manner during tripping for the water-bearing, gas-bearing, and oil-bearing cores.
In this work, the hydraulic diffusivity and the fluid type have been introduced as the main factors controlling the maximum allowable safe-tripping rates. A relationship between the allowable decompression rate and the hydraulic diffusivity will be presented for each specified fluid type. In addition, the results indicate that water-bearing cores can be safely tripped as quickly as the normal tripping speed of the wireline, even with a core that has a permeability as low as 0.01 md. For gas- and oil-bearing cores, the safe-tripping rates are determined to be much less than the water-bearing cores because the fluids expand with the pressure drop along the journey to the surface. The results show that the tripping rate is the lowest for the oil-bearing cores, particularly in the vicinity of the bubblepoint and gas critical pressure (because the gas expansion pushes the oil and applies significant viscous forces across the core pore throats).
This paper is a novel work developing T-P-E and mathematical models for the case of core tripping considering the effects of pore-pressure change, temperature change, mudcake, and swabbing. The hydraulic diffusivity and the fluid type have been considered as the controlling factors. The approach has been applied for modeling the tripping of water-, gas-, and oil-bearing cores to provide maximum allowable tripping rates.
|File Size||661 KB||Number of Pages||17|
Ahmed, T. and McKinney, P. D. 2005. Advanced Reservoir Engineering. Houston: Gulf Professional Publishing.
Amyx, J. W., Bass, D. M. Jr., and Whiting, R. L. 1960. Petroleum Reservoir Engineering. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
API RP 40, Recommended Practices for Core Analysis. 1998. Washington, DC: API.
Ashena, R. 2017. Optimization of Core Tripping Using a Thermo-Poro-Elastic Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Leoben, Leoben, Austria (April 2017).
Ashena, R. and Thonhauser, G. 2018. Coring Methods and Systems. New York City: Springer International Publishing.
Ashena, R., Thonhauser, G., Vortisch, W. et al. 2017a. Preserving Shale Gas Core Quality During Tripping. Presented at the 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Paris, 12–15 June. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201701047.
Ashena, R., Thonhauser, G., Ott, H. et al. 2017b. A Thermo-Poro-Elastic (T-P-E) Model Developed for Core Tripping Failure Analysis. Presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Vienna, Austria, 27–30 August. SCA2017-026.
Ashena, R., Thonhauser, G., Vortisch, W. et al. 2018. Optimization of Core Retrieval Using a Thermo-Poro-Elastic (T-P-E) Approach. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 167 (August): 577–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.04.041.
Bourgoyne, A. T., Millheim, K. K., Chenevert, M. E.Jr. et al. 1986. Applied Drilling Engineering, Vol. 2. Richardson, Texas: Textbook Series, Society of Petroleum Engineering.
Bouteca, M. J., Bary, D., Piau, J. M. et al. 1994. Contribution of Poroelasticity to Reservoir Engineering: Lab Experiments, Application to Core Decompression and Implication in HP-HT Reservoirs Depletion. Presented at Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands, 29–31 August. SPE-28093-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/28093-MS.
Byrne, M., Zubizarreta, I., and Sorrentino, Y. 2015. The Impact of Formation Damage on Core Quality. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition, Budapest, Hungary, 3–5 June. SPE-174189-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174189-MS.
Carman, P. C. 1956. Flow of Gases Through Porous Media. New York City: Academic Press.
Chen, G. and Ewy, R. T. 2005. Thermoporoelastic Effect on Wellbore Stability. SPE J. 10 (2): 121–129. SPE-89039-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/89039-PA. Dake, L. P. 1998. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.
Detournay, E. and Cheng, A. 1993. Fundamentals of Poroelasticity. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Hettema, M. H. H., Hanssen, T. H., and Jones, B. L. 2002. Minimizing Coring-Induced Damage in Consolidated Rock. Presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, 20–23 October. SPE-78156-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/78156-MS.
Hoeink, T., van der Zee, W., and Arndt, S. 2015. Optimal Core Retrieval Time for Minimizing Core Decompression Damage. Presented at the SPE Pacific Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia, 9–11 November. SPE-176943-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/176943-MS.
Jaeger, J. C., Cook, N. G. W., and Zimmerman, R. W. 2007. Deformation and Failure of Rocks: Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, fourth edition. p. 221–228. Hoboken, New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
Kreyszig, E. 2006. Advanced Engineering Mathematics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
McPhee, C., Reed, J., and Zubizarreta, I. 2015. Core Analysis: A Best Practice Guide, Vol. 64, first edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Mitchell, R. F. and Miska, S. Z. 2011. Fundamentals of Drilling Engineering, No. 12. Richardson, Texas: Textbook Series, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Norrie, A. G., Akram, S., and Niznik, M. R. 2002. North Sea Coring Record Attained by Step Change Application Modeling. Presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, 26–28 February. SPE-74509-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/74509-MS.
Roark, R. J. 1954. Formulas for Stress and Strain, third edition. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
Rosen, R., Mickelson, B., Fry, J. et al. 2007. Recent Experience With Unconsolidated Core Analysis. Presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Calgary, 10–12 September. SCA2007-41.
Santarelli, F. J. and Dusseault, M. B. 1991. Core Quality Control in Petroleum Engineering. Presented at the 32nd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Norman, Oklahoma, 10–12 July. ARMA-91-111.
Timoshenko, S. 1934. Theory of Elasticity. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
Wang, H. 2000. Theory of Linear Poroelasticity With Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Zoback, M. 2010. Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zubizarreta, I., Byrne, M., Sorrentino, Y. et al. 2013. Pore Pressure Evolution, Core Damage and Tripping Out Schedules: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 5–7 March. SPE-163527-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163527-MS.