Geomechanical Simulation of Partially Propped Fracture Closure and Its Implication for Water Flowback and Gas Production
- Yongzan Liu (University of Alberta) | Juliana Y. Leung (University of Alberta) | Rick Chalaturnyk (University of Alberta)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- May 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 273 - 290
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- proppant distribution, numerical simulation, fracturing fluid flowback, fracture closure, unconventional reservoirs
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 508 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Uneven proppant distribution is often encountered in hydraulic fracturing. Despite propped and unpropped fractures exhibiting different closure behavior during shut-in and early-flowback periods as a result of changes in effective stress, modeling of the geometry and closure behavior of a partially propped fracture is rarely performed. Numerical simulation is used in this study to simulate the closure behavior of a partially propped fracture and to examine its effects on water flowback and gas production.
Explicit finite-difference geomechanical simulation is used to simulate the change in effective stress and the corresponding closure geometry of a partially propped fracture. Parameters including rock strength, in-situ stress condition, proppant compaction, and propped-fracture height and aperture are considered to understand their effects on the fracture-closure geometry. This partially propped fracture is then represented explicitly in the computational domain in a flow simulation to model fluid flow during the shut-in and flowback periods. Fracture volume and fracture conductivity are adjusted as a function of effective stress to represent the fracture-closure process. The effect of coupling of partially propped fracture closure and multiphase flow on water recovery and gas production is investigated. Implications of ignoring the physical process of fracture closure and complex partially propped fracture geometry are examined.
Geomechanical-simulation results reveal the potential formation of a residual opening above the proppant pack in a partially propped fracture. Three distinct parts are identified within a partially propped fracture: a propped region, an unpropped region, and a residual opening (arch). The size of the residual opening is most sensitive to the initial fracture aperture. Stress concentrations occur at the top of the proppant pack and lead to potential proppant crushing or embedment. In addition to water uptake into the matrix because of forced (large pressure differential across the matrix/fracture interface) and spontaneous (high capillary pressure in the matrix) imbibition, fracture closure during the shut-in and flowback periods could displace more water into the nearby matrix and reduce the final water recovery. The residual opening would exaggerate the effects of gravity segregation and hamper water recovery by providing a highly conductive flow path to gas flow, such that the water would accumulate near the bottom of the fracture. The implication is that more-aggressive drawdown should be implemented to recover the fracturing fluid.
This study offers a quantitative analysis of the geometry of a partially propped fracture and highlights its effects on water flowback and gas production. The existence of the residual opening, which is commonly ignored in most analysis, would indeed play a crucial role in the subsequent well performance and in-situ fluid distribution. A number of insights pertinent to practical fracture design and operational strategy are discussed.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Acharya, A. R. 1986. Particle Transport in Viscous and Viscoelastic Fracturing Fluids. SPE Prod Eng 1 (2): 104–110. SPE-13179-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/13179-PA.
Agrawal, S. and Sharma, M. M. 2015. Practical Insights into Liquid Loading Within Hydraulic Fractures and Potential Unconventional Gas Reservoir Optimization Strategies. J. Unconven. Oil Gas Resour. 11 (September): 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2015.04.001.
Alkouh, A., McKetta, S., and Wattenbarger, R. A. 2014. Estimation of Effective-Fracture Volume Using Water-Flowback and Production Data for Shale-Gas Wells. J Can Pet Technol 53 (5): 290–303. SPE-166279-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/166279-PA.
Alotaibi, M. A. and Miskimins, J. L. 2015. Slickwater Proppant Transport in Complex Fractures: New Experimental Findings and Scalable Correlation. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 28–30 September. SPE-174828. https://doi.org/10.2118/174828-MS.
Alramahi, B. and Sundberg, M. I. 2012. Proppant Embedment and Conductivity of Hydraulic Fractures in Shales. Presented at the 46th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Chicago, 24–27 June. ARMA-2012-291.
Amadei, B. and Goodman, R.E. 1981. Formulation Of Complete Plane Strain Problems For Regularly Jointed Rocks. Presented at the 22nd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 29 June–2 July. ARMA-81-0245.
Anderson, D. M., Turco, F., Virues, C. J. J. et al. 2013. Application of Rate Transient Analysis Workflow in Unconventional Reservoirs: Horn River Shale Gas Case Study. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition—Asia Pacific, Brisbane, Australia, 11–13 November. SPE-167042-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167042-MS.
Bear, J. 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. New York City: Elsevier.
Bokane, A., Jain, S., Deshpande, Y. et al. 2013. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Study and Investigation of Proppant Transport and Distribution in Multistage Fractured Horizontal Wells. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, 16–18 September. SPE-165952-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/165952-MS.
Bradley, H. B. ed. 1992. Petroleum Engineering Handbook, third edition. Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Chen, D., Pan, Z., and Ye, Z. 2015. Dependence of Gas Shale Fracture Permeability on Effective Stress and Reservoir Pressure: Model Match and Insights. Fuel 139 (1 January): 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.018.
Cheng, Y. 2012. Impact of Water Dynamics in Fractures on the Performance of Hydraulically Fractured Wells in Gas-Shale Reservoirs. J Can Pet Technol 51 (2): 143–151. SPE-127863-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/127863-PA.
Cho, Y., Ozkan, E., and Apaydin, O. G. 2013. Pressure-Dependent Natural-Fracture Permeability in Shale and Its Effect on Shale-Gas Well Production. SPE Res Eval & Eng 16 (2): 216–228. SPE-159801-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/159801-PA.
Chou, Q., Gao, H. J., and Somerwil, M. 2011. Analysis of Geomechanical Data for Horn River Basin Gas Shales, North-East British Columbia, Canada. Presented at the SPE Middle East Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Muscat, Oman, 31 January–2 February. SPE-142498-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/142498-MS.
Cipolla, C. L., Lolon, E., Mayerhofer, M. J. et al. 2009. The Effect of Proppant Distribution and Un-Propped Fracture Conductivity on Well Performance in Unconventional Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 19–21 January. SPE-119368-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/119368-MS.
Clark, P. E. and Quadir, J. A. 1981. Prop Transport in Hydraulic Fractures: A Critical Review of Particle Settling Velocity Equations. Presented at the SPE/DOE Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 27–29 May. SPE-9866-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/9866-MS.
Computer Modelling Group. 2015. GEM: Compositional & Unconventional Reservoir Simulator User’s Guide, Version 2015. Calgary: CMG.
Crafton, J. W. and Noe, S. 2013. Factors Affecting Early Well Productivity in Six Shale Plays. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166101-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166101-MS.
Daneshy, A. A. 2005. Proppant Distribution and Flowback in Off-Balance Hydraulic Fractures. SPE Prod & Fac 20 (1): 41–47. SPE-89889-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/89889-PA.
Dayan, A., Stracener, S. M., and Clark, P. E. 2009. Proppant Transport in Slickwater Fracturing of Shale Gas Formations. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4–7 October. SPE-125068-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/125068-MS.
Evans, R. D. and Civan, F. 1994. Characterization of Non-Darcy Multiphase Flow in Petroleum Bearing Formation. Final Report, No. DOE/BC/14659–7, School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering, Oklahoma University, Oklahoma.
Fredd, C. N., McConnell, S. B., Boney, C. L. et al. 2001. Experimental Study of Fracture Conductivity for Water-Fracturing and Conventional Fracturing Applications. SPE J. 6 (3): 288–298. SPE-74138-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/74138-PA.
Gale, J. F., Laubach, S. E., Olson, J. E. et al. 2014. Natural Fractures in Shale: A Review and New Observations. AAPG Bull. 98 (11): 2165–2216.
Gdanski, R. D., Fulton, D. D., and Shen, C. 2009. Fracture-Face-Skin Evolution During Cleanup. SPE Prod & Oper 24 (1): 22–34. SPE-101083-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/101083-PA.
Ghanbari, E. and Dehghanpour, H. 2016. The Fate of Fracturing Water: A Field and Simulation Study. Fuel 163 (1 January): 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.040.
Ghassemi, A., Riley, S., and Ye, Z. 2016. Fracture Properties Characterization of Shale Rocks. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1–3 August. URTEC-2448066-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2016-2448066.
Gu, F. and Chalaturnyk, R. 2010. Permeability and Porosity Models Considering Anisotropy and Discontinuity of Coalbeds and Application in Coupled Simulation. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 74 (3–4): 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.09.002.
Holditch, S. A. 1979. Factors Affecting Water Blocking and Gas Flow From Hydraulically Fractured Gas Wells. J Pet Technol 31 (12): 1,515–1,524. SPE-7561-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/7561-PA.
Holditch, S. A. and Tschirhart, N. 2005. Optimal Stimulation Treatments in Tight Gas Sands. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9–12 October. SPE-96104-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/96104-MS.
Huo, D., Li, B., and Benson, S. M. 2014. Investigating Aperture-Based Stress-Dependent Permeability and Capillary Pressure in Rock Fractures. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 27–29 October. SPE-170819-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170819-MS.
Itasca Consulting Group. 2015. FLAC: Two-Dimensional Explicit Finite Difference Program User’s Guide, Version 7.0. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Itasca Consulting Group.
Jansen, T. A., Zhu, D., and Hill, A. D. 2015. The Effect of Rock Mechanical Properties on Fracture Conductivity for Shale Formations. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 3–5 February. SPE-173347-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173347-MS.
Kam, P., Nadeem, M., Novlesky, A. et al. 2015. Reservoir Characterization and History Matching of the Horn River Shale: An Integrated Geoscience and Reservoir-Simulation Approach. J Can Pet Technol 54 (6): 475–488. SPE-171611-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/171611-PA.
Kassis, S. and Sondergeld, C. H. 2010. Fracture Permeability of Gas Shale: Effect of Roughness, Fracture Offset, Proppant, and Effective Stress. Presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing, 8–10 June. SPE-131376-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/131376-MS.
Kern, L. R., Perkins, T. K., and Wyant, R. E. 1959. The Mechanics of Sand Movement in Fracturing. J Pet Technol 11 (7): 55–57. SPE-1108-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/1108-G.
Khanna, A., Neto, L. B., and Kotousov, A. 2014. Effect of Residual Opening on the Inflow Performance of a Hydraulic Fracture. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 74 (January): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2013.08.012.
Krajcinovic, D. and Lemaitre, J. ed. 1987. Continuum Damage Mechanics: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lake, L. W. 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Langmuir, I. 1918. The Adsorption of Gases on Plane Surfaces of Glass, Mica and Platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40 (9): 1361–140. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02242a004.
Leverett, M. 1941. Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids. Trans. AIME 142 (1): 152–169. SPE-941152-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/941152-G.
Liu, Y., Leung, J. Y., Chalaturnyk, R. et al. 2017. Fracturing Fluid Distribution in Shale Gas Reservoirs Due to Fracture Closure, Proppant Distribution and Gravity Segregation. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 15–16 February. SPE-185043-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185043-MS.
Mack, M., Maxwell, S. C., and Lee, B. T. 2016. Microseismic Geomechanical Optimization of Hydraulic Fracturing in the Horn River Basin. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1–3 August. URTEC-2430012-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2016-2430012.
Makhanov, K., Habibi, A., Dehghanpour, H. et al. 2014. Liquid Uptake of Gas Shales: A Workflow to Estimate Water Loss During Shut-in Periods After Fracturing Operations. J. Unconven. Oil Gas Resour. 7 (September): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2014.04.001.
McClure, M. 2014. The Potential Effect of Network Complexity on Recovery of Injected Fluid Following Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 1–3 April. SPE-168991-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168991-MS.
Nejadi, S., Leung, J. Y., Trivedi, J. J. et al. 2015. Integrated Characterization of Hydraulically Fractured Shale-Gas Reservoirs—Production History Matching. SPE Res Eval & Eng 18 (4): 481–494. SPE-171664-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/171664-PA.
Neto, L. B. and Kotousov, A. 2013. Residual Opening of Hydraulic Fractures Filled with Compressible Proppant. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. 61 (July): 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.02.012.
Novlesky, A., Kumar, A. and Merkle, S. 2011. Shale Gas Modeling Workflow: From Microseismic to Simulation—A Horn River Case Study. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 15–17 November. SPE-148710-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/148710-MS.
Palisch, T. T., Vincent, M., and Handren, P. J. 2010. Slickwater Fracturing: Food for Thought. SPE Prod & Oper 25 (3): 327–344. SPE-115766-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/115766-PA.
Parmar, J., Dehghanpour, H., and Kuru, E. 2012. Unstable Displacement: a Missing Factor in Fracturing Fluid Recovery. Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 October–1 November. SPE-162649-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162649-MS.
Patankar, N. A., Joseph, D. D., Wang, J. et al. 2002. Power Law Correlations for Sediment Transport in Pressure Driven Channel Flows. Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 28 (8): 1269–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00030-7.
Sahai, R., Miskimins, J. L., and Olson, K. E. 2014. Laboratory Results of Proppant Transport in Complex Fracture Systems. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, the Woodlands, Texas, 4–6 February. SPE-168579. https://doi.org/10.2118/168579-MS.
Shah, S. N., Mahmoud, A., and Lord, D. L. 2001. Proppant Transport Characterization of Hydraulic-Fracturing Fluids Using a High-Pressure Simulator Integrated With a Fiber-Optic/Light-Emitting-Diode (LED) Vision System. SPE Prod & Fac 16 (1): 42–49. SPE-69210-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/69210-PA.
Sherman, J. B. and Holditch, S. A. 1991. Effect of Injected Fracture Fluids and Operating Procedures on Ultimate Gas Recovery. Presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Houston, 22–24 January. SPE-21496-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/21496-MS.
Shiozawa, S. and McClure, M. 2016a. Simulation of Proppant Transport with Gravitational Settling and Fracture Closure in a Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Fracturing Simulator. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 138 (February): 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.01.002.
Shiozawa, S. and McClure, M. 2016b. Comparison of Pseudo-3D and Fully-3D Simulations of Proppant Transport in Hydraulic Fractures, Including Gravitational Settling, Formation of Proppant Banks, Tip-Screen Out, and Fracture Closure. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 9–11 February. SPE-179132-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179132-MS.
Sierra, L., Sahai, R., and Mayerhofer, M. J. 2014. Quantification of Proppant Distribution Effect on Well Productivity and Recovery Factor of Hydraulically Fractured Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 September–2 October. SPE-171594-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/171594-MS.
Terzaghi, K. 1944. Theoretical Soil Mechanics. New York: Chapman and Hali, Limited and John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Tong, S. and Mohanty, K. K. 2016. Proppant Transport Study in Fractures with Intersections. Fuel 181 (1 October): 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.144.
Wang, J. Y., Holditch, S., and McVay, D. 2010. Modeling Fracture-Fluid Cleanup in Tight-Gas Wells. SPE J. 15 (3): 783–793. SPE-119624-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/119624-PA.
Wang, M. and Leung, J. Y. 2015. Numerical Investigation of Fluid-Loss Mechanisms During Hydraulic Fracturing Flow-Back Operations in Tight Reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 133 (September): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.05.013.
Wang, M. and Leung, J. Y. 2016. Numerical Investigation of Coupling Multiphase Flow and Geomechanical Effects on Water Loss During Hydraulic-Fracturing Flowback Operation. SPE Res Eval & Eng 19 (3): 520–537. SPE-178618-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/178618-PA.
Wang, Y. and Aryana, S. 2016. Numerical Investigation of Stress-Dependent Fracture Apertures and Their Spatial Variations on Production from Unconventional Gas Reservoirs with Complex Fracture Geometries. Presented at the SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, 5–6 May. SPE-180244-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180244-MS.
Warpinski, N. R. 2010. Stress Amplification and Arch Dimensions in Proppant Beds Deposited by Waterfracs. SPE Prod & Oper 25 (4): 461–471. SPE-119350-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/119350-PA.
Wu, K. and Olson, J. E. 2016. Mechanisms of Simultaneous Hydraulic-Fracture Propagation From Multiple Perforation Clusters in Horizontal Wells. SPE J. 21 (3): 1000–1008. SPE-178925-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/178925-PA.
Wu, Y. S., Li, J., Ding, D. et al. 2014. A Generalized Framework Model for the Simulation of Gas Production in Unconventional Gas Reservoirs. SPE J. 19 (5): 845–857. SPE-163609-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/163609-PA.
Xu, Y., Adefidipe, O., and Dehghanpour, H. 2016. A Flowing Material Balance Equation for Two-Phase Flowback Analysis. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 142 (June): 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.01.018.
Yu, W. and Sepehrnoori, K. 2014. An Efficient Reservoir-Simulation Approach to Design and Optimize Unconventional Gas Production. J Can Pet Technol 53 (2): 109–121. SPE-165343-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/165343-PA.
Yu, W., Zhang, T., Du, S. et al. 2015. Numerical Study of the Effect of Uneven Proppant Distribution Between Multiple Fractures on Shale Gas Well Performance. Fuel 142 (15 February): 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.074.
Yue, M., Leung, J. Y., and Dehghanpour, H. 2016. Numerical Investigation of Limitations and Assumptions of Analytical Transient Flow Models in Tight Oil Reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 30 (March): 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.01.042.
Zanganeh, B., Ahmadi, M., Hanks, C. et al. 2015. The Role of Hydraulic Fracture Geometry and Conductivity Profile, Unpropped Zone Conductivity and Fracturing Fluid Flowback on Production Performance of Shale Oil Wells. J. Unconven. Oil Gas Resour. 9 (March): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2014.11.006.
Zhang, J. and Dunn-Norman, S. 2015. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Modeling of Proppant Transport in a Plug and Perf Completion with Different Perforation Phasing. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July. URTEC-2169184-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2015-2169184.
Zhang, J., Kamenov, A., Hill, A. D. et al. 2014. Laboratory Measurement of Hydraulic-Fracture Conductivities in the Barnett Shale. SPE Prod & Oper 29 (3): 216–227. SPE-163839-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/163839-PA.