An Advanced Clarification Process for Treating Produced Waters
- Eric Ringler (Southern Research Institute) | Bill Chatterton (Southern Research Institute) | Dave Philbrook (M2 Water Treatment) | Blaine F. Severin (Environmental Process Dynamics)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- February 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 154 - 163
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Produced Water, Magnetic Ballast Clarification, Clarification, Hydraulic Fracture Wastewater, Economics
- 8 in the last 30 days
- 282 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
An advanced clarification process that was based on enhanced floc removal with magnetite and magnetic ballast [M2 Water Treatment’s Magnetic Ballast Clarification (MBC) system] was evaluated in a field study at a hydraulic-fracture wastewater disposal site in southwest Texas. In this process, suspended solids are chemically flocculated in the presence of magnetite, rendering dense floc particles that are also magnetic. Flocculated solids with high settling rates are removed by gravity separation. The settled solids are then removed by use of drum-styled magnetics. Magnetite is recovered and reused. Although technically called clarification, the MBC process is governed by magnetic flux as opposed to gravity forces, allowing for a much smaller unit footprint, a unit that is portable for mobile use, and more dynamic control compared with conventional clarification. Produced water from a total of nine wells was processed during a period of several weeks in July and August 2015 in a 5-gal/min (171-B/D) pilot unit. Most tests were operated at approximately 3.1 gal/min (106 B/D) for consistency with the highly variable wastes encountered. Treated water sufficiently met criteria for reuse on the basis of oil and grease (O&G), total suspended solids, and turbidity removal. The cost included two hypothetical treatment-plant sizes: a local processing unit plant (2,380 B/D or 100,000 gal/D) and a larger regional treatment system (11,900 B/D or 500,000 gal/D). Costs ranged from USD 0.79/bbl for the smaller treatment option to USD 0.22/bbl for the larger option, which included chemical costs and amortized (10 years) capital costs, installation, and labor. Estimates were based on assumptions for water requirements and treatment needs in the Barnett, Marcellus, and Eagle Ford shale plays, and included assumptions on freshwater availability, trucking costs, and treatment costs.
|File Size||570 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Boschee, P. 2014. Produced and Flowback Water Recycling and Re-use: Economics, Limitations, and Technology. Oil and Gas Fac 3 (1): 16–21. SPE-0214-0016-OGF. https://doi.org/10.2118/0214-0016-OGF.
Bruff, M. J., and Jikich, S. 2011. Field Demonstration of an Integrated Water Treatment Technology Solution in Marcellus Shale. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Columbus, Ohio, 17–19 August. SPE-149466-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/149466-MS.
CDM Smith. 2012. Guidelines for Water Reuse. EPA 600/R-12/618, September, 122 pp.
CRC. 1979. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 54th edition, p. D-223, West R. C., Editor-in-Chief. Cleveland, Ohio: CRC Press.
EPA. 2003. Small Water System By-Products Treatment and Disposal Cost Document, USEPA 811-D-93011, pp. 44–51 (110 pp).
Galusky, P. L. and Hayes, T. D. 2011. Feasibility Assessment of Early Flowback Water Recovery for Reuse in Subsequent Well Completions, Task 7; RPSEA No. 08122-05.07 48 pp.
Hayes, T. D. 2009. Sampling and Analysis of Water Streams Associated With the Development of Marcellus Shale Gas, Final Report to the Marcellus Shale Coalition. Gas Technology Institute, Des Plaines, Illinois.
Hayes, T. D. and Severin, B. F. 2012. Barnett and Marcellus Shale Water Management and Reuse Technologies. Final Report, RPSEA Contract 08122-05.
Hayes, T. D., Halldorson, B., Horner, P. et al. 2014. Mechanical Vapor Recompression for the Treatment of Shale Gas Flowback Water. Oil & Gas Facilities 3 (4): 54–62. SPE-170247-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/170247-PA.
Hayes, T. D. 2015. Personal Communication, Gas Technology Institute, Des Plaines, Illinois.
Kuijvenhoven, C., Fedotov, V., Gallo, D. et al. 2013. Water Management Approach for Shale Operations in North America. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition–Asia Pacific, Brisbane, Australia, 11–13 November. SPE-167057-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167057-MS.
Martell, M. E. 2011. Produced Water Reuse and Recycling Challenges and Opportunities Across Major Shale Plays. EPA Hydraulic Fracture Study Technical Workshop #4.
Paktinat, J., O’Neil, B. J., and Tulissi, M. G.. 2011. Case Studies: Improved Performance of High Brine Friction Reducers in Fracturing Shale Reservoirs. Paper presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 17–19 August. SPE-148794-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/148794-MS.
Rail Road Commission of Texas. 2015a. www.lrrc.state.tx.us/oil-gas/major-oil-gas-formations/Eagle-Ford-Shale/.
Rail Road Commission of Texas. 2015b. www.lrrc.state.tx.us/media/14482/barnettshaledrillingpermitsissued.pdf.
Rail Road Commission of Texas. 2015c. www.barnetshalenews.com/documents/Tinterra/20%SW20%FW4.pdf.
Severin, B. F. and Hayes, T. D. 2012. Evaluation of Electrodialysis for the Desalination of Shale Gas Flowback Water. RPSEA Report No. 08122-05.12, Contract No. 08122-05, 156 pp.
Severin, B. F., Ringler, E., Chatterton, B. et al. 2017. Trends in Fluid Waste Generation From the Hydraulic Fracture and Operation of Shale Gas Wells in Pennsylvania, 2012–2014. SPE Prod & Oper 32 (3): 351–361. SPE-184403-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/184403-PA.
Shipman, S., McConnell, D., McCutchan, M. P. et al. 2013. Maximizing Flowback Reuse and Reducing Freshwater Demand: Case Studies from the Challenging Marcellus Shale. Paper presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 20–22 August. SPE-165693-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/165693-MS.
Silva, J. M., Matis, H., Kostedt, W. L. IV et al. 2012. Produced Water Pretreatment for Water Recovery and Salt Production. Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America, Final Report Contract #08122-36, 67 pp.
Slutz, J., Anderson, J., and Horner, P. 2012. Key Shale Gas Water Management Strategies: An Economic Assessment Tool. Presented at the SPE/APPEA International Conference on Health, Safety, and the Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Perth, Australia, 11–13 September. SPE-157532-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/157532-MS.
State of Pennsylvania. 2015. Department of Environmental Protection Website http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/wastewater_management/10582.
SRI. 2015. Advanced Treatment of Shale Gas Fracturing Water to Produce Re-use or Discharge Quality Water, RPSEA Project 11122-57, Final Report–Technology Field Demonstration (64 pp.)