A New Method of Backup-Cutter Layout To Extend Bit Life Without Sacrificing Rate of Penetration
- Shilin Chen (Halliburton) | Yazan Khlefat (Halliburton) | Chris Cleboski (Halliburton) | Seth Anderle (Halliburton) | Zakaria Maouche (Halliburton)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- June 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 115 - 129
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Cutter Wear, Drilling Efficiency, Backup Cutters, PDC Bits, Bit Life
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 206 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
This paper discusses a new and general method of backup-cutter layout to extend bit life without sacrificing rate of penetration (ROP) and two field-case studies. This method includes the following aspects:
• Ensuring backup cutters do not cut or only partially cut when their primary cutters experience little-to-no wear and when the penetration per revolution of the bit does not exceed an expected value. This aspect is enabled by allowing backup cutters to have a minimal critical depth of cut that is greater than the depth of cut of the primary cutters.
• Ensuring that backup cutters act as active cutters when the primary cutters’ wear depth is equal to or greater than the underexposure of the backup cutters. This aspect is enabled by allowing each backup cutter to be rotationally behind its primary cutter by approximately 150° or greater. The underexposure of each backup cutter relative to its primary cutter is calculated carefully on the basis of the primary cutter’s wear and drilling conditions.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||15|
Abdullah,M. H., Esmaiel, A. H., El Heiny, A. H. et al. 2016. Solving 16-in. Deep Harsh Drilling Environment Challenges in South East Kuwait. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bangkok, 14–16 November. IPTC-18606-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-18606-MS.
Brandon, B. D., Cerkovnik, J., Koskie, E. et al. 1992. First Revision to the IADC Fixed Cutter Dull Grading System. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, New Orleans, 18–21 February. SPE-23939-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/23939-MS.
Chen, S., Arfele, R., Anderle, S. et al. 2013. A New Theory on Cutter Layout for Improving PDC Bit Performance in Hard and Transit Formation Drilling. SPE Drill & Compl 28 (4): 338–349. SPE-168224-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/168224-PA.
Chen, S., Ashby, J. R., and Arfele, R. W. 2014. System and Method of Improved Depth of Cut Control of Drilling Tools. US Patent No. 8863860.
Chen, S., Lefort, G., Arfele, R. W. et al. 2015a. Rotary Drill Bits With Back-Up Cutting Elements To Optimize Bit Life. Pending US Patent, US 20150152689A1.
Chen, S., Grosz, G., Anderle, S. et al. 2015b. The Role of Rock-Chip Removals and Cutting-Area Shapes in Polycrystalline-Diamond-Compact-Bit Design Optimization. SPE Drill & Compl 30 (40): 334–347. SPE-171833-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/171833-PA.
Clayton, R., Chen, S., and Lefort, G. 2005. New Bit Design, Cutter Technology Extend PDC Applications to Hard Rock Drilling. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 23–25 February. SPE-91840-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/91840-MS.
Curry, D., Pessier R., Spencer, R. et al. 2017. Assuring Efficient PDC Drilling. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, The Hague, 14–16 March. SPE-184676-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/184676-MS.
Detournay, E. and Defourny, P. 1992. A Phenomenological Model of the Drilling Action of Drag Bits. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 29 (1): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(92)91041-3.
Detournay, E., Richard, T., and Shepherd, M. 2008. Drilling Response of Drag Bits: Theory and Experiment. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 45 (8): 1347–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.01.010.
Glowka, D. A. and Stone, C. M. 1985. Thermal Response of Polycrystalline Diamond Compact Cutters Under Simulated Downhole Conditions. SPE J. 25 (2): 143–156. SPE-11947-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/11947-PA.
Glowka, D. A. 1989. Use of Single-Cutter Data in the Analysis of PDC Bit Design, Part 1—Development of a PDC Cutting Force Model. J Pet Technol 41 (8): 797–849. SPE-15619-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/15619-PA.
Gonzales A., Clark, T., Douglas, C. et al. 2011. Advances in PDC Cutter Bits Improve Drilling in Hard, Abrasive Formations. J Pet Technol 63 (11): 26–27. SPE-1111-0026-JPT. https://doi.org/10.2118/1111-0026-JPT.
King W., Leon, C., Rumbos, T. et al. 2015. PDC Shearing Cap Technology Protects Cutters When Drilling Out Casing Bits for Increased ROP and Bit Life in the Next Hole Section. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, London, 17–19 March. SPA/IADC 173086-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173086-MS.
Maouche Z., Al-Rawahi, F., Agapie, I. et al. 2014. New PDC Bit Technology Sets the Standards in Drilling Hard and Abrasive Formations in Oman—Case Study. Presented at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference, Bangkok, 25–27 August. SPE-170462-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170462-MS.
Teasdale P., Holalkere Markandeya, S., Djaoui, M. et al. 2013. Innovative PDC Bit Designs With Improved Cutter Technology Deliver Significant Performance Improvements in Arabian Deep Gas Applications. Presented at the SPE Asia Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, 22–24 October. SPE-165858-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/165858-MS.
Warren, T. M. and Sinor, A. 1989. Drag-Bit Performance Modeling. SPE Drill Eng 4 (2): 119–127. SPE-15618-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/15618-PA.
Zijsling, D. H. 1987. Single Cutter Testing—A Key for PDC Bit Development. Presented at the Offshore Europe Conference, Aberdeen, 8–11 September. SPE-16529-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/16529-MS.