Inversion of Downhole Temperature Measurements in Multistage-Fracturing Stimulation of Horizontal Wells in Unconventional Reservoirs
- Shuang Zhang (Texas A&M University) | Ding Zhu (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- May 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 231 - 244
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- fracture diagnosis, DTS measurement, multistage fracturing
- 10 in the last 30 days
- 191 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
There are still many challenges involved with the quantitative interpretation of downhole distributed-temperature measurements for diagnosing multistage-fracturing treatments in horizontal wells. These challenges include handling enormous amounts of data measured by the sensors in a continuous time and space domain, a ready-to-use fast and robust forward model to simulate temperature behavior, and an efficient algorithm to invert the parameters that are of interest. Because multistage fracturing involves many uncertain parameters (ranging from reservoir properties to treatment design, to fracture geometries and conductivity), the problem becomes extremely complicated when the measured temperature is inverted to a downhole flow profile. In this study we present an approach for combining forward and inverse models to interpret downhole temperature data. Our goal was to improve computational efficiency. Field data from a gas well in the Marcellus Shale were used to illustrate the feasibility of quantitative interpretation of temperature measurement for fracture diagnosis.
The forward model used the fast-marching method (FMM). The forward simulation was an order of magnitude faster than the semianalytical model, which is the essential contribution for successfully applying the method in the field case. The improved inversion procedure increased the efficiency of the interpretation. The inversion procedure began with a sensitivity study to select the inversion parameters among various other parameters, such as fracture half-length and the fracture conductivity, and to determine the impact of their uncertainty on inversion. The inversion model used the initial analysis of the temperature gradient to identify the fracture locations with significant temperature changes for interpretation and eliminated the rest of the fracture locations from interpretation. Thus, we obtained a prior estimation of the selected inversion parameters, which was used as an initial estimate for the inversion process. This prior estimation saved significant computation. The inversion was performed fracture by fracture using either parallel computing or sequential computing on the basis of the sensor locations.
We began with a synthetic example containing multiple fractures to illustrate the approach and test the procedure accuracy and computation speed. The primary inversion parameter was flow rate, though we also interpreted either fracture length or fracture conductivity when assuming all the other parameters as additional constraints. With an adequate initial estimate, the inverted parameters matched the reference “true value” properly. The inversion process converged with reasonable iterations for each fracture (2–3 iterations). The operation time highlights the advantages of the inversion approach presented in this paper. The guided initial estimation ensured that the gradient inversion approach converged and avoided local minimization. Finally, a field application for interpreting the DTS measurement for the flow profile of the multistage-fractured horizontal well was performed using this inversion method, and it showed encouraging results.
The results of our investigation illustrate the procedure feasibility for using temperature data to diagnose a multistage-fracturing treatment. Our proposed inversion model was fast and reliable and provided a promising tool that can be used to quantitatively interpret downhole temperature data.
|File Size||11 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Al-Najim, A., Zahedi, A., Al-Khonaini, T. et al. 2012. A New Methodology for Stimulation of a High-Water-Cut Horizontal Oil Well Through the Combination of a Smart Chemical System With Real-Time Temperature Sensing: A Case Study of South Umm Gudair Field, PZ Kuwait. Presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing & Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 27–28 March. SPE-154387-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/154387-MS.
Anifowoshe, O., Yates, M., Xu, L. et al. 2016. Improving Wellbore Stimulation Coverage in the Marcellus: Integrating Lateral Measurements With Enhanced Engineered Completion Design and Fiber Optic Evaluation. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Canton, Ohio, 13–15 September. SPE-184051-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/184051-MS.
Cui, J., Yang, C., Zhu, D. et al. 2016a. Fracture Diagnosis in Multiple-Stage-Stimulated Horizontal Well by Temperature Measurements With Fast Marching Method. SPE J. 21 (6): 2289–2300. SPE-174880-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/174880-PA.
Cui, J., Zhu, D., and Jin, M. 2016b. Diagnosis of Production Performance After Multistage Fracture Stimulation in Horizontal Wells by Downhole Temperature Measurements. SPE Prod & Oper 31 (4): 280–288. SPE-170874-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/170874-PA.
Fujita, Y., Datta-Gupta, A., and King, M. J. 2016. A Comprehensive Reservoir Simulator for Unconventional Reservoirs That is Based on the Fast Marching Method and Diffusive Time of Flight. SPE J. 21 (6): 2276–2288. SPE-173269-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/173269-PA.
Hartley, H. O. 1961. The Modified Gauss-Newton Method for the Fitting of Non-Linear Regression Functions by Least Squares. Technometrics 3 (2): 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1961.10489945.
Holland, J. H. 1992. Genetic Algorithms. Sci Am 267 (1): 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66.
Huckabee, P. T. 2009. Optic Fiber Distributed Temperature for Fracture Stimulation Diagnostics and Well Performance Evaluation. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 19–21 January. SPE-118831-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/118831-MS.
Kulkarni, K. N., Datta-Gupta, A., and Vasco, D. W. 2000. A Streamline Approach for Integrating Transient Pressure Data Into High Resolution Reservoir Models. Presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference, Paris, 24–25 October. SPE-65120-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/65120-MS.
Ma, X., Al-Harbi, M., Datta-Gupta, A. et al. 2008. An Efficient Two-Stage Sampling Method for Uncertainty Quantification in History Matching Geological Models. SPE J. 13 (1): 77–87. SPE-102476-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/102476-PA.
McGinley, M., Zhu, D., and Hill, A. D. 2015. The Effects of Fracture Orientation and Elastic Property Anisotropy on Hydraulic Fracture Conductivity in the Marcellus Shale. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 28–30 September. SPE-174870-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174870-MS.
MSEEL (Marcellus Shale Energy and Environment Laboratory) Data Portal. 2017. http://data.mseel.org/dataset (accessed 20 December 2016).
Oliver, D. S., Reynolds, A. C., and Liu, N. 2008. Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Ribeiro, P. M. and Horne, R. N. 2016. Detecting Fracture Growth Out of Zone by Use of Temperature Analysis. SPE J. 21 (4): 1263–1278. SPE-170746-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/170746-PA.
Sierra, J. R., Kaura, J. D., Gualtieri, D. et al. 2008. DTS Monitoring of Hydraulic Fracturing: Experiences and Lessons Learned. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 21–24 September. SPE-116182-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/116182-MS.
Tardy, P. M. J., Ramondenc, P., Weng, X. et al. 2011. Inversion of DTS Logs To Measure Zonal Coverage During and After Wellbore Treatments With Coiled Tubing. Presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing & Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 5–6 April. SPE-143331-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/143331-MS.
Ugueto, G. A., Huckabee, P. T., and Molenaar, M. M. 2015. Challenging Assumptions About Fracture Stimulation Placement Effectiveness Using Fiber Optic Distributed Sensing Diagnostics: Diversion, Stage Isolation and Overflushing. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 3–5 February. SPE-173348-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173348-MS.
Ugueto, G. A., Huckabee, P. T., Molenaar, M. M. et al. 2016. Perforation Cluster Efficiency of Cemented Plug and Perf Limited Entry Completions; Insights From Fiber Optics Diagnostics. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 9–11 February. SPE-179124-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179124-MS.
Vasco, D. W., Keers, H., and Karasaki, K. 2000. Estimation of Reservoir Properties Using Transient Pressure Data: An Asymptotic Approach. Water Resour Res 36 (12): 3447–3465. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900179.
Wheaton, B., Haustveit, K., Deeg, W. et al. 2016. A Case Study of Completion Effectiveness in the Eagle Ford Shale Using DAS/DTS Observations and Hydraulic Fracture Modeling. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 9–11 February. SPE-179149-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179149-MS.
Xue, X., Yang, C., Sharma, V. K. et al. 2016. Reservoir and Fracture Flow Characterization Using a Novel W(s) Formulation. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1–3 August. URTEC-2440083-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2016-2440083.
Yang, C., Xue, X., Huang, J. et al. 2016. Rapid Refracturing Candidate Selection in Shale Reservoirs Using Drainage Volume and Instantaneous Recovery Ratio. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1–3 August. URTEC-2459368-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2016-2459368.
Yang, C., Xue, X., King, M. J. et al. 2017. Flow Simulation of Complex Fracture Systems With Unstructured Grids Using the Fast Marching Method. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Austin, Texas, 24–26 July. URTEC-2691393-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2017-2691393.