Phase Behavior in Shale Organic/Inorganic Nanopores From Molecular Simulation
- Bikai Jin (Texas A&M University) | Hadi Nasrabadi (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 626 - 637
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Phase behavior, Nanopore, Shale, Confinement effect
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 299 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Production from shale reservoirs is receiving more attention from the petroleum industry. However, there are many complexities associated with optimal production of shale reservoirs. One complexity is the unclear fluid-phase behavior in shale nanopores. In the shale nanopores, the interaction between the pore wall and fluid molecules can significantly change the fluid-phase behavior from the bulk (unconfined) condition. Therefore, the type of pore material can influence the fluid-phase behavior. There have been several recent efforts to model the confined fluid-phase behavior in shale reservoirs. However, the effect of pore material on fluid-phase behavior in shale reservoirs has not been addressed in the previous studies. In this paper, to have a better understanding of phase diagrams in different shale environments, we perform molecular simulations with three materials (two inorganic minerals and one kerogen) and two types of nanopores (slit and cylinder) to model the confined-phase behavior of pure fluids (methane and propane) and one ternary fluid (C1/C3/nC5). From the pure-fluid simulations in the pores of three diameters (4, 7, and 10 nm), confined liquid densities are decreased, whereas vapor densities are increased in the slit and cylinder pores. When pore diameters are increased, critical points are shifted to low densities and high temperatures. Critical temperature and density under confinement can deviate as high as 15 and 60%, respectively, from the original values in bulk. Molecular simulations are conducted for the ternary fluid in the slit and cylinder pores at 160°F. Under confinement, there is a large shift in the nC5 composition of the vapor phase in the ternary diagrams, whereas only small changes have been observed in the ternary diagrams of liquid phase. The density difference between two phases is reduced. Additional tests are performed at one typical shale temperature (290°F) for this ternary fluid in both nanopore types. Phase separation is observed in the slitpore tests, although only one phase is formed in the tests of the cylinder pores. Because the cylinder pore has more adsorption surface area compared with the slit pore, a stronger adsorption effect is introduced in all tests of the cylinder pores. Based on the comparison of all results (pure fluids and ternary fluid) from the three materials, the calcite pores provide a stronger confinement effect on fluids, and the other two materials have a similar confinement effect on the phase diagrams.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Alfi, M., Banerjee, D., and Nasrabadi, H. 2016a. Effect of Confinement on the Dynamic Contact Angle of Hydrocarbons. Energy Fuels 30 (11): 8962–8967. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01450.
Alfi, M., Nasrabadi, H., and Banerjee, D. 2016b. Experimental Investigation of Confinement Effect on Phase Behavior of Hexane, Heptane and Octane Using Lab-on-a-Chip Technology. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 423 (15 September): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.04.017.
Alharthy, N. S., Nguyen, T., Teklu, T. et al. 2013. Multiphase Compositional Modeling in Small-Scale Pores of Unconventional Shale Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166306-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166306-MS.
Allen, M. P. and Tildesley, D. J. 1989. Computer Simulation of Liquids. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L. G., and Halenda, P. P. 1951. The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations From Nitrogen Isotherms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73 (1): 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01145a126.
Behar, F. and Vandenbroucke, M. 1986. Représentation Chimique de la Structure des Kérogènes et des Asphaltènes en Fonction de Leur Origine et de Leur Degré d’évolution. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 41 (2): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:1986010.
Berthelot, D. 1898. Sur le Mélange des Gaz. Compt. Rendus 126: 1703–1855.
Browning, J., Ikonnikova, S., Gülen, G. et al. 2013. Barnett Shale Production Outlook. SPE Econ & Mgmt 5 (3): 89–104. SPE-165585-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/165585-PA.
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., and Teller, E. 1938. Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60 (2): 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01269a023.
Clarkson, C. R., Solano, N., Bustin, R. M. et al. 2013. Pore Structure Characterization of North American Shale Gas Reservoirs Using USANS/SANS, Gas Adsorption, and Mercury Intrusion. Fuel 103 (January): 606–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.119.
Collell, J., Ungerer, P., Galliero, G. et al. 2014. Molecular Simulation of Bulk Organic Matter in Type II Shales in the Middle of the Oil Formation Window. Energy Fuels 28 (12): 7457–7466. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef5021632.
Curtis, M. E., Ambrose, R. J., and Sondergeld, C. H. 2010. Structural Characterization of Gas Shales on the Micro- and Nano-Scales. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 19–21 October. SPE-137693-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/137693-MS.
Curtis, M. E., Ambrose, R. J., Sondergeld, C. H. et al. 2011. Investigation of the Relationship Between Organic Porosity and Thermal Maturity in the Marcellus Shale. Presented at the North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 14–16 June. SPE-144370-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/144370-MS.
Cygan, R. T., Liang, J.-J., and Kalinichev, A. G. 2004. Molecular Models of Hydroxide, Oxyhydroxide, and Clay Phases and the Development of a General Force Field. J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (4): 1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0363287.
Deighton, I. 2015. Basin Temperature Modeling Using Large Bottom Hole Temperature Datasets. Oral presentation given at the SMU Power Plays Geothermal Conference, Dallas. 20 May.
Devegowda, D., Sapmanee, K., Civan, F. et al. 2012. Phase Behavior of Gas Condensates in Shales Due to Pore Proximity Effects: Implications for Transport, Reserves and Well Productivity. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-160099-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/160099-MS.
Dong, X., Liu, H., Hou J. et al. 2016a. Phase Behavior of Multicomponent Hydrocarbons in Organic Nanopores Under the Effects of Capillary Pressure and Adsorption Film. Presented at the SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, 5–6 May. SPE-180237-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180237-MS.
Dong, X., Liu, H., Hou J. et al. 2016b. Phase Equilibria of Confined Fluids in Nanopores of Tight and Shale Rocks Considering the Effect of Capillary Pressure and Adsorption Film. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55 (3): 798–811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04276.
Du, L. and Chu, L. 2012. Understanding Anomalous Phase Behavior in Unconventional Oil Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 October–1 November. SPE-161830-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/161830-MS.
Firoozabadi, A. 1999. Thermodynamics of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs. New York City: McGraw-Hill Education.
Foloppe, N. and MacKerell, A. D. Jr. 2000. All-Atom Empirical Force Field for Nucleic Acids: I. Parameter Optimization Based on Small Molecule and Condensed Phase Macromolecular Target Data. J. Comput. Chem. 21 (2): 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(20000130)21:2<86::AID-JCC2>3.0.CO;2-G.
Frenkel, D. and Smit, B. 2002. Understanding Molecular Simulation, second edition. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Gasparik, M., Ghanizadeh, A., Bertier, P. et al. 2012. High-Pressure Methane Sorption Isotherms of Black Shales From The Netherlands. Energy Fuels 26 (8): 4995–5004. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef300405g.
Ghoufi, A., Malfreyt, P., and Tildesley, D. J. 2016. Computer Modelling of the Surface Tension of the Gas–Liquid and Liquid–Liquid Interface. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (5): 1387–1409. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00736D.
Gulen, G., Ikonnikova, S., Browning, J. et al. 2014. Fayetteville Shale-Production Outlook. SPE Econ & Mgmt 7 (2): 47–59. SPE-173187-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/173187-PA.
Hoover, W. G. 1985. Canonical Dynamics: Equilibrium Phase-Space Distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695.
Hoover, W. G. 1986. Constant-Pressure Equations of Motion. Phys. Rev. A 34. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.34.2499.
Jin, B. and Nasrabadi, H. 2016. Phase Behavior of Multi-Component Hydrocarbon Systems in Nano-Pores Using Gauge-GCMC Molecular Simulation. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 425 (15 October): 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.06.018.
Jin, L., Ma, Y., and Jamili, A. 2013. Investigating the Effect of Pore Proximity on Phase Behavior and Fluid Properties in Shale Formations. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166192-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166192-MS.
Jin, Z. and Firoozabadi. A. 2015. Phase Behavior and Flow in Shale Nanopores From Molecular Simulations. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 28–30 September. SPE-175151-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175151-MS.
Jin, Z. and Firoozabadi. A. 2016. Thermodynamic Modeling of Phase Behavior in Shale Media. SPE J. 21 (1): 190–207. SPE-176015-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/176015-PA.
Jones, J. E. 1924. On the Determination of Molecular Fields. II. From the Equation of State of a Gas. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. A 106 (738): 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1924.0082.
Jorgensen, W. L., Madura, J. D., and Swenson, C. J. 1984. Optimized Intermolecular Potential Functions for Liquid Hydrocarbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106 (22): 6638–6646. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00334a030.
Kuila, U. and Prasad, M. 2013. Specific Surface Area and Pore-Size Distribution in Clays and Shales. Geophys. Prospect 61 (2): 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12028.
Langmuir, I. 1916. The Constitution and Fundamental Properties of Solids and Liquids. Part I. Solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38 (11): 2221–2295. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02268a002.
Li, B., Bui, K., and Akkutlu, I. Y. 2017. Capillary Pressure in Nanopores: Deviation from Young-Laplace Equation. Presented at SPE Europec featured at the 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Paris, 12–15 June. SPE-185801-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185801-MS.
Li, Z., Jin, Z., and Firoozabadi, A. 2014. Phase Behavior and Adsorption of Pure Substances and Mixtures and Characterization in Nanopore Structures by Density Functional Theory. SPE J. 19 (6): 1096–1109. SPE-169819-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/169819-PA.
Linstrom, P. J. and Mallard, W. G. ed. 2017. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, Maryland: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Lippens, B. C. and de Boer, J. H. 1965. Studies on Pore Systems in Catalysts. J. Catalysis 4 (3): 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(65)90307-6.
Lorentz, H. A. 1881. Ueber die Anwendung des Satzes vom Virial in der kinetischen Theorie der Gase. Annalen der Physik. 248 (1): 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18812480110.
Luo, S., Lutkenhaus, J. L., and Nasrabadi. H. 2016a. Confinement-Induced Supercriticality and Phase Equilibria of Hydrocarbons in Nanopores. Langmuir 32 (44): 11506–11513. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03177.
Luo, S., Lutkenhaus, J. L., and Nasrabadi. H. 2016b. Use of Differential Scanning Calorimetry to Study Phase Behavior of Hydrocarbon Mixtures in Nano-Scale Porous Media. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.12.019 (in press; posted 15 December 2016).
Luo, S., Nasrabadi, H., and Lutkenhaus, J. L. 2016c. Effect of Confinement on the Bubble Points of Hydrocarbons in Nanoporous Media. AIChE J. 62 (5): 1772–1780. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15154.
Luo, S., Lutkenhaus, J. L., and Nasrabadi. H. 2017. Multi-Scale Fluid-Phase Behavior Simulation in Shale Reservoirs by a Pore-Size-Dependent Equation of State. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 9–11 October. SPE-187422-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/187422-MS.
Ma, Y., Jin, L., and Jamili, A. 2013. Modifying van der Waals Equation of State to Consider Influence of Confinement on Phase Behavior. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166476-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166476-MS.
MacKerell, A. D., Bashford, D., Bellott, M. et al. 1998. All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (18): 3586–3616. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp973084f.
Martin, M. G. and Siepmann, J. I. 1998. Transferable Potentials for Phase Equilibria. 1. United-Atom Description of n-Alkanes. J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (14): 2569–2577. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp972543+.
Miyahara, M. T. and Tanaka, H. 2013. Determination of Phase Equilibria in Confined Systems by Open Pore Cell Monte Carlo Method. J. Chem. Phys. 138 (8): 084709. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4792715.
Montgomery, S. L., Jarvie, D. M., Bowker, K. A. et al. 2005. Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, North-Central Texas: Gas-Shale Play With Multi-Trillion Cubic Foot Potential. AAPG Bull. 89 (2): 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1306/09170404042.
Myers, A. L. and Prausnitz J. M. 1965. Thermodynamics of Mixed-Gas Adsorption. AIChE J. 11 (1): 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690110125.
Neimark, A. V. and Vishnyakov, A. 2000. Gauge Cell Method for Simulation Studies of Phase Transitions in Confined Systems. Phys. Rev. E 62 (4): 4611–4622. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.4611.
Nojabaei, B., Johns, R. T., and Chu, L. 2013. Effect of Capillary Pressure on Phase Behavior in Tight Rocks and Shales. SPE Res Eval & Eng 16 (3): 281–289. SPE-159258-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/159258-PA.
Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. 1987. Direct Determination of Phase Coexistence Properties of Fluids by Monte Carlo Simulation in a New Ensemble. Mol. Phys. 61 (4): 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978700101491.
Peng, D. Y. and Robinson, D. B. 1976. A New Two-Constant Equation of State. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15 (1): 59–64.
Pioneer. 2011. Eagle Ford Shale Field Tour.
Plimpton, S. 1995. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. J. Comput. Phys 117 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039.
Qiao, S. Z., Bhatia, S. K., and Nicholson, D. 2004. Study of Hexane Adsorption in Nanoporous MCM-41 Silica. Langmuir 20 (2): 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0353430.
Rezaveisi, M., Sepehrnoori, K., Pope, G. A. et al. 2015. Compositional Simulation Including Effect of Capillary Pressure on Phase Behavior. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 28–30 September. SPE-175135-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175135-MS.
Rouquerol, J., Avnir, D., Fairbridge, C. W. et al. 1994. Recommendations for the Characterization of Porous Solids. Pure Appl. Chem. 66 (8): 1739–1758.
Rowlinson, J. S. and Swinton, F. L. 1982. The Critical State. In Liquids and Liquid Mixtures, third edition, ed. J. E. Baldwin, A. D. Buckingham, and S. Danishefsky, Chap. 3, 59–85. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Rowlinson, J.S. and Widom, B. 1982. Molecular Theory of Capillarity. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Sandoval, D., Yan, W., Michelsen, M. L. et al. 2015. Phase Envelope Calculations for Reservoir Fluids in the Presence of Capillary Pressure. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 28–30 September. SPE-175110-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175110-MS.
Sapmanee, K. 2011. Effects of Pore Proximity on Behavior and Production Prediction of Gas/Condensate. Master’s thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
Sarkisov, L. and Monson, P. A. 2000. Hysteresis in Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Adsorption in Porous Materials. Langmuir 16 (25): 9857–9860. https://doi.org/10.1021/la001000f.
Sigal, R. F. 2015. Pore-Size Distributions for Organic-Shale-Reservoir Rocks From Nuclear-Magnetic-Resonance Spectra Combined With Adsorption Measurements. SPE J. 20 (4): 824–830. SPE-174546-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/174546-PA.
Sun, H. 1998. COMPASS: An ab Initio Force-Field Optimized for Condensed-Phase Applications—Overview With Details on Alkane and Benzene Compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (38): 7338–7364. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980939v.
Tan, S. P. and Piri, M. 2015a. Equation-of-State Modeling of Associating-Fluids Phase Equilibria in Nanopores. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 405 (15 November): 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2015.07.044.
Tan, S. P. and Piri, M. 2015b. Equation-of-State Modeling of Confined-Fluid Phase Equilibria in Nanopores. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 393 (15 May): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2015.02.028.
Thommes, M. and Findenegg, G. H. 1994. Pore Condensation and Critical-Point Shift of a Fluid in Controlled-Pore Glass. Langmuir 10 (11): 4270–4277. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00023a058.
Tissot, B. P. and Welte, D. H. 1984. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence. Berlin: Springer.
Travalloni, L., Castier, M., and Tavares, F. W. 2014. Phase Equilibrium of Fluids Confined in Porous Media From an Extended Peng–Robinson Equation of State. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 362 (25 January): 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2013.10.049.
Travalloni, L., Castier, M., Tavares, F. W. et al. 2010. Thermodynamic Modeling of Confined Fluids Using an Extension of the Generalized van der Waals Theory. Chem. Eng. Sci. 65 (10): 3088–3099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.01.032.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2014. Updates to the EIA Eagle Ford Play Maps. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, December 2014.
van der Ploeg, P. and Berendsen, H. J. C. 1982. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of a Bilayer Membrane. J. Chem. Phys. 76 (6): 3271–3276. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.443321.
Vishnyakov, A. and Neimark, A. V. 2009. Multicomponent Gauge Cell Method. J. Chem. Phys. 130 (22): 224103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3124186.
Waldman, M. and Hagler. A. T. 1993. New Combining Rules for Rare Gas van der Waals Parameters. J. Comput. Chem. 14 (9): 1077–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540140909.
Wang, F. P. and Reed, R. M. 2009. Pore Networks and Fluid Flow in Gas Shales. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4–7 October. SPE-124253-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/124253-MS.
Wang, Y., Yan, B., and Killough, J. 2013. Compositional Modeling of Tight Oil Using Dynamic Nanopore Properties. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166267-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166267-MS.
Xiao, S., Edwards, S. A., and Gräter, F. 2011. A New Transferable Forcefield for Simulating the Mechanics of CaCO3 Crystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 115 (41): 20067–20075. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp202743v.
Zhang, T., Ellis, G. S., Ruppel, S. C. et al. 2012. Effect of Organic-Matter Type and Thermal Maturity on Methane Adsorption in Shale-Gas Systems. Org. Geochem. 47 (June): 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.03.012.
Zhang, Y., Lashgari, H. R., Di, Y. et al. 2016. Capillary Pressure Effect on Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior in Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Low Perm Symposium, Denver, 5–6 May. SPE-180235-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180235-MS.