Prognosis for Safe Water-Disposal-Well Operations and Practices That Are Based on Reservoir Flow Modeling and Real-Time Performance Analysis
- Maulin Pankaj Gogri (University of Oklahoma) | Joseph M. Rohleder (University of Oklahoma) | C. Shah Kabir (University of Houston) | Matthew J. Pranter (University of Oklahoma) | Zulfiquar A. Reza (University of Oklahoma)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 576 - 592
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Water Disposal Well Performance, Subsurface Monitoring, Induced Seismicity, Reservoir Flow Modeling, Modified Hall Analysis
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 202 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Oklahoma has been at center stage of induced seismicity. Water-disposal activities have been associated with triggering the increasing number of seismic events. The objective of the study is to provide a simple diagnostics method and procedure for safe water-disposal operations. A comprehensive suite of scenarios and parameters has been analyzed that affect water disposal. On the basis of this study, prognosis will lead to safe water-disposal operation without the adverse effect.
A suite of reservoir models involving water injection helped understand disposal-well performance. The well operational limits correspond to disposal-zone fracture gradient. The modified Hall analysis is used to ascertain the point of departure from normal injection behavior. Limiting cumulative injected volumes are determined and investigated for various scenarios from simple to increasingly complex subsurface conditions. This investigation includes studying the effects of disposal-zone porosity, compartment size, conductivity, formation compressibility, heterogeneity, and natural fractures. In addition, we explored the effects of communication with overlying producing zone, communication through completion anomaly, seal integrity, and fluid complexities.
This study illuminates an overall understanding of disposal-well performance through various scenario analyses. A relationship between disposal-zone fracture gradient and limiting cumulative injection volume is established. For a fracture gradient of 0.7 psi/ft, this limiting pore-volume (PV) injection is less than 2%, which corresponds well with the conventional wisdom learned from carbon dioxide (CO2) injection-well performance. The relationship of disposal-zone compartment size, established with rate-transient analysis (RTA), with limiting cumulative injection volume is formulated. Analyses from the various statistical design of experiments (DoEs) reveal the important variables that may affect disposal-well performance. The disposal-well operation can be devised in real time withthe modified Hall analysis that can reveal the departure from normal injection-well behavior. Factors accentuating the departure from normal behavior include disposal-zone porosity, formation compressibility, and seal integrity. Situations in which pressure release through leaks or communication with an adjacent formation takes place will naturally accommodate a larger volume of disposal water. Also, we learned that limiting cumulative injection volume and not injection rate (assuming injection pressure gradient is less than the fracture gradient) triggers a departure from normal injection behavior.
Using a suite of numerical reservoir models and the reservoir-monitoring tools involving modified. Hall analysis and RTA led to a comprehensive understanding of disposal-well performance. This study found a relationship of fracture gradient with limiting cumulative injection volume, and identified key variables affecting the disposal-well behavior. These findings led to a smart and safe disposal-well monitoring scheme, which will help disposal-well management become more economical and environmentally friendly.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||17|
Abrahams, L. S., Norbeck, J. H., and Horne, R. N. 2017. Investigation of Physical Mechanisms That Influence Injection-Induced Earthquake Sequence Statistics. Presented at the 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 13–15 February. SGPTR-212.
Akinnikawe, O. and Ehlig-Economides, C. A. 2016. Geologic Model and Fluid Flow Simulation of Woodbine Aquifer CO2 Sequestration. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 49: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.02.014.
Al-Taq, A. A., Al-Dahlan, M. N., and Alrustum, A. A. 2017. Maintaining Injectivity of Disposal Wells: From Water Quality to Formation Permeability. Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain, 6–9 March. SPE-183743-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/183743-MS.
Anchliya, A., Ehlig-Economides, C. A., and Jafarpour, B. 2012. Aquifer Management to Accelerate CO2 Dissolution and Trapping. SPE J. 17 (3): 805–816. SPE-126688-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/126688-PA.
Antony, J. 2014. Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists, second edition. Waltham, Massachusetts: Elsevier.
Aschehoug, M. and Kabir, C. S. 2013. Real-Time Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Production and Sequestration in a Gas Field. SPE Res Eval & Eng 16 (2): 134–143. SPE-163149-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/163149-PA.
Barenblatt, G. I., Zheltov, I. P., and Kochina, I. N. 1960. Basic Concepts in the Theory of Seepage of Homogeneous Liquids in Fissured Rocks. J. of Appl. Math and Mech. 24 (5): 1286–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8928(60)90107-6.
Chasset, C., Jarsjo, J., Erlstrom, M. et al. 2011. Scenario Simulations of CO2 Injection Feasibility, Plume Migration and Storage in a Saline Aquifer, Scania, Sweden. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 5 (5): 1303–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.06.003.
Dusseault, M. B. 2010. Deep Injection Disposal: Environmental and Petroleum Geomechanics. Presented at the ISRM International Symposium 2010 and 6th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium—Advances in Rock Engineering, New Delhi, India, 23–27 October. ISRM-ARMS6-2010-168.
Ehlig-Economides, C. and Economides, M. J. 2010. Sequestering Carbon Dioxide in a Closed Underground Volume. J. Pet. Sci. & Eng. 70 (1–2): 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.11.002.
Fan, Z., Eichhubl, P., and Gale, J. F. W. 2016. Geomechanical Analysis of Fluid Injection and Seismic Fault Slip for the Mw 4.8 Timpson, Texas, Earthquake Sequence. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 121 (4): 2798–2812. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012821.
Gogri, M. 2017. Investigation and Real-Time Monitoring for Safe Waste-Water Disposal With a Focus on Arbuckle Group, Oklahoma. MS thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma (January 2018).
Gono, V., Olson, J. E., and Gale, J. F. 2015. Understanding the Correlation Between Induced Seismicity and Wastewater Injection in the Fort Worth Basin. Presented at the 49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, 28 June–1 July. ARMA-2015-419.
Goodman, A., Hakala, A., Bromhal, G. et al. 2011. US DOE Methodology for the Development of Geologic Storage Potential for Carbon Dioxide at the National and Regional Scale. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 5 (4): 952–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.010.
Hall, H. N. 1953. Compressibility of Reservoir Rocks. J Pet Technol 5 (1): 17–19. SPE-953309-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/953309-G.
Holubnyak, Y. 2016. Reservoir Modeling of CO2 Injection in Arbuckle Saline Aquifer at Wellington Field, Summer County, Kansas. KGS Open File Report (OFR)-2016-29. Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas.
Houz´e, O., Viturat, D., and Fjaere, O. S. 2017. Dynamic Data Analysis. Vol. 5.12, Chap. 4. https://www.kappaeng.com/documents/flip/dda512/.
International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas. 2009. Development of Storage Coefficients for Carbon Dioxide Storage in Deep Saline Formations. Technical Study, Report No. 2009/13. Chelteham, Gloucestershire, UK: IEA GHG.
International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas. 2010. Pressurization and Brine Displacement Issues for Deep Saline Formation CO2 Storage. Technical Study, Report No. 2010/15. Chelteham, Gloucestershire, UK: IEA GHG.
Izgec, B. and Kabir, C. S. 2009. Real-Time Performance Analysis of Water-Injection Wells. SPE Res Eval & Eng 12 (1): 116–123. SPE-109876-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/109876-PA.
Izgec, B. and Kabir C. S. 2011. Identification and Classification of High-Conductive Layers in Waterfloods. SPE Res Eval & Eng 14 (1): 113–119. SPE-123930-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/123930-PA.
Jacobs, T. 2016. Seismic Shifts in Oklahoma Lead to Stricter Regulations. J Pet Technol 68 (5): 44–48. SPE-0516-0044-JPT. https://doi.org/10.2118/0516-0044-JPT.
Jalalh, A. A. 2006. Compressibility of Porous Rocks: Part II. New Relationships. Acta Geophysica 54 (4): 399–412. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-006-0029-4.
Kazemi, H. 1969. Pressure Transient Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs With Uniform Fracture Distribution. SPE J. 9 (4): 451–462. SPE-2156-A. https://doi.org/10.2118/2156-A.
Kumar, A., Noh, M. H., Ozah, R. C. et al. 2005. Reservoir Simulation of CO2 Storage in Aquifers. SPE J. 10 (3): 336–348. SPE-89343-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/89343-PA.
Macary, S., Tenizbaeva, B., Azhigaliyeva, A. et al. 2012. Waste Water Disposal Has Become Critical Strategic Focus Area (Russian). Presented at the SPE Russian Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Technical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, 16–18 October. SPE-160769-RU. https://doi.org/10.2118/160769-RU.
Morgan, B. C. and Murray, K. E. 2015. Characterizing Small-Scale Permeability of the Arbuckle Group, Oklahoma. Open-File Report (OF2-2015). Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Geological Survey (9 March).
Murray, K. E. 2015. Class II Saltwater Disposal for 2009–2014 at the Annual-, State-, and County-Scales by Geologic Zones of Completion, Oklahoma. Open-File Report (OF5-2015). Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Geological Survey (31 December).
Newman, G. H. 1973. Pore-Volume Compressibility of Consolidated, Friable, and Unconsolidated Reservoir Rocks Under Hydrostatic Loading. J Pet Technol 25 (2): 129–134. SPE-3835-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/3835-PA.
Oklahoma Corporation Commission. 2017. Oil and Gas Info. Occeweb, https://apps.occeweb.com/RBDMSWeb_OK/OCCOGOnline.aspx (accessed 10 January 2017).
Pawar, R. J., Bromhal, G. S., Carey, J. W. et al. 2015. Recent Advances in Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Geologic CO2 Storage. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 40: 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014.
Person, M., Banerjee, A., Rupp, J. et al. 2010. Assessment of Basin-Scale Hydrologic Impacts of CO2 Sequestration, Illinois Basin. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4 (5): 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.004.
Saripalli, K. P., Sharma, M. M., and Bryant, S. L. 2000. Modeling Injection Well Performance During Deep-Well Injection of Liquid Wastes. Journal of Hydrology 227 (1–4): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00164-X.
Shafer, L. 2011. Water Recycling and Purification in the Pinedale Anticline Field: Results From the Anticline Disposal Project. Presented at the SPE Americas E&P Health, Safety, Security. and Environmental Conference, Houston, 21–23 March. SPE-141448-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/141448-MS.
Sopher, D., Juhlin, C., and Erlstorm, M. 2014. A Probabilistic Assessment of the Effective CO2 Storage Capacity Within the Swedish Section of the Baltic Basin. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 30: 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.09.009.
Umholtz, N. and Ouenes, A. 2016. The Effects of Faults on Induced Seismicity Potential During Water Disposal and Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anchorage, 23–26 May. SPE-180461-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180461-MS.
US Geological Survey. 2017. USGS FAQs. https://www2.usgs.gov/faq/categories/9833/3424_home (accessed 10 April 2017).
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. Minimizing and Managing Potential Impacts of Injection-Induced Seismicity From Class II Disposal Well: Practical Approaches. Revised Report. US EPA, Washington, DC (12 November).
Veil, J. A. and Clark, C. E. 2011. Produced Water Volume Estimates and Management Practices. SPE Prod Oper 26 (3): 234–239. SPE-125999-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/125999-PA.
Veil, J. A., Harto, C. B., and McNemar, A. T. 2011. Management of Water Extracted From Carbon Sequestration Projects: Parallels to Produced Water Management. Presented at the SPE Americas E&P Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental Conference, Houston, 21–23 March. SPE-140994-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/140994-MS.
Walsh III, F. R. and Zoback, M. D. 2015. Oklahoma’s Recent Earthquakes and Saltwater Disposal. Science Advances 1 (5): 9. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500195.
White, J. A. and Foxall, W. 2016. Assessing Induced Seismicity Risk at CO2 Storage Projects: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 49: 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.03.021.
Wolaver, B. D., Hovorka, S. D., and Smyth, R. C. 2013. Greensites and Brownsites: Implications for CO2 Sequestration Characterization, Risk Assessment, and Monitoring. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 19: 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.07.020.
Yamamoto, H., Zhang, K., Karasaki, K. et al. 2009. Numerical Investigation Concerning the Impact of CO2 Geologic Storage on Regional Groundwater Flow. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 3 (5): 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.04.007.
Zhou, Q., Birkholzer, J. T., Tsang, C. F. et al. 2008. A Method for Quick Assessment of CO2 Storage Capacity in Closed and Semi-Closed Saline Formations. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2 (4): 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004.
Zhu, C., Fan, Z., and Eichhubl, P. 2017. The Effect of Variable Fluid Injection Rate on the Stability of Seismogenic Faults. Presented at the 51st US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, 25–28 June. ARMA-2017-0098.
Zimmerman, R. W., Somerton, W. H., and King, M. S. 1986. Compressibility of Porous Rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 91 (B12): 12765–12777. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB12p12765.