A Laplace-Domain Hybrid Model for Representing Flow Behavior of Multifractured Horizontal Wells Communicating Through Secondary Fractures in Unconventional Reservoirs
- Pin Jia (China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Linsong Cheng (China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Christopher R. Clarkson (University of Calgary) | Farhad Qanbari (University of Calgary) | Shijun Huang (China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Renyi Cao (China University of Petroleum, Beijing)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- December 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,856 - 1,876
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- secondary fracture, flow behavior, Laplace domain, multi-well communication, pressure interference
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 410 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
In a multiwell pad, the chance of interwell communication increases because of the creation of primary and secondary fractures during hydraulic-fracture stimulation. The flow behavior associated with communicating wells is significantly different from that of a single isolated well, because of interplay of flow caused by the interconnected fractures, complex connections, and multiple production conditions. The main purpose of this paper is to develop a rigorous and efficient flow model and quantify flow characteristics of multiple pad wells communicating through primary and secondary fractures.
In the model, matrix and primary- and secondary-fracture flows are captured. Fractures are explicitly represented by discrete segments. The Laplace-transform finite-difference (LTFD) method is used to numerically model fracture flow, with sufficient flexibility to consider arbitrary fracture geometries and fracture-conductivity distributions. The analytical matrix-flow model, derived with the line-source function in the Laplace domain, is dynamically coupled with the fracture-flow model, by imposing the continuity of pressure and flux on the fracture surface. Thus, a hybrid model in the Laplace domain is constructed. The main advantage of the solution occurring in Laplace domain is that computations can be performed at predetermined, discrete times, and with grids only for fractures. Thus, stability and convergence problems caused by time discretization are avoided, and the burden of gridding and computation is decreased without loss of important fracture characteristics.
The model is validated through comparison with a fully numerical simulator and a semi-analytical model. Detailed flow-regime analysis reveals that pressure interference caused by communication significantly alters the flow signature compared with single (isolated) wells. Before interference, the communicating wells behave as single isolated wells, and will exhibit a fracture linear-flow period and possibly even a matrix linear-flow period. After interference, the flow behavior of the system will vary largely with different production strategies. When the communicating wells all operate under the constant-rate condition, the transient responses of the wells will gradually merge to develop another matrix linear-flow period. If the wells are operated under the constant-bottomhole-pressure (BHP) conditions, the response deviation caused by interference will increase with production; therefore, one of the wells will undergo a rate loss. The results of a sensitivity analysis for a two-well system demonstrate that the time to well interference is primarily determined by secondary-fracture conductivity, number of connections, and communicating-well operating conditions. With larger contrasts in these properties, interference time is accelerated. However, for different production strategies, the effects on the flow behavior after interference are variable.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||21|
Anderson, D. M. and Mattar, L. 2005. An Improved Pseudo-time for Gas Reservoirs With Significant Transient Flow. Paper presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 1–3 August. PETSOC-2005-114. https://doi.org/10.2118/2005-114.
Awada, A., Santo, M., Lougheed, D. et al. 2016. Is That Interference? A Work Flow for Identifying and Analyzing Communication Through Hydraulic Fractures in a Multiwell Pad. SPE J. 21 (5): 1554–1566. SPE-178509-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/178509-PA.
Cipolla, C. L., Warpinski, N. R., Mayerhofer, M. et al. 2010. The Relationship Between Fracture Complexity, Reservoir Properties, and Fracture-Treatment Design. SPE Prod & Oper 25 (4): 438–452. SPE-115769-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/115769-PA.
Cipolla, C. L., Fitzpatrick, T., Williams, M. J. et al. 2011. Seismic-to-Simulation for Unconventional Reservoir Development. Paper presented at the Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, 9–11 October. SPE-146876-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/146876-MS.
Clarkson, C. R., Nobakht, M., Kaviani, D. et al. 2012. Production Analysis of Tight-Gas and Shale-Gas Reservoirs Using the Dynamic-Slippage Concept. SPE J. 17 (1): 230–242. SPE-144317-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/144317-PA.
Earlougher, R. C. and Ramey, H. J. 1973. Interference Analysis in Bounded System. J Can Pet Technol 12 (4): 33–45. PETSOC-73-04-04. https://doi.org/10.2118/73-04-04.
Gringarten, A. C. and Ramey, H. J. 1973. The Use of Source and Green’s Functions in Solving Unsteady Flow Problems in Reservoirs. SPE J. 13 (5): 285–296. SPE-3818-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/3818-PA.
Gupta, J. K., Zielonka, M. G., Albert, R. A. et al. 2012. Integrated Methodology for Optimizing Development of Unconventional Gas Resources. Paper presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 6–8 February. SPE-152224-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/152224-MS.
Habte, A. D. and Onur, M. 2014. Laplace-Transform Finite-Difference and Quasistationary Solution Method for Water-Injection/Falloff Tests. SPE J. 19 (3): 398–409. SPE-168221-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/168221-PA.
Hazlett, R. D. and Babu, D. K. 2014. Discrete Wellbore and Fracture Productivity Modeling for Unconventional Wells and Unconventional Reservoirs. SPE J. 19 (1): 19–33. SPE-157379-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/157379-PA.
Jia, P., Cheng, L., Huang, S. et al. 2015. Transient Behavior of Complex Fracture Networks. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 132: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.04.041.
Jia, P., Cheng, L., Huang, S. et al. 2016. A Semi-analytical Model for the Flow Behavior of Naturally Fractured Formations With Multi-Scale Fracture Networks. J. Hydrol. 537: 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.022.
Karimi-Fard, M., Durlofsky, L. J. and Aziz, K. 2003. An Efficient Discrete Fracture Model Applicable for General Purpose Reservoir Simulators. SPE J. 9 (2): 227–236. SPE-88812-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/88812-PA.
King, P. R. 1989. The Use of Renormalization for Calculating Effective Permeability. Trans Porous Med. 4 (1): 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134741.
Lawal, H., Jackson, G., Abolo, N. et al. 2013. A Novel Approach to Modeling and Forecasting Frac Hits in Shale Gas Wells. Paper presented at the EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE Europec, London, 10–13 June. SPE-164898-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/164898-MS.
Malpani, R., Sinha, S., Charry, L. et al. 2015. Improving Hydrocarbon Recovery of Horizontal Shale Wells Through Refracturing. Paper presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 20–22 October. SPE-175920-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175920-MS.
Marongiu-Porcu, M., Lee, D., Shan, D. et al. 2016. Advanced Modeling of Interwell-Fracturing Interference: An Eagle Ford Shale-Oil Study. SPE J. 21 (5): 1567–1582. SPE-174902-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/174902-PA.
Martinez, R. C., Rosinski, J., and Dreher, D. 2012. Horizontal Pressure Sink Mitigation Completion Design: A Case Study in the Haynesville Shale. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 8–10 October. SPE-159089-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/159089-MS.
Moridis, G. J., McVay, D. A., Holditch, S. A. et al. 1994. The Laplace Transform Finite Difference (LTFD) Numerical Method for the Simulation of Compressible Liquid Flow in Reservoirs. SPE Advanced Technology Series 2 (2): 122–131. SPE-22888-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/22888-PA.
Mukherjee, H. and Economides, M. J. 1991. A Parametric Comparison of Horizontal and Vertical Well Performance. SPE Form Eval 6 (2): 209–216. SPE-18303-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/18303-PA.
Ozkan, E. and Raghavan, R. 1991. New Solutions for Well-Test-Analysis Problems: Part I—Analytical Consideration. SPE Form Eval 6 (3): 359–368. SPE-18615-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/18615-PA.
Portis, D. H., Bello, H., Murray, M. et al. 2013. Searching for the Optimal Well Spacing in the Eagle Ford Shale: A Practical Tool-Kit. Paper presented at the Unconventional Resource Technology Conference, Denver, 12–14 August. SPE-168810-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168810-MS.
Qanbari, F. and Clarkson, C. R. 2012. Rate Transient Analysis of Stress-Sensitive Formations During Transient Linear Flow Period. Paper presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 October–1 November. SPE-162741-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162741-MS.
Sani, A. M., Podhoretz, S. B., and Chambers, B. D. 2015. The Use of Completion Diagnostics in Haynesville Shale Horizontal Wells to Monitor Fracture Propagation, Well Communication, and Production Impact. Paper presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 20–22 October. SPE-175917-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175917-MS.
Sardinha, C., Petr, C., Lehmann, J. et al. 2014. Determining Interwell Connectivity and Reservoir Complexity Through Frac Pressure Hits and Production Interference Analysis. Paper presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 September–2 October. SPE-171628-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/171628-MS.
Stalgorova, E. and Mattar, L. 2013. Analytical Model for Unconventional Multifractured Composite Systems. SPE Res Eval & Eng 16 (3): 246–256. SPE-162516-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/162516-PA.
Stehfest, H. 1970. Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms. Commun ACM 13 (1): 47–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/361953.361969.
Van Everdingen, A. F. and Hurst, W. 1949. The Application of the Laplace Transformation Flow Problem in Reservoirs. J Pet Technol 1 (12): 305–324. SPE-949305-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/949305-G.
Yaich, E., Diaz de Souza, O. C., Foster, R. A. et al. 2014. A Methodology to Quantify the Impact of Well Interference and Optimize Well Spacing in the Marcellus Shale. Paper presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 September–2 October. SPE-171578-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/171578-MS.
Yu, W., Wu, K., Zuo, L. et al. 2016. Physical Models for Inter-Well Interference in Shale Reservoirs: Relative Impacts of Fracture Hits and Matrix Permeability. Paper presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 1–3 August. URTEC-2457663-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2016-2457663-MS.
Zeng, F. and Zhao, G. 2010. The Optimal Hydraulic Fracture Geometry Under Non-Darcy Flow Effects. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 72 (1): 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.03.012.
Zhou, W., Banerjee, R., Poe, B. et al. 2014. Semi-Analytical Production Simulation of Complex Hydraulic Fracture Networks. SPE J. 19 (1): 6–18. SPE-157367-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/157367-PA.