Hydrocarbons Recovery From Model-Kerogen Nanopores
- Khoa Bui (Texas A&M University) | I. Yucel Akkutlu (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 854 - 862
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- adsorption, shale gas, kerogen, nanopore confinement
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 480 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Existing strategies for oil and gas recovery are designed on the basis of macroscopic properties of the produced hydrocarbon fluids. However, recent studies on source rocks revealed that properties of fluids stored in nanopores of the organic constituent material kerogen deviate from the bulk behavior. Hence, the traditional equation-of-state (EOS) and fluid-properties correlations are no longer applicable. This, in turn, leads to added uncertainties in hydrocarbon-in-place and recovery calculations for the source rocks that are rich in kerogen. In this paper, we seek to address the question at a fundamental level from the thermodynamics standpoint by simulating isothermal expansion of a quinary hydrocarbon mixture in a model nanopore under typical subsurface conditions, and measuring the fluid composition and amount. Molecular Monte Carlo simulations are used to investigate the equilibrium relationship between the bulk fluid at the outside of the pore and the remaining mixture inside during the stages of pressure depletion. The fluid stored in nanopores shows a composition that varies significantly with the pore size. The smaller the pore is, the heavier becomes the mixture that is in equilibrium with the bulk fluid. During the depletion, the small hydrocarbon molecules escape readily from the pores. The composition of the remaining fluid inside the pore thus becomes progressively heavier and viscous. We show that nanopore confinement significantly limits the release of hydrocarbon molecules from the pores with sizes smaller than 10 nm. For each hydrocarbon component, a strong correlation exists between molar fractions of the component in the produced fluid with that which remained inside the pore. This correlation can serve in future studies as the basis for establishing alternative methods for reservoir-engineering calculations, such as the ultimate recovery.
|File Size||939 KB||Number of Pages||9|
Abraham, M., Hess, B., van der Spoel, D. et al. 2015. GROMACS User’s Manual, Version 5.0.4. GROMACS.
Adesida, A. G., Akkutlu, I., Resasco, D. E. et al. 2011. Characterization of Barnett Shale Kerogen Pore Size Distribution using DFT Analysis and Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulations. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October–2 November. SPE-147397-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/147397-MS.
Akkutlu, I. Y. and Fathi, E. 2012. Multiscale Gas Transport in Shales With Local Kerogen Heterogeneities. SPE J. 17 (4): 1002–1011. SPE-146422-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/146422-PA.
Ambrose, R. J., Hartman, R. C., Diaz-Campos, M. et al. 2012. Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations Part I: New Pore-Scale Considerations. SPE J. 17 (1): 219–229. SPE-131772-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/131772-PA.
Baek S. 2016. Assessment of Multi-Component Shale Gas Recovery Potential Using Molecular Simulations. PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Bousige, C., Ghimbeu, C. M., Vix-Guterl, C. et al. 2016. Realistic Molecular Model of Kerogen’s Nanostructure. Nature Mater. 15: 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4541.
Bui, K. and Akkutlu, I. Y. 2015. Nanopore Wall Effect on Surface Tension of Methane. Mol. Phys. 113 (22): 3506–3513. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2015.1037369.
Bui, K., Akkutlu, I. Y., Zelenev, A. et al. 2016. Insights Into Mobilization of Shale Oil by Use of Microemulsion. SPE J. 21 (2): 613–620. SPE-178630-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/178630-PA.
Chilingarian, G. V. and Yen, T. F. 1976. Oil Shale, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Didar, B. R. and Akkutlu, I. Y. 2013. Pore-Size Dependence of Fluid Phase Behavior and Properties in Organic-Rich Shale Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 8–10 April. SPE-164099-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/164099-MS.
Frenkel, D. and Smit, B. 2001. Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications, second edition. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Hess, B. 2002. Determining the Shear Viscosity of Model Liquids from Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 116 (1): 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1421362.
Irving, J. H. and Kirkwood, J. G. 1950. The Statistical Mechanical Theory of Transport Processes. IV. The Equations of Hydrodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 18 (6): 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1747782.
Jin, Z. and Firoozabadi, A. 2016. Thermodynamic Modeling of Phase Behavior in Shale Media. SPE J. 21 (1): 190–207. SPE-176015-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/176015-PA.
Josh, M., Esteban, L., Delle Piane, C. et al. 2012. Laboratory Characterisation of Shale Properties. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 88–89 (June): 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.01.023.
Kang, S. M., Fathi, E., Ambrose, R. J. et al. 2011. Carbon Dioxide Storage Capacity of Organic-Rich Shales. SPE J. 16 (4): 842–855. SPE-134583-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/134583-PA.
Kim, S., Kramer, R. W., and Hatcher, P. G. 2003. Graphical Method for Analysis of Ultrahigh-Resolution Broadband Mass Spectra of Natural Organic Matter, the Van Krevelen Diagram. Anal. Chem. 75 (20): 5336–5344. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034415p.
Lee, A. L., Gonzalez, M. H., and Eakin, B. E. 1966. The Viscosity of Natural Gases. J Pet Technol 18 (8): 997–1000. SPE-1340-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/1340-PA.
Long, Y., Palmer, J. C., Coasne, B. et al. 2012. Under Pressure: Quasi-High Pressure Effects in Nanopores. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 154 (15 May): 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.07.017.
Loucks, R. G., Reed, R. M., Ruppel, S. C. et al. 2012. Spectrum of Pore Types and Networks in Mudrocks and a Descriptive Classification for Matrix-Related Mudrock Pores. AAPG Bull. 96 (6): 1071–1098. https://doi.org/10.1306/08171111061.
Martin, M. G. 2013. MCCCS Towhee: A Tool for Monte Carlo Molecular Simulation. Mol. Simulat. 39 (14–15): 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2013.828208.
Martin, M. G. 2014. MCCCS Towhee Chemical Potential, http://towhee.sourceforge.net/algorithm/chemicalpotential.html (accessed 10 February 2015).
Martin, M. G. and Siepmann, J. I. 1998. Transferable Potentials for Phase Equilibria. 1. United-Atom Description of n-Alkanes. J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (14): 2569–2577. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp972543+.
Orendt, Anita M., Ian S. O. Pimienta, Shyam R. Badu et al. 2013. Three-Dimensional Structure of the Siskin Green River Oil Shale Kerogen Model: A Comparison between Calculated and Observed Properties. Energ. Fuel. 27 (2): 702–710. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef3017046.
Palciauskas, V. V. and Domenico, P. A. 1980. Microfracture Development in Compacting Sediments: Relation to Hydrocarbon-Maturation Kinetics. AAPG Bull. 64 (6): 927–937.
Passey, Q. R., Bohacs, K., Esch, W. L. et al. 2010. From Oil-Prone Source Rock to Gas-Producing Shale Reservoir–Geological and Petrophysical Characterization of Unconventional Shale Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing, 8–10 June. SPE-131350-MS. https://doi.org./10.2118/131350-MS.
Peng, D.-Y. and Robinson, D. B. 1976. A New Two-Constant Equation of State. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamen. 15 (1): 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1021/i160057a011.
Potter, P. E., Maynard, J. B., and Depetris, P. E. 2004. Mud and Mudstones: Introduction and Overview. New York City: Springer.
Pronk, S., Páll, S., Schulz, R. et al. 2013. GROMACS 4.5: A High-Throughput and Highly Parallel Open Source Molecular Simulation Toolkit. Bioinformatics 29 (7): 845–854. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Fbioinformatics%2Fbtt055.
Rezaee, R. ed. 2015. Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs, first edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Samuli Ollila, O. H., Jelger Risselada, H., Louhivuori, M. et al. 2009. 3D Pressure Field in Lipid Membranes and Membrane-Protein Complexes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (7): 078101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.078101.
Santos, J., M. and Akkutlu, I. Y. 2013. Laboratory Measurement of Sorption Isotherm under Confining Stress with Pore-Volume Effects. SPE J. 18 (5): 924–931. SPE-162595-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/162595-PA.
Singh, S. K., Sinha, A., Deo, G. et al. 2009. Vapor-Liquid Phase Coexistence, Critical Properties, and Surface Tension of Confined Alkanes. J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (17): 7170–7180. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8073915.
Steele, W. A. 1973. The Physical Interaction of Gases with Crystalline Solids. Surf. Sci. 36 (1): 317–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(73)90264-1.
Ungerer, P., Collell, J., and Yiannourakou, M. 2015. Molecular Modeling of the Volumetric and Thermodynamic Properties of Kerogen: Influence of Organic Type and Maturity. Energ. Fuel. 29 (1): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef502154k.
Vo, T. Q., Barisik, M., and Kim, B. 2015. Near-Surface Viscosity Effects on Capillary Rise of Water in Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. E 92 (5): 053009. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.053009.
Zhang, T., Wiggins-Camacho, J., Ruppel, S. et al. 2013. Integrated Hydrocarbon Geochemical Characterization and Pore Size Distribution Analysis for Bakken Shales, Williston Basin, USA. Oral presentation given at the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 19–22 May.