Modeling and Simulation of a Cylinder Hoisting System for Real-Time Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing
- Witold Pawlus (MHWirth AS) | Fred Liland (MHWirth AS) | Nicolai Nilsen (MHWirthAS) | Søren Øydna (MHWirth AS) | Geir Hovland (University of Agder) | Torstein K. Wroldsen (University of Agder)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- March 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 69 - 78
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Modeling and simulation, Offshore drilling equipment, Hardware-in-the-loop testing
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 206 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Modeling-and-simulation software that is used in the design and development of drilling equipment provides testing and redesigning of offshore machines early in the product-development process. Typically, models of offshore equipment are complex and suitable only for offline simulations that allow testing of just predefined functions of the system without the possibility of controlling it with the operator’s inputs in real time (RT). This is related to the fact that, usually, complex models put high demands on the computational power of the simulator hardware and, thus, limit its RT performance. On the basis of the authors’ observations, it is concluded that RT performance can be difficult to achieve even on modern computers because of the stiff nature of hydraulic mechanical models and high demands on computational power. Therefore, it is often necessary to optimize complex models of drilling machinery for RT operation to extensively test its real control systems in a virtual-modeling environment. The methodology presented in the current paper provides for controlling a virtual model in RT by means of full-scale control hardware and software. This, in turn, allows for performing a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) test and evaluation of developed control algorithms early in the machine-design phase as well as verification determining if the chosen control equipment meets the desired specifications and performance.
The current work presents an efficient way to optimize large, high-fidelity models of offshore drilling equipment. First, a complex virtual model of the selected hoisting system is created, and its simulation results are compared with the reference data logs recorded on a full-scale rig. Second, rules and guidelines for conversion of a complex model to a low-fidelity model that could be simulated in RT are formulated. Simulation results prove that both high- and low-fidelity models of the analyzed cylinder hoisting system yield comparable outcomes that correspond satisfactorily to the reference real-world rig measurements. It is concluded that, to simplify a model, it is important to determine how its particular components affect the computational efficiency of the simulation hardware and to clearly understand the functions of the machine under consideration.
The paper contributes in two areas. First, a high-fidelity virtual model of an existing hoisting system is established and validated against real measurements from the offshore-drilling rig. Second, such a complex model is simplified and confirmed to be applicable for RT HIL simulations. The results of the current work can be successfully applied to evaluate and examine real control systems in a virtual-simulation environment, to reduce the need to conduct costly on-site tests on full-scale equipment and reduce the time spent by control-systems engineers offshore, as well as to shorten commissioning time and product-delivery period.
|File Size||642 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Al-Khaledi, S. and Al-Qallaf, A. 2013. Modeling, Simulation and Comparison of Common Control Techniques of AC Induction Motor Drive. Proc., SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, 10–13 March, SPE-164174-MS, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/164174-MS.
Aziz, M. and Mohd-Mokhtar, R. 2010. Performance Measure of Some Subspace-Based Methods for Closed-loop System Identification. Proc., Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation (CIMSiM), Bali, Indonesia, 28–30 September, 255–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CIMSiM.2010.13.
Bak, M. K. and Hansen, M. R. 2013a. Model-Based Design Optimization of Operational Reliability in Offshore Boom Cranes. International Journal of Fluid Power 14 (3): 53–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2013.10801413.
Bak, M. K. and Hansen, M. R. 2013b. Analysis of Offshore Knuckle Boom Crane–Part One: Modeling and Parameter Identification. Modeling, Identification, and Control 34 (4): 157–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.4173/mic.2013.4.1.
Bak, M. K. and Hansen, M. R. 2013c. Analysis of Offshore Knuckle Boom Crane–Part Two: Motion Control. Modeling, Identification, and Control 34 (4): 175–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.4173/mic.2013.4.2.
Breyholtz, Ø. and Nikolaou, M. 2012. Drilling Automation: Presenting a Framework for Automated Operations. SPE Drill & Compl 27 (1): 118–126. SPE-158109-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/158109-PA.
Calderoni, A., Cesaroni, R., Cercato, M. et al. 2001. Changes in Drilling Techniques Provide New Opportunities for the Deepwater Challenge. Proc., Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition, Ravenna, Italy, 28–30 March, OMC-2001-036, 1–13.
Cayeux, E., Daireaux, B., Dvergsnes, E. et al. 2012. Advanced Drilling Simulation Environment for Testing New Drilling Automation Techniques and Practices. SPE Drill & Compl 27 (4): 559–573. SPE-150941-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/150941-PA.
Chen, H., Moan, T., and Verhoeven, H. 2008. Safety of Dynamic Positioning Operations on Mobile Offshore Drilling Units. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93 (7): 1072–1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.003.
Chung, J. S. and Tsurusaki, K. 1999. Advance in Deep-Ocean Mining Systems Research. Proc., Fourth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan, 10–15 April, ISOPE-I-94-003, 18–31.
Dawson, L. S. 1937. Fluid Couplings and Their Application to Oilfield Equipment. Proc., World Petroleum Congress, Paris, 14–19 June, WPC-2103, 853–864.
de Wardt, J. P. 2014. Industry Analogues for Successful Implementation of Drilling-Systems Automation and Real-time Operating Centers. SPE Drill & Compl 29 (1): 22–27. SPE-163412-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/163412-PA.
Downton, G. 2015. Systems Modeling and Design of Automated Directional Drilling Systems. SPE Drill & Compl 27 (1): 212–232. SPE-170644-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/170644-PA.
Dupuis, D., Girault, A., and Codron, M. 1995. New Remote Control-Conventional Drawworks. Proc., SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 28 February–2 March, SPE-29390-MS, 485–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/29390-MS.
Gupta, S. 2006. Rig Automation–Altering the Visage of the Oil Industry. Proc., IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Bangkok, Thailand, 13–15 November, SPE-100052-MS, 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/100052-MS.
Healy, J. C., Powers, J. T., Maharaj, M. et al. 2009. Completion Design, Installation, and Performance–Cannonball Field, Offshore Trinidad. SPE Drill & Compl 24 (4): 626–641. SPE-110524-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110524-PA.
Iversen, F., Gressgård, L. J., Thorogood, J. et al. 2013. Drilling Automation: Potential for Human Error. SPE Drill & Compl 28 (1): 45–59. SPE-151474-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/151474-PA.
Jansen, J. D., van den Steen, L., and Zachariasen, E. 1995. Active Damping of Torsional Drillstring Vibrations With a Hydraulic Top Drive. SPE Drill & Compl 10 (4): 250–254. SPE-28911-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28911-PA.
Kaldestad, K. B., Haddadin, S., Belder, R. et al. 2014. Collision Avoidance With Potential Fields Based on Parallel Processing of 3D-point Cloud Data on the GPU. Proc., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, 31 May–7 June, 3250–3257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907326.
Macpherson, J. D., de Wardt, J. P., Florence, F. et al. 2013. Drilling Systems Automation: Current State, Initiatives, and Potential Impact. SPE Drill & Compl 28 (4): 296–308. SPE-166263-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/166263-PA.
Meriam, J. L. and Kraige, L. G. 2012. Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Munch-Søegaard, L. and Nergaard, A. 2001. Offshore Drilling Experience With Dual Derrick Operations. Proc., SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 27 February–1 March, SPE-67706-MS, 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/67706-MS.
Palka, K. and Czyz, J. 2008. Optimizing Downhole Fluid Production of Sucker Rod Pumps Using Variable Motor Speed. Proc., SPE Western Regional and Pacific Section AAPG Joint Meeting, Bakersfield, California, 29 March–4 April, SPE-113186-MS, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/113186-MS.
Pawlus, W., Choux, M., Hovland, G. et al. 2014. Modeling and Simulation of an Offshore Pipe Handling Machine. Proc., SIMS 55th Conference on Simulation and Modeling, Aalborg, Denmark, 21–22 October, 277–284.
Pawlus, W., Frick, D., Morari, M. et al. 2015. Drivetrain Design Optimization for Electrically Actuated Systems via Mixed Integer Programing. Proc., 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), Yokohama, Japan, 9–12 November, 1465–1470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2015.7392307.
Pawlus, W., Choux, M., and Hansen, M. R. 2016a. Hydraulic vs. Electric: A Review of Actuation Systems in Offshore Drilling Equipment. Modeling, Identification, and Control 37 (1): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.4173/mic.2016.1.1.
Pawlus, W., Choux, M., Hansen, M. R. et al. 2016b. Load Torque Estimation Method to Design Electric Drivetrains for Offshore Pipe
Handling Equipment. ASME Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 138 (4): 041301: 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4032897.
Pedersen, T. and Smogeli, Ø. 2013. Experience From Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing of Drilling Control Systems. SPE Drill & Compl 28 (4): 309–315. SPE-163509-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/163509-PA.
Pessanha, J. E., Paz, A. A., Prada, R. et al. 2013. Making Use of BDFGMRES Methods for Solving Short and Long-term Dynamics in Power Systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 45 (1): 293–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.08.065.
Rouse, E., Hargrove, L., Perreault, E. et al. 2012. Estimation of Human Ankle Impedance During Walking Using the Perturberator Robot. Proc., 4th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Rome, 24–27 June, 373–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BioRob.2012.6290842.
Rudshaug, B. and Skibelid, T. 1999. Modern Use of Closed-loop Hydraulics for Controlling and Powering of Cylinder-based Hoisting Systems. Proc., SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 9–11 March, SPE-52771-MS, 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/52771-MS.
Skalle, P., Aamodt, A., and Laumann, K. 2014. Integrating Human Related Errors With Technical Errors to Determine Causes Behind Offshore Accidents. Safety Science 63: 179–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.009.
Skjelbred, V. 1997. Comparison of the RamRig Versus Conventional Drilling Systems. Proc., Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 5–8 May, OTC-8461-MS, 227–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.4043/8461-MS.
Steyer, A. J. and Vleck, E. S. V. 2016. A Step-size Selection Strategy for Explicit Runge-Kutta Methods Based on Lyapunov Exponent Theory. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 292: 703–719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2015.03.056.
Vatne, P. and Norheim, P. 1996. The RamRig Concept for Drilling and Workover Rigs. Proc., SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, New Orleans, 12–15 March, SPE-35047-MS, 117–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/35047-MS.
Verbert, K. A. J., To´th, R., and Babuiˆska, R. 2016. Adaptive Friction Compensation: A Globally Stable Approach. IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics 21 (1): 351–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2015.2428995.
Walid, A. A., Gu, P., Hansen, M. R. et al. 2011. Modeling and Simulation of an Active Heave Compensated Draw-works. Proc., WSEAS 4th International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering, Quality and Production Systems (MEQAPS ’11), Barcelona, Spain, 15–17 September, 291–296.