Issues and Challenges With Controlling Large Drawdown in the First Offshore Methane-Hydrate Production Test
- Shunsuke Sakurai (Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation) | Itoyuki Nishioka (Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation) | Maki Matsuzawa (Japan Drilling Company Limited) | Bazlee Matzain (Schlumberger) | Ayae Goto (Schlumberger) | Jay E. Lee (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 500 - 516
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- artificial lift, production, gas hydrate, two phase flow, flow simulation
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 220 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The first offshore methane-hydrate production test was conducted in the Eastern Nankai Trough area of Japan in 2013, subjecting a gas-hydrates reservoir to large drawdowns by reducing bottomhole pressure (BHP) for in-situ dissociation of gas hydrates. This pioneering test has proved the feasibility of the depressurization method through demonstration of gas production from a deepwater gas-hydrates reservoir. Approximately 119 500 std m3 of gas was produced during a continuous flow period of 6 days. However, reservoir response to a range of drawdown conditions was not attainable, which is important for reservoir evaluation, because drawdown became uncontrollable after unintended water production through the gas line occurred.
Gas and water released from the dissociation of gas hydrates were separated by use of a downhole gas-separation system. The separated gas and water were produced to surface by means of two dedicated gas and water lines. Drawdown was executed by pumping out water into the water line by use of an electrical submersible pump (ESP). Drawdown control was designed to regulate the liquid level (or hydrostatic pressure) in the gas line by controlling the ESP frequency and the water-line surface backpressure.
Analysis of production data supported by flow simulations indicated that continuous water production through the gas line was the main reason for the loss of drawdown control. The trigger of the water production was that the water column in the gas line reached surface because of the rising water level resulting from the produced gas, which also lightened the water column and lowered the BHP. Consequently, the continuous water production made it difficult to regulate the drawdown as intended.
The analysis concluded that the risk of water production through the gas line could be significantly lowered if a choke valve was installed at the surface gas line and/or the ESP had high tolerance to the presence of free gas. This first field trial has provided valuable information in understanding the methane-hydrate production system to further improve/develop strategies in controlling large drawdown in the system.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||17|
Ashford, D. I., Numasawa, M., Martin, C. K. et al. 2012. Overview of Engineering and Operations Activities Conducted as Part of the JOGMEC/NRCan/Aurora Mallik 2007–2008 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, Part B: 2008 Field Program. Geological Survey of Canada, Bull. 601: 53–65.
Bearden, J. 2007. Electrical Submersible Pumps. Petroleum Engineering Handbook, Volume IV: Production Operations Engineering. Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 625–711.
Bohorquez, R. R., Ananaba, O. V., Alabi, O. A. et al. 2009. Laboratory Testing of Downhole Gas Separators. SPE Prod & Oper 24 (4): 499–509. SPE-109532-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/109532-PA.
Colebrook, C. F. and White, C. M. 1937. Experiments With Fluid Friction in Roughened Pipes. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 161 (906): 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1937.0150.
Coleman, S., Clay, H., McCurdy, D. et al. 1991. A New Look at Predicting Gas-Well Load-Up. J Pet Technol 43 (3): 329–333. SPE-20280-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/20280-PA.
Dallimore, S. R., Wright, J. F., Yamamoto, K. et al. 2012. Proof of Concept for Gas Hydrate Production Using the Depressurization Technique, As Established by the JOGMEC/NRCan/Aurora Mallik 2007–2008 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program. Geological Survey of Canada, Bull. 601: 1–15.
Dickens, G. R. and Quinby-Hunt, M. S. 1994. Methane Hydrate Stability in Seawater. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21 (19): 2115–2118. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01858.
Duan, Z., Møller, N., and Weare, J. H. 1992. An Equation of State for the CH4-CO2-H2O System: I. Pure Systems From 0 to 1,000°C and 0 to 8000 bar. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 56 (7): 2605–2617. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(92)90347-L.
Duan, Z. and Mao, S. 2006. A Thermodynamic Model for Calculating Methane Solubility, Density and Gas Phase Composition of Methane-Bearing Aqueous Fluids From 273 to 523K and From 1 to 2000 bar. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 70 (13): 3369–3386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.03.018.
Fernandes, R. C., Semiat, R., and Dukler, A. E. 1983. Hydrodynamic Model for Gas-Liquid Slug Flow in Vertical Tubes. AIChE J. 29 (6): 981–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690290617.
Fujii, T., Suzuki, K., Takayama, T. et al. 2015. Geological Setting and Characterization of a Methane Hydrate Reservoir Distributed at the First Offshore Production Test Site on the Daini-Atsumi Knoll in the Eastern Nankai Trough, Japan. March Pet. Geol. 66 (2): 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02,037.
Gamboa, J. and Prado, M. 2011. Review of Electrical-Submersible-Pump Surging Correlation and Models. SPE Prod & Oper 26 (4): 314–324. SPE-140937-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/140937-PA.
Gamboa, J. and Prado, M. 2012. Experimental Study of Two-Phase Performance of an Electric-Submersible-Pump Stage. SPE Prod & Oper 27 (4): 414–421. SPE-163048-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/163048-PA.
Iyer, S., Lang, P., Schoppa, W. et al. 2010. Subsea Processing at Parque Das Conchas (BC-10): Taking Flow Assurance to the Next Level. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 3–6 May. OTC-20451-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/20451-MS.
Kanno, T., Takekoshi, M., Wang, X. et al, 2014. In-Situ Temperature Measurement of Gas Hydrate Dissociation During the World-First Offshore Production Test. Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 5–8 May. OTC-25235-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/25235-MS.
Kurihara, M., Ouchi, H., Masuda, Y. et al. 2004. Assessment of Gas Productivity of Natural Methane Hydrates Using MH21 Reservoir Simulator. Presented at the AAPG Hedberg Conference, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 12–16 September.
Kurihara, M., Sato, A., Funatsu, K. et al. 2012. Analysis of 2007 and 2008 Gas Hydrate Production Tests on the Aurora/JOGMEC/Nrcan Mallik 2L-38 Well Through Numerical Simulation. Geological Survey of Canada, Bull. 601: 217–259.
Matsuzawa, M., Yoshihiro, T., Hay, W. J. et al. 2014. A Completion System Application for the World’s First Marine Hydrate Production Test. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 5–8 May. OTC-25310-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/25310-MS.
Moridis, G. J., Collett, T. S., Boswell, R. et al. 2009. Toward Production From Gas Hydrates: Current Status, Assessment of Resources, and Simulation-Based Evaluation of Technology and Potential. SPE Res Eval & Eng. 12 (5): 745–771. SPE-114163-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/114163-PA.
Morrison, G., Pirouzpanah, S., Kirland, K. et al. 2014. Performance Evaluation of a Multiphase Electric Submersible Pump. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 5–8 May. OTC-25080-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/25080-MS.
Nogueira, S., Riethmuller, M. L., Campos, J. B. L. M. et al. 2006. Flow Patterns in the Wake of a Taylor Bubble Rising Through Vertical Columns of Stagnant and Flowing Newtonian Liquids: An Experimental Study. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61 (22): 7199–7212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.002.
OLGA, Version 2014.3. 2014. Houston: Schlumberger.
PVTsim, V20.2 (2012). Lyngby, Denmark: Calsep.
Sakiyama, N., Fujii, K., Pimenov, V. et al. 2013. Fluid-Level Monitoring Using a Distributed Temperature Sensing System During a Methane Hydrate Production Test. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, 26–28 March. IPTC-16769-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-16769-MS.
Schoderbek, D., Martin, K. L., Howard, J. et al. 2012. North Slope Hydrate Field Trial: CO2/CH4 Exchange. Presented at the OTC Arctic Technology Conference, Houston, 3–5 December. OTC-23725-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/23725-MS.
Sharqawy, M. H., Lienhard, J. H., and Zubair, S. M. 2010. Thermophysical Properties of Seawater: A Review of Existing Correlations and Data. Desalin. Water Treat. 16 (1–3): 354–380. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1079.
Sloan, E. D. and Koh, C. 2007. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases, third edition, Chemical Industries: CRC Press.
Turner, R. G., Hubbard, M. G., and Dukler, A. E. 1969. Analysis and Prediction of Minimum Flow Rate for the Continuous Removal of Liquids From Gas Wells. J Pet Technol 21 (11): 1475–1482. SPE-2198-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/2198-PA.
Yamamoto, K., Terao, Y., Fujii, T. et al, 2014. Operational Overview of the First Offshore Production Test ofMethane Hydrates in the Eastern Nankai Trough. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 5–8May. OTC-25243-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/25243-MS.