Methodology for the Development of Laboratory-Based Comprehensive Foam Model for Use in the Reservoir Simulation of Enhanced Oil Recovery
- Maghsood Abbaszadeh (Innovative Petrotech Solutions) | Abdoljalil Varavei (Innovative Petrotech Solutions) | Fernando Rodriguez-de la Garza (Pemex E&P) | Antonio Enrique Villavicencio (Pemex E&P) | Jose Lopez Salinas (Rice University) | Maura C. Puerto (Rice University) | George Hirasaki (Rice University) | Clarence A. Miller (Rice University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- May 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 344 - 363
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- foam model, Foam flow, mobility control, laboratory experiments, foam simulation
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 238 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
An integrated methodology is presented for the development of a comprehensive empirical foam model based on tailored laboratory tests and representative numerical simulations that encompass processes of foam generation, coalescence, and shear thinning along with rheological characteristics and associated flow regimes. Steady-state and unsteady-state laboratory experiments of foam floods in a vertical column of sandpack with and without oil at different surfactant concentrations and at varied gas/surfactant-solution injection rates are designed, conducted, and analyzed. The logic and basis of these experiments are provided. Test results from experiments in the presence of oil provide information on the oil-induced foam/lamella coalescence functions. Unsteady-state experiments capture foam-generation and foam-dry-out phenomena, whereas steady-state experiments capture the effects of foam quality, foam velocity, and surfactant concentration. Process-based numerical simulations of these experiments are combined with basic governing analytical relationships of foam flow to provide a methodology for a comprehensive empirical foam model and to uniquely define the model parameters to preserve consistency with simulations of foam-flow processes. A procedure is presented to fully model the effect of surfactant concentration on foam strength and to quantify all concentration-function parameters, and, in particular, epsurf.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||20|
Abbaszadeh, M., Rodriguez-de la Garza, F., Yuan, C. et al. 2010. Single-Well Simulation Study of Foam EOR in Gas-Cap Oil of the Naturally-Fractured Cantarell Field. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 24–28 April. SPE-129867-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/129867-MS.
Abbaszadeh, M., Kazemi-Nia Korrani, A., Lopez Salinas, J. L. et al. 2014. Experimentally-Based Empirical Foam Modeling. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 12–16 April. SPE-169888-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169888-MS.
Abbaszadeh, M., Rodriguez-de la Garza, F., and Villavicencio Pino, 2016. Foam-Surfactant EOR Pilot Design in a Fractured Reservoir: From Laboratory to Field Application. Presented at the SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 21–23 March. SPE-179842-MS.https://doi.org/10.2118/179842-MS.
Alvarez, J. M., Rivas, H. J., and Rossen, W. R. 2001. Unified Model for Steady-State Foam Behavior at High and Low Foam Qualities. SPE J. 6 (3): 325–333. SPE-74141-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/74141-PA.
Ashoori, E., van der Heijden, T. L. M., and Rossen, W. R. 2010. Fractional-Flow Theory of Foam Displacements With Oil. SPE J. 15 (2): 260–273. SPE-121579-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/121579-PA.
Chalbaud, C. A., Moreno, R. A., and Alvarez, J. M. 2002. Simulating Foam Process for a Venezuelan Pilot Test. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29 September–2 October. SPE-77699-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/77699-MS.
Cheng, L., Reme, A. B., Shan, D. et al. 2000. Simulating Foam Processes at High and Low Foam Qualities. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3–5 April. SPE-59287-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/59287-MS.
Computer Modeling Group. 2007. STARSTM User’s Guide. Calgary.
Dholkawala, Z. F., Sarma, H. K., and Kam, S. I. 2007. Application of Fractional Flow Theory to Foams in Porous Media. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 57 (1–2): 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.10.012.
Dong, P., Puerto, M., Ma. K. et al. 2017. Low-Interfacial-Tension Foaming System for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Highly Heterogeneous/Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry, Montgomery, Texas, USA, 3–5 April. SPE-184569-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/184569-MS.
Farajzadeh, R. F., Lotfollahi, M., Eftekhari, A. A. et al. 2015. Effect of Permeability on Implicit-Texture Foam Model Parameters and the Limiting Capillary Pressure. Energy Fuels 29: 3011–3018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00248.
French, T., Broz, J., Lorenz, P. et al. 1986. Use of Emulsions for Mobility Control During Steamflooding. Presented at the SPE California Regional Meeting, Oakland, California, USA, 2–4 April. SPE-15052-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/15052-MS.
Gauglitz, P. A., Friedmann, F., Kam, S. I. et al. 2002. Foam Generation in Homogeneous Porous Media. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (19): 4037–4052. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00340-8.
Heller, J. P. 1994. CO2 Foams in Enhanced Oil-Recovery. In Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry, ed. Laurier L. Schramm, Vol. 242, 201–234. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ba-1994-0242.
Hirasaki, G. J. and Lawson, J. B. 1985. Mechanisms of Foam Flow in Porous Media—Apparent Viscosity in Smooth Capillaries. SPE J. 25 (2): 176–190. SPE-12129-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/12129-PA.
Hirasaki, G. J. 1989. The Steam-Foam Process. J Pet Technol 41 (5): 449–456. SPE-19505-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/19505-PA.
Hirasaki, G., Miller, C., Szafranski, R. et al. 1997. Field Demonstration of the Surfactant/Foam Process for Aquifer Remediation. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 5–8 October. SPE-39292-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/39292-MS.
Kam, S. I., Nguyen, Q. P., Li, Q. et al. 2007. Dynamics Simulations With an Improved Model for Foam Generation. SPE J. 12 (1): 35–48. SPE-90938-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/90938-PA.
Khatib, Z., Hirasaki, G., and Falls, A. 1988. Effects of Capillary Pressure on Coalescence and Phase Mobilities in Foams Flowing Through Porous Media. SPE Res Eng 3 (3): 919–926. SPE-15442-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/15442-PA.
Kovscek, A. R. and Radke, C. J. 1994. Fundamentals of Foam Transport in Porous-Media. Topical Report: US Department of Energy. DOE/BC/93000174.
Kovscek, A. R. and Bertin, H. J. 2003. Foam Mobility in Heterogeneous Porous Media—(I: Scaling Concepts). Transport Porous Media 52 (1): 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102231222.
Lawson, J. and Reisberg, J. 1980. Alternative Slugs of Gas and Dilute Surfactant for Mobility Control During Chemical Flooding. Presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 20–23 April. SPE-8839-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/8839-MS.
Li, B., Hirasaki, J. G., and Miller, A. C. 2006. Upscaling of Foam Mobility Control to Three Dimensions. Presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 22–26 April. SPE-99719-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/99719-MS.
Li, R. F., Yan, W., Liu, S. H. et al. 2010. Foam Mobility Control for Surfactant Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE J. 15 (4): 934–948. SPE-113910-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/113910-PA.
Li, R. F., Hirasaki, G. J., Miller, C. A. et al. 2012. Wettability Alteration and Foam Mobility Control in a Layered 2-D Heterogeneous Sandpack. SPE J. 17 (4): 1207–1220. SPE-141462-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/141462-PA.
Liu, M., Andrianov, A., and Rossen, W. R. 2011. Sweep Efficiency in CO2 Foam Simulations With Oil. Presented at the SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition of Society of Petroleum Engineers, Vienna, Austria, 23–26 May. SPE-142999-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/142999-MS.
Ma, K., Lopez-Salinas, J. L., Miller, M. C. et al. 2013. Estimation of Parameters for Simulation of Steady-State Foam Flow in Porous Media. Part 1: The Dry-Out Effect. Energy Fuels 27 (5): 2363–2375. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef302036s.
Ma, K., Farajzadeh, R., Lopez-Salinas, J. L. et al. 2014. Non-uniqueness, Numerical Artifact and Parameter Sensitivity in Simulating Steady-State and Transient Foam Flow Through Porous Media. Transp. Porous Med. 102 (3): 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0276-9.
Masalmeh, S. K., Wei, L., and Blom, C. P. A. 2011. Mobility Control for Gas Injection in Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoirs: Comparison of Foams versus Polymers. Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, 25–28 September. SPE-142542-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/142542-MS.
Osterloh, W. T. and Jante Jr., M. J. 1992. Effects of Gas and Liquid Velocity on Steady-State Foam Flow at High Temperature. Presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 22–24 April. SPE-24179-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/24179-MS.
Patzek, T. W. 1988. Description of Foam Flow in Porous Media by the Population Balance Method. In ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 373, Chap. 16, 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1988-0373.ch016.
Renkema, W. J. and Rossen, W. R. 2007. Success of Foam SAG Processes in Heterogeneous Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11–14 November. SPE-110408-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/110408-MS.
Rossen, W. R. and Wang, M. W. 1997. Modeling Foams for Acid Diversion. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, 2–3 June. SPE-38200-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/38200-MS.
Skauge, A., Aarra, M. G., Surguchev, L. et al. 2002. Foam-Assisted WAG: Experience From the Snorre Field. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 13–17 April. SPE-75157-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/75157-MS.
Tang, G. Q. and Kovscek, A. R. 2006. Trapped Gas Fraction During Steady-State Foam Flow. Transport in Porous Media 65 (2): 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-005-6093-4.
Tanzil, D., Hirasaki, G. J., and Miller, C. A. 2002. Conditions for Foam Generation in Homogeneous Porous Media. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 13–17 April. SPE-75176-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/75176-MS.
Yan, W., Miller, C. A., and Hirasaki, G. J. 2006. Foam Sweep in Fractures for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Colloids & Surfaces A. Physico. Eng. Aspects282–283: 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.02.067.
Zeng, Y., Muthuswamy, A., Ma, K. et al. 2016. Insights on Foam Transport From a Texture-Implicit Local-Equilibrium Model With an Improved Parameter Estimation Algorithm. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55 (28): 7819–7829. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01424.
Zhang, C. Y., Oostrom, M., Grate, J. W. et al. 2011. Liquid CO2 Displacement of Water in a Dual-Permeability Pore Network Micromodel. Env. Sci. Tech. 45 (17): 7581–7588. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201858r.
Zhou, Z. and Rossen, W. R. 1995. Applying Fractional Flow Theory to Foam Processes at the “Limiting Capillary Pressure”. SPE Advanced Technology Series 3 (1): 154–162. SPE-24180-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/24180-PA.